The Battle of Mut'ah
"In Ayannid-era hagiographical works of Seerah and modern academic treatments of the Prophet’s life alike, there is a tendency to relegate the Ghazwah of Mut’ah to a role of utter insignificance. This has mostly been due to fact that the confrontation at Mut’ah didn't result in any lasting territorial changes or diplomatic maneuvers, unlike the shocking victory of the small Muslim army at Badr over their Makkan opponents or the later grand campaigns against the Byzantines or the Sasanids. Despite this, Mut’ah retains a unique place in the story of the early Muslim faithful, not only because it represented the first real military confrontation with the “Rum" or Romans that occupied Syria and the Levant, but also because it gives the student of history a good look at two people who would shape the Ummah in years to come.
The first of these men is Saifullah Khalid ibn al Walid, a Makkan nobleman turned zealous follower of his once-enemy Muhammad who brilliantly engineered the addition of vast territories to the lands of the Caliphate. Although religious scholars from later periods would claim that Khalid had snatched victory from the jaws of defeat at Mut’ah, destroying the much larger Byzantine army entirely, this is patently untrue. Analysis of the earliest sources, including sayings of the Prophet Muhammad and Khalid himself indicate that Mut’ah was a stinging loss for the Muslims. This is not to say that Khalid did not display his usual acumen for battle here, however. The grizzled general acted quickly enough to turn the Muslim rout into an orderly retreat that inflicted heavy losses on the Ghassanid Christian Arab client-cavalry sent to pursue them. For their part, the Byzantines almost certainly saw Mut’ah as an unimportant repulsion of raiding Arabs. Although stories were floating in Bilad As-Sham about the nature of the Arabs who attacked them, the soldiers of the Caesar had more pressing matters to concern themselves with than the vagaries of deep desert tribal politics.
The second - and even more influential - figure to emerge from this is the charismatic warrior-scholar Zaid ibn Haritha. From slave to adopted son of the Prophet to Commander of the Faithful, few other events so embodied the death of the old Makkan-Tai’fan social system in Muhammad’s Arabia than the new prominence of Zaid, a prominence that would only increase after his return to Makkah. The only Companion of the Prophet mentioned by name in the Qur’an, Zaid is a liminal figure, a man who stood halfway between being a member of the Ahl-ul-Bayt and being an outsider tribesman from Najd. In time, this quality, along with his singular status of being well-liked by almost all the prominent Companions and Mothers of the Believers at the time of the Prophet’s death, would impact not only his rule of the Caliphate, but the whole of Islam itself."
Woah, this is a touchy topic. Much of this history is still really important to a lot of Muslims and inspires some bad blood to this day. Why are you doing this? Yeah, I know. I’m a Muslim myself, from a mixed Sunni-Shia household, so a lot of this stuff can get awkward around the dinner table, so to speak. However, I think the idea of a surviving Zaid as a Rightly Guided Caliph is one that deserves treatment. I'll try my best to not pull too heavily from sectarian sources (although many of the very earliest ones show astonishingly little bias, except of course the obvious pro-Muslim one in theology.) Prophet Muhammad himself will not show up; in fact, the next update will jump to right after his death and take off from there.
Oh, so this is going to be a Rashidun-wank? Not really, but I would be lying if I said that trying to see if the Rashidun Caliphate had the ability to last a while longer than it did OTL wasn't part of the goal here. There's gonna be lots of trouble in the future for our friend Ibn Haritha and he’ll have to deal with many of the same issues that the Ummah faced in OTL as well as some new ones. In fact, if any folks who are well-read on Byzantine and Sassanid Empires want to jump in and pitch their ideas, that'd be more than welcome.
What else can I expect from this thing? Lots! There'll be questions about the role of the Caliph, whether hereditary monarchy ever becomes part of the Islamic tradition, what exactly IS a Muslim at this time and how that shifts, the clash of classism and Arabization vs proto-egalitarian institutions from Muhammad's time and all sorts of other stuff. Also, expect frequent appearances by the Mothers of the Believers. Aisha, Hafsah, and the other Umm al-Mumineen are too interesting to not take a center stage in a TL like this!
