I've been reading up on him and was wondering what you guys thought of him and his pros and cons.
It seems he was on the verge of becoming a savior to millions of destitute folks of all backgrounds across the US OR he could have been on the verge of using their desperation to become a ruthless dictator. Oddly enough, even eight decades after his questionable violent death, it's hard to tell which path he would have taken.
I'm a bit of a fan. What can I say, he managed to enact a radical left-wing program in the Deep South without resorting to race-baiting, and had the sort of ruthlessness and political savy to enforce it. His death is one of the great political what-ifs of US political history, and gosh darn it if the man didn't have style.
By all means not a nice person, but I think the good he did far outweighed the bad.
Well when our side winning or losing is the difference between whether or not children go to schools, the sick get medical care, and the elderly and infirm have security, that's a bridge I'm willing to cross.He's proof that people will tolerate demagoguery and dictatorialness as long as it's being done by their side.
Yep. He passed some great social programs, to his eternal credit, but he was a dictatorial demagogue who would have damaged our democratic institutions (perhaps irreparably so).Thank god he did not reach anywhere near the presidency. He was a dangerous dictator who turned Louisiana into his personal fiefdom, kicking out his personal enemies and a lot of other bad shit happened while he was his state's dictator.
I agree. He did great things WITHIN the context of living in the one-party dictatorship that the pre-1960's South was. However, he'd have likely done more harm than good had he'd become President.Up there with Tito and Castro on my Benevolent Dictator List. It makes sense that the sort of regime he created could emerge out of Depression-era Louisiana. It was hardly a democratic context to begin with. That doesn't excuse a lot of what he did, but it'd be fair to say he did more good than bad. And even if you (understandably) disagree with that assessment, you should still read about him. He's such a larger than life figure that any decent biography will be a very entertaining read.
He could sic the law on his enemies, use lawsuits to rig elections, and easily become a soft-dictator. Not that hard, really.I don't think it would have been possible for him to become an actual dictator. It's not a movie, unlike "Gabriel over the white house" Long won't have movie magic to dissolve Congress.
May I interest either of you in a Dank Meme Stash?