L’Aigle Triomphant: A Napoleonic Victory TL

I just wondered, what of Haiti?
Once peace with the British has been made at Aix, and the French navy can resume crossing the Atlantic ocean unimpeded, would Napoléon have tried once again to reconquer Haiti, as he did try before the peace of Amiens fell apart?
Napoleon sort of regretted his whole invasion as a waste of men and money. Haiti at this point is basically reset to year zero due to the constant invasions, rebellions, and counter-rebellions. At most he likely tries to talk the leadership at the time, I'm not actually fully sure who that would be at this point, into some sort of protectorate status and if that failed just leaving the whole thing to sort itself out. For all his learning and varied interests Napoleon didn't seem to care about colonies or the New World at all and had zero strong opinions on any of it. Even slavery was something he sort of flip-flopped on a bunch.

The one major benefit is that it's hard to see him demanding Haiti pay the former planters "damages" like the other French governments in OTL which would mean that the nation wouldn't be saddled with billions in debt before they even had open trade. This would mean long term the nation is more prosperous (but still likely suffering in the 20th century from Neo-Collonialism from America like much of the Western Hemisphere).
 
Napoleon sort of regretted his whole invasion as a waste of men and money. Haiti at this point is basically reset to year zero due to the constant invasions, rebellions, and counter-rebellions. At most he likely tries to talk the leadership at the time, I'm not actually fully sure who that would be at this point, into some sort of protectorate status and if that failed just leaving the whole thing to sort itself out. For all his learning and varied interests Napoleon didn't seem to care about colonies or the New World at all and had zero strong opinions on any of it. Even slavery was something he sort of flip-flopped on a bunch.

The one major benefit is that it's hard to see him demanding Haiti pay the former planters "damages" like the other French governments in OTL which would mean that the nation wouldn't be saddled with billions in debt before they even had open trade. This would mean long term the nation is more prosperous (but still likely suffering in the 20th century from Neo-Collonialism from America like much of the Western Hemisphere).
This comment is the closest to where I’m likely to wind up fwiw
 
This comment is the closest to where I’m likely to wind up fwiw
I still want to see the outcomes I hinted at in this post, this post, and this post. That is, France extend an olive branch to Haiti via le plan maréchal (aka, "the Marshal Plan") whereby France helps Haiti with money so Haiti can rebuild or build anew.

As a result of the Marshal Plan, not only do Haiti and France become allies, but Haiti also becomes the power in the Caribbean and generally a military power to be reckoned with. France and Haiti, along with France's other allies, then proceed to liberate the Irish and all of Ireland from their British oppressors. The coalitions ends up returning England to being a French possession. As a result, the world-wide dominance of metric system happens earlier and to far greater extent, while the suffering caused by British cuisine is tremendously reduced.

Ideally, in this time line, Thomas-Alexandre Dumas has a second son who eventually become head of the government of a multi-racial French Republic that evolves from the mighty French Empire.
 
Last edited:
?? Britain?? The country obsessed with having the greatest colonial empire possible by invading and conquering as many lands as they can isn't the worst option in the world at this point in time?? Yeah, sure if you say so.
Honestly, between Spain, France and Britain, it feels like choosing between black plague, typhus and cholera...
 
?? Britain?? The country obsessed with having the greatest colonial empire possible by invading and conquering as many lands as they can isn't the worst option in the world at this point in time?? Yeah, sure if you say so.
I mean Britain isn’t the best option, but Haiti has had many horrible experiences with France and with the US not far behind in opposing its existence Britain is the least worse of the three options.
 
The UK is a vicious conqueror and exploiter but it knows when not to kill you. If Haiti can be a pawn against France and the US then the British will take the opportunity

Plus, the wave of British conquests hasn’t begun just yet. India isn’t fully subjugated (it might never be?) and the UK hasn’t blown open the Chinese ports with iron gunboats (if it ever will)
 
Last edited:
The Pearl of the Indies
The Pearl of the Indies

Curtailed as her ambitions in Europe may have been, Britain had not exited the Napoleonic Wars entirely empty handed, demanding the retention of the East Indies from the Netherlands as their price at Aix (and returning what was thought of as a worthless waystation in South Africa to the Dutch as compensation), and from that arrangement Britain's economy recovery in the late 1810s was aided by the lucrative trade of the Malayas which the Dutch had enjoyed; this filled the East India Company's coffers and helped stabilize the realm's increasingly shaky and unsustainable finances in the short term, but also meant that a new understanding of their Oriental domains was necessary.

The founding of Singapore thus represented one of the most crucial episodes of the "Third" British Empire, so denoted as it followed the First (which ended in 1776) and Second (1815) iterations of British power both in North America and in European affairs. The island lay at the very southern tip of the Malay Peninsula, owned by the nearby Sultanate of Johor, and had for years been seen by the local Malays as something of an afterthought and backwater; indeed, it was marshy and disease-ridden. For EIC official Sir Stamford Raffles, however, there was a tremendous amount of potential for a Royal Navy port sited "betwixt Bengal and Batavia" and after the conclusion of the EIC's intervention in a Johori dynastic struggle, the island in its entirety was transferred to British control and Singapore became the third British possession on the Peninsula, after the small outposts at Penang and Malacca.

Singapore's strategic placement was considerable. It lay at what today we know as one of the world's most important strategic chokepoints along the Strait of Malacca, and thus it controlled essentially all trade between India, China and Java - and, thus, all trade between Europe and East Asia. With Britain having seen setbacks in India in the years prior to Singapore, it proved an absolutely crucial ground for launching pacification missions in Sumatra and Java, where Dutch authority's evaporation had left many local fiefdoms and sultanates restive, and Indian mercenaries were imported to Singapore to keep the peace throughout the rest of the 1820s as the city grew rapidly.

Indeed, Singapore in the 1820s and 1830s - with only a brief interruption during the Great Unrest - was probably one of the fastest growing cities in the world. Within less than a generation, Raffles' waystation had become the "Pearl of the Indies," Britain's most critical overseas port and one of the most thriving trade entrepots on earth. Merchants from every European state, from the Americas, and all across Asia, India and the Near East consolidated there in a buzzing polyglot city, all lying under the watchful eye of Royal Navy cutters which maintained it as the base of the Far East Station, before long the most prestigious command after the Mediterranean. In a sense, the revenues of Singapore had helped rescue the revenues of the British overseas empire, and made the East Indies among the most lucrative colonial possessions on earth with full advantage taken of their proximity to China, India, and other British possessions...
 
Yay its back! Curious to see how Dutch South Africa and British Indonesia develop as we progress through the years.
Indonesia is in some ways replacing having a whole Raj, and that definitely shifts British focus eastward in terms of what is the “Crown Jewel”

How that would impact China is to me hard to say
 
Indonesia is in some ways replacing having a whole Raj, and that definitely shifts British focus eastward in terms of what is the “Crown Jewel”

How that would impact China is to me hard to say
Maybe it is the Brits, rather than Perry (or Alt-Perry, not sure if you are handling births post-POD like you are in CdM?) and the US who open up Japan? A more eastward focused GB could be the guys who force Japan open.
 
Maybe it is the Brits, rather than Perry (or Alt-Perry, not sure if you are handling births post-POD like you are in CdM?) and the US who open up Japan? A more eastward focused GB could be the guys who force Japan open.
Somebody other than USA opening Japan will be largely inevitable, with the US not having nearly the same Pacific exposure (spoilers I guess?)

Japan remaining a crackpot backwater sans a Meiji Restoration would be an interesting butterfly considering how deep into the TL 1854/67 would be, too!
 
Top