The first of these men is Saifullah Khalid ibn al Walid, a Makkan nobleman turned zealous follower of his once-enemy Muhammad who brilliantly engineered the addition of vast territories to the lands of the Caliphate. Although religious scholars from later periods would claim that Khalid had snatched victory from the jaws of defeat at Mut’ah, destroying the much larger Byzantine army entirely, this is patently untrue. Analysis of the earliest sources, including sayings of the Prophet Muhammad and Khalid himself indicate that Mut’ah was a stinging loss for the Muslims. This is not to say that Khalid did not display his usual acumen for battle here, however. The grizzled general acted quickly enough to turn the Muslim rout into an orderly retreat that inflicted heavy losses on the Ghassanid Christian Arab client-cavalry sent to pursue them. For their part, the Byzantines almost certainly saw Mut’ah as an unimportant repulsion of raiding Arabs. Although stories were floating in Bilad As-Sham about the nature of the Arabs who attacked them, the soldiers of the Caesar had more pressing matters to concern themselves with than the vagaries of deep desert tribal politics.
The second - and even more influential - figure to emerge from this is the charismatic warrior-scholar Zaid ibn Haritha. From slave to adopted son of the Prophet to Commander of the Faithful, few other events so embodied the death of the old Makkan-Tai’fan social system in Muhammad’s Arabia than the new prominence of Zaid, a prominence that would only increase after his return to Makkah. The only Companion of the Prophet mentioned by name in the Qur’an, Zaid is a liminal figure, a man who stood halfway between being a member of the Ahl-ul-Bayt and being an outsider tribesman from Najd. In time, this quality, along with his singular status of being well-liked by almost all the prominent Companions and Mothers of the Believers at the time of the Prophet’s death, would impact not only his rule of the Caliphate, but the whole of Islam itself."
Introducing the TL
Hey, everybody! This is my first TL (huzzah) and you've just seen the POD. In OTL, the Battle of Mut’ah, a Muslim raid sent against the Byzantine Empire in retribution for the death of a Muslim missionary in Basra, ended in the death of Zaid ibn Haritha, Abdallah ibn Rawahah and the Prophet’s uncle Ja’far. When Khalid took command, he conducted an organized retreat and got his remaining men out safely. In TTL, Zaid listens to Khalid’s counsel to only harass the much larger army, retreat, and decimate the Ghassanid outriders who chase them over Abdallah’s advice to enter pitched battle. The TTL Muslims lose many less men thanks to this, with Zaid and Abdallah being among the survivors.Woah, this is a touchy topic. Much of this history is still really important to a lot of Muslims and inspires some bad blood to this day. Why are you doing this? Yeah, I know. I’m a Muslim myself, from a mixed Sunni-Shia household, so a lot of this stuff can get awkward around the dinner table, so to speak. However, I think the idea of a surviving Zaid as a Rightly Guided Caliph is one that deserves treatment. I'll try my best to not pull too heavily from sectarian sources (although many of the very earliest ones show astonishingly little bias, except of course the obvious pro-Muslim one in theology.) Prophet Muhammad himself will not show up; in fact, the next update will jump to right after his death and take off from there.
Oh, so this is going to be a Rashidun-wank? Not really, but I would be lying if I said that trying to see if the Rashidun Caliphate had the ability to last a while longer than it did OTL wasn't part of the goal here. There's gonna be lots of trouble in the future for our friend Ibn Haritha and he’ll have to deal with many of the same issues that the Ummah faced in OTL as well as some new ones. In fact, if any folks who are well-read on Byzantine and Sassanid Empires want to jump in and pitch their ideas, that'd be more than welcome.
What else can I expect from this thing? Lots! There'll be questions about the role of the Caliph, whether hereditary monarchy ever becomes part of the Islamic tradition, what exactly IS a Muslim at this time and how that shifts, the clash of classism and Arabization vs proto-egalitarian institutions from Muhammad's time and all sorts of other stuff. Also, expect frequent appearances by the Mothers of the Believers. Aisha, Hafsah, and the other Umm al-Mumineen are too interesting to not take a center stage in a TL like this!
Last edited: