Feedback!
First and foremost, I would like to congratulate our Emperor and Autocract for his birthday. Happy day to you, your Majesty. Rhomania rejoices!
Now, on to that nice update!
I personally suggest you to fix all this mess in the Third Council of Nicaea, using Basil of Caesarea's approach on philosophy and theology which predominated during the Empire's early years.
First and foremost, I would like to congratulate our Emperor and Autocract for his birthday. Happy day to you, your Majesty. Rhomania rejoices!
Now, on to that nice update!
This guy tried to depose Alexius IOTL, didn't he? Or am I getting my history confused? Is there any specific reason for him to support Alexius ITTL or is he building up a plot with Isaac the Younger to depose the Emperor?The following year, Alexios sent across his loyal general Nikēphoros Bryennios, who, acting in concert with Isaac the Younger, managed to capture the Normans in a pincer attack and destroy their forces at the Battle of Kaulōnia in Kalabria (i).
A major change from 1.0 here. IIRC Alexius fought and defeated Henry's army. I remember something regarding Pisa in all of this, but the city isn't mentioned at all. Also, did Milan support Henry's campaign?By September, he was in Apulia, and then, four weeks later, had arrived in Rome at the head of a massive army. Now it was Henry’s turn to flee, and Alexios Komnenos found himself the first Eastern Roman Emperor to set foot in the Eternal City since the seventh century (iii).
I like this part. You managed to integrate very well two traditional problems of Rhomania, although it's entertaining to see that while the Patriarch supports a more rational approach of theology and education, the Empress Mother goes on to call him a heretic. I'm also looking forward to seeing how the future Emperors will solve the inner conflict between the Constantinopolitans and the Anatolian aristocracy, i.e. if it ever gets solved. Very interesting indeed.Dalassēnē, a headstrong and intelligent woman, had found her match in the Patriarch John Italos (ix), one of the few characters of Constantinople who could equal her for that brand of self-confidence that often tips into arrogance. In the summer of 1084, the two had come to repeated blows over the education of Alexios’ young son Michael Komnenos, who was under the tuition of one Basilios, a pupil of Italos. Dalassēnē considered the influence of Basilios and Italos upon her grandson to be corrosive and near heretical, and had tried to arrange for him to be sent out to the old Komnenid estates in Anatolia for his education (x), but this had been strongly resisted by Alexios’ wife, the Empress Euphemia, a born metropolitan and the daughter of Michael Psellos. Tensions had rapidly begun to rise, splitting the Imperial family. Ignatios gleefully records that by the time of Alexios’ return to the city, his wife and mother had not spoken for weeks.
Great! Finally an Emperor who undoubtly supports the "External Wisdom".Alexios himself had been raised in the philosophical tradition, and was eager to throw himself back into intellectual culture once freed from the burdens of war in Italy- accordingly, in 1087 we find him writing a handbook for the layman setting out the basic philosophical concepts behind the teachings of Christ (xii). The controversy continued to simmer, but quietly.
Oh no. Are Anna and Michael/John going to be enemies as per OTL? I have always liked your approach on their friendship in 1.0.Dalassēnē was quick to seize her advantage, and immediately proclaimed Basil Palaiologos to be a Caesar. Michael suddenly found himself being sidelined from politics by his own grandmother, and things became worse still, when, in the summer of 1090, Anna delivered Basil a healthy daughter (xiv). Michael was now thirteen and his family should have begun making active efforts to find him an eligible princess, but little was done. The young prince found himself alone and almost friendless, with his only constant companion being his eunuch tutor Basilios.
What of Bryennios? Did he support Isaac?Accordingly, in 1092, he invaded the Balkans at the head of a large army, emphasising carefully his loyalty to his brother and nephew. The governors of the Balkan Themata did little to hinder Isaac’s passage, and, approaching Adrianople, he accepted the surrender of the Tagma of Thrace. The Palaiologoi family indignantly protested their own loyalty to the Komnenoi, and Alexios Komnenos himself was wheeled out from obscurity to attempt to reassure the Constantinopolitans of his trust for them (xviii).
Very well-written paragraph. Nice to see Isaac saving his nephew Michael. One would think he would put his own sons on the succession line. What happens to Anna? Does she go with Palaiologos to Sicily or does she abandon him to his fate? Also, what are the impacts of Dalassense's death on Emperor Alexius? IOTL, he looked up to her as if she was a goddess.The urban mob, though, had other ideas. Try as he might, George Palaiologos was quite unable to convince them of his earnest intentions (xix), and, as Isaac’s army approached, took the decision to head west to throw himself upon the mercy of the Katepánō. Isaac, for his part, was magnanimous, offering Palaiologos lands in western Sicily, far away from Constantinople.
The Emirates of Damascus, Aleppo and Mosul? I would like to see an update on that too.The events of 1084-1092 have baffled modern scholars, and there is a tendency by many to dismiss their significance (xxi). Rather, these writers point to events in the East, where the Seljuk Sultanate’s hold over the Levant first splintered, and then collapsed altogether, in the same period (xxii).
Do I see an early Byzantine Renaissance coming? The victory of philosophy over religion will have a huge impact in the Roman 12th century. I can see a Patriarch trying to get more powerful by criticizing rationalism to its core, maybe generating a major debate in Constantinople. It would be interesting to see some die-hard philosophers such as Plethon. You know, venerating the old Pagan gods and ignoring the Church completely?Alternatively, they look north to Germany, where a process of political centralisation had begun that would be the dominant theme in German history for the next two hundred years (xxiii). These historians are fools. The triumph of Michael Komnenos marks the victory of the philosophers in the battle for the Imperial soul that had been fought since the death of Basil II.
I personally suggest you to fix all this mess in the Third Council of Nicaea, using Basil of Caesarea's approach on philosophy and theology which predominated during the Empire's early years.
What an evil cliffhanger BG.For events of the coup had shaken Alexios Komnenos out of the stupor of depression, and back into vigorous action. And it was not a moment too soon.
Can we see a bit more on this, please?xxiii. This is the genesis for what will become the Holy German Empire. At this stage, it consists mostly of Henry IV going round and battling with various lords.
Last edited: