Alternate Wikipedia Infoboxes IV (Do not post Current Politics Here)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Continuing my Third Party election results series, 1896:

Third Party America 1896.png

Note: I would have included Bryan as the Populist candidate with Weaver, but I could not find a source that separated his Dem votes from his Populist votes, so excluded him.
 
POD: Chappaquiddick never happens



The 1972 Democratic primaries were one of the most memorable in history. Ted Kennedy announced his run in late 1971. Kennedy was expected to dominate, however he faced two very different challengers. George McGovern was a known liberal, while his other opponent George Wallace was a conservative Democrat. Wallace did very well, especially in the South. Wallace easily won states like South Carolina, Florida, and Texas. There were also three other candidates who won states. Shirley Chisholm ran an activistic campaign and won New Jersey, Hubert Humphrey tried to run for a fourth time but he got lost in the battle between Wallace, Kennedy, and McGovern. He only won Wisconsin. Finally there was Eugene McCarthy. McCarthy somehow managed to win Illinois, but he decided to pledge his delegates to McGovern at the Convention.

0mCcA6VW8z8oJdbOQqNCNBPcRQ1yKRPhL2ovoH5js3TiFm9-2Oz5WVgu8WtHa9OkNqXTUHnARUuIZ8JyqbIJE60VHntjJPybndzhA8f2enaFzyVrlJpA4nrTjKt5EtrpiRh57HRd


Many were expecting an interesting convention.
 
The penultimate update to my project of wikiboxing all of @Komodo's AIPverse elections.

Here's Liberty's 2012, where President Hillary Clinton wins re-election...

upload_2017-6-7_21-37-29.png


Kom's write-up.
The election of 2012 was a relatively straight-forward affair, though notable for the presence of a woman on both major parties' tickets. President Clinton, though not the most popular President, defeated the junior Senator from Virginia with relative ease.

And here's World's 2012, where President North loses re-election to Charlie Crist as Republicans and Democrats team up in fear of the AIP's increasingly authoritarian streak...

upload_2017-6-10_0-46-36.png

Breakdown of Fusioning
Oliver North/Tom Tancredo (American Independent): 47.3%

Charlie Crist/Chuck Hagel (Republican): 43.1%
Charlie Crist/Chuck Hagel (Democratic): 4.5%
Mike Gravel/Rocky Anderson (Democratic-Statehood): 4.1%

Kom's write-up for this.
Things looked dark going into the 2012 Presidential ticket. President Palin had been assassinated, and President North had authorized a nationwide manhunt for her killers. Granting sweeping powers to local and federal law enforcement, and reinstating the House Committee on Internal Security (AKA HUAC), the American Independent Party plunged the nation into a Third Red Scare. With rumored connections between the Free Citizens Front and larger militant leftist groups, the nation stood at the abyss...and stepped back, narrowly electing Charlie Crist of the Republican Party by a margin of less than 0.5% in the popular vote.

And here's SUFA's 2012, where bespectacled Rick Perry leads the Democrats to victory.

upload_2017-6-7_22-49-8.png

And this is the last time we see the SUFA Republicans, that weird and perhaps-quirky mixture of New England liberal-conservatism and Western libertarianism, in an election wikibox. Farewell.

Kom's write-up.
The 2012 Presidential election was hotly contested between the Democratic and American Independent parties. Ultimately, two energized bases and well-oiled political machines went to head-to-head, and it became a numbers game of who could turn out the most voters in the critical states. Fortunately for Perry, his popularity in his home state, as well as the political machine supporting him and millions of Hispanic voters alienated by the Goode campaign, carried Texas (alone among its southern brethren) and with it, the election.

The 2012 election was by no means a walk for Perry and the Democratic Party. Entering the general election season, Perry was plagued by both persistent back pain and a lukewarm reception from the urban liberals and African-American voters that had supported Kennedy in the primaries. During the primaries, Governor Perry had taken medication for his condition, and after blaming this medication for several gaffes during the debates with Kennedy he had used the tail-end of the primary season - while the Republicans and American Independents were still hammering out their tickets - to resume his physical therapy, seek alternative medications, and simply rest while the after-effects from his 2011 surgery wore off. When Governor Perry returned to the campaign trail after the DNC, he came back with his back pain under control and had traded in his contact lenses for glasses - while the look earned criticism and mockery on social media, focus-groups attested that overall the switch detracted from the "dumb cowboy" caricature that had been created during the primaries. Having focused his primary campaign on rural whites and Hispanics, Perry now took to the cities to make his case to other minority communities, vowing to fight for and defend their interests as American citizens equal under God. Meanwhile, Senator Kennedy was instrumental to bringing his supporters on board, reassuring liberals on the coasts that Governor Perry was in fact not a secret American Independent that would ban all abortion and abolish all firearm regulations. While Kennedy campaigned across the nation's cities and college campuses, Sanchez's barnstorming of the southwest was instrumental in boosting Hispanic turnout, and has been attributed to helping keep Texas and California in the Democratic camp (and locking Johnson out of his home state).

Of course, Senator Goode and the American Independents put up a good fight of their own. Running against the backdrop of the Santorum administration, Goode promised to continue upon its positive aspects - campaigning on a family-friendly platform of protecting the "real America" from the horrors of child-murder, deviant alternative lifestyles, and forced multilingualism in American schools. Goode, blending the "classic" AIP anti-government philosophy with Santorum's brand of right-wing Christian populism, also campaigned on a retreat from neoconservative-inspired military interventions and costly government aid programs to anti-American foreigners. However, for much of the country, the chief issue of the 2012 election was immigration and America's relationship with its neighbors to the south. While Perry and Sanchez campaigned on establishing a pathway to citizenship for law-abiding and taxpaying undocumented immigrants, Goode and LePage campaigned on continuing Santorum's round-ups and deportations while simultaneously adopting a position skeptical of the Common Market, likening it to a "backdoor" for which Latin Americans could continue to take Americans jobs and money. In doing so, Goode was able to rally the AIP base and increase turnout among the Rust Belt, but it simply was not enough.

However, a lasting impact of the Goode campaign was to legitimize the somewhat maligned and lost paleoconservative wing. Since 2004, many paleoconservatives had felt ignored by the Santorum administration, and with Buchanan ostensibly retired from electoral politics and Barr's 2008 campaign imploding, they had drifted in the wilderness for nearly a decade. They found in Goode a new standard-bearer, though at the cost of alienating key players in the State and Defense departments.

The real loser of the 2012 election was the Republican/Libertarian Party ticket. The Republican Party had found itself increasingly under siege in recent years. Though many in the party had been confident that the nomination of a southern conservative for the Democratic ticket would send thousands of disgruntled liberal voters to the party, this was complicated by several factors. First of which was Kennedy and other prominent liberal Democrat quickly falling in line behind Perry, shoring up his support by groups which ordinarily would not vote for a southern conservative (then again, Roemer was a southern conservative and never had any issues). Second was the growing gap between the Republican Party and the youth vote, which it had done well with since the 1980s. However, the Republican Party's adherence to classical liberal economics came into direct conflict with the rising cost of college tuition and increasingly high numbers of young Americans unable to find employment to escape their debts. Gary Johnson's stances on student loan debt and welfare programs came off to many student activists as callous, and as a result thousands of would-be GOP/Libertarian voters stayed home, or voted for Perry (or Kucinich or Stewart). This was compounded by nearly two decades of emphasis on vocational schools and alternatives to a college education - as a result of programs put into place by pretty much every American President between Gore and Santorum, the percent of the American electorate that traditional students comprised had actually decreased since the 1990s. Lastly was simple demographics; many once-reliable Republican voters had either moved to the Democrats, AIP, or simply died.

Speaking of student activists, the Greens had hoped nominating a former Democratic Congressman would help increase their numbers. Ultimately, however, Kucinich was unable to rally many Democrats to the Green Party banner, and in the end the Greens only carried their usual group of angry far-leftists as well as a few thousand disgruntled ex-Republicans. This was blamed, in large part, on the surprisingly effective campaign by liberal Democratic legislators to rally behind Perry to boot the AIP out of the White House. Additionally, they weren't the only protest ticket around.

The Stewart/Johnson ticket was an interesting one. Americans Elect was founded by a group who believed that establishment politics and the AIP-Democratic duopoly were the key roadblocks to effective legislation, and that unchaining the voices of the common people would usher in a political revolution built on bipartisanship and common understanding. However, they made a fatal flaw: they did not understand how the average web-surfer interacted with politics. As a result of a "viral" campaign among social media sites like Facebook and Reddit, Americans Elect was forced to run a comedian with a former wrestler and action star. However, the ticket did not exactly get far. First and foremost was the reluctance of Stewart and Johnson to campaign; they knew perfectly well that they had been nominated as a joke by pranksters on the internet, and beyond a running gag on Stewart's show the two did not seriously campaign. Second was the fact that Americans Elect really did not have anything of a campaign infrastructure; as an experiment in "digital democracy" they had no door-knockers, no phone-bankers, no fliers. Apparently, you can't run a campaign on memes alone. The whole incident has left the backers of Americans Elect a little disillusioned, and it seems unlikely that they will be fielding a ticket in 2016.

Interestingly enough, 2012 was the first election in which both parties had a prominent Former/Soon-to-be-former President acting as campaign surrogates. While most of the spotlight was on the Perry-Goode race, many networks publicized the apparent feud between former President Roemer and incumbent two-term President Santorum, both of whom had taken to the trail to support their respective parties' campaigns.

In the end, the Democratic Party was able to effectively increase turnout among traditional Democratic voting blocs and ex-Republicans to narrowly carry the White House, despite fears (somewhat realized) of low turn-out by those turned off by Perry's brand southern, socially conservative populism. And so Rick Perry became the 44th President of the United States, and Loretta Sanchez became the nation's second female (and first ever Hispanic) Vice President.

Index.
The 1968 election (constant)
The 1972 elections in Gauntlet and SUFA, the 1976 election in Gauntlet.
The 1976 elections in Liberty and SUFA.
The 1980 elections in Gauntlet, Liberty and SUFA.
The 1984 elections in Gauntlet, Liberty, World and SUFA.
The 1988 elections in Gauntlet, Liberty, World and SUFA.
The 1992 elections in Gauntlet, Liberty, World and SUFA.
The 1996 elections in Gauntlet, Liberty, World and SUFA.
The 2000 elections in Gauntlet, Liberty, World and SUFA.
The 2004 elections in Gauntlet, Liberty, World and SUFA.
The 2008 elections in Gauntlet, Liberty and World.
The 2008 election in SUFA.
The 2012 election in Gauntlet.
The 2012 elections in Liberty, World and SUFA. [THIS POST]
The 2016 elections in Gauntlet, Liberty, World and SUFA. [COMING SOON]

The 1976, 1980 and 1984 elections in ALOH. [planned]
The 1988, 1992 and 1996 elections in ALOH. [planned]
 
Last edited:
I just got back from a couple day-long trip to South Dakota, and the long drive through the plains inspired me to make this. A kind of alternate version of my Minnesota-in-Canada series or "Canadakota", if you will.

----------------------------------​

The province of Dakota is the southernmost of Canada's prairie provinces. The Missouri River bisects the province, dividing it between the eastern half of the province, an agricultural region covered in plains and home to most of the province's population and the western half, sparsely populated and home to the rugged Badlands and Black Hills. Inhabited originally by many First Nations people, including the Lakota, Dakota was gradually settled by Europeans in the 19th century, with the population rapidly increasing after gold was discovered in the Black Hills in the 1870s. The flood of prospectors and settlers resulted in the Lakota Wars, a decade-long series of conflicts between Canadian and British authorities ostensibly trying to police treaty-violating settlers and prospectors and the Lakota and other First Nations people fighting against encroachment on land they had been promised in previous treaties that culminated in a revocation of previous treaties and the controversial Treaty of Wounded Knee Creek that greatly reduced the size of Lakota reserves in Dakota and many rights they had previously enjoyed.

