All right, everyone, I understand that Mrs Thatcher was, and remains, a very polarizing figure. However, I ask that you please refrain from discussing her legacy here and now. Most of you don’t want her to become PM ITTL – fair enough. Your requests have been duly noted and will be put into consideration. I must also ask for you to please stop devising gruesome and untimely deaths for her – I realize that these are meant in fun, but they’re
incredibly morbid, and can’t help but be coloured by the fact that she is presently in very ill health, and will likely die a slow and painful death (if she isn’t doing so already). This is a pop culture timeline, and despite occasional forays into politics, I do intend to keep it that way, and to maintain a fairly lighthearted tone. Thank you all very much for your understanding.
That said, I continue to welcome speculation on events facing the United Kingdom in the mid-to-late-1970s, and how governments might have responded to them; along with potential replacements for Ted Heath after he vacates the leadership of the Conservative Party, however (and
whenever)
that may come about.
I wonder if we could get an update on butterflies affecting non-Western (e.g. Eastern Bloc) countries?
Welcome aboard, wolf_brother! That's an excellent and very fair question, however, I would have a great deal of trouble answering it to your satisfaction, for two reasons: First, I speak only two languages, neither of which are Russian (or any Slavic language, for that matter). That makes it far more difficult for me to investigate Soviet pop culture effectively. Also, the very nature of the tightly censored and restricted Soviet media makes the notion of
popular culture in those countries problematic. Now, obviously, the state produces programming in capitalist societies as well, but their
success is reliant on the public response. But thank you for taking an interest in this timeline
Should be interesting. Especially with Hubert the happy warrior!
Thank you, but we're definitely going to be testing that nickname in the last few years of his term!
All of these sentences excite me in different ways.
Glad to hear it. I hope that the relevant
updates will excite you even more still
I have been fortunate enough to have seen a couple of live professional performances of Shakespeare's plays, including one performance in the Globe Theater in London.
That sounds really nice, Chuck
I have to admit, if I ever made it to London, visiting the Globe would probably be one of my destinations. Assuming that I had enough
time! That's always the problem with visiting one of those World Cities. I happen to
live in an aspirational World City, and I've still not seen everything there is to see about it, myself.
I've similarly seen several Shakespeare performances--Taming of the Shrew, Hamlet, Midsummer's Night's Dream, Romeo and Juliet...and they were all improved in seeing them in person vs. simply reading them.
I imagine seeing the comedies, in particular, on stage would be a lot of fun. One of these days, I should avail myself of the opportunity. And one of the most famous Shakespeare festivals in the world -
this one - is day-trip distance from where I live. Maybe that might be something for me to do this summer
Anyway, great TL and looking forward to seeing what develops. Especially hoping that Liz Sladen still gets a role with the Doctor and what else comes along. [Am I treating you enough like royalty.
]
Thank you, Steve. Ordinarily, I might tell you that flattery will get you everywhere, but it's a
very tough call against my selfishness as a writer
And it will, I daresay, make you ashamed to belong to the SF/fantasy fandom...the same fandom as the loons.
)
I
don't consider myself a member of science-fiction or fantasy fandom. I
admire all kinds of speculative fiction, and respect them as legitimate artistic genres, but (as I've said before) I came to love
Star Trek as a student of
popular culture. That said,
all groups of sufficient size and disparity tend to have a vocal minority whose opinions are not representative of the group at large; the best way to oppose them is to make it clear that you, and others in the group, do not subscribe to their interpretations.
phx1138 said:
I find myself thinking that was budget-limited, & audience-limited. Don't forget, even Canadian gameshows, which are about as cheap a show as it's possible to make, didn't offer genuinely big-ticket prizes.
Indeed not, for two main reasons: risk aversion and economies of scale. Sometimes Canadian broadcasters and producers would defeat the former, only to fall face-first into the latter (witness "The Trouble with Tracy" for an infamous example). We'll see how much luck they have ITTL.
phx1138 said:
Am I wrong that hadn't passed yet?
It passed in 1972 (under Trudeau, prior to the election in which he's defeated ITTL, but Stanfield will definitely not reverse it). The CBC is anticipating the new regulations.
Possibly, but it's worth remembering that at this time Dr Who was far more of a mainstream programme in th UK than Star Trek was in the US. This means that the Dr Who fandom would be far less fanatic.
That's actually not the case ITTL.
Star Trek is at least as popular in the US as
Doctor Who is in the UK, probably more so. (
Star Trek is also more popular in the UK than
Doctor Who is in the US, though
Doctor Who is certainly far more popular in the US at this point ITTL than it was IOTL). But I understand your point.
NCW8 said:
Still I can see that there would be some US influences if the series is being aimed at an American audience. For example, the Terran Empire episodes (such as The Frontier in Space and The Mutants) would be written differently as American SF often considers empires to be intrinsically evil. Indeed The Mutants with its background of Decolonisation might not be as accessible to American audiences as it was to Britsh ones of the time.
When I return to
Doctor Who, I'll be sure to consult all of these excellent suggestions I'm receiving
NCW8 said:
I'm interested in seeing what you come up with for British Comedy. Will you be looking at radio comedy as well as TV?
I'll have to look into that. I already have a lot of ground to cover with television alone, but if any of the focal shows have radio antecedents, I'll be sure to mention those.
Agree with the desire for Lis Sladen to still show up as Sarah. Her casting ITTL as the next companion is definitely plausible if not inevitable.
As you have made clear a great many times in the past, Glen
That's why I was thinking that if you had a Reagan like figure in the US in 76 and he brought the sort of economic turmoil he did OTL people in Britain might think more, 'hell no, we need change but not that!'
It amuses me that everyone is so thoroughly convinced that Reagan (or a "Reagan-like figure"
) will be elected in 1976 ITTL. We'll have to see if you're all right!
There's still a chance that Thatcher could come to power in the eighties, however.
Or a "Thatcher-like figure", for that matter
Preventing the Carlton and Granada-isation of ITV ITTL would be good.... keeping it so a franchise could only own 5% of another ITV franchise... Thames Television surviving as a franchisee for London Weekdays... heck the survival of ITV regional identities... London Weekend Television etc. instead of ITV1
Your request is duly noted. However, I shall have to investigate further before I make any decisions on the matter.
Thank you all for the continuing comments! I really appreciate your interest and active discussion. The next update should be ready in the next few days.