Thread highjack alert.
It sounds to me that we are of the same mind in the Spruance v. Halsey debate--I don't sense any disagreement there. I find your Prost/Senna analogy an interesting one and quite on-the-money besides, although is some ways I wonder if Lauda/Hunt would be even more appropriate--regardless, the comparison is between Calculation and Emotion, or as Mike Moorcock would say, Reason and Romance. Perhaps we could veer into Sci-Fi here and say it is like Picard and Kirk. ;-)
Thx for agreeing.
I was just a fraction young for Hunt & Lauda (tho I was aware of F1, I wasn't really a fan until after Gilles was killed), so I can't comment there. As for Kirk & Picard, they're so much a product of broader social issues, as stand-ins for U.S. policy & attitude, & so driven by the producers' goals, it's hard to judge fairly. Can we safely say Kirk was passion personified, & Picard passion tempered? I'd say that's a fair assessment. I'm not (quite) so sure I'd parallel him tightly with Prost, tho; I got the sense he was governed by tradition as much as reason, in a lot of his actions. (The conflict between his very British/RN approach & his notional French background was no help.
)
I have always wondered how '44 would have gone if Halsey and Spruance were swapped through the entire year: Halsey in June with the Battle of the Philippine Sea and Spruance in October with Leyte. I think Halsey would have more aggressively pursued the IJN carriers in June, surface threats be-damned, which would have left Spruance in a perfect place to take out Center Force and a weaker than OTL Northern Force at Leyte by simply parking off the NE of Samar and letting them come at him one-at-a-time. Keep the Carriers farther east, in a position where they can provide CAP for TF 34 blocking the exit route from San Bernardino but from where they can still effectively reach north when needed to take on the IJN Northern Force. It is defensive, certainly, but it allows concentration of power where and when it is needed and frees the entire fleet for maneuvers as required. Also consider the possibility that Spruance may have released McCain earlier or later than Halsey did and it is very possible that TG 58.1 (OTL 38.1) would be available during the battle.
I'll agree with most of that, with a proviso I'm too rusty on the details to be certain.
(I've really, really gotten too far away from reading in this area these days.
) My big concern with such a swap is giving Halsey orders to defend the beaches (Saipan?), when presented with an opportunity to pursue. Spruance stayed, & was criticized for it--but AIUI, had he gone, he risked blowing up the operation, having his ass handed to him, or both.
I have a strong feeling Halsey'd have pursued, & we'd be roasting him for that, instead--& at a place that could've been a lot more consequential in strategic terms
We should note one thing: had MacArthur been pushed under a bus, where he belonged,
it would all be moot.
There'd have been no invasion, & Fifth Fleet would've been guarding landings at Okinawa, or Iwo Jima (depending on how well things went).
On Ramius, I don't recall it from the book, either, but Ryan did write a defense of Halsey...& IDK how Clancy (who appears to use Ryan as his avatar) got to that.
(OTOH, he could've been using the remark to show just who Ramius was: a Sov Spruance. That fits with the rest of his actions: cool & calculating to the very, very edge.)