Given Theodore's connections to The Old Pretender, will see some Jacobite support or influence beyond letters in the rebellion?

He's already had a fair amount. Theodore, both IOTL and ITTL, was served by a number of different Jacobite officers (mostly Irishmen) - McDonald, Callan, Kilmallock, and Powers have already been mentioned in this thread, and there were others as well. There are certainly some "Wild Geese" among his foreign troops at the moment, although the largest ethnic component is German.

Also, is Britain aware of Theodore's connections?

Yes, but only to a point. Theodore occasionally attempted to gain Hanoverian assistance by offering his knowledge of (invented) Jacobite plots; how else would Theodore be in a position to gain this information unless he had prominent Jacobite friends? By this time in his life, several books had been written about Theodore already, and if they even did the least bit of research the British would know that Theodore had married into an Irish Jacobite family (who were also related to the Duke of Ormonde) and had been an agent of Cardinal Alberoni, who had directed Jacobite schemes during his time in power in Spain. They clearly knew about some of his Jacobite officer friends, although they may not have held that against him; IOTL, Kilmallock ended up returning to Britain and becoming a British officer despite having been a descendant of Wild Geese