What's the most implausible AH ever?

Drakkon,

Sure they were.

Of course the Draka timeline doesn't have the experience that produced those designs. It's not just a matter of technology or industrial technique, it's also a matter of knowing what capabilities are desirable and which work. I can design and then build a Centurian in 1936 because I know all about the tank battles that occurred between 1939 and 2009.

The Draka have no actual experience in armored warfare beyond that of armored cars and yet can design a Centurian. The Draka have no actual experience in aerial combat beyond that of zeppelins and biplanes and yet can design a Whirlwind or A-38. That's ASB.

Wargames and theoretical analysis can only take you so far, the rubber needs to hit the road sooner or later. Yet Stirling show no comprehension of this fact throughout the entire repulsive Draka series.


Bill

The ASB's really take flight in the third volume of the series, when both the Alliance and Draka seem to have made a qualitative leap of about 100 years in technology...again with no experience or tactical or strategic doctrine to support it. Nothing in The Stone Dogs is suggested as an outgrowth or evolution of the technology in the previous two books. I could buy Draka genetic engineering to a point (given their long history with eugenics the Draka logically would be the first ones to figure out DNA and how to make it work for them--but then somehow these anachronistic throwbacks figure out how to do things we can't even do in 2009 OTL by the 1970's!!!) but everything else just clanks hard.

I like Stirling; the story itself is good and his later non-Draka work is much better but I couldn't suspend disbelief long enough to let this one slide. me.
 
The ASB's really take flight in the third volume of the series, when both the Alliance and Draka seem to have made a qualitative leap of about 100 years in technology...again with no experience or tactical or strategic doctrine to support it. Nothing in The Stone Dogs is suggested as an outgrowth or evolution of the technology in the previous two books. I could buy Draka genetic engineering to a point (given their long history with eugenics the Draka logically would be the first ones to figure out DNA and how to make it work for them--but then somehow these anachronistic throwbacks figure out how to do things we can't even do in 2009 OTL by the 1970's!!!) but everything else just clanks hard.

I like Stirling; the story itself is good and his later non-Draka work is much better but I couldn't suspend disbelief long enough to let this one slide. me.

I haven't read the Draka books, but can I ask anyone who's read them, the ASB AH aside, are they worth reading? Do they have good stories, characters, writing, etc?
 
True, but they were in constant contact with the Golden Horde by river and horseback, and those Mongol-type riders travelled far and fast: excellent vectors of disease, if you ask me. It's quite likely that the temporary Mongol unification of most of Asia helped the plague spread OTL. (Actually, I'm not sure of your point. Are you arguing Russians should have survived in YSR because of their low population density? Or the low density of OTL indicate that low density doesn't stop the advance of the plague? You can't have it both ways! :confused: )

And you don't say anything about the plague's seeming inability to cross salt water...

The point was that the low density hindered the spread of the plague into Asia at large. Smaller towns and a weaker trade network meant that the plague didn't move as quickly, as in Poland. Where Russia's trade network existed, it linked directly into Scandinavia (which caused the plague to spread there).

As for salt water, sea travel was much slower and more uncertain then, allowing for a disease to run its course aboard an infected ship before reaching its destination. Surviving crew members would have immunity and it was not unheard of for most of a ship's crew (and in some cases the entire crew) to die before the ship made port. Not until the invention of the caravel were there ships fast enough to spread most human diseases effectively across large expanses of ocean. The Black Sea is a confounding variable in that there were also land routes around it and the Bosporus isn't exactly a formidable sea barrier.




Which would lead to something more like the Islam-conquered but still with a large native population scenario in the "Gate of Worlds" (Silverberg), or perhaps like the Europeans in Latin America, not the total obliteration of YSR. Would have been interesting in itself...

A more realistic scenario would have the plague spread, and hit _both_ Muslims and Christians. Due to low population density, Muslims in places like Iran, Central Asia, parts of NW Africa, Arabia, etc. do much better than in densely populated areas in W. Anatolia, Egypt, Iraq, etc. Similarly, the French, Germans, Italians, etc. are devastated while Balkan and Eastern European nations do better. New forms of Islam come out of the desert, as they often do, and restore order and repopulate the Nile and the Tigri-Eurphrates, while the small surviving fragments of western Europe remain chaotic, and the Poles move west into Germany while struggling in the east against the Russians...

