Well, Europe was nice while it lasted.
Are we looking at Threads or a mere The Day After type scenario?
Are we looking at Threads or a mere The Day After type scenario?
I thought I'd taken that into account, have I missed it anywhere?Just as a quick note. " U.S. 3rd Armoured Division" A US Division uses Armored (no u) rather than Armoured. When I first saw "3rd Armoured Division", I was trying to figure out what other countries involved had Armoured Divisions...
Ah, thanks. Corrected.I also indicate a typo :
Chapitre 9 : In retaliation, NATO air forces retaliate against military targets inside East Germany. NVA Air Force command headquarters in Strausberg is hit by a British Valient - Valiant - bomber and wiped from the face of the earth
For much of central Europe, closer to Threads. The United States actually won't be hit as hard as in The Day After.Well, Europe was nice while it lasted.
Are we looking at Threads or a mere The Day After type scenario?
Chapter 8 has 3rd Armoured Division three times in one paragraphI thought I'd taken that into account, have I missed it anywhere?
Ah, thanks. Corrected.
The first of these strikes Chicago, killing over 2.1 million and exceeding Antietam 95-fold.
Thanks. Once this timeline's finished I'll be continuing with my book project. Set in this universe.@BurkeanLibCon consider the above "love" one for the whole timeline. Being a bit of a "fan" of that era of history I certainly enjoyed reading your take on a Cuban missile crisis gone wrong, and am looking forward to the aftermath.
The Jupiter bases were in southern Italy. Sweden (and Finland) got hit by the Soviets because they were in the way of Norway, as well as being generally western aligned the USSR wasn't going to just let them off the hook.It will be interesting to see what parts of Europe escaped being targetted. For example, Spain/Portugal outside a few military bases? Is there anything that would have been worth Nuking in the southern third of Italy? And I'm still surprised that places like Sweden got hit by Soviet missiles. I can't see the United States or United Kingdom hitting any nation outside the Warsaw Pact in Europe deliberately
IIRC, even though Sweden was neutral they were NATO aligned and most people figured they would cooperate with NATO if WWIII ever occurred.It will be interesting to see what parts of Europe escaped being targetted. For example, Spain/Portugal outside a few military bases? Is there anything that would have been worth Nuking in the southern third of Italy? And I'm still surprised that places like Sweden got hit by Soviet missiles. I can't see the United States or United Kingdom hitting any nation outside the Warsaw Pact in Europe deliberately
The exchange has only just ended. There could well be relief operations, but not yet.No news even from ships at sea in European waters? there are American air bases in Morocco which can carry out relief missions.
Unlikely. America hasn’t been bombed badly enough for that. More likely you’ll have an internal migrant crisis in the affected areas.Mexico will certainly be under pressure with the influx of Americans wanting to leave a bombed country.
It makes absolutely no sense for the Soviet Union to bomb Finland because for the northwestern Soviet Union, Finland was theoretically their first line of defence.The Jupiter bases were in southern Italy. Sweden (and Finland) got hit by the Soviets because they were in the way of Norway, as well as being generally western aligned the USSR wasn't going to just let them off the hook.
More on them to come.
Did we last longer than the couple of hours we did during ww2?At 07:45 local time, men of the Soviet 61st Naval Infantry Brigade and the 76th Air Assault Division land in the northern Norwegian isles and launch a frontal attack on Kirkenes. The attack in Norway is a diversionary assault designed to seize territory to bargain with in any peace conference - assuming there will be anyone left to attend a peace conference. In the Baltic straits, Polish and Soviet marine units land in the Danish isles, supported by the Soviet Baltic Fleet.
Living in an a-bomb paradise"Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for You are with me."
I will cover Finland in the next update.It makes absolutely no sense for the Soviet Union to bomb Finland because for the northwestern Soviet Union, Finland was theoretically their first line of defence.
While Finland was officially neutral during the Cold War, the Soviet leadership didn't see it that way and officially Finland was not seen as a neutral, but merely as "striving to be neutral". From Kremlin's viewpoint, Finland was in their sphere, even if it wasn't a "people's republic". And this wasn't just an informal agreement. With the signing of an Agreement of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance, from 1948 till the end of the Cold War, Finland was obligated to defend its territory against armed attacks by the United States or its allies, possibly with the aid of the Soviet Union.
If anyone was going to bomb Finland, had Cold War gone hot, it was going to be the United States.
Depending on how much nuclear ordnance you want to drop on Finland in this timeline, you can count a dozen bombs for northern Finland, vaporizing any municipal centre of importance and the associated transport links and anywhere from a low of five weapons to a high of another dozen weapons for the rest of Finland.
It’s all the more scary realising it could have happened like this.Well this is really a right mess… A nightmare come true really…
Yes. Denmark was still fighting when the sky fell down.Did we last longer than the couple of hours we did during ww2?
Amen.Living in an a-bomb paradise
They won’t in any large number. America has a refugee crisis on its hand but it’s internal.I still think that the southern Californians and Texans will go to Mexico until they are sure that the nuclear attacks are over.
There are, and a lot of them still have Shaddock nuclear missiles.There must still be marauding Soviet submarines...