Rightly Guided: Zaid ibn Haritha and his Rashidun Caliphate

What should the next series of posts be?

  • Following Khalid and Ali's conquest of Syria and the Levant.

    Votes: 39 42.4%
  • Following Zaid and Muthanna's conquest of Iran.

    Votes: 21 22.8%
  • Alternating posts so both plots are updated.

    Votes: 52 56.5%

  • Total voters
    92
"To Jerusalem! To Damascus! To Rome!" Part I - The Final Battle in Iraq, Trouble in Madinah, and the Beginning of Ghazwah As-Sham
"To Jerusalem! To Damascus! To Rome!"- Part I


The_Arabs_drive_the_Byzantines_to_flight_at_Azazion.jpg


"Wait for us, Romans, haughty in your power!
Old and rich, sneering at the young and poor!
There will come to you fleet mounts,
Whose hooves spark against stone
Carrying lions in brilliant armour,
Brave men who wield two weapons:
Sharp swords and cutting intellect!
Battalions followed by battalions!
We ride towards the blessed land
Towards the Holy City of Al-Quds
Which you have chained for years
...
You will see, Romans, in this coming test
Who is the true possessor of craft and daring -
Which of us melts like heated copper
And which of us endures like proven steel!"

--- war poem attributed to Yazid ibn Abi Sufyan


"Many are those who fight the lesser jihad and think themselves the best of the Ummah. This is a road to falsehood, for the ones who are truly the best of the Ummah are those who smile in the faces of their fellow believers and maintain the ties of friendship between them."

--- Ayesha bint Abu Bakr, Mother of the Believers, Adviser of the Caliph Az-Zubeyr, and founder of the Ayeshi school of jurisprudence




Khalid could finally rest and recuperate, basking in the wake of his victories. In less than a month he had crushed large imperial forces in four separate battles covering an operational area whose length measured 100 miles. He had done this by exploiting the tremendous mobility of his mounted army, by the use of audacity and surprise, and by violent offensive action. He had accomplished the mission given by the Caliph; perhaps too well - there was no "pagan" opposition left for the restless soldiers of Muhammad and Jesus to war against. The Persians had ventured out of the imperial capital earlier but after Khalid's capture of Al-Hira and the installment of the Lakhmid Malik Ukayd upon his ancestral throne, Ctesiphon withdrew into its shell. Several raids were launched by Khalid into the region between the rivers. Places which had so far not felt the heavy hand of war now echoed to the tread of Muslim cavalry and the calls of "God is Great!" and "Behold the Victory of the Cross!" Khalid and his soldiers were victorious over the Persians in Iraq, but it was not in Khalid's nature to sit back and take his ease. It was in his nature to be discontented with past achievements, ever seeking fresh glory and striving towards distant horizons. The Persian capital seemed reluctant to slake his thirst for battle by sending more armies against him so it was a pleasure for Khalid to be reminded that a strong Persian garrison still existed on the Euphrates at Fouzar, which marked the frontier between the empires of Persia and Rome. This was the only Persian garrison left west of Ctesiphon; and since he had been instructed by the Caliph to "fight the Persians", Khalid decided to eliminate this force also.


He marched to Fouzar. On arrival here in the early fall of 633, Khalid found two garrisons - a Persian and a Roman. These garrisons, representing empires which in the preceding two decades had fought each other in a long and costly war, were still not united in the face of the Muslim armies. The Roman commander Theodosius told his soldiers to hold, as the Muslim force did not appear to be threatening the Roman position. Theodosius was a longtime military man, the son of a Roman man and a Ghassanid noblewoman, and took some pleasure in seeing his Sassanid foes across the border assailed by an Arab force which he assumed was a result of a wildly successful Christian Arab revolt. Indeed, the Roman soldiers and their Ghassanid foederati went to trade with the Muslims when they arrived.


For more than six weeks, nothing happened. The two armies stood and glared at each other across the Euphrates, the Muslims on the south bank and the Persians on the north bank, neither side willing to cross the river. The Romans watched the standoff bemusedly, sure that the Arab force would be slaughtered but selling them food and weapons to make their resistance against the Persians fiercer. By drawing away a number of his men in a false retreat, Khalid was able to entice the Persians across the Euphrates onto his side; but their crossing was hardly complete when he attacked them with his usual speed and intensity. Thousands of them were slain before the rest found safety in flight. This was neither a great nor a decisive battle; nor was the enemy force a very large one, as some early historians have stated (no Persian strategist in his senses would leave a powerful garrison in a minor frontier town like Fouzar while Central and Western Iraq was being lost and Ctesiphon itself was threatened.) Its importance lies only in the fact that it was the last battle in a brilliant campaign.


Khalid spent the next 10 days at Fouzar, collecting the spoils of war which were divided equally amongst the soldiers Christian and Muslim alike with the usual portion being reserved for the coffers of the Caliphate, then the army left Fouzar on its way back to the military camp of Kufa. For this march it was formed into an advance guard, a main body and a rearguard; and Khalid let it be known that he would travel with the rear guard. But as the rearguard filed out of Fouzar, Khalid and a good number of formerly Christian men who had just converted to Islam while traveling with the Muslim army struck out on their own in a southerly direction. They were off to Makkah, to perform the Pilgrimage which was due in a fortnight, for Khalid had promised the new Muslims that he would personally see to it that they were able to conduct their first Hajj and receive the blessings of the Caliph Abu Bakr.


This was to be a peaceful adventure; almost an escapade! The actual route taken by Khalid is not known. All that is known is that he and his comrades traversed a trackless waste - a difficult and inhospitable region which no guides knew and into which even bandits feared to enter, but they made it after some trial. At Makkah they performed the pilgrimage inconspicuously to avoid being recognised, but this did not succeed. Soon the people realized that the Sword of God Khalid was amongst the pilgrims and the Hajj became as much a victory celebration for Khalid and his bewildered convert soldiers as it was a ritual pilgrimage. The Caliph himself met with the men and spoke to them individually, listening to their personal stories and advising them on various issues. Many of the Iraqis even ended up marrying in whirlwind romances before they took off the white robes of pilgrimage and belted on their swords again. All was not calm, however, as the valiant knight of Islam Ali ibn Abi Talib appeared in a coat of mail with his legendary sword Zulfiqar in his hand, at the head of a strong force of Banu Hashim tribesmen. He asked for the leave of the Caliph to journey with Khalid back to Iraq, for he wished to wage the jihad and serve the Caliphate as a soldier again. Khalid was gladdened to see his old friend in high spirits again and praised the bravery of the younger man, also arguing for him to accompany his troops back to Kufa. On the other side brooded Thaqif of Banu Makhzum, a former "great clan" which had long resented the rise in fame of men from less-illustrious blood like the dashing young Usama, the son of the ex-slave Najdi Zaid ibn Haritha and the ex-slave Abyssinian Umm Ayman or the handsome Jewish-born companion Ilyas ibn Musa (Elias, son of Moses.) Even more than Thaqif hated the half-African son of Zaid or the Jewish son of Musa, he hated Ali - for the Banu Hashim was always respected, but stayed firmly in place in the lowest rung of intra-Qurayshi politics. Thaqif could tolerate the advancement of other peoples to the levels of Quraysh, but he would not tolerate the re-arrangement of the structure of Quraysh itself.


