Map Thread V

Status
Not open for further replies.
it's a surviving and wanked republic of Venice?

I like the idea but I think that the internal divisions should be done in a different way, especially the part in Italy:)

Well, not really wanked, it does'nt control all of Historical Venice or really alot of territory overall, though it is the second largest Euro country ITTL.

They were originally (and are on the world map) done using dotted line divisions, but since each state was'nt gonna be the same color I had to make a full border to prevent the colors from filling in multiple states.
 

Krall

Banned
I vomited in my mouth a little.
How about no?:rolleyes:
Me too.
It makes
no-sense-what-so-ever
Gracious flying fudge lamb stew, what compelled you to do that?

Hey! It's my job to needlessly insult people about their maps!

Oh, and, Darkaiz? That should have been "It makes no sense whatsoever".

It should have been posted in ASB map thread, right?

No, it shouldn't have been posted at all. We are recoilling in horror not because it is ASB, but because it is a terrible map.
 
No, they're both still part of British North America. Before 1867 "Canada" means the St Lawrence watershed, basically. (And to the second question: yes before 1784, although your POD is after that so "the maritimes" might be a better name.)

It ain't British anymore...and in any event it's not an official name, just what they are referred to, as Pakistan and Bangladesh-to-be were referred to as west and east Pakistan. But you intrigue me: if British North America broke away from the home country in the 1850's as a result of some political catastrophe or other, what might the proto-Canadians call themselves?

Bruce
 
It ain't British anymore...and in any event it's not an official name, just what they are referred to, as Pakistan and Bangladesh-to-be were referred to as west and east Pakistan. But you intrigue me: if British North America broke away from the home country in the 1850's as a result of some political catastrophe or other, what might the proto-Canadians call themselves?

Bruce

It's the wrong name! Like I said, it's like calling Georgia "South Carolina". And for your second question - it depends when it happens: pre-1867 I have no idea, although "Canada" is doubtful, but in that case it's unlikely they'd all leave en bloc anyways (either some stay or they all go their separate ways). Post-1867 it's definitely Canada.
 
It's the wrong name! Like I said, it's like calling Georgia "South Carolina"..

If the former South Carolina now was a seperate nation called Freedonia, and Georgia had not previously existed save as several seperate states. But fine. I suppose the Maratimes might not want to be referred to by a name previously touched by the French and therefore presumably icky. Would east and west Canada not provoke your wrath?


And for your second question - it depends when it happens: pre-1867 I have no idea, although "Canada" is doubtful, but in that case it's unlikely they'd all leave en bloc anyways (either some stay or they all go their separate ways). Post-1867 it's definitely Canada.

None of them are "staying" because the British had a leftist revolution (a couple of them, actually) and are essentially a one-party dictatorship. And the most likely outcome of _not_ sticking together was absorbtion by the US, which swallowed up the western territories in any event. But too late to change the map now in any event.

Bruce
 
I approve; is the NGF a radical German state, and how do the Bavarians feel about their lot?

Nationalist, republican, Protestant, and definitely in favor of a strong government to strengthen the nation, but not actually full-out radical: British-aligned out of mutual detestation of Napoleonic France. The Bavarian government is occasionally troubled by pro-German-unity revolutionary groups, but the Catholic and capitalist upper classes are ok enough with the current situation to make a successful revolution unlikely in the short to medium term.

Bruce
 
Last edited:
Okay it's not a great achievment, but it's the first time i'm not cannibalize Wikicommons.

Socialist Federation of Czechosilesia, in 1974, french communist party document.

[IMAGE]

This is well done. Would parts of Silesia as displayed include Sorbian populations?
 
.......just wow. I mean WOW! This makes me ill and tears apart a little of what left of my soul inside. If this was your aim them congrats you did it.:mad:
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top