A comment that that makes sense is that he builds a regime that seems very fascist, instead of a conservative authoritarian republic, to quote that user
"What I'm wondering then, if Quisling isn't a natpop in this time line, why do all the national focuses make him seem to be one? Like, literally every one of them seem like a variation of a focus you could very easily make for Nazi Germany or fascist Italy.
NSFO (German Labour Front), reorganizing the economy into a corporatist one, Statspolitiet (Gestapo), NS Arbeidstjeneste (Reich Labour Service), the "Rikshird" and "førergarde" (SS anyone?), as well as an agressively irridentist "national rebirth" foreign policy where they literally harken back to territory their country lost hundreds of years ago and end up demanding it. This is pretty much as Italy/Nazi-esque fascist as you can get to be honest. And if this isn't "a radical new society", I don't know what is."
I mean, yeah, it looks natpop, not pat aut