Let me rephrase his rhetoric is worthy of 4chan if it had a YouTube comments section which hosted that weird right wing cousin you have's Facebook postsThe king is so vehemenent in his ideals I almost.thought it was satire
Let me rephrase his rhetoric is worthy of 4chan if it had a YouTube comments section which hosted that weird right wing cousin you have's Facebook postsThe king is so vehemenent in his ideals I almost.thought it was satire
I've read some neo-monarchist philosophers before (in an attempt to see whether they have any good points - in short, they diagnose some real problems with modern society together with other things that aren't problems, and propose solutions that'd make things even worse on balance); I completely buy his sincerity.The king is so vehemenent in his ideals I almost.thought it was satire
My issue wasn't in the philosophy just the presentation, felt a dash strawmannyI've read some neo-monarchist philosophers before (in an attempt to see whether they have any good points - in short, they diagnose some real problems with modern society together with other things that aren't problems, and propose solutions that'd make things even worse on balance); I completely buy his sincerity.
Well, frankly, that's a common issue in this thread - the people open up far too quickly to the interviewer and readily summarize their political philosophies. In-universe, I suppose we could say the interviews are summarized and excerpted? It's been a while since I've read the European Empire entry (and it's a long thread... got a link?), but I don't remember any unusual problems there.My issue wasn't in the philosophy just the presentation, felt a dash strawmanny
It's.most.likely internal.bias on my partWell, frankly, that's a common issue in this thread - the people open up far too quickly to the interviewer and readily summarize their political philosophies. In-universe, I suppose we could say the interviews are summarized and excerpted? It's been a while since I've read the European Empire entry (and it's a long thread... got a link?), but I don't remember any unusual problems there.
Well, frankly, that's a common issue in this thread - the people open up far too quickly to the interviewer and readily summarize their political philosophies. In-universe, I suppose we could say the interviews are summarized and excerpted? It's been a while since I've read the European Empire entry (and it's a long thread... got a link?), but I don't remember any unusual problems there.
Another idea for a privately-owned society: the City of London, with what we colloquially know as the London metropolis known ITTL as Westminster. Unlike Guatemala, London meets the requirements of the stereotypical evil privately-owned society: a democracy where massive banks and corporations can vote (and their votes matter most), where the economy is based on colonial exploits[1], laundering money for criminals, terrorists and dictators, and acting as a tax haven for the world's corporations, meaning they are effectively impossible to tax directly.
[1] I'm thinking of giving London its own, de facto colonies across the former British Empire. Maybe they even own parts of the Congo directly.
The colonies or Free Ports are coastal cities/trade points that have been leased or purchased from strapped governments. Most governments would want them back for the tax revenue but owe the City a lot of money and need the access to the financial markets and resources.
I like it. The big issue is how to collapse the UK in such a way that the City of London becomes a fully sovereign state. I want to avoid a revolution, Nazis, or anything 20th century.
I had an idea for a military trans-national government, like executive action that has its own citizenship and little embassies throughout africa. Or a less nonsensical option, one of the great mercenary companies of the renaissance (Landsknecht? Urbino?, maybe the great English company from earlier) puts pressure on the HRE in a moment of weakness and exacts an electorship.
There's always the old nugget of a surviving Templar Order that eventually becomes so powerful that it becomes a fully sovereign entity. All its monasteries / castles / banks / other holdings become sovereign land, treates as embassies are within other countries.
The Knights of Malta are still fully sovereign.
I heard some talk then about "Vatican City invades the Sovereign Order of Malta!!!"And also, when Pope Francis says "jump!", the Grand Master he doesn't like resigns.
Aww, but that's a official conscripted military. I was set on a smaller "weird" professional mercenary groupCawnpore, I think?