Very good timeline I hope it isn't dead.
Thank you my friend! Next update is coming tomorrow:
The second siege of Massalia
Very good timeline I hope it isn't dead.
If Xenon wins this war, what would be the effects on Roman expansionism? A strong Volcae state might be enough to keep them away from Gaul, and might tip the balance of power enough to prevent Rome from destroying and conquering Carthage. Will Rome try to expand east to the Adriatic Balkans and Greece?
Well in this ATL Massalia had bad luck...Poor Massalia... Anyway really glad to see this TL continue!
Go Xenon
Valid points my friend. I am not going to lie... Xenon is building a nice Hegemon status in Gaul. A third major player in the West med is surely going to alter the future of the area.I can see TTL's Gaul-Punic-Rome War going better for Carthage despite Halmicars loss. Both Carthage and Rome wore themselves to almost ruin in the punic wars otl so with a third strong player in this war Rome will have bigger problems. As for Xenon/Volcae, their expansion is being carried out the best way. They are most likely the strongest Gaul kingdom and they will end up assimilating their surrounding Gaul soon enough.
I agree with you. If Xenon wants to be a influence in the Med he needs the Greeks in his territoty.He does need to draw upon the Greeks on the coast, expanding into Gaul as a whole is perhaps more important, but to be a influence in the Med, he needs the greeks in his territory. Give them a stake that they can live with, not one they die with.
just let the dogs bark away and do your thing, no need to get into stupid fights over here broThe forum member @LSCatilina in another thread criticised some things regarding this ATL and then locked that thread to not allow me to reply with my thesis...
So with all the respect @LSCatilina if you have something to say or criticise my work please feel free to do so, but be ready to hear other people opinion and thesis. If not, you are just a sycophant. My stories and maps are well researched and i challenge you to prove me wrong with evidence.
I think for the Romans the main point of a war with Carthage would be to secure Sicily and the other Mediterranean islands. In the north controling Cisalpine gaul is also important for them. But they really don't have the necessary forces to fight both Carthage and the Volcae led gaul coalition. Still Rome had an incredibly stubborn institution leading it so i dont think they will step down the easy way.
They were lucky in otl,but when their luck clearly ran out,that same stubbornness ran into a lot of trouble. By not giving up doesn't mean they could repeatedly make come backs.My point is that Rome at this stage can most certainly be defeated and even crippled. So i think that it's far from an invincible entity at this stage.
I'd also think that the relationship between the Gauls and the Greeks of South France at this point in time is at an all time low,given how they have conquered Massalia and enslaved most of its popullation...
just let the dogs bark away and do your thing, no need to get into stupid fights over here bro
I don't what is your problem, but please, please don't involve me in your delirium.The forum member @LSCatilina in another thread criticised some things regarding this ATL and then locked that thread to not allow me to reply with my thesis...
Full stop there : you don't have any respect : you insulted me, threatened me of being reported (which is something not really well seen there, as well abuse of report system). I don't trust you to give me any respect, while I did for you.So with all the respect
I did so there, and you were entierly free to either answer in the thread, either by PM or to ignore and agree to disagree.You choose instead to act in a puerile manner, and I'm not interested discussing with you unless you gain some manner and maturity : I've nothing to proove on this behalf, neither to you, neither to myself.if you have something to say or criticise my work please feel free to do so