I didn't even know you could link from an emoji! Nice.I put the link, it takes you there if you hit the thumbs-up
I didn't even know you could link from an emoji! Nice.I put the link, it takes you there if you hit the thumbs-up
Do you want to pick/run the next contest? If not, I'm happy to do it.Hmm. We seem to have a tie between myself and @FriendlyGhost .
I accept victory.It should be @Meshakhad because everyone voted for themself and the organizer voted for FriendlyGhost. Atleast thats my two cents.
Personally I never vote for my own entry. In fact when I have an entry in a contest I usually don't vote, unless there's another entry which is so very good that it deserves my vote.
We could have a rule which says: 'do not vote for your own entry' but there's a danger then that we will get very few votes overall. This particular contest had a lot more entries than previous ones, so I suggest we wait to see how the next one goes before introducing a new rule. (That's just my opinion - if the majority opinion differs, let's go with it.)
Edit: we could have this as a tie-breaker, perhaps? If there's a tie, 'own-votes' are subtracted?
@Meshakhad - I like the new contest - should produce some interesting work!
I dont think it is a rule. Just something some of us debated. In past threads nearly everyone voted for their own entries, myself included, and it made it difficult to find a winner.@Count of Crisco I have a question about this contest. On the main thread, there seemed to be a lot of discussion about not allowing contestants to vote for themselves. Is this rule going to apply to the debunking article contest, or is it too soon to call?