An Alternate 90s Comics? Very interesting... I know way more about DC in thia era than Marvel, but still, already looks like things will be different here given there's no Image Comics.
Byrne won't return to Marvel as long Shooter's running the show so Next Men will stay at Dark Horse. And I just realized that I've just butterflied his Sensational She-Hulk run and prevented Iron Fist's resurrection (which happened in the Namor title under Byrne.)Jim Starlin brings Dreadstar to Epic, leading to Dave Cockrum using the label to sell his own successful title- Futurians. Leading to Lee, McFalane Etc having an outlet for their creativity on projects they own. Perhaps Byrne can be persuaded to publish Next Men there. Maybe TMNT goes there instead of to Image later?
X-Men will still be debuting on Fox Kids, but the 90s Fantastic Four and Iron Man animated series are still in play.Is Paramounts network going to take off? I remember reading Stan Lee was trying to pitch series at them. Maybe X-Men is made there instead of at Fox, and the marvel Animation universe actually truly comes together? Maybe DS9 is Paramounts headline show instead of Voyager?
I'm trying to keep Marvel from expanding too fast, but could a Marvel CCG be a possibility?If Marvel are looking to expand perhaps an eyeball falls on Magic: The Gathering and TSR as ways to expand - Marvel had beeen involved in the D&D cartoon after all.
The New Universe is dead, for now. However, the PITT is butterflied so there is always a possibility for a return.I wonder if New Universe will get revived now Jim owns the place? Perhaps his own Epic line?
I'm trying to keep Shooter away from the editorial side as much a possible so it will be DeFalco will be dealing with the artists and writers on a day-to-day basis.Something like the Image is still possible or in any case a massive exodus of artist from Marvel to DC...Shooter was not easy to work and there were 'tension' between him and people like Byrne.
Said that, if DeFalco is basically the defacto editor in chief, thinks can be really much more smooth
How's this for a tease. The first major butterfly to hit DC will be in November 1992. Any guesses as to what that will be?An Alternate 90s Comics? Very interesting... I know way more about DC in thia era than Marvel, but still, already looks like things will be different here given there's no Image Comics.
Byrne won't return to Marvel as long Shooter's running the show so Next Men will stay at Dark Horse. And I just realized that I've just butterflied his Sensational She-Hulk run and prevented Iron Fist's resurrection (which happened in the Namor title under Byrne.)
X-Men will still be debuting on Fox Kids, but the 90s Fantastic Four and Iron Man animated series are still in play.
I'm trying to keep Marvel from expanding too fast, but could a Marvel CCG be a possibility?
The New Universe is dead, for now. However, the PITT is butterflied so there is always a possibility for a return.
I'm trying to keep Shooter away from the editorial side as much a possible so it will be DeFalco will be dealing with the artists and writers on a day-to-day basis.
How's this for a tease. The first major butterfly to hit DC will be in November 1992. Any guesses as to what that will be?
You can say that. *whistles*Superman has a quiet day in Metropolis?
How's this for a tease. The first major butterfly to hit DC will be in November 1992. Any guesses as to what that will be?
The fact we get a Superman film in 1995 is something of a clue for those that know the behind-the-scenes history of DC in the early 90s. How do you fancy the idea of Brendan Fraser as the Man of Steel, by the way? I though he had the height and build for the role, and I think that he could pull of the Superman/Clark dichotomy well.DC Comics in 92?
Death and Return of Superman is what I'd wager. Avoided or handled better here, one can only hope. Superman's sales never recovered after that little stunt... it was one of the moves that started DC down the long road to basically being just "Batman and friends".
The fact we get a Superman film in 1995 is something of a clue for those that know the behind-the-scenes history of DC in the early 90s. How do you fancy the idea of Brendan Fraser as the Man of Steel, by the way? I though he had the height and build for the role, and I think that he could pull of the Superman/Clark dichotomy well.
I have a very low opinion of the "Death of Superman." While it gave us Conner Kent and Steel, it was also a major catalyst for the event-driven stories that dominated the decade and inflated the collectors bubble. While I cannot tell you what happens, changing it will have massive ripple effect on other DC properties as "Emerald Twilight" in the Green Lantern title spun off from "Reign of the Supermen."
(Here's a spoiler nugget: John Stewart will feature as the GL in the coming Claremont/Byrne Justice League run because GL writer Gerard Jone will be using Hal in Justice League International.
I'm going to try find a way to bring in Steel and Superboy some other way because of my love for the characters, and I'm still deciding on what to do about Emerald Twilight. It should be worth noting that the story was originally pitched and solicited was not the one that saw print so the story is very butterfly-prone. If Hal got a heroic sendoff like Barry Allen did, I don't think that it would have split the fanbase as badly as it did.I'm with you that I love Steel and Superboy, and I'm even the rare guy who loved Emerald Twilight... but there's gotta be a better way then the story arc that tanked Superman, and turned death into a revolving door in comics.
I'm going to try find a way to bring in Steel and Superboy some other way because of my love for the characters, and I'm still deciding on what to do about Emerald Twilight. It should be worth noting that the story was originally pitched and solicited was not the one that saw print so the story is very butterfly-prone. If Hal got a heroic sendoff like Barry Allen did, I don't think that it would have split the fanbase as badly as it did.