It was this backdrop that resulted in Dakota finally joining the Confederation in 1890. During the First World War, Dakota's large population of German immigrants and their descendants faced intense anti-German sentiment from other ethnic groups in the province. The anti-German sentiment eventually resulted in the provincial capital of Bismarck being renamed to Gladstone (to honor former British Prime Minister William Gladstone) in 1915, and the interning of several hundred suspected "fifth columnists" (mostly first-generation German immigrants). The Great Depression and Dust Bowl greatly affected Dakota, as did the postwar mechanization of farming that has resulted in several decades of depopulation in many farming communities. Recently, the discovery of oil in the Bakken formation in northwest Dakota led to a brief economic boom in the province that was short-circuited by the fall of global oil prices.

On the federal level, Dakota has historically been a stronghold of the Conservative Party and its Progressive Conservative predecessor. However, other parties have briefly gained a majority of seats in the province, including the Progressives (during the first elections after the First World War) and federal Liberals (during the King-St. Laurent years and in the 1990s when the Reform Party split the right-wing vote in the province). Among the most famous federal politicians to hail from Dakota include former NDP leader George McGovern and federal Liberal cabinet minister Tom Daschle.

On the provincial level, Dakota has a much more varied history. While the Conservatives (renamed the Progressive Conservatives (PC) in 1941) dominated provincial politics in the decades after joining the Confederation, the effects of the First World War and poverty among farmers allowed the Liberals and Progressives to make serious inroads in the 1920s. The collapse of the economy during the Great Depression finally resulted in a realignment of provincial politics, with Liberal and Progressive coalitions taking over in the 1930s. The Second World War resulted in a "unity government" that culminated in the merger of the Progressives into the Liberal machine. The rejuvenated Liberals would dominate the province's politics during this period, but the dissatisfaction of former Progressives resulted in the New Democratic Party (NDP, previously the Co-Operative Commonwealth Federation) gaining steadily in the 1960s and 1970s.

The divisive nature of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau's policies would have a great effect on Dakota provincial politics. Trudeau's unpopularity in the province resulted in poor shows by the provincial Liberals in the 1970s, when the Progressive Conservatives were able to tie the provincial Liberals to Trudeau. The momentum shift to the provincial Progressive Conservatives during the Trudeau years was aided by a Liberal Party that veered wildly during the 1970s and 1980s between the centre-left and running as more fiscally conservative than the Progressive Conservative government, depending on the party leader. The wild swings allowed the New Democratic Party to seize the centre-left vote in the province. When Dakota voters went to the polls greatly unhappy with Brian Mulroney's Progressive Conservatives in 1993, it was NDP leader Byron Dorgan who formed a new government. Dorgan defied political gravity and won re-election in the overwhelmingly rural province in 1997, but the Progressive Conservatives roared back into power in 2000 under John Hoeven's leadership.

The early 2000s saw the Progressive Conservatives win three straight elections (2000, 2005, 2009) handily as the New Democrats failed to get a new footing and the Liberals continued to stubbornly hang on to a significant share of the urban center and center-left vote as they retooled themselves into a technocratic, socially liberal and "fiscally responsible" party. The 2013 provincial election, following on the tails of reports of provincial negligence in oil towns in the Bakken formation and the strong performance of the federal NDP in 2011, resulted in the first competitive election in Dakota in over a decade. As a result of centre-left vote-splitting between the NDP and Liberals, the PCs retained a small majority but their margin of victory over the NDP was worryingly small (less than three percentage-points) for PC supporters. The collapse of oil prices from 2014 to 2016 resulted in the PCs under Premier Dennis Daugaard consistently running behind the NDP and their young leader, Mac Schneider. Daugaard was persuaded to retire and the PCs recruited federal MP Kristi Noem to replace him, making Noem the first woman to lead the province.

The slight uptick of oil prices after Noem came into office did wonders for the provincial economy, and the NDP's opposition to the construction of more oil pipelines in favor of more investment in renewable energy was hammered repeatedly by the PCs in the run-up to the 2017 campaign. The Liberals, meanwhile, continued to flounder, and many provincial analysts believed that they would be shut out of the assembly with polls showing them hovering around five percent of the vote by the end of 2016. The party was thrown a lifeline when Sioux Falls Mayor Mike Huether agreed to take on the unenviable task of bringing direction to the party and was elected leader in an uncontested convention four months before the election. The NDP, which had been predicted to sweep into government less than two years earlier found itself farther and farther behind in the polls as the election went on and Huether's strong performance at the leader's debate resulted in the Liberals' numbers reaching back into the double-digits.

dakota17.png


The results spoke for themselves. Noem and the PCs romped to a 48-seat victory, cutting the NDP caucus in half and reducing the Liberals to just one seat. The current longest-running dynasty in Canada, the Progressive Conservatives ensured that their unbroken string of control over Dakota would continue until at least 2021.
 
Last edited:
The big four political parties of The Union of Britain (Officially known as The Union of British Republics.)
xTFvMYO.png

CPAgizs.png

Zg2z1N3.png

SrhumXO.png
The only issue I have with this is I can't see Clegg in a party with Mandelson.

He'd actually probably be quite happy in the Conservatives in this universe.
 

Bryton

Banned
The only issue I have with this is I can't see Clegg in a party with Mandelson.

He'd actually probably be quite happy in the Conservatives in this universe.
Well, I'll explain it more in depth like this.

In this timeline, the Tories have dominated Westminster for nearly a quarter of a century. This is mostly due to a crippling economy after the Kingdoms' loss in the Canadian War of Independence in 1898. This loss is so damaging not only to the Liberal party, who was in a majority during the war which started in 1892 with Laurier and his Liberal government declaring independence and reforming the country as a republic. This led to the CSA under Democrat president Grover Cleveland to intervene with a ship incident on the Atlantic seas. Cleveland was faced with recession but won the reelection in 1894 promising to end the war before his second term was over. While the war was victorious, the Confederacy continued to fall into a worser recession and many people were tired of Democrats ruling over the presidency for two decades. The 1898 election would be a doozy. But anyways, back to Britain. With the economy in the toilet and an empire embarrassed. The Liberal Party was crushed in the 1899 Election with the Tories gaining over 450 seats in the house. During this era, Balfour was Prime Minister from 1899 to 1911, Austen Chamberlain was Prime Minister from 1911 to 1923. With the founding of the Labour Party in 1900, the party right out of the door exploded in popularity do to Liberal disenfranchisement. Leader Keir Hardie and his party soared in the 1904 election to become the Leader of the Opposition but dropped to third place in 1909. Even though rising in popularity, Labour was found to be difficult to be electable and reach Britons across the board. After Hardie resigned in 1909, Arthur Henderson became leader until 1918 and tried to soften the parties image. But only the gains were minimal, especially with Chamberlains' social policies and tax cuts putting confidence in the British people. But the empire was becoming rusty. and the British people wanted change. Ramsay MacDonald became the next leader of Labour in 1918, MacDonald took a more radical approach to reform by scrapping Clause IV, adopting free trade policies, promoting free enterprise, Scottish and Welsh federalism, and embracing social corporatism. All while still keeping it's strong republican and progressive views. Moving the party from the left, to left of centre. With the country hitting into an even harder recession by 1919, Chamberlain and the rest of the Tories could not fix the mess of the rusting empire. So came the 1923 election, MacDonald ran on a platform of redistribution of the wealth redistribution, Irish sovereignty negotiation, implementation of a National Insurance program. Labour skyrocketed from 193 seats to 281 seats, with Tories left with 270 seats and the Liberals with 115 seats. A Labour-Liberal coalition was formed, and by April 7th of 1924, under agreement with David Lloyd George of the Liberals, merged the two parties to create the Democratic Party. A big tent predominantly made up of a social democratic majority and a socially liberal minority.

Basically the Democrats are made up of mostly centrist third way New Labourers and centrist Liberal Democrats from our timeline, a moderate to moderately left party.

Speaking of the Confederacy I mentioned earlier, why not some more templates from my timeline? :D
Some logos for some good measure. (Partial credit to Nanwe for the torch in the Whig logo.)

cUVsBhr.png

4Hdg3Dx.png

31afgGj.png

DJqTcea.png

d1dWUgq.png

JYQ7xJJ.png

6VEYsa6.png

DdahxPj.png

P2TLrL0.png
 
Well, I'll explain it more in depth like this.

In this timeline, the Tories have dominated Westminster for nearly a quarter of a century. This is mostly due to a crippling economy after the Kingdoms' loss in the Canadian War of Independence in 1898. This loss is so damaging not only to the Liberal party, who was in a majority during the war which started in 1892 with Laurier and his Liberal government declaring independence and reforming the country as a republic. This led to the CSA under Democrat president Grover Cleveland to intervene with a ship incident on the Atlantic seas. Cleveland was faced with recession but won the reelection in 1894 promising to end the war before his second term was over. While the war was victorious, the Confederacy continued to fall into a worser recession and many people were tired of Democrats ruling over the presidency for two decades. The 1898 election would be a doozy. But anyways, back to Britain. With the economy in the toilet and an empire embarrassed. The Liberal Party was crushed in the 1899 Election with the Tories gaining over 450 seats in the house. During this era, Balfour was Prime Minister from 1899 to 1911, Austen Chamberlain was Prime Minister from 1911 to 1923. With the founding of the Labour Party in 1900, the party right out of the door exploded in popularity do to Liberal disenfranchisement. Leader Keir Hardie and his party soared in the 1904 election to become the Leader of the Opposition but dropped to third place in 1909. Even though rising in popularity, Labour was found to be difficult to be electable and reach Britons across the board. After Hardie resigned in 1909, Arthur Henderson became leader until 1918 and tried to soften the parties image. But only the gains were minimal, especially with Chamberlains' social policies and tax cuts putting confidence in the British people. But the empire was becoming rusty. and the British people wanted change. Ramsay MacDonald became the next leader of Labour in 1918, MacDonald took a more radical approach to reform by scrapping Clause IV, adopting free trade policies, promoting free enterprise, Scottish and Welsh federalism, and embracing social corporatism. All while still keeping it's strong republican and progressive views. Moving the party from the left, to left of centre. With the country hitting into an even harder recession by 1919, Chamberlain and the rest of the Tories could not fix the mess of the rusting empire. So came the 1923 election, MacDonald ran on a platform of redistribution of the wealth redistribution, Irish sovereignty negotiation, implementation of a National Insurance program. Labour skyrocketed from 193 seats to 281 seats, with Tories left with 270 seats and the Liberals with 115 seats. A Labour-Liberal coalition was formed, and by April 7th of 1924, under agreement with David Lloyd George of the Liberals, merged the two parties to create the Democratic Party. A big tent predominantly made up of a social democratic majority and a socially liberal minority.

Basically the Democrats are made up of mostly centrist third way New Labourers and centrist Liberal Democrats from our timeline, a moderate to moderately left party.
Which is fine, but Clegg is on the Orange Book, fiscally conservative end of the Liberal Democrats. One of the main reasons he is a liberal democrat is because of the Tories stance on Europe.

If the Conservatives in this TL aren't raving Eurosceptics there would be no reason for Clegg to switch allegiances.
 
Probably the most nitpicky comment in the history of nitpicky comments: 1144 Duke Street (the Whig headquarters) is built on an old industrial yard and the address in question is rather small and probably not fitting for a major party. Unless, of course, it was developed differently.

That aside, how exactly did the Confederate States become that large?
 

Asami

Banned
ylwDnJT.png


A half-serious, half-funny thing for my New Deal TL. Not canon, of course.

So, this is Andrew Fairfax of the Confederation of New Anglia... a monarchy that takes a confederation of Americans, Brits, Aussies, New Zealanders and Canadians on a far-off planet.

Imagine the British Empire but incredibly small on an oceanic planet, and one that never left 1885.
 
Thank you, although my mastery of Inkscape is...non-existent, and I had to resort to good-old fashioned MSPaint to get the riding map (brought to you by Dave's Redistricting App) to look snazzy.
How did you get Dave's Redistricting App to work? I've been trying everything and nothing is working for me.
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top