I hate directing. You go to work knowing just how you want a scene to be, but by the end of the day, you’re usually depressed because you didn’t do a good enough job. It’s hard enough just to walk through it, let alone direct the actors, move the equipment. It was easy to let go of directing.
-George Lucas, 1980
Filmmaking is, first and foremost, a collaborative process. It's about working together and compromising to get the best result. Friction. Or as my friend here likes to call, balance. And if anyone who tells you otherwise... well, they're not making blockbuster modern timeless mythologies like us, are they? [1]
-Gary Kurtz, 1985
-George Lucas, 1980
Filmmaking is, first and foremost, a collaborative process. It's about working together and compromising to get the best result. Friction. Or as my friend here likes to call, balance. And if anyone who tells you otherwise... well, they're not making blockbuster modern timeless mythologies like us, are they? [1]
-Gary Kurtz, 1985
APRIL 1980
SKYWALKER RANCH
George Lucas massaged his temples.
He had just called Irvin Kershner in England from California, telling his mentor to attend the London opening of the Empire Strikes Back without him. That George Lucas didn't want to take credit when Irvin Kershner clearly was responsible for much of the Empire Strikes Backs.[2]
The Empire Strikes Back was finally finished and ready to become the next global phenomena next month.
He should be excited. Relieved. Or at worst, anxious if the sequel can capture that same magic with the audience.
And yet, as he sat behind his desk at the newly bought Skywalker Ranch, his eyes glanced over to the stack of papers and then to the countless sticky notes plastered on the wall and elsewhere on his desk. The latter of which burrowed deep into his anxiety as they plainly read in bold bright marker text:
'DELAY!', 'OVER BUDGET!', 'BANK OF AMERICA LOAN!', 'FOX STUDIO PRESSURE!', 'DIRECTOR'S GUILD!', 'Feedback: TOO DARK!', and more.
He covered his mouth before sliding his hand down to breath in, and breathe out. The production of the sequel was taxing on him, even though he didn't direct it. Gary Kurtz, his co-creator and producer, had reached out to Irvin Kershner, their former film mentor, to direct the film. With Gary Kurtz and Kershner on location shooting, Lucas was in California helping out with the visual effects and handling the administrative duties to keep Star Wars independent from studio control and other responsibilities. But now he was wondering if he regretted handing over so much control and freedom to the two as they went overbudget and were weeks behind schedule.
External pressure from Fox, Bank of America, and the Director's Guild of America put the franchise at jeopardy.
And his relationship at home was deteriorating.
He leaned back into his chair and stared at the ceiling.
One at a time... he thought.
If he was to save the franchise he and others built, he had to calmly and rationally tackle the problems individually, one at a time.
He scanned across the post-it notes before landing on 'DIRECTOR'S GUILD!'. The Directors Guild of America were threatening to fine Irvin Kershner for crediting George Lucas in the opening of the film. Or more specifically, the guild saw the Lucasfilm logo before the opening crawl to be a cloaked attempt for Lucas to take credit before the director.
He was presented with two choices. Either resign from the DGA and risk losing out on the pool of directors but keeping the integrity and name of his independent production company, or remove the credit, leaving only the 20th Century Fox sequence in.
However, a third possibility arose.[3] Having discussed with Gary Kurtz on the phone, despite the timezone differences, Kurtz suggested why not rename the company to something more 'palatable' to the guild, unfortunately striking out Lucas' name but ensuring the future pool of directors to choose from with the franchise.
Lucas, having had their relationship strained over creative differences, weighed the options and was about to stand his ground, pay the fines the DGA had against Kershner, and resign from the DGA, maintaining his integrity against the establishment.
But then, an epiphanic moment struck him. Almost half a decade of sweat and tears from everyone on board, from him to Kurtz to the actors to the production crew, all at risk in the long term all because he didn't compromise.
It came off selfish. Mayhaps it was the stress? It had to be.
He was always known to be humble and modest. He had just told Kershner to go to the London screening without Lucas.
He picked up the phone and waited for some time before it got through.
"Kurtz? Yeah, I thought about it... what do you think about 'LightWorks Ltd.'?"
______________________________________________________________________________________
Evening, peeps.
So, like a handful, Star Wars played a important part in my childhood and serves as a beacon of hope, inspiration, and entertainment. I don't think I need to detail why so I'll cut straight to the cheese.
I've been rewatching Star Wars and more curiously, the behind the scenes stories that aren't often covered. Namely the breakup of Gary Kurtz and George Lucas. Lucas often cited as the 'visionary' with his creative fertile mind while Gary Kurtz played a more on-the-ground, practical, approachable role and making Lucas' vision a reality to a large extent.
And Gary Kurtz was the one person who could say 'No' to Lucas. That's not to say Kurtz is the sole savior of Star Wars had he taken over as you can argue his time after Star Wars wasn't that glorious with the Dark Crystal film, but you can say the same thing for Lucas too with ROTJ, the Prequels, etc. But the point is that when the two were with one another, to offer ideas, feedback, friction, balance, they created two of my and many people's favorite films of all time.
You could say Lucas was the brains while Kurtz was the heart of Star Wars.
And I, having read deeper in that and the weight of the stress on Lucas, think it's safe to stand by and say that it was this breakup along with other external and unfortunately personal issues that, while many fans like to claim Lucas killed Star Wars with the Prequels or Disney killed Star Wars because of oversaturation or some silly 'agenda', I think it was this breakup that killed Star Wars.
Hyperbolic, yes. I still really, really enjoy Disney Star Wars despite it sometimes feeling like too much fanservice and not much originality. And the prequels I can see bits of brilliance despite the pretty awful execution. But I do think Star Wars and its future to this day could have been in a much healthier and better condition had the worked through their issues and helped overcome the external threats... together.
So yeah, this timeline focuses on what could have happened to Star Wars from the 80s onwards from a behind the scenes, story, and impact on the world perspective if Gary Kurtz and George Lucas continued their relationship to create a modern mythology whose magic lived on...
[1] Fictitious quote, though hint hint at the year...
[2] Serious kudos to George Lucas here since he historically did do this. He phoned Kershner to take the credit. So, yeah, awfully decent of Lucas.
[3] Historically George Lucas stood his ground, resigned from the DGA, and kept the Lucasfilm credit in there, which meant he couldn't hire any directors who're members in it, it applying to Americans mostly. Which was one of the main reasons why Lucas picked Richard Marquand, a British filmmaker.
Last edited: