To be frank, I'm rather astounded at apparent talk of using Austria as a theatre given the 1955 Austrian State Treaty, violation of which would be significantly more of a propaganda coup for the defending bloc than any Yugoslav antics.
He is right I though and turning it into what about ism is exactly that.The fact that all nations have done immoral things or have broken treaties does not justify "whataboutism". Does "the Americans were killing off the Native Americans" or "the Turks killed the Armenians (and random others)" mean that the Nazis and the Holocaust is just another day in the world of international relations and ethnic hostility? I suggest you ask the folks of Eastern Europe about the "free elections" they were pledged to get following WWII, as another example...
8pm Belgrade Yugoslavia
The Presidential Council was split on what to do, the Serbs were in favor of supporting the Soviet Union.
The Serbs are Slavs and the people of the Soviet Union are Slavs and the theory is that Slavs stick together. While the bulk of the leadership of Yugoslavia is opposed to fighting on the side of the Soviet Union. But as in any situation some people we see an advantage on fighting on the side of the Soviet Union no matter who stupid everyone else thinks the idea is. The ones who see an advantage are the fanatics the true believers. The ones who believe Slavik unity is all important and they would view it as an opportunity to put the rest of Yugoslavia firmly under their control. Remember what happened during the Yugoslavian Civil War.