Yes but my premise is that she manages to give him two children, a son and a daughter, not like 6 living ones. Also, unlike Catherine at this point she hasn't been pregnant like five times, which may have also affected Catherine's chances.Joanna seems to have been a Portuguese Catherine of Aragon, and Joanna is in her 30s by now, which is relative old by now. Catherine had tonnes of kids in her 20s and early 30s, yet only pumped out a single daughter. Joanna will be older than Catherine was when she had children, and all the fasting has already occured, damaging her fertility. In other words Joanna isn’t likely to give Richard his long desired heir.
True, I am not saying it’s impossible, just that it is unlikely. Of course she could manage two children. It would also save England a third phase of the Wars of the RosesYes but my premise is that she manages to give him two children, a son and a daughter, not like 6 living ones. Also, unlike Catherine at this point she hasn't been pregnant like five times, which may have also affected Catherine's chances.
True, I am not saying it’s impossible, just that it is unlikely. Of course she could manage two children. It would also save England a third phase of the Wars of the Roses
True, but Warwick is in Richard’s custody and all of the women are likely to be married off to royal retainers.Not necessarily. There's still EoY and her sisters, some of whom at least wiill have kids. And then there's Warwick and his sister.
The Lancastrians are still around* in the form of Buckingham (assuming he lives) and Henry Tudor.The lack of a Lancastrian heir doesn't necessarily end the Wars - just leaves the Yorks free to quarrel among themselves.
French support for Tudor did not unite the country behind Richard in OTL ...You're forgetting that France is the traditional enemy. A war with France would pull the nobles together under Richard like nothing else would.
The resources she'd need is more than Portugal can offer in the 1480s, which is the POD being proposed. Portugal is a small kingdom tied down by wars in Africa and Spain. It is already spread too thin and, what's more, her proposed Portuguese husband is not yet king, but "merely" a duke at this time. The country's fortunes will have changed dramatically come the reign of her husband, Manuel I, though.How much resources would she need?
OTL, Henry was able to acquire several thousand French mercenaries who formed the core of his army at Bosworth. Any reason why Manuel couldn't do so? Were relations between France and Portugal unforiendly enough to prevent it?
It's easy to ignore the Portuguese Lancastrian line when there's an Englishman (Welshman) for them to rally around and a proposed marriage to join disaffected Edwardians to the rump Lancastrian faction.The Lancastrians are still around* in the form of Buckingham (assuming he lives) and Henry Tudor.
* The Portuguese and Castilian are purposely ignored as Edward III passed an act prohibiting them from inheriting the throne, and depending on one’s view of the Beauforts, there are two different sets of Castilian claimants.
Agreed, the Lancastrian claimant would always be an Englishman if one was available.It's easy to ignore the Portuguese Lancastrian line when there's an Englishman (Welshman) for them to rally around and a proposed marriage to join disaffected Edwardians to the rump Lancastrian faction.
This is also true, so an alt Edwardian court in Exile, in Portugal? I could see Manuel sponsoring his second son Duarte* to go and retake the English throne.It becomes much harder to ignore the Portuguese when the person the Edwardians are most likely to support is there. At least, it would become so if Richard's reign is a rocky one. Some bright spark on the outs with Richard is sure to realize "Hey, don't they have Lancastrian blood too?" And once/if Elizabeth's husband takes the throne as he did in OTL and the Portuguese start rolling in gold from the spice trade, how long would it really be before her father's old supporters start showing up at the Portuguese court?
Again, it would depend largely on Richard's reign. If he turns out to be the next Edward III, then there'd be no political support to displace his regime or stop the succession of his heir, if and when he had an heir.This is also true, so an alt Edwardian court in Exile, in Portugal?
Oh I see.Again, it would depend largely on Richard's reign. If he turns out to be the next Edward III, then there'd be no political support to displace his regime or stop the succession of his heir, if and when he had an heir.
I'm not sure what you're proposing re: France and Portugal. Are you imagine that Elizabeth of York would collaborate with Henry Tudor in France for some reason?
Actually, Isabel had no problem with Richard IIRC. There was even talk of a marriage between Edward of Middleham and one of her daughters OTL, and then when Ned died and Dickon was widowed, more talk of a Spanish infanta marrying DickonRichard is too much of a warrior for that, I fear...
Oh and by the way, your tree is lovely, except Isabella of Castile would never let her daughter marry Richard's heir. She hated the Yorks after Edward IV jilted her. Perhaps a Scottish match, if there's one available? Or a Savoyard one?
Fair. I stand corrected then. Maria of Aragon as Princess of Wales it can be.Actually, Isabel had no problem with Richard IIRC. There was even talk of a marriage between Edward of Middleham and one of her daughters OTL, and then when Ned died and Dickon was widowed, more talk of a Spanish infanta marrying Dickon
Juana la Loca as queen of England instead of duchess of Burgundy, would be fascinating as well. Dickon, for all his faults, would probably treat her A LOT better than Philipp of Austria didFair. I stand corrected then. Maria of Aragon as Princess of Wales it can be.
I mean, I've heard Philip was abusive towards Joanna (or at least by our standards to day he was), so it would be hard to find her a worse husband.Juana la Loca as queen of England instead of duchess of Burgundy, would be fascinating as well. Dickon, for all his faults, would probably treat her A LOT better than Philipp of Austria did
Juana had a rum go of life. Abused by her mother to start with. Mean that's downright fucked up what Isabel used to apparently do to her. As to Philipp being abusive, while today it would be abuse, by today's standards, MANY marriages at that point were "abusive", even Fernando and Isabel's "love match". (Max of Austria-Mary of Burgundy is probably one of the FEW between 1450-1550 that WEREN'T abusive/neglectful by modern standards).I mean, I've heard Philip was abusive towards Joanna (or at least by our standards to day he was), so it would be hard to find her a worse husband.
Really? I know Fernando was away often and could accidentally end up in the wrong chamber, but I don't realise it was abusive (unless that's what you meant). At least Mary and Max were happy together then.Juana had a rum go of life. Abused by her mother to start with. Mean that's downright fucked up what Isabel used to apparently do to her. As to Philipp being abusive, while today it would be abuse, by today's standards, MANY marriages at that point were "abusive", even Fernando and Isabel's "love match". (Max of Austria-Mary of Burgundy is probably one of the FEW between 1450-1550 that WEREN'T abusive/neglectful by modern standards).
One time (according to a story) Fernando actually wound up in the right chamber (namely, his wife's) with the wrong woman (Isabel walked in on Fernando with another woman on her bed).Really? I know Fernando was away often and could accidentally end up in the wrong chamber, but I don't realise it was abusive (unless that's what you meant).