I hate to be pedantic, but Timor-Leste wasn't independent yet.
I hate to be pedantic, but Timor-Leste wasn't independent yet.
Fixed, hopefully for the last time:I hate to be pedantic, but Timor-Leste wasn't independent yet.
Looks good as far as I can tell, but is it just me or are the coastlines on the Azores and Cape Verde too light? They look to be around the same shade as the first-level borders.Hopefully fixed.
I'm sorry but I missed Kosovo under NATO occupation. And Vojvodina was a second level division in Serbia, when Montenegro was a subject of a federationFixed, hopefully for the last time:
I prefer solution 3, as it shows that these are at least nominally independent nations, but vassals/puppets of (here) the Roman Empire.Also I'm not sure how I should display protectorates: above (0), or one of the below (1, 2, or 3)?
I second this.I prefer solution 3, as it shows that these are at least nominally independent nations, but vassals/puppets of (here) the Roman Empire.
I'm more of afan of 2 myself.I prefer solution 3, as it shows that these are at least nominally independent nations, but vassals/puppets of (here) the Roman Empire.
A very good idea. Solution 2 can also serve for outlining an inter- or supranational organisation (e.g. EU or the Commonwealth)I'd say use solution 3 for vassal states (eg Poland during the Cold War or British Egypt) and solution 2 for "influenced states" (eg Romania or Hungary during WW2)