Most of it is, the westernmost part of the state is west of the Connecticut River and will thus be Dutch territory.Does that mean all of OTL's Massachusetts is included?
Most of it is, the westernmost part of the state is west of the Connecticut River and will thus be Dutch territory.Does that mean all of OTL's Massachusetts is included?
Ooh nice I really like the update!Snip
The Scandinavian colony will at the very least hold the north shore of the Great Lakes.Ooh nice I really like the update!
Ittl Montreal being the capital is interesting since it could mean that the great lakes are quite contested. I defo hope the great lakes are dominated by the Kalmar union's colony tho.
The Scandinavian colony will at the very least hold the north shore of the Great Lakes.
I plan on having the Upper Midwest be Nordic (same with the Hudson Bay), but the Lower Midwest is more unclear. The English will at the very least take everything south of the Ohio River and possibly a bit north of it, while the Dutch will likely expand into Ohio and Indiana. As for the French, they will not be involved in North America ITTL, their main colony is in Northern Brazil.With the population number and the most likely geographic spread I think it’s almost unavoidable that they end up dominate the Midwest and honestly likely the entire Mississippi basin, they will have population on the south shore of the Great Lakes by the 1750ties, giving them a edge on other expanding powers. Of course we could see territories and population lost to other powers.
Thought it do raise a question who will be the first to move into the Lower Mississippi and Hudson Bay. With Nordic St. Lawrence the French lack access to the fur trade and American interior, so they could go both way.
tbf I think controlling the upper midwest is already quite substantial for the Scandinavian colony.I plan on having the Upper Midwest be Nordic (same with the Hudson Bay), but the Lower Midwest is more unclear. The English will at the very least take everything south of the Ohio River and possibly a bit north of it, while the Dutch will likely expand into Ohio and Indiana. As for the French, they will not be involved in North America ITTL, their main colony is in Northern Brazil.
What part of India do you think Scandinavia should have the bulk of its activity in? I already have a few things planned for the Subcontinent (Dutch Bengal for example), but other than that India is still something I haven't really thought out. Historically the Danish bases in India were mainly in the south and Bengal, so if OTL were to be followed the Nordic Indian colonies would be in the south. That wouldn't have to be the case, though, somewhere like Northwestern India and Pakistan could also be an option for Nordic India. If you guys have any ideas, please let me know.
Just a thought, but the coalition could be somewhat split? Rivalries between allies are hardly unheard of, and I could see it happening here. France or the Netherlands could achieve their goals and dip, but honestly I could see the Scandinavians do it as well. Beat the Austrians, defend their interests and dip.Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you all. Now that the the Part 150 World Tour in EC/FC is done, I'm going to resume work on this timeline. One question I have regarding the 30 Years' War analogue would be who a plausible Habsburg ally would be. The Bourbons in France and the Oldenburgs in Scandinavia, The Netherlands and Poland-Lithuania are going to be opposed to the Habsburg alliance of Austria and Spain, but that seems like it could lead to a Habsburg screw, which is not my plan for the war's outcome. Thus, I need a realistic ally for the Habsburgs to have in the war. England, Muscovy/Russia and The Ottomans have all come to my mind, but each come with their own issues (England is Protestant, Russia is Orthodox and The Ottomans are both Muslim and historic Habsburg rivals). There are smaller Catholic countries in the HRE and Italy that could potentially work, but that might not balance the scales. Then again, countries did bow in and out of the conflict historically depending on the circumstances, so if one of the Habsburg opponents has achieved its goals or is facing internal strife they probably wouldn't stay in the war. Just trying to get things ironed out before I resume work.
Tbf you can have the thirty years war be a lot less centralised around a central conflict, instead we could see it being just being various nations Vs the hre/Hapsburgs. But if you want an ally the Russians do seem like the least worst option since I think England is more likely to sit it out if they don't like the alliance and the ottomans are just as likely to join in the beating.Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you all. Now that the the Part 150 World Tour in EC/FC is done, I'm going to resume work on this timeline. One question I have regarding the 30 Years' War analogue would be who a plausible Habsburg ally would be. The Bourbons in France and the Oldenburgs in Scandinavia, The Netherlands and Poland-Lithuania are going to be opposed to the Habsburg alliance of Austria and Spain, but that seems like it could lead to a Habsburg screw, which is not my plan for the war's outcome. Thus, I need a realistic ally for the Habsburgs to have in the war. England, Muscovy/Russia and The Ottomans have all come to my mind, but each come with their own issues (England is Protestant, Russia is Orthodox and The Ottomans are both Muslim and historic Habsburg rivals). There are smaller Catholic countries in the HRE and Italy that could potentially work, but that might not balance the scales. Then again, countries did bow in and out of the conflict historically depending on the circumstances, so if one of the Habsburg opponents has achieved its goals or is facing internal strife they probably wouldn't stay in the war. Just trying to get things ironed out before I resume work.