The Rise of the Tri-State World Order: A Timeline of Orwell's '1984'

I've seen enough "North Korea in Britain" treatments. It is far more frightening if one can make the Party's words true.

It is actually scary how easy it was to write this.

Seconded heartily. While the NK in GB treatment is more realistic, it's so common that I've grown sick of it, and the Party's word being true is a much darker approach. I approve of this work very much. :D

I kind of want to do a Oceania is Britain scenario... would anyone read it? :(

Great timeline , really interesting to see the scenario presented in this way, even if I do prefer Britain Alone interpretations of 1984. I personally have problems with the whole "The Threeist world" will last for ever but I guess that wouldn't really fit Orwell's work.


teg
 
One of the most enjoyable things I have read in awhile. If watching the world degrade into an Orwellian hell is enjoyable. Good job.
 
Good analysis. Very well written, and just plausible enough to be disturbing.

One of the most enjoyable things I have read in awhile. If watching the world degrade into an Orwellian hell is enjoyable. Good job.

You people are too kind for something which the last five pages (basically the last section plus some stuff on Oceanian currency) were written the night before it was due.

Now if somebody would read my other stuff.
 
Last edited:
Congrats for the nice work. While there are of course some quite far-fetched elements, I don't see anything that is more out there than the book itself.
 
Terrifying. I only wish I had had this much imagination. (Anything like the book would have to start in the 'thirties, wouldn't it?) I especially like how Ingsoc started out as a fascist, not socialist, movement. Well done, sir or madam!
 
Terrifying. I only wish I had had this much imagination. (Anything like the book would have to start in the 'thirties, wouldn't it?) I especially like how Ingsoc started out as a fascist, not socialist, movement. Well done, sir or madam!

Well, I didn't see a way for Britain to go socialist, and Fascism is very socialist economically. I thought that Fascism was the only logical route.
 
Here's my map of the scenario. :)

1984Final.png
 
Having re-read this several times now, I've come to the conclusion that it's now one of my favourite TLs - well done, indeed!
 
Damnit, you stole the same idea I had been planning and procrastinating for the better part of a year. Nice work though. It's probably for the best, since I'm woefully unlearned in Anglo-American PoDs. However so as to not let my work go to waste, I will still post my own studies of Eastasia and to a lesser extent Eurasia, which will unfortunately have to contradict your account, eps. in the case of the former superstate) when they are finished.

I wonder if your teacher is thinking "holy shit this guy is a genius", "holy shit I have to read 55 pages of fanwankery", or a combination of the two. :p
 
Last edited:
Damnit, you stole the same idea I had been planning and procrastinating for the better part of a year. Nice work though. It's probably for the best, since I'm woefully unlearned in Anglo-American PoDs. However so as to not let my work go to waste, I will still post my own studies of Eastasia and to a lesser extent Eurasia, which will unfortunately have to contradict your account, eps. in the case of the former superstate) when they are finished.

I wonder if your teacher is thinking "holy shit this guy is a genius", "holy shit I have to read 55 pages of fanwankery", or a combination of the two. :p

I got a hundred on it, so I think she likes it. She sounded interested during the presentation.
 
Why? Filler

I wanted a PoD not too far from the original publishing of the novel (1948), and the need to create three blocs did not permit any way to make Britain or, perhaps even more importantly, the USA go socialist. It would also have made a justification for war with Eurasia be much harder.
 
Top