You can repost your message in the >1900 thread.How likely is it that the United States will not intervene in other nations after 1946, what would be the consequences?
That probably require several break throughs in steel production and chemistry a few decades before OTL.‘Earlier Automatic Weapons’.
Usually, when a title goes extinct for whatever reason, the titles and land go back to the King. If he wants to, he can create a new Earldom and give the title to someone else...what happened to land under a peerage after its becomes forfeit? like say if an english earldom gets forfeited, does the king become the new earl in all but name, perhaps appointing somekind of viceroy? or do the barons/ hundreds underneath become the new highest level of direct authority?
It depends what period of history you're considering.what happened to land under a peerage after its becomes forfeit? like say if an english earldom gets forfeited, does the king become the new earl in all but name, perhaps appointing somekind of viceroy? or do the barons/ hundreds underneath become the new highest level of direct authority?
It depends what period of history you're considering.
For example, during Edward the Confessor of England's arguments with the Godwine family, he exiled them all at one point and one of the Godwinsons forfeited his earldom (East Anglia, iirc) - which was immediately given to someone else as the new earl (Ælfgar, son of Leofric of Mercia, iirc). The same sort of thing happened quite a few times over the following few centuries.
It just wasn't practical to have an earldom without an earl - as you've hinted at, this would have left a gap in the various levels of authority, particularly once feudalism was firmly established.
In later centuries when titles were given by letters patent and were less concerned with military matters (in other words, when becoming an earl or other noble didn't automatically bring with it the need to provide a set number of knights/etc for a number of days per year), then titles could be left vacant without having such a potential negative impact on the defence of the realm. So the monarch could afford to have a vacant earldom/dukedom/whatever - either from a line going extinct or if a title were forfeited.
Any title once created never really dies out though; as vandevere says above, any empty title reverts to the crown and is available any time in the future - if a new 'Earl of Thisplace' is created, it's a 're-creation' of the old earldom.
Some titles are vested permanently in the crown (such as the Duchies of Rothesay and Lancaster, for example).
The above is the system in the UK (and its constituent countries in earlier centuries) - it may well be different in other countries.
There's some information here: https://www.britannica.com/topic/earl-title
and here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl#Changing_power_of_English_earls
late medieval england, was trying to figure out what fell under the kings demense. i think i understand now thoIt depends what period of history you're considering.
For example, during Edward the Confessor of England's arguments with the Godwine family, he exiled them all at one point and one of the Godwinsons forfeited his earldom (East Anglia, iirc) - which was immediately given to someone else as the new earl (Ælfgar, son of Leofric of Mercia, iirc). The same sort of thing happened quite a few times over the following few centuries.
It just wasn't practical to have an earldom without an earl - as you've hinted at, this would have left a gap in the various levels of authority, particularly once feudalism was firmly established.
In later centuries when titles were given by letters patent and were less concerned with military matters (in other words, when becoming an earl or other noble didn't automatically bring with it the need to provide a set number of knights/etc for a number of days per year), then titles could be left vacant without having such a potential negative impact on the defence of the realm. So the monarch could afford to have a vacant earldom/dukedom/whatever - either from a line going extinct or if a title were forfeited.
Any title once created never really dies out though; as vandevere says above, any empty title reverts to the crown and is available any time in the future - if a new 'Earl of Thisplace' is created, it's a 're-creation' of the old earldom.
Some titles are vested permanently in the crown (such as the Duchies of Rothesay and Lancaster, for example).
The above is the system in the UK (and its constituent countries in earlier centuries) - it may well be different in other countries.
There's some information here: https://www.britannica.com/topic/earl-title
and here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl#Changing_power_of_English_earls
How about the Chukutko-Kamchatkan peoples, particularly Chukchis and Koryaks (although we need a scenario that would wank beyond their OTL occupation of reindeer herders.)Who would inhabit Estonia, Pannonia, Sapmi, Finland and Karelia if the Uralic peoples just, never existed ?
That's a hell of an interesting scenario, and I'll make a map about it rn, but I was more wondering like, realistically, what people might have been there insteadHow about the Chukutko-Kamchatkan peoples, particularly Chukchis and Koryaks (although we need a scenario that would wank beyond their OTL occupation of reindeer herders.)
Although Chukutko-Kamchatkan (most specifically Chukchi-Koryak clans) tribes settling in Pannonia (and beyond) would be more complicated.That's a hell of an interesting scenario, and I'll make a map about it rn, but I was more wondering like, realistically, what people might have been there instead
They’d be as influential as the Germans. Assuming that the Soviets still exist, they’d likely die off depending on the way the world goes.Hey,How Would be if Latins(Order of Saint Lazzarus) dominated Estonia and Latvia instead of Livonian/Teutonic Order
How this would change the Estonian Language
and How would Change the Names of/how would be the Lazzaranian Latin Names(Considering that The First Crusader Invasion was at Muhu Island,Knihu Island,Western Laanemaa and Eastern Saaremaa:
Saaremaa(Estonian)/Osel(OTL Teutonic Name)/Oselia(OTL Modern/Teutonic Infleunced Latin)
Hiumaa(Estonian)/Dago(Teutonic)
Parnu(Estonian)/Pernau(Teutonic
Tartu(Estonian)/Dopart(Teutonic)
Tallinn(Estonian)/Tallinna(Estonian and Finnish/Reval(Estonian, and Teutonic)/Lydanisse(Estonian and Dannish)
Liepaja(Latvian)/Libau(Teutonic)
Also Considering that They Form a Kingdom(Latin Kingdom of Aestia) like in Jerusalem,how would be the Flag,how would be the Latin Elite unitil today days,how would be the flag of the Latin Baltics/Latin Estones,how this would change the History of Estonian,Seto,Voro,Tartu,Mulgi,Livonian and Kreevin Votes Languages,and of the Latvian Ones,and this would allow a Monarchy in Estonia?,also how would this Change the History of some People like Kreusestern,Bellisguasen,\Lydia Koidula and her Family,also how would be the flag of the Medieval Era Military Order/Crusade Kingdom and how this would Make Influence at least the Population and Both Estonian and Latvian CoA
late medieval england, was trying to figure out what fell under the kings demense. i think i understand now tho