Bruce

Superior sanitation saved the Moslem communities in most cases (albeit not all of them) in OTL. Where Christians and Moslems lived side by side there were die-offs in both populations. There may have been a specific vulnerability in the European population which caused the plague of YRS to strike them so much harder (it clearly isn't the bubonic plague we know).
 
I haven't read the Draka books, but can I ask anyone who's read them, the ASB AH aside, are they worth reading? Do they have good stories, characters, writing, etc?

Strictly my opinion, but I found the characters and the psychological studies involved very compelling. Disgusting in most places, but compelling. Marching through Georgia was one of the few stories I've ever read in which I hoped the Nazis would win.

Read Conquistador if you want something similar, but less depraved. Read ISOT for a good adventure and if you want to see how a decent society can grow from nothing. ;)
 

Japhy

Banned
"Lee of the Union" it was a date by date timeline written on the old othertimelines message board, continued on other sites from its 1861 POD all the way to the present. Zero butterflies, Constant Progressive Liberal and Ameriwanking, and absolutely no understanding of the events included within it.
 
Superior sanitation saved the Moslem communities in most cases (albeit not all of them) in OTL. Where Christians and Moslems lived side by side there were die-offs in both populations. There may have been a specific vulnerability in the European population which caused the plague of YRS to strike them so much harder (it clearly isn't the bubonic plague we know).

Actually, the ASB nature of the plague is given a little shout-out at the end of the book, with the scientists discussing how in the world this plague was so deadly. A bunch of theories are discussed, including some specific vulnerability in Europeans or a mutated disease, but no one really knows. In any event, like any good sci-fi writer (which, after all, KSR was first), he's not necessarily concerned so much with how this happens, but what it leads to.
 
The Draka have no actual experience in armored warfare beyond that of armored cars and yet can design a Centurian. The Draka have no actual experience in aerial combat beyond that of zeppelins and biplanes and yet can design a Whirlwind or A-38. That's ASB.

Actually, they have a decades-long guerilla war in Afganistan after 1919, which specificly spurs the development of ground attack aircraft.

Also, border clashes with the Soviet Union in the 1930s (analogous to Lake Khasan, Khalkhyn Gol etc.) leads to the Draka recognizing the need for a next-generation tank to compete with the Soviet tanks, particularly the KV series heavy tanks.

The Draka are only 3-5 years ahead of everyone else. I agree that is unlikely, but not ASB.
 
Actually, they have a decades-long guerilla war in Afganistan after 1919, which specificly spurs the development of ground attack aircraft.

Also, border clashes with the Soviet Union in the 1930s (analogous to Lake Khasan, Khalkhyn Gol etc.) leads to the Draka recognizing the need for a next-generation tank to compete with the Soviet tanks, particularly the KV series heavy tanks.

The Draka are only 3-5 years ahead of everyone else. I agree that is unlikely, but not ASB.

Yes I agree with you, as can you see from my username I also enjoy reading about the Draka.
 
Actually, they have a decades-long guerilla war in Afganistan after 1919, which specificly spurs the development of ground attack aircraft.


Drakkon,

Yeah, because ground attack aircraft are so useful in guerilla war situations. Just ask the US in Iraq and US/NATO/USSR in Afghanistan.

And a ground assault aircraft designed to hunt down rifle-armed guerillas is automatically going to be just as good against a regular army with organic AA equipment and fighter cover, right? :rolleyes:

Also, border clashes with the Soviet Union in the 1930s (analogous to Lake Khasan, Khalkhyn Gol etc.) leads to the Draka recognizing the need for a next-generation tank to compete with the Soviet tanks, particularly the KV series heavy tanks.

Bollocks. First, the KV series wouldn't have been in use that early. Second, the same kind of clashes in the OTL didn't spur the development of better Japanese tanks or point to the many deficiencies in Soviet light tank designs. Third, a border skirmish involving a division or two isn't Barbarossa involving army groups.

I notice you didn't bother to come up with an excuse for the Draka's better fighter designs.

The Draka are only 3-5 years ahead of everyone else. I agree that is unlikely, but not ASB.

Once again, it's not just the design. It's the wholly necessary operational history of previous weapons which lead to the design. The Draka simply don't have it. Apart from their primary role of terrorizing slaves, the Draka's armed forces have only fought natives, engaged in a colonial war with Tsarist Russia, and tackled the Ottomans in a-WW1. Yet they show up in a-WW2 with an army with both 1950s technology and the ability to use that technology correctly.

You may be gulled by Stirling's lush helpings of lesbian, S&M, bestiality, and gun porn, but anyone who take time to think about the Draka series cannot help but be amazed at how ASB it is on a myriad of levels. From an AH standpoint, the Draka series is just as bad as Harrison's Stars and Stripes.


Bill
 
Not a book, but still - take a look at this fan campaign for IL-2 Sturmovik (which already had Luft'46-styled missions in it's last expansion) :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1rBa_rk9n8

So, according to the vid :

The Germans just come to their senses and oust Hitler out of the country for no apparent reason ? The Nazis and all other extremist movements plagueing the early 1930s Weimar Republic just disappear into thin air ? Germany becomes once again a prosperous starry-eyed example of ol' European democracy ? And apparently, Stalin, being bored, says to himself : "Ah, what the hell ? Lets invade Europe just for the lulz !!!" And then the bold and brave nations of free and righteous western and central Europe hold hands together and morph into a quasi-NATO/quasi-EU and kick Soviet ass with suddenly advanced 1940s aircraft ? :rolleyes: Yeah, totally possible... :D

I smell an epic fail... ;) Heh, even one of the commenters wrote : "Nice job, historically almost impossible. But still very nicely done."

And... since when was Lenin named "Nickoli" ?! Gaaahhh !!! :mad: Did. Not. Do. The. Research. :mad:
 
Butterflies only float so far, though. By that logic any form of prediction of what could happen is impossible. Any outcome is as reasonable as any other.

Well, frankly, to be anal, yes: after more than a few decades the exponential divergences will mean anything IS as reasonable and all IS speculative. ;)

That said, I can willingly suspend disbelief up to a point. Several centuries is a wee bit beyond that point for me.


Also keep in mind that medieval Europe was a much less resource-intensive society than any society today. It was not a major importer or exporter except for minor luxury items enjoyed by the elite. It had almost no diplomatic presence beyond the Near East. Its loss would be noticed by the Islamic traders who made their money off the European elite, but once other trade networks are established (and they are early on in the book--a stronger presence in Africa and greater trade with the Chinese and Indians) they'll make their money elsewhere. The population is low so its impact is correspondingly low, and even though the croplands go wild and the domesticated animals go feral there's still no major change in their contribution to the equation.
Western Europe, Germany, Britain, yes, sure.

But Constantinople (specifically mentioned in the first chapters as depopulated by the plague), a major trade and travel hub with its land and sea trade networks all throughout the Med, into the ME, across the silk road...hard to isolate that. It's a Butterfly Superhighway! ;)

If you've just wiped out C-town, yet Damascus gets off lightly, you need some serious butterfly nets in place. Instead the plague seemed to conveniently stop at White Christian territory, save for a few token places like Al Andalus. Had the plague really tore up Damascus and Baghdad and Egypt, etc., It'd hold up better AH-wise, IMO.

Though admittedly the goal of his novel was to explore the affects of Europe on the world, not to explore counterfactuals, so as a POD it works...and better from a literary standpoint than time-traveling Black Panthers with Bioweapons. :D


Based upon what empirical evidence? Homeostasis is homeostasis throughout the entire human species. Over a very long period of time, I could see this, with radically different outcome for human evolution among other things. But not over only a few hundred years.
Admittedly I'm not one of the "fanatics" I mentioned, nor an expert on biochemistry, so you'll have to ask those devout I about their underlying reasoning. But simple reasoning and just plain common sense you can address their point: millions of individual sperm cells, all distinct genetically, churning around. If Mom and Dad are delayed by even a minute then any one of those could logically do the deed. Change the ARW and Lighthorse Henry Lee and his wife might just have a girl. But even if "R.E. Lee" is born, you can't guarantee that he'll be the same genetically as OTL.

But for myself, I'm willing to suspend disbelief up to a point. RE Lee born into a No ARW TL? Sure, I'll play along. FDR? A little too much of a stretch for me.


Perhaps that one is a bit of a stretch, since Portugese and Dutch attempts at exploiting Japan helped create the impetus for the Tokugawa Shogunate to begin with (although Ieyasu himself was not the one who closed Japan; that was his grandson IIRC). But substitute the Moslems for the Europeans and you could get a similar (albeit not identical) outcome. Japan is isolated from much of the world except China until the 16th century. What happens in Europe doesn't matter squat to them.
More than a bit IMO. With Three Centuries, even if we completely discount the extreme butterfly theorists, the simple accumulation of small changes in day-to-day interactions of day-to-day people will start to affect things, and far faster than you might think when there are established trade networks across Asia. For example, Aziz in Damascus, who lost his lucrative trade route to Constantinople when the plague wiped out the city, now looks into caravans to the east. He doesn't marry that Egyptian trader's daughter like OTL, but instead marries that Mughal trader's daughter (immediate generational offspring changes). Plus there's the members of his caravan who now go east rather than west, affect the lives of those Hindu merchants they meet who in turn via third/fourth/fifth degrees affect merchants in Xiankang who affect people in China...in a couple of generations or less changes propagate to Japan, particularly since Japan was in no way totally isolated or cordoned off from China at this stage.

Now, overall historical trends may still arguably come to dominate, but things will start to vary quickly, including royal bloodlines. Overall China remains China, though the little changes may quickly add up if, say, a certain eunic is now fabulously wealthier than OTL due to the changed trade, meaning different factions take control TTL and bend the Emperor's ear towards different projects, different wives/concubines, support of different regions or families, etc. China culturally and overall politically in a hundred years is pretty much indistinguishable from OTL, but the changes will likely mean that a totally different Emperor (with different objectives) is on the throne, one perhaps better or worse than OTL. China may be better able to resist a barbarian assault that hurt the Empire OTL, but conversely may be worse off against an assault that failed OTL.

Japan, same: the Feudal States will still clash, though maybe a different region dominates, or maybe gets unified sooner or later than OTL under some Shogun. Oh, and I do believe I mentioned something about the possibility of "some" Great Shogun logically arising in YoR&S. :p Just not Ieyasu.


A lesser author would not have been able to pull it off at all.
Fully agreed. It remains a great book and highly recommended. I enjoyed it for its writing and its observations on life and culture...even if the AH had some glaring holes that would never be accepted on the pre-1900 board if presented as a TL.

But then again, he's the published author and we're a bunch of internet dweebs, so last laugh is on us! :eek:
 

Friedebarth

Banned
I can't remember, but once on the Althistory wiki (the wikia one) I came across an article for speedy deletion... ...said something about Jesus being a tranny and the world being ruled by the Goat Republic of Anarchist Punks in the year 1344... ...that's the most implausible thing I ever came across. I think it was just a test, though.
 
Yeah, because ground attack aircraft are so useful in guerilla war situations. Just ask the US in Iraq and US/NATO/USSR in Afghanistan.

Ground attack aircraft were and are used all the time in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

And a ground assault aircraft designed to hunt down rifle-armed guerillas is automatically going to be just as good against a regular army with organic AA equipment and fighter cover, right? :rolleyes:

Not "automatically", no. However there is no reason to assume that such aircraft would be ineffective either.


Bollocks. First, the KV series wouldn't have been in use that early. Second, the same kind of clashes in the OTL didn't spur the development of better Japanese tanks or point to the many deficiencies in Soviet light tank designs. Third, a border skirmish involving a division or two isn't Barbarossa involving army groups.

OTL, the KVs were designed in the late 30s as a direct result of lessons learned from the Spanish Civil war. They were used in the Winter War with Finland, so in fact they were in service by the late 30s.


I notice you didn't bother to come up with an excuse for the Draka's better fighter designs.

You are assuming I am making "excuses". On the contrary, I am simply playing Devil's advocate. I certainly agree that the Draka are not very realistic or likely, but to call their tech ASB is a bit too harsh.


Once again, it's not just the design. It's the wholly necessary operational history of previous weapons which lead to the design. The Draka simply don't have it. Apart from their primary role of terrorizing slaves, the Draka's armed forces have only fought natives, engaged in a colonial war with Tsarist Russia, and tackled the Ottomans in a-WW1. Yet they show up in a-WW2 with an army with both 1950s technology and the ability to use that technology correctly.

Prior to WW2 the only operational experiance of the U.S. millitary and the whole U.S. millitary/industrial complex was limited to police actions in Mexico/China/Hati etc, plus limited involvement in WW1.

Well then, according to your line of reasoning the U.S. should not have been capable of designing the P38, P47, or P51. All of those designs dated from 1938 to 1940.

My reading of Marching through Georgia left me with the impression that the Eagle/Rhino were capable weapon systems, but not more capable then any of the aforementioned U.S. designs.

As for learning to use the tech correctly; the Germans did so, and if they can do it so can the Draka. The Snakes are just as capable of observing the minor conflicts of the 1930s and drawing lessons from those conflicts as anyone else.


but anyone who take time to think about the Draka series cannot help but be amazed at how ASB it is on a myriad of levels.

Now that I agree with. The Draka's Political/Social/Historical background is indeed ASB. But not their technology IMHO.


From an AH standpoint, the Draka series is just as bad as Harrison's Stars and Stripes.

Nothing could be THAT bad!

You may be gulled by Stirling's lush helpings of lesbian, S&M, bestiality, and gun porn,

This statement is either trolling or very close to it. Please notice I can dissagree with You without resorting to personal attack or insult. Please reciprocate.
 
Bollocks. First, the KV series wouldn't have been in use that early. Second, the same kind of clashes in the OTL didn't spur the development of better Japanese tanks or point to the many deficiencies in Soviet light tank designs. Third, a border skirmish involving a division or two isn't Barbarossa involving army groups.

I notice you didn't bother to come up with an excuse for the Draka's better fighter designs.

Just a bit of interjection here: the Imperial Japanese Navy tended to get the lion's share of the R&D budget and Japan's limited resources. Tanks simply weren't a priority for the Japanese (although toward the end of the war OTL in anticipation of the US invasion they did produce some superior homegrown designs in limited numbers). Japanese R&D tended toward aircraft and naval design, not tanks and artillery. After the surge of 1941-1942 Japan basically gets its ass whooped by the US/British/etc. on land because of their lopsided arms policy. And once their production capacity can't keep up with their losses, even Japan's superior naval technology can't save them. So from the Draka vs. Japanese standpoint the conjecture holds up.

As for the Soviets, the most likely opponent facing the Draka would have been the BT series of tanks, which was equivalent in firepower and superior in speed to most other tanks operated during the 1930's. The BT's would have been lethal to most tanks operating on the Russian steppe during that period (its failure in the Winter War was due to the Finns taking advantage of the tank's restricted movement in heavily forested territory--blame that one on weak Soviet operational doctrine probably due to Stalin's keeping Zhukov in Siberia and Konev in a desk job while purging most of the other general officers who had a clue). Such conforntations would have led to an opponent developing something more stoutly-armored (and possibly ground attack aircraft as well).

So something like the Rhino/Hond combination, and the operational doctrine to support it (blitzkrieg was seen as early as the Spanish Civil War OTL when Nationalist forces devastated a Loyalist retreat from the Ebro in 1938) could have sprung from the creative minds of designers given the immense resources available to the Draka. Likewise, the Soviets given this threat would have spurred development of the T-34 and later marks to meet it.


You may be gulled by Stirling's lush helpings of lesbian, S&M, bestiality, and gun porn, but anyone who take time to think about the Draka series cannot help but be amazed at how ASB it is on a myriad of levels. From an AH standpoint, the Draka series is just as bad as Harrison's Stars and Stripes.

To be fair, this was what was selling in men's adventure fiction in the late 80's/early 90's, and Stirling at the time was a relatively new author. And again, as another poster pointed out in this thread with regard to another author, he's the pro; we're the dweebs on the Internet. ;)
 
Top