Thaqif called up his own soldiers and told Ali that he must not dare to leave Madinah and join the army, or else Thaqif would slay him for being a glory-seeking false Muslim. Aghast at the accusation, Ali and his ally Khalid said that they would be the ones to slay Thaqif for his foul statements. The pride of both men bristled and Ali's faction and Thaqif's faction both drew swords in the streets of Madinah - with the calls of the Caliph for peace forgotten about in the white-hot rage of the moment. Just as they were about to spill blood in the Holy City, the three most illustrious of the Umm al-Mumineen made a suprise apperance in the Jund Marketplace of the Radiant City with their own soldiers (rallied by Az-Zubeyr and Usama ibn Zaid, those two stalwart allies of Ayesha.) Hafsa, Ayesha, and Saffiyah declared that they would have peace amongst the Muslims, whoever they had to slay to preserve it. Ali and Khalid, sincere men who had been carried away by passion, were humbled by their chastisment and laid down their arms in the face of the Army of the Three Mothers. Thaqif was less impressed and ordered his men to block the exits to the city, but his army stood frozen. Men of Banu Makhzum though they were, Thaqif's army was mostly composed of Companions who knew the Prophet personally, and to raise a hand in war against not only one but three of the wives of Muhammad was beyond sacrilege. Soon Ayesha obtained the clearance of her father the Caliph to order Thaqif brought to her and his own soldiers obeyed the command of Ayesha over him. Collecting the necessary witnesses from the armies, she passed judgement on Thaqif, branding him a rebel and a traitor - one who would lift his sword against his brother and defied the will of the Caliph. There could only be one penalty for this: swift death by beheading. Az-Zubeyr unsheathed his sword "The Full Moon" and fulfilled the sentence of Ayesha right there at the market square. With peace restored again, the Umm al-Mumineen opened the way out of Madinah for the armies of Khalid and Ali who filed out of the city to much fanfare and celebration. Then they rushed back to Iraq. The speed at which Khalid and his wild, adventurous comrades travelled can be judged by the fact that the Muslim rear guard had not yet entered Hira when Khalid rejoined it. He rode into Hira with the rear guard as if he had been there all the time!


Only the commander of the rear guard had known the secret; but the men did wonder why Khalid and a few others had freshly shaven heads, and why Ali had suddenly appeared amongst them! Shortly after this adventure, Khalid went out on another. Tiring of the peace and quiet which now prevailed in Iraq, he decided to lead a raid in person in the area close to Ctesiphon. Along with Muthanna, Ali, and the Christian chieftain Rayyan Al-Thawr (or Rayyan the Bull), he raided the prosperous markets surrounding the area and returned laden with spoils. At Hira, in the winter of 633, Khalid opened a letter brought to him by a Tai'fan messenger from the Caliph and read:


"In the name of God, the Beneficent, the Merciful.


From the servant of God, Atiq, son of Abu Quhafa, to the servant of God, Khalid, son of Al Walid:

Peace be upon you. I render praise unto God, save whom there is none worthy of worship, and invoke blessings on His Prophet, Muhammad, may the blessings of God and peace by upon his noble person in the Afterlife.

March with your soldiers, dhimmi and Muslim, until you reach the gathering of the Muslims forces in Syria, who are in a state of great anxiety and fear the strength of the Romans...


Khalid stopped reading, fearing that this meant demotion and that at last the pressure of Banu Makhzum against him had borne fruit. And what bitter fruit! Khalid muttered, "This must be the work of those left-handed ones! They are jealous of me for conquering Iraq and supporting the cause of Ali!" But his fears turned to joy as he read on:


...I appoint you commander over the armies of all the Muslims and direct you to fight the Romans. You shall be commander over Abu Ubaidah and those with him. Go with speed and high purpose, Father of Sulaiman, and complete your task with the help of God, exalted be He. Be among those who strive mightly in the path of justice for God.

Divide your army into two and leave half with Muthanna who shall be commander in Iraq. Let not more go with you than stay with him. After victory, install Ali as the commander of your conquered land in Syria and retain command of the army.

Let not pride enter your mind, for it will deceive and mislead you. And let there be no delay! Lo, to God belongs all bounty and He is the dispenser of rewards.

You will come upon a people who live like hermits in monasteries, believing that they have given up all for God. Let them be and destroy not their monasteries. And you will meet other people who are worshippers of the Cross, who shave the centre of their heads so that you can see the scalp. These are men of wisdom - who keep ancient lore and seek no worldly gains - speak softly to them and seek out their knowledge if you can. Send the greatest of them unto me when you succeed, for I have a wish to speak to them.

Finally, you will meet some of the lords of Rome who dress in great finery. Their ways are corrupt and they only worship gold and silver. Assail them with your swords until they submit to Islam or pay the Jizya.


I entrust you to the care of God."


Thus was Khalid appointed Commander-in-Chief of the Muslim forces in Syria and the doom of the Romans was sealed. Khalid now set about the preparations for his march. He explained the instructions of the Caliph to Muthanna, divided his army into two and handed over one half of it to Muthanna. But in the division of the army, Khalid tried to keep all the Companions of the Prophet - the Emigrants and the Helpers.- men held in special esteem by the soldiers. To this Muthanna objected vehemently. "I insist on a total execution of Abu Bakr's orders", he said, "and I shall have half the Companions also, for it is by their presence that I hope to win great victories." Khalid saw the justice of Muthanna's claim. He revised the division to leave Muthanna a satisfactory share of the Companions, particularly as these included many of the finest officers of the army like the fiery youth Az-Zubeyr and the scholarly Zaid ibn Haritha. This done, Khalid was ready for the march to Syria.


It was Abu Bakr's way to give his generals their mission, the geographical area in which that mission would be carried out, and the resources that, could be made available for that purpose. He would then leave it to his generals to accomplish their mission in whatever manner they chose. This is how he had launched Khalid into Iraq, and this is how he was now launching Khalid into Syria. The mission given to Khalid was clear: he was to move with all speed to Syria, take command of the Muslim forces and fight the Romans until victory was achieved. What route Khalid should take to get to Syria was left to him, and this was the most important immediate decision that Khalid had to take. The detailed locations of the Muslim forces in Syria were not known to him. He knew, however, that they were in the general area of Bus'ra and Jabbiyah, and he had to get there fast.







Afternotes

Big changes are happening in the Ummah! If you've ever read accounts of the Rashidun conquests and wondered to yourself "Hey, where's Ali? He's a young, well-liked and skilled commander - why isn't he out there kicking ass?", well, here's your answer. In OTL, there were people who wanted to keep Ali from gaining glory in the conquests (Banu Makhzum is always making trouble) and Ali himself was somewhat sullen following the debacle of the First Great Shura. ITTL, Ali is just as enthusiastic as he was during the Prophetic days since he got a place and a fair shake at the Shura, with Khalid ibn al Walid himself using his massive political clout (something he rarely did) to shout down the naysayers.

I may have forgotten to mention it in the last few updates, but our favorite Iraqi Bedouin Muthanna did not receive the arrow wound that would eventually prove fatal to him in TTL's version of the Siege of Al-Hira, which ended quicker and with less blood ITTL thanks to the presence of Ukayd and the Muslims simply re-installing the rightful king (under them, of course...) A living Muthanna is a virtual shoe-in for the role of Military Governor of Iraq, being from the region himself and highly popular with the new converts, which means Ali is shipped off to Syria.

I never got why it is that the Shiatul Ali (which you might recall from the "Factions of the Ummah" post is mostly part of the Shiatul Shura ITTL) somehow always ends up in Iraq, with Yazid ibn Abi Sufyan and then Mu'awiya ibn Abi Sufyan in Syria, when there are a bunch of different ways that could have turned out. In any case, without a governorship, the ambitions of the Banu Umayya are going to be dampened (which gives us the benefit of keeping around Mu'awiya for his administrative and military mind while neutering his ability to form a power base) but there is one other ambitious general with the ability to step into that void.....someone else who gets a plum governorship and turns it into a faction.

Find out in the next installment of Arab Game of Thro...uh, I mean...Rightly Guided: Zaid ibn Haritha and his Rashidun Caliphate!
 
Last edited:
Like the update very much. I'm curious as to how long the situation of Christian kings under the Caliphate will linger. Clearly territories like Egypt and Syria have no native kings to represent the Arameans, Assyrians, Copts, Maronites or Orthodox, so will it simply be relegated to the priesthood within each community to address matters to local governors?

Also, Ramadan Kareem.
 
Like the update very much.

Thank you! Your comments are always very edifying, so I'm glad you're following along.

I'm curious as to how long the situation of Christian kings under the Caliphate will linger. Clearly territories like Egypt and Syria have no native kings to represent the Arameans, Assyrians, Copts, Maronites or Orthodox, so will it simply be relegated to the priesthood within each community to address matters to local governors?

You've got it in one. With the exception of the weird autonomous situations of the Ghassanids and Lakhmids, the Romans and Persians were not keen on letting disgruntled (often-heretical) minorities have much local self-rule, so the only hierarchical authority that remains in place many of the places in Roman Syria/Roman Egypt outside of the Imperial bureaucracy is the ecclesiastical leadership. Naturally, the Muslims are just going to give the leadership over various dhimmi communities (as well as the accompanying seat in the Majlis-as-Shura) to their religious leaders. The Lakhmids and the Ghassanids will be the exception, but the Ghassanids will be less "independent dhimmi kings" and more "mostly converted and inside the machinery of the Rashidun military bureaucracy" - which when you think about it is actually the more powerful position. As much of the early Romanization of the Caliphate ITTL is a result of far greater co-option of the Romanized Ghassanid Arabs as a result of straight-up Roman converts.


Also, Ramadan Kareem.

Ramadan Kareem!
 
You've got it in one. With the exception of the weird autonomous situations of the Ghassanids and Lakhmids, the Romans and Persians were not keen on letting disgruntled (often-heretical) minorities have much local self-rule, so the only hierarchical authority that remains in place many of the places in Roman Syria/Roman Egypt outside of the Imperial bureaucracy is the ecclesiastical leadership. Naturally, the Muslims are just going to give the leadership over various dhimmi communities (as well as the accompanying seat in the Majlis-as-Shura) to their religious leaders. The Lakhmids and the Ghassanids will be the exception, but the Ghassanids will be less "independent dhimmi kings" and more "mostly converted and inside the machinery of the Rashidun military bureaucracy" - which when you think about it is actually the more powerful position. As much of the early Romanization of the Caliphate ITTL is a result of far greater co-option of the Romanized Ghassanid Arabs as a result of straight-up Roman converts.

See, that's the other issue. Converting Romans is all well and good, but we all know how aristocratic they were and how many powerful families lived in likes of Byzantine Rome. Integrating those people even gradually sounds like a recipe for disaster, as much as you tell Khalid to wipe them out via Abu Bakr.
 
Ayesha bint Abu Bakr, Mother of the Believers, Adviser of the Caliph Az-Zubeyr, and founder of the Ayeshi school of jurisprudence
Interesting... So not only will the schools of jurisprudence exist ITTL but their founders will mostly be Companions or at the very least Tabi'in or Tabi'ultabi'in? How are the Muslims treating the Zoroastrians (and Manichaeans) in Iraq? Also, Ramadan Mubarak.
 
See, that's the other issue. Converting Romans is all well and good, but we all know how aristocratic they were and how many powerful families lived in likes of Byzantine Rome. Integrating those people even gradually sounds like a recipe for disaster, as much as you tell Khalid to wipe them out via Abu Bakr.

Damn, y'all have to stop reading my mind!

You are very right that the Romans will be bringing along with their fancy mosaics and pretty statues a far less egalitarian way of looking at things than the !Rashidun, who will have had time to solidify their system of meritocratic military bureaucracy and elected soldier-caliphs bound by the Law of Zaid by the time large amounts of Romans convert. There's gonna be some rough times were the newly converted Romans try to bring back tribal-style politics for family lineages and assimilation into the Rashidun soldier-caliphate will not be painless.

If you thought the Caliphs had a hard time busting up Arab tribalism, just wait until they have to deal with Rhomain aristocracy.
 
Interesting... So not only will the schools of jurisprudence exist ITTL but their founders will mostly be Companions or at the very least Tabi'in or Tabi'ultabi'in?

Yup, with Zaid ibn Thabit's early example of teaching both youth and adult students his brand of jurisprudence (and even proto-kalam) while also writing religious texts for the literate, many Companions will themselves be considered the founders of fiqh schools.

This is boosted by the fact that Zaid never becomes a withdrawn recluse scholar like he did in OTL due to the murder of his wife, but instead remains a prolific writer who inspires others from the Companions to follow his path and write their own texts on legal interpretations.


How are the Muslims treating the Zoroastrians (and Manichaeans) in Iraq?

Sadly, there's little way around the fact that the treatment of the Zoroastrians and Manichaeans in Iraq is going to be a lot more violent than the treatment of the Christians and Jews in the Syrian campaign. I did, however, leave the "Compassion of the Faith" Zaid in Iraq intentionally to help dampen the worst excesses of the temple-destruction, burnings and lootings. Muthanna is a hot-tempered young man, but Zaid is older and wiser with a cooler head, so he'll help rein in the Muslim/Christian army on the warpath.

Also, Ramadan Mubarak.

Ramadan Mubarak!!
 
Last edited:
A school of jurisprudence founded by Aisha herself? Very interesting; on one hand, she is a woman in a very patriarchal society but, on the other hand, her prestige and reputation among the believers was immense in OTL and will be even greater here, so her school of thought might be able to achieve a very prominent role among the Muslim faithful - and since she was one of the wives of Muhammad, her school might come to be viewed as the most orthodox one, given how close she was to the Prophet.

The orders given to Khalid might have consequences far surpassing mere military matters: not only sparing the lives of Christian monks and scholars, but actively protecting them, will be a great thing for culture.

Have a good Ramadan, by the way. ;)
 
A school of jurisprudence founded by Aisha herself? Very interesting; on one hand, she is a woman in a very patriarchal society but, on the other hand, her prestige and reputation among the believers was immense in OTL and will be even greater here, so her school of thought might be able to achieve a very prominent role among the Muslim faithful - and since she was one of the wives of Muhammad, her school might come to be viewed as the most orthodox one, given how close she was to the Prophet.

Yeah, it would be hard to make the claim that Islam had changed the fabric of Arabian society enough at this early point to allow for a female scholar to have such a prominent place....if it was anyone other than Ayesha. This was a woman who led armies into battle and was the undisputed master of Islamic theology in the Caliphate by the age of 26 IOTL. You also correctly point out that if anything, Ayesha is even more of a towering figure ITTL, since her split with Ali is gradually being mended with events like the Shura Council and Ali's acquiescence to her commands at the standoff with Thaqif, and she has the support of one of her closest friends, Usama ibn Zaid. IOTL, Usama was away on campaign for most of the earliest political splits in the Ummah, but ITTL, his father Zaid has taken on the role of co-commander in Khalid's Army instead which leaves Usama free to back Ayesha's power plays with both words and steel.


It's interesting that although Islam expressly forbids true monasticism, with Muhammad declaring that he preferred the faithful to be engaged in both temporal and spiritual affairs, Muslims have always been rather fond of Christian monks. It might be because converts from the Nestorian monastic communities made up a significant fraction of the early Companions, or because the later prophethood of Muhammad was legendarily supposed to have been predicted by a monk named Bahira who met Muhammad when he was a young boy traveling with a trade caravan to Antioch. In any case, the Christian monks which Khalid's men bring to Abu Bakr for their submission to jizya and Abu Bakr's reciprocal promises of protection and self-rule will start something of a sensation in Madinah with all the art and brilliantly illustrated manuscripts they'll bring as tribute to the Caliph.


Happy Ramadan!
 
Last edited:
Great update as always!
I love how much clout the prophet's widows have , they are a very strong unifying force.

also eagerly waiting for the war against the Byzantine, let's see how much ass Ali will kick!
oh, Ramzan Mubarak to all
 
Looking forward to the fight with the Romans and implications of the Caliphate's contact with Romans. I was looking through some older threads that discuss a Romanized Caliph and the Mu'tazila school came up a few times. Would that play a role at all later in the timeline or has it been butterflied away? Thanks.
 
Looking forward to the fight with the Romans and implications of the Caliphate's contact with Romans. I was looking through some older threads that discuss a Romanized Caliph and the Mu'tazila school came up a few times. Would that play a role at all later in the timeline or has it been butterflied away? Thanks.

!Mu'tazila thought will be different (perhaps even more Greek in philosophical basis) but if anything it will be far more influential than it is IOTL. Zaid ibn Thabit, who was a sort of proto-Mu'tazila himself and was considered by Mu'tazila luminaries like Ibn Sina and Az-Zamakshari to be the intellectual father of the movement, got to elucidate his views on faith and his text Noor-ul-Ikhlas (which will become one of Islam's foundational texts ITTL) is very much a proto-Mu'tazila text. Analogues to Mu'tazila kalam may very well be the Islamic orthodoxy.
 
Last edited:
“We march with our brothers,
We march with our brothers;
To the delight of Heaven
And the sorrow of the Persians
We march with our brothers!”

--- war chant of the Christian Arab defectors at Ullais

So upon rereading this, I... may have come up with some Spanish song lyrics, a translation of the above passage, set to the tune of a Hungarian folk song called Akkor szep az erdo. Can I post them here? For some reason, I make up random songs when I see passages, and I wanted to share the idea I got from this TL.
 
So upon rereading this, I... may have come up with some Spanish song lyrics, a translation of the above passage, set to the tune of a Hungarian folk song called Akkor szep az erdo. Can I post them here? For some reason, I make up random songs when I see passages, and I wanted to share the idea I got from this TL.


I don't speak Spanish and I know nothing about Hungarian folk music, but that sounds incredible! I'll promise to find some way to work it into the story (can anyone say Andalusia?)

By all means, post away!
 
"¡Marchamos con nuestros hermanos!"/"We march with our brothers" - A War Song of Khalid's Christian Mujahideen (by Halocon)
Right, here’s what I have so far. You may want to listen to the song the tune is based on first just to have an idea of how it’s supposed to be sung.

¡Marchamos con nuestros hermanos!
¡Marchamos con nuestros hermanos!
Para el deleite del cielo,
Y el gran dolor de los persos; [1]
Para el deleite del cielo,
¡Con nuestros hermanos, marchamos!

A la guerra e-en el este
Con soldados de la nueva fé
Los soldados de los árabes
Van a la ti-err-a de verde;
Con soldados de la nueva fé,
¡Vamos a la guerra del este!

La ciudad vieja de Ctesiphon
Es en la boca del gran cazón, [2] [4]
Cuyos dientes han destruido
Sus ejércitos poderosos;
¡Estos dientes han conquistado
Esto imperio poderoso!

Translation:

We march with our brothers!
We march with our brothers!
To the delight of heaven
And the great sorrow of the Persians;
To the delight of heaven,
With our brothers we march!

To the war in the east
With soldiers of the new faith
The soldiers of the Arabs
Go to the lands of green; [3]
With the soldiers of the new faith,
We go to the war in the east!

The old city of Ctesiphon
Is in the mouth of the great shark,
Whose teeth have destroyed
Its powerful armies;
These teeth have conquered
This mighty empire!

[1] I do admit to changing some endings to the words (“persos” should be “persas”) to fit the rhyme scheme, as well as stretching some words into more syllables than usual to fit the meter.

[2] I was running out of rhymes, this was the best I had.

[3] i.e. Persian Mesopotamia/Iraq, as described in one of the updates concerning the invasion there.

[4] “Tiburón” is derived from a First Nations language of the Caribbean; this, according to @Roger II , is the word used in pre-Columbian times.
 
Last edited:
Right, here’s what I have so far. You may want to listen to the song the tune is based on first just to have an idea of how it’s supposed to be sung.

¡Marchamos con nuestros hermanos!
¡Marchamos con nuestros hermanos!
Para el deleite del cielo,
Y el gran dolor de los persos; [1]
Para el deleite del cielo,
¡Con nuestros hermanos, marchamos!

A la guerra e-en el este
Con soldados de la nueva fé
Los soldados de los árabes
Van a la ti-err-a de verde;
Con soldados de la nueva fé,
¡Vamos a la guerra del este!

La ciudad vieja de Ctesiphon
Es en la boca del tiburón, [2]
Cuyos dientes han destruido
Sus ejércitos poderosos;
¡Estos dientes han conquistado
Esto imperio poderoso!

Translation:

We march with our brothers!
We march with our brothers!
To the delight of heaven
And the great sorrow of the Persians;
To the delight of heaven,
With our brothers we march!

To the war in the east
With soldiers of the new faith
The soldiers of the Arabs
Go to the lands of green; [3]
With the soldiers of the new faith,
We go to the war in the east!

The old city of Ctesiphon
Is in the mouth of the shark,
Whose teeth have destroyed
Its powerful armies;
These teeth have conquered
This mighty empire!

[1] I do admit to changing some endings to the words (“persos” should be “persas”) to fit the rhyme scheme, as well as stretching some words into more syllables than usual to fit the meter.

[2] I was running out of rhymes, this was the best I had.

[3] i.e. Persian Mesopotamia/Iraq, as described in one of the updates concerning the invasion there.


This is fantastic! Like always, the readers are the real MVPs :closedeyesmile:. I've gone ahead and canonized it with a threadmark, if you don't mind.

The languages of the Iberian Peninsula will develop quite differently ITTL (a Caliphate based on the more inclusive soldier-caliph model will have a lot more staying power in Al-Andalus than the Arab-aristocrat model that the Umayyads in Spain used OTL) - Castilian (if it's even called that here) will probably be only as important as Galician or any of the other languages of the Peninsula. Still, I'll find a way to have the Caliphate's soldiers of the cross singing this while on the march - whether in Castilian, Nobiin, Greek, or Khazaric!
 
This is fantastic! Like always, the readers are the real MVPs :closedeyesmile:. I've gone ahead and canonized it with a threadmark, if you don't mind.

The languages of the Iberian Peninsula will develop quite differently ITTL (a Caliphate based on the more inclusive soldier-caliph model will have a lot more staying power in Al-Andalus than the Arab-aristocrat model that the Umayyads in Spain used OTL) - Castilian (if it's even called that here) will probably be only as important as Galician or any of the other languages of the Peninsula. Still, I'll find a way to have the Caliphate's soldiers of the cross singing this while on the march - whether in Castilian, Nobiin, Greek, or Khazaric!

Andalusian/Mozarabic will become the "main" language of the peninsula, then?

The linguistic border could run along the Ebro and the mountains of Cantabria.
 
Quiz on the Caliphate!
Here's some more hints at what's ahead for the Caliphate...but in the form of a game! Instead of just explaining things through narrative, I'm going to use an idea cribbed from @Dr. Waterhouse's excellent TL The Extra Girl and give you the information in the form of an in-universe test. I'll put up the answers after some time but I wanna see what y'all think is right first! There's no prize for the person who gets the most correct but bragging rights and the honor of coming up with the next chapter title.


Excerpted from a midterm exam in "Introduction to Caliphal Studies - the Early Caliphate"



How many of the Caliphs from the "soldier-caliphate" period were of Jewish descent?

A) Zero, there were no Soldier-Caliphs of Jewish descent
B) Two
C) Four
D) One


Which Caliph was famous for launching the Expedition to China?

A) Caliph Maksant al-Rûmi (Maxentius the Roman)
B) Caliph Al-Hasan II al-Ghazi* (Al-Hasan the Campaigner)
C) Caliph Muhaajir ibn Naasif
D) Caliph Ilyas al-Qudsi (Elias the Jerusalemite)


What city was known as the "Second Capital of the Caliphate" for serving as the summer home of the Caliphs as well as its golden age of art, literature, and philosophy inspired by contact with Roman culture?

A) Damascus
B) Basra
C) Van
D) Antioch


True or False: "After recovering from the loss of many core territories to the Caliphate, Rhomania began a decades-long campaign of expansion that saw the conquest of a great deal of territory for the Empire in the West."


Only one of the Six Companion Caliphs is not buried in Madinah. Who is it?

A) Zaid ibn Haritha
B) Umar ibn al-Khattab
C) Al-Hasan ibn Ali
D) Az-Zubeyr ibn al-Awam


Caliph Maksant first rose to prominence after his decisive military victories against -

A) A rebellious dhimmi army in Anatolia
B) The Romans in the Italian Campaigns
C) Schismatic rigorist Muslims called the Takfiris
D) The Buddhist kingdoms of Central Asia


The two most prominent holders of the role of the High Qadi or Chief Justice during the "Companion-Caliphate" were Tawadrosa al-ʾIskandari (Theodora the Alexandrian) and Haroun ibn Yunus (Aaron, son of Jonah). Which of these two figures was considered the more significant High Qadi by later scholars from the "Soldier-Caliphate" period?

A) Tawadrosa al-ʾIskandari
B) Haroun ibn Yunus


*Not a dynastic thing, the "II" just distinguishes Caliph Al-Hasan Al-Ghazi from Caliph Al-Hasan ibn Ali
 
Last edited:
B (I think there will be some)
D
D (seems like the most likely place to be a major centre of Roman culture)
False (the loss of so much core territory is going to make territorial expansion much harder)
A
C
A
 
Top