marktaha
Banned
Harriman as old as McCormack.and lacking a power base.Chapter Nineteen: The Christmas Eve Surprise'Washington, D.C.; The White House, December 24th, 2:15 p.m.:
President McCormack and Speaker of the House Carl Albert were having an informal Christmas Eve luncheon to discuss the events of the previous evening.
Dubbed the Christmas Eve Surprise by the press two new Democrats had declared their intention to run for president: Hubert Humphrey of Minnesota, and H. Averell Harriman from New York.
President McCormack sighed and said, “Carl, honestly, I will be so happy when January 20, 1965, rolls around. Then I can kiss this desk goodbye without regrets. I never wanted to sit here. Whoever wins – except for George Wallace – I will hand over the keys to the White House to him happily.”
“Bobby is still adamant he won’t run,” said Carl Albert, already knowing the answer?
“He’s made it clear he’ll stay with this administration through 1965 and then he’s out. Though he did leave the door open to running in ’68 depending on who the new man is and how well he does,” replied the President.
So, how do you see the chances for both of them,” asked Albert?
“Humphrey should do well in the north especially with the unions, but his support for the Civil Rights Act is really going to hurt him south of the Mason Dixon Line. And Harriman’s a committed old time New Dealer. While his anti-communist stance might go over well with some in the south the fact that he is associated so strongly with F.D.R. could lose us most of the more conservative voters in the south,” said McCormack.
“So, if I’m hearing you correctly, it sounds like you’re ready to support Connally,” said the Speaker thoughtfully.
“Connally is our best chance to carry the South and some of the more conservative states up north. He’s not so conservative that other parts of the party can’t work with him, and not so liberal that the conservative elements in the party distrust him,” the President answered.
“He’s our best chance to keep Wallace from getting the nomination,” Albert agreed. “The last thing we need is Wallace being nominated or worse a Wallace presidency. If that happens then you know the next four years will see violence break out in all our major cities.”
“You think a Wallace presidency would be that bad for the nation,” queried McCormack?
“I am willing to bet Wallace will do his best to ensure that the Civil Rights Act never again sees the light of day. And his stance on segregation combined with his law-and-order pledge to ensure “communist agitators” as he calls them are arrested for fomenting violence will certainly mean an end to King’s non-violent approach and could have us facing violence in all our major cities.”
Both men fell silent as they considered the full ramifications of a Wallace presidency.