Up next, the CSA will face its first major challenge to survive as a country: The Panic of 1873.
Do I see a confederate Civil War coming up?By the way, here are the Mexican territories previously annexed by the Confederacy in earlier chapters. Those territories are in red.View attachment 510981
Currently it’s not in the cards but that could change.Do I see a confederate Civil War coming up?
Sorry for not replying sooner but Davis wanted DC as the Confederate capital outright. The free city thing was just a compromise.They were yes, but the scenario you put up that leads to them recognizing the Confederacy is ASB. There's no way the Confederates could have ever put Washington under siege, it's just not possible. You should recognize the fact that both Confederate invasions of the North were failures, and center your timeline on Lee successfully using attrition and annihilation to break the minds of the Union government and cause them to just let the South go. It's the only way they could have won, and if the Confederacy does it well, which I honestly think it could have, Britain and France would recognize it, and perhaps even pull a Navarino on the Union fleet to break the blockade of the Confederacy and reopen the Trans-Atlantic cotton trade, but I cannot see them go any further as I would certainly expect Lincoln to request an armistice in the aftermath of such a disaster.
Anyway, even if the Confederates win their independence, I would still expect the Confederate government not to want to annex Maryland; the Potomac would be a very advantageous river border for them to have, and I would expect Davis to push for the US-CS border to be along the Potomac, Ohio and Missouri Rivers; he would want to be able to keep Yankee troops on the other side of the rivers to prevent them from advancing into his territory much easier in a potential second war. Of course, Davis may still want Maryland as a Confederate state anyway, which would make my point here moot.
About Missouri, the Missouri River Basin voted primarily for the Unionist John Bell in the 1860 election, which clearly indicates their preference against secession. On the other hand, many counties in the Southernmost third of Missouri voted for Breckinridge, the Southern Democrat candidate. These regions would be the nucleus of the new Missouri I propose.
Also, why does Jeff Davis so adamantly demand that DC becomes a free city? This would seem to be a very contentious debate that would satisfy neither side. If I were the Confederate President during negotiations over a treaty to end the Civil War, I would forgo the free city proposal, and instead demand massive economic reparations from the North in order to fund Davis' planned economic reconstruction (yeah, I know) of the South, as its economy would be absolutely devasted from having to hold up the weight the war would bring bearing down on it. This A) brings money into Southern coffers after the war and B) removes the need to get loans from European countries that the South would have to pay back later; in this scenario, the South would not need to pay the Union back, as they won the money fair and square.
In his first term, I’ll assume that Bryan was the Vice President. As the populist movement was dying by 1900 (although it won’t be dead as soon as it was in OTL), I have him taking Teddy Roosevelt as his pick.I like the Populist merging with the Republicans to capture the white house. However, populists in 1896 were certainly against William McKinley. I'm assuming that the coalition/merge party ran a balanced ticket with a prominent populist as the vp. So, I'm guessing Weaver or Bryan himself was McKinley' s running mate.
That makes sense, seeing that by the time the 1900 election rolls around, Bryan and McKinley will have serious disagreements over policy. Maybe Bryan fights Mckinly for the nomination even.In his first term, I’ll assume that Bryan was the Vice President. As the populist movement was dying by 1900 (although it won’t be dead as soon as it was in OTL), I have him taking Teddy Roosevelt as his pick.
I have the Populists and New Republicans merge since at the time the OTL Republican Party was generally more liberal than Democrats and the Populists themselves were left-winged. Meanwhile, it’s been over 30 years since the war ended meaning that the idea of the Democrats being the “good” party is wearing off, especially with the Panic 1893 making them look bad.That makes sense, seeing that by the time the 1900 election rolls around, Bryan and McKinley will have serious disagreements over policy. Maybe Bryan fights Mckinly for the nomination even.
On October 30, the Virginius started toward Cuba from Jamaica. The Spanish figured this out and sent the warship Tornado to capture it. They spotted it over open waters the same day, just 6 miles off the shore from Cuba. The Tornado fired at the Virginius several times, causing the top deck to suffer from severe damage. Captain Fry surrendered the ship, knowing it could not outrun the rivaling Tornado. After securing the ship, the Spanish sailed the vessel to Santiago de Cuba, taking the entire crew prisoner and ordering them to be put on trial as pirates. The entire Virginius crew was found guilty of piracy and sentenced to death. Between November 4 and November 8, all 53 ship members were executed mostly by firing squad, including Captain Fry himself, plus an additional four mercenaries who were executed without trial.
With near-universal outrage among free white Confederates, the Confederate Congress declared war on Spain on November 11, 187.
All of this meant that southern cotton was less viable to the European (and even the USA) market. Cotton prices fell domestically and shipments across the world plummeted. With the depression, ambitious railroad building programs crashed across the CSA, South, leaving most states deep in debt and burdened with heavy taxes. Between this and the reduced viability of slavery, a common response to this was retrenchment, with spending at record lows. In the Upper States of Kentucky, Missouri, and Virginia, where cotton was not as prosperous to start with and slaves were seen as luxury items, there were even debates about emancipating slaves entirely. Also in those states, cuts in wages and bad working conditions led to a Great Railroad Strike in 1877 beginning in Martinsburg, Virginia. However, this was brutally put down by government troops and was characterized in the press as an insurrection rather than an act of desperation. Similar strikes happened to its northern neighbor. By 1878, the damage the Panic had caused was done and would shape the country and its institutions (including slavery) for decades to come. By 1880, five states - Arizona, Coahuila, New Chichuaha, New Sonora, and South California - had abolished slavery entirely and two more (Kentucky and Missouri) plus Indian Territory had just passed gradual emancipation acts. These states stood alone with their futures in the air. Would they be the new leaders of an industrialized tomorrow or would they be shunned by the rest of the agrarian Confederacy?
I meant 1872 and I fixed it so it should be good now.This is clearly not right you need to fix this asap. I'm guessing the year is 1870, not 187.