Terres Australes | Alternative World Thread by Substantial_Habit

Reader mode
Substantial_Habit_94

Substantial_Habit_94

Gabingston said:
This map seems a bit off. Kerguelen is antipodal to the tripoint area around Montana, Alberta and Saskatchewan and New Gelderland is antipodal to the gulf coast from Louisiana to the Florida Panhandle and then up into Georgia.
www.freemaptools.com

Tunnel to the Other Side of the Earth

Have you ever wondered which part of the other side of the earth is directly below you? Find out using this map tunnelling tool.
www.freemaptools.com www.freemaptools.com
Click to expand...
ah maybe is the projection I'm using, it is a bit odd on the poles
 
Substantial_Habit_94

Substantial_Habit_94

Gabingston said:
This map seems a bit off. Kerguelen is antipodal to the tripoint area around Montana, Alberta and Saskatchewan and New Gelderland is antipodal to the gulf coast from Louisiana to the Florida Panhandle and then up into Georgia.
www.freemaptools.com

Tunnel to the Other Side of the Earth

Have you ever wondered which part of the other side of the earth is directly below you? Find out using this map tunnelling tool.
www.freemaptools.com www.freemaptools.com
Click to expand...
Following the page on the link:
Port-aux-Français would be antipodal to Glasgow, Montana
Altazin would be close to Eureka, Montana
Molloy would be south of Regina, Saskatchewan
Saint Lanne would be around Patuanak, Saskatchewan
And Port Alfred near Lake Athabasca.

Culemborg (Capital of New Gelderland) would be around Keystone Heights, Florida
And Goustad (Second largest city in NG) would be close to Lake Charles, Louisiana
 
Last edited:
Separatist Movements - Map
  • Index
    • Substantial_Habit_94

    Substantial_Habit_94

    Hi guys, happy Sunday! Here is a map of the most relevant separatist movements ITTL for you to see!

    Separatist/secessionist movements in the Americas:
    - Cascadia (USA and Canada)
    - Quebec (Canada)
    - O Sul (Brasil)
    - Patagonia (Argentina and Chile)
    - Greenland (Denmark)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Europe:
    - Scotland (UK)
    - Ireland (UK)
    - Wales (UK)
    - Cornwall (UK)
    - Brittany (France)
    - Basque Country (Spain and France)
    - Croatia (Yugoslavia)
    - Ukraine (Russia, Poland and Romania)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Africa:
    - Western Sahara (Spain)
    - Sudan (Egypt)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Asia:
    - Dagestan (Russia)
    - Chechnya (Russia)
    - Turkmenistan (Russia)
    - Russian Far East (Russia)
    - Xinjiang (China)
    - Tibet (China)
    - Taiwan (China)
    -Seven Sister States (India)
    - Bangladesh (India)
    - Kashmir (India)
    - Dravida Nadu (India)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Oceania:
    - Western Australia (Australia)
    - New Caledonia (France)
    - Timor (Portugal)


    om4z2Um.png
     
    Last edited:
  • Index
    • Neoteros

    Neoteros

    Substantial_Habit_94 said:
    Hi guys, happy Sunday! Here is a map of the most relevant separatist movements ITTL for you to see!

    Separatist/secessionist movements in the Americas:
    - Cascadia (USA and Canada)
    - Quebec (Canada)
    - O Sul (Brasil)
    - Patagonia (Argentina and Chile)
    - Greenland (Denmark)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Europe:
    - Scotland (UK)
    - Ireland (UK)
    - Wales (UK)
    - Cornwall (UK)
    - Brittany (France)
    - Basque Country (Spain and France)
    - Croatia (Yugoslavia)
    - Ukraine (Russia, Poland and Romania)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Africa:
    - Western Sahara (Spain)
    - Sudan (Egypt)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Asia:
    - Dagestan (Russia)
    - Chechnya (Russia)
    - Turkmenistan (Russia)
    - Russian Far East (Russia)
    - Xinjiang (China)
    - Tibet (China)
    - Taiwan (China)
    -Seven Sister States (India)
    - Bangladesh (India)
    - Kashmir (India)
    - Dravida Nadu (India)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Oceania:
    - Western Australia (Australia)
    - New Caledonia (France)
    - Timor (Portugal)


    secesionism.png
    Click to expand...

    How popular are they?
     
    CountofDooku

    CountofDooku

    Substantial_Habit_94 said:
    Hi guys, happy Sunday! Here is a map of the most relevant separatist movements ITTL for you to see!

    Separatist/secessionist movements in the Americas:
    - Cascadia (USA and Canada)
    - Quebec (Canada)
    - O Sul (Brasil)
    - Patagonia (Argentina and Chile)
    - Greenland (Denmark)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Europe:
    - Scotland (UK)
    - Ireland (UK)
    - Wales (UK)
    - Cornwall (UK)
    - Brittany (France)
    - Basque Country (Spain and France)
    - Croatia (Yugoslavia)
    - Ukraine (Russia, Poland and Romania)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Africa:
    - Western Sahara (Spain)
    - Sudan (Egypt)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Asia:
    - Dagestan (Russia)
    - Chechnya (Russia)
    - Turkmenistan (Russia)
    - Russian Far East (Russia)
    - Xinjiang (China)
    - Tibet (China)
    - Taiwan (China)
    -Seven Sister States (India)
    - Bangladesh (India)
    - Kashmir (India)
    - Dravida Nadu (India)

    Separatist/secessionist movements in Oceania:
    - Western Australia (Australia)
    - New Caledonia (France)
    - Timor (Portugal)


    secesionism.png
    Click to expand...
    Very lovely detail and chapter :D
     

    John Waters

    Banned
    The USA-led block for some reason is limited to the Americas(probably isolationism never ended ITTL), the British-French block has lost it's crown jewel in India and only has poor third world african countries in it(wich are probably more headache to maintain control over than they are worth), the German block is probably industrially and millitarily formidable but runs into the same problem that Germans had IOTL in WW1 and WW2 - no oil and no ability to feed itself, so it can't be self-sufficient, Chinese-Indian block has superior human numbers but once again lacks in natural resourses and is traditionally dragging behind, the Russian block here has both the natural resources and the industrial capabilities, and if ITTL Russia somehow dodged humanitarian catastrophies of the OTL XX century it should have superior human numbers too
     
    Last edited:
    Višeslav

    Višeslav

    John Waters said:
    If ITTL Russia somehow dodged humanitarian catastrophies of the OTL XX century it should have superior human numbers too
    Click to expand...
    The rest 100%, this nah. You either grossly overestimate Russia's/USSR's population decline or underestimate Eastern Asia's population. India, China, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Congo, Vietnam, and Indonesia are all INSANELY heavy hitters population-wise. They ARE missing Java so perhaps not the majority of the world's population but this alliance probably has a solid 40% of the world's population in it.
     
    Substantial_Habit_94

    Substantial_Habit_94

    John Waters said:
    The USA-led block for some reason is limited to the Americas(probably isolationism never ended ITTL), the British-French block has lost it's crown jewel in India and only has poor third world african countries in it(wich are probably more headache to maintain control over than they are worth), the German block is probably industrially and millitarily formidable but runs into the same problem that Germans had IOTL in WW1 and WW2 - no oil and no ability to feed itself, so it can't be self-sufficient, Chinese-Indian block has superior human numbers but once again lacks in natural resourses and is traditionally dragging behind, the Russian block here has both the natural resources and the industrial capabilities, and if ITTL Russia somehow dodged humanitarian catastrophies of the OTL XX century it should have superior human numbers too
    Click to expand...
    That is very well put! Also, note that the USA and the British-French blocs are, in reality, one large bloc. They have very close relations and are part of several economic and military organizations. Some countries also have "dual influences" lets say; for instance, most of Oceania (and Canada) are, in reality, purple and blue, Brazil is blue and grey, India is purple and red, etc. There is not as hard as a contrast between some of the countries as the map represents, but overall their leaning tendencies are there.
     

    John Waters

    Banned
    Substantial_Habit_94 said:
    That is very well put! Also, note that the USA and the British-French blocs are, in reality, one large bloc. They have very close relations and are part of several economic and military organizations. Some countries also have "dual influences" lets say; for instance, most of Oceania (and Canada) are, in reality, purple and blue, Brazil is blue and grey, India is purple and red, etc. There is not as hard as a contrast between some of the countries as the map represents, but overall their leaning tendencies are there.
    Click to expand...
    So it's as if USA didn't join NATO?
     
    Reader mode
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Top
    Top