Dunno how to work it as that is an unique interquel/pararel, maybe more development a full fledge sequel?
Rememebr when Lawrence Taylor headline Wrestlemania? when as you say vince will not put the title, Arquette might headline a PPV(when were real PPV cost a lot of money) over a more established wrestler...could work..as could notWI the film Ready to Rumble is written for the WWF instead of WCW?
While WCW was well on its way to bankruptcy, IMO, David Arquette winning the world title pretty much ensured that it was likely; I also can't see the WWF putting the title on David Arquette...
WI the film Ready to Rumble is written for the WWF instead of WCW?
While WCW was well on its way to bankruptcy, IMO, David Arquette winning the world title pretty much ensured that it was likely; I also can't see the WWF putting the title on David Arquette...
Triple H was champ around the time Arquette won it in OTL, so you can tell that ain't happening.
Of Course he will not make arquette champion but vince himself is not above to milk that mainstream coverage for all that is worth(see LT example) so we could see anythingI agree, especially since Vince would shoot the idea down (with a "HELL NO!" to boot, probably followed by a "YOU'RE FFFFIIIRRREEEDDD!!!" to the person who proposed it...)...
Having an angle where David Arquette is the guest referee and screws Triple H in favor of the Rock would be satisfying...
The thing of Don Quixote is you can only adapt two ways, either you got full zany as that example or adapt it straight, like the tragedy of Quijano wanting to live his delusion just to recover his sanity and learn all his act were mere delusion, there no middle points, both in spanish market is how we read and adapt the Quijote/Quixote...and that is the point of the book too.nd Walter Lantz's Don Quixote being zany and goofy like the shorts from the tim
Are you not kind of contradicting yourself by complaining that someone else's TL doesn't appeal to your own personal tastes?So, here's a criticism I have with some of these pop culture TLs: they seem to be more focused on personal wish fulfillment than exploring what could have been.
A little personal wish fulfillment here and there in a TL isn't a bad thing, but I noticed a lot of TLs will throw in common tropes like Walt Disney quitting smoking early and living longer even if it's not the main focus of the project.
On my alternate animated films TL, I got a user complaining about Warner Brothers' John Carter adaptation (I still don't give a crap about how WB is spelled BTW) and Walter Lantz's Don Quixote being zany and goofy like the shorts from the time. I explained to that user that it's common for animated films IOTL to be a lot denser and wackier than their source material, only for that user to say something along the lines of "that doesn't mean those films should've been", as if they wanted every single film in my TL to appeal to their own personal tastes instead of what I think these filmmakers would realistically do ITTL.
Are you not kind of contradicting yourself by complaining that someone else's TL doesn't appeal to your own personal tastes?
If you had only mentioned your own TL and the poster, I would agree with you whole heartily. But first you specifically called out another person's TL for not meeting your personal taste for realism. Then went on about how other people should avoid their personal tastes and make TL's that appeal to your personal taste. I just find that contradictory but that's only imho.No, I'm not. Because I'm criticizing those other TLs for focusing more on wish fulfillment than realism, and that user criticized mine for focusing more on realism than wish fulfillment.
I don't belive a failed rock musician as politician.Dirty Laundry were very much rooted in hard AH
I don't belive a failed rock musician as politician.
Not sure that's possible with the Pistols, punk had a very narrow window anyway and it seems the manager deliberately set out to cause tension that saw Matlock walk. Once he's gone you get Sid Vicious and that was always going to end in disaster.WI The Sex Pistols don't go on the Bill Grundy show plus Glen Matlock stays in the band.
I recently watched some documentaries on the band and one thing that guitarist Steve Jones said was that it all happened too fast and that if the above mentioned happened, they would've lasted longer. Basically, my idea for the TL would have included Queen's Freddy Mercury not going to his fateful dentist appointment and TTL having a pretty unremarkable interview as the POD, and the Sex Pistols would be able to more slowly (relative to OTL) have more sustainable success. Not sure how to keep Glen in the band though. What do you guys think?