The big issue with Libya is the oil revenue. Whose profit centre is it? If Italy is funneling most of the revenue to the peninsula, people living in Libya will feel like something is being taken from them.
Oh? How many oil companies have their head offices in Alaska?Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rice tend to be net recipients of funds from the federal government. This is different from the hypothetical Libya whose oil will be a net contributer.
Oh? How many oil companies have their head offices in Alaska?
Saudia Arabia gets the oil and it's profit.It would be like the development of Eastern Saudi Arabia when the US did deals with Ibn Saud.
The US built infrastructure, because there was nothing to support the oilfield workers. Brand new cities would have to be built.
So you would have well paid people in an almost empty land in a brand new city with all the modern conveniences Italy could provide, so you would have Cafes, Football fields and Pools.
Want the high life? Locals would be hired, and it would beat herding goats
What if Italian on the peninsula don't want to pay for that? What if they get tired dealing with the African issues?Also, Italian Libyans might want to remain part of Italy to shield them against Egypt, Algeria and Chad (or whatever country emerges in the south), as a white colony among actual African countries...
Alaskan residents had been getting a Check from the State from the Oil Profits each year, and really don't care that more Federal money flows in, they have no State income tax or Sales tax.Saudia Arabia gets the oil and it's profit.
I suppose the Italian Libyans would never be unhappy if they get the revenue.
Again, Alaska is a net recipient of federal funds.
- Possible Dutch disease
- Over reliance on oil revenues
- Oil price shocks destroying Italian finances
A fascist dictator using the funds for personal project to the detriment of the nation
I think simply accepting the fait accompli on their earlier adventures in Africa, I saw nothing on them wanting more territory.Could Italy be offered British and French Somaliland in return for declaring war on Germany?
Just after the end of WWII, Italy would hold on to all of its colonies. The AOI, Italian West Africa, is a hotbed of guerrillas, and definitely a net loss, but they'll hold on to that too. The rest is reasonably peaceful, under an iron-fisted rule.
...Italy was well on its way to integrating Eritrea, and Somalia was very peaceful and could likely be spun off as a sort of dominion. Ethiopia is the only west African colony that will give Italy any grief in the short term.
But to get a neutral Italy you might need to get rid or Mussolini first.
But possibly good news if you live in Hiroshima or Nagasaki...Not set in stone. Pact of steel aside, should Benny be a little bit more of a vulture (one can still attack a capitulated france or demand things without a drop of blood in the negotiations) they could have sit out the whole affair with, even with shenigans on the balkans. Bad news for the japanese tough..
Why would Italy have veto power? I don't think Italy would be powerful enough to have an UN Security Council seat. And, I don't see why any other country would want it to have an UN Security Council seat. The Soviets, obviously, would be against it and the USA would have no interest in it because they already have a seat and France and the UK also do.