Soundtrack:
Gossec - Suite d'airs Revolutionnaires
*exterior* *Paris* *establishing shot of Notre Dame* *then we see the seat of the Corps Législatif at the Palais Bourbon* *and the seat of the Chambre des Pairs at the Palais Luxembourg*
*cut to interior* *the cabinet des ministres at the Tuileries* *all the cabinet is present, as is Louis Philippe* *title card flashes 6 April 1843*
Laurent Cunin-Gridaine, Minister of Agriculture: *banging his fists on the table* I've said it before, the leaders of this opposition should be terrorized by seeing their leaders arrested.
Guizot: should we do that we are even
more likely to cause a revolution than if we let them speak.
Soult: even if we wanted to, I can give no assurances that the men will follow an order to open fire on the people
Cunin-Gridaine: then court-martial them if they refuse!
Soult: spoken like a man who has never served in the army. That would be the
first step to getting
them to join the people. We have twelve legions of the National Guard in Paris and I cannot speak for
one's loyalty to the crown.
Pierre Sylvain-Dumon, Minister of Public Works [2]: what we should consider doing is form a regency council, chosen
by the Corps Législatif, and armed with
absolute powers. It will be presided over by the king and Marshal Soult. This council will then keep order in France until the crisis is passed.
Soult: you speak of the crisis as if it were merely a changing season.
Louis Philippe: Monsieur Sylvaint-Dumon's suggestion has merit, it will assauge the more radical of the Corps Législatif, and it will allow us to take care of business, Monsieur le Maréchal.
Soult: *doesn't look entirely convinced but when the vote in favour comes around, he and the Minister of the Navy, Admiral Duperre and Minister of Justice, Tanneguy Duchatel [3], seem to be competing for who votes in favour first*
Louis Philippe: then it is decided, this decision shall be presented to the Chambers.
*cut to the headquarters of
Le National newspaper* *in the office, two men are seated* *Odillon Barot and Adolphe Thiers* *Thiers has his feet up on the table*
*a messenger arrives* *hands a note to Thiers*
Thiers: *gives the boy a coin*
Messenger: I was told to wait for your answer, M'sieur.
Thiers: *scans note* tell them I have no answer for them.
Messenger: *looks unsatisfied at that answer*
Barrot: who's it from?
Thiers: *indifferently* the king.
Barrot: which one, in France at the moment, we have a full house: two kings, a queen, fools without count-
Thiers: the one who sits in the Tuileries.
Barrot: and what answer did he want?
Thiers: *sharkish smile* whether I would consider assuming a post in government.
Barrot: what post would that be?
Thiers: does it matter? Whatever post it is, would be under that idiot Guizot. People don't realize it but Soult is just the face...Guizot's the one pulling the strings behind the scenes. The king will only send for me when he is in danger. I will only take the ministry on the condition of being the master there
Barrot: you are not concerned about the possibility of a coup d'état?
Thiers: *walks over to window* *looks out at the street* it will be a revolution, not a coup. Possibly even bloodier than 1793. The conditions are the same: the king is ruling, not reigning - poorly, I might add - and the people are starving and malcontent.
Barrot: so you are not for the king?
Thiers: I am waiting to see what course events take.
Barrot: and if they go against you, they will surely come for your head.
Thiers: they will come for my head if I side with them and they still fall. Take courage, Jules, I have already sent my resolution to the Palais Bourbon to be read when they adjourn after lunch.
*cut to Palais Bourbon* *the deputies are all assembled* *the mood is tense* *Sylvain-Dumon's proposal has just been read*
President of the Chamber, Paul Jean Sauzet: the chamber acknowledges the Deputy for Bouches-du-Rhône.
Thiers: *stands up to speak* I am not a radical, gentlemen, the radicals know it well and one only has to read their newspapers to be convinced of it. But listen to my feelings. I am of the party of the revolution, both in France and in Europe; I hope that the government of the revolution will remain in the hands of moderate men; I will do everything I can to keep it there; but when this government passes into the hands of men less moderate than myself and my friends, into the hands of ardent men, were the Radicals, I will not abandon my cause for this reason: I will always be on the party of the revolution -
*murmurs from the rest of the chamber*
Thiers: this is why I propose that we accept Minister Sylvain-Dumon's proposal-
*several catcalls from the more republican aspects*
Thiers: *holds up single finger for silence* we accept the proposal, but with our own modifications. The Chamber will nominate a council of National Defense. The power will be removed from the hands of the most messy of kings without enforcing dethronement. It shall ensure the substance if not the form of an abdication. I neither support nor suppress the monarchy, and I leave the future in the hands of God and circumstance.
*where there were catcalls from the pro-republican side of the bench before, now there are from the pro-royalist side of the bench*
Sauzet: the chamber acknowledges the Deputy for Meurthe
Charles-Juste de Craon, Deputy for Meurthe [4]: honourable members...I would call to mind that Monsieur Thiers was one of the foremost advocates for his Majesty to ascend the throne in 1830. His exact words, let us remind the honourable chamber *reads from paper* Charles X can no longer return to Paris: he has caused the blood of the people to flow. The republic would expose us to terrible divisions; it would embroil us with Europe. The duc d'Orléans is devoted to the cause of the Revolution. He has never fought against us. He has carried the tricolour under fire. He alone can still wear them. He has spoken, he accepts the Charte as we wanted that it is from the French people that he will hold his crown!
Thiers: And it is because his Majesty has betrayed those promises that I propose this council.
Craon: Let us not forget, Messieurs [Louis] Blanc et [Jules] Michelet, that where you have sought to detach the idea of the republic from the Terror, Monsieur Thiers has
gloried in it. He has called the revolution of 1789
necessary and the
dictatorship that followed, he calls the
fruit of the circumstances imposed by the aristocracy! One can only imagine that Monsieur Thiers hopes that once more a revolution will be necessary! That he may rise to rule you all as a new Bonaparte! [5]
Thiers: *over the braying of the chamber* we will excuse that
Monsieur de Craon wishes to critique my politics of more than a decade ago when he has no previous experience playing politics.
Craon: one doesn't need experience to smell a rank opportunist, Monsieur Thiers. While some of us may be barred from our rightful place, there are others who would fly to high for theirs.
Thiers: interesting how Monsieur de Craon talks of opportunism when he fought with Napoléon, his father was the emperor's chamberlain, and now he bends the knee to a man who would happily see this chamber suppressed!
Craon: there is no escaping the blood on a judge's robe, Monsieur Thiers, or mud on a uniform for any of us. But we should not be encouraged by this *sarcastically* honourable and learned gentleman to so
quickly violate the oaths we all swore on taking this office.
Thiers: you would have us believe that should the comte de Chambord show up outside of Paris tomorrow, you will remember your duties to the king?
Craon: until such time as, as you pointed out, the comte chooses to dissolve the chamber, I will serve the departement I swore to represent. I am not alone in being one who does not approve of his Majesty's policies, nor am I alone in being the one who will carry them out to their utmost. If you gentlemen will vote for the minister's proposal, then you should vote for the proposal. If you wish to vote for Monsieur Thiers' idea of a committee of national defense- which, to my mind, sounds no more than a new name for a committee of public safety- then by all means, do so. Just know that what Monsieur Thiers is proposing is little short of a
usurpation of the powers that these chambers granted to the king in 1830. It is up to him to abdicate those powers to you,
not for you to take them as Monsieur Thiers proposes. By taking those powers, you prove to the crowned heads of Europe that you wish to start a second revolution and to the people of France that if you cannot honour the word given to your king, why should you honour the word you have given to them? You have proved yourselves ungrateful of the trust placed in you, unreliable in times of trouble, that you would perjure yourselves for the sake of it, cowardly in that you are swayed by the arguments of *looks at Thiers* lesser men [6] and greedy for profits. Don't make the mistake of trusting the devils around you, once they have what they want, they leave you to your fate. You have two paths before you, gentlemen. One is that of justice, dishonour lies at the end of the other. But know that as soon as you have crossed the threshold of dishonour, you are dishonoured forever and your conscience will die each day that you live. *sits down*
*cut to sundown* *we see a shot of the Hotel des Invalides* *the military governor of Paris Tiburce Sébastiani, Vicomte de la Porta, is just returning from the sitting of the Chambre des Pairs at the Luxembourg*
Footman: this arrived for you from Marechal le Duc de Reggio, Monsieur le Gouverneur *hands a letter*
Sébastiani: *reads*
Reggio: *voice over* Monsieur le Gouverneur, I hereby forward you the orders that I received from Maréchal le Duc de Dalmatie, I hope you will find them useful.
Sébastiani: *opens the second letter as he walks*
Soult: *voice over* I know for a fact that trouble is brewing. The matter being entirely outside of the defense of Paris, which is your special concern, any steps you may have to take for public order are to be reported directly to me. You will, furthermore, receive your orders directly from me if the peace is disturbed. Dalmatie. [7]
Sébastiani: *looks at the note* *then crumples it up and tosses is it away* Where is the duc de Reggio?
Footman: he is at dinner sir.
Sébastiani: then that is where I'll be.
Footman: and if the duc de Dalmatie sends for you, sir?
Sébastiani: since the duc does not need me, then well and good. I shall concern myself
only with the
external defense of Paris. And I shall leave
him to handle the coming disturbances as best he can. *walks away*
*cut to mess hall at Les Invalides [8]* *Sébastiani and Maréchal Oudinot, Duc de Reggio, Governor of Les Invalides are both seated at the table* *there are a few other soldiers in the hall* *some are telling stories or playing cards* *servants are busy clearing away the dishes*
*a man approaches where they are sitting*
Sébastiani: what is it, Passy?
Antoine François Passy, Under-Secretary of the Interior: his Majesty would like to know if you can call on him?
Sébastiani: *busies himself with his food in front of him* *in fact, we get the idea - looking at the plate - he arrived late for dinner and had to content himself with "what's left"*
Reggio: can't you see the Gouverneur is busy eating?
Sébastiani: *swallows his food* tell the king, Passy, that I am tired after sitting in the Chambre des Pairs all day. My arse is sore, my back is sore, my legs are sore.
Passy: the king would like your advice on how best to control the rising agitation in the city.
Sébastiani: you may tell his Majesty that I will call on him later.
Passy: *insistently* the king is most anxious for the state of affairs. It is at this moment that the prince de Craon's speech holds true: our place is at his Majesty's side, that
all his faithful
friends array themselves around him.
Sébastiani: *takes his wine glass* you may tell his Majesty that I will call on him.
Later.
*fade to black*
[1] Do you remember? Name of a post-Napoléonic song written in 1817
[2] Sylvain-Dumon bounced around in the third Soult Ministry. He was ministry of public works from 1843-1845 and again from 1845-1847, Minister of Education in 1845, then minister of finance from 1847. Thing is, I can't seem to find that he was actually capable or whether Guizot just liked him (since the "shuffling" was Guizot's idea)
[3] Duperre and Duchatel here are sort of attempting to "curry favour" with Louis Philippe. They were responsible OTL for losing the request for an endowment for the duc de Nemours in 1842, TTL that has turned into Louis Philippe's scheme for settling the Condé inheritance on his grandson. Which means that their failure is driving them to show how "devoted" they are lest they be accused of "deliberately blocking" it.
[4] Craon is married to Elise Baciocchi. Elise is the sister of Henri de Chambord's secretary. While Craon showed absolutely no interest in politics OTL, I don't see his wife - who was a formidable figure, letting him stand idly by when the elections of 1842 showed up. Why is Craon sitting in the chamber of deputies and not the chamber of peers? OTL neither he nor his dad were
allowed to sit in the chamber of peers after 1830 (they're not listed on the rolls), so him - or rather his wife - campaigning to get elected to the deputies is not that ASB.
[5] Thiers actually made such sweeping statements in his runaway best-seller
History of the French Revolution (by 1845 850000 copies had been sold already). Blanc and Michelet (Michelet the former tutor to Princess Clémentine and an ally of Guizot) who rejected this. Tocqueville, Stendhal and Chateaubriand were all indignant/horrified at what Thiers had written. Craon standing up to remind the deputies of this is the equivalent of a modern politician getting exposed by a scandalous remark or tweet he made
[6] Thiers
was short, so "lesser" in that sense, not that Craon is demeaning him. Craon is not actually taking a side beyond cutting the floor out from under Thiers. He likely does mean what he says about service, come rain or shine, he will serve the people of Meurthe (noblesse oblige), where, FWIG, Thiers hasn't done anything in Bouches-du-Rhône since he got elected for the département in 1830. His analogy of justice/dishonour is justice=stand by your oaths, dishonour=break them. It's more a warning shot that says "remember how the guys who voted for the king's execution in 1793 were treated"
[7] Soult and Tiburce's brother, Horace Sebastiani, have a long history of not getting along (all the way back to the Peninsular War), however Soult sending these orders is not to "fan flames" but rather, because of Horace's faux pas of 1832 where he announced, after the brutal suppression of the November Revolution "order reigns in Warsaw". That, just in case Horace tells his brother (who was fanatically loyal to him) to "do something" about a rising in Paris, Tiburce is made aware that he has to run it past Soult first, he does
not have carte blanche.
[8] I don't know if Les Invalides had/has a communal mess hall, but I would imagine that a home for wounded soldiers would
not have them eating off a tray in their rooms
@The_Most_Happy @isabella @VVD0D95 @Jan Olbracht @Ramontxo @HortenseMancini @Anarch King of Dipsodes @Dragonboy @kaiidth @SavoyTruffle @Wendell @nathanael1234 @Fehérvári @Guatemalan Nat-Synd @Valena @maw @LordMartinax @Grey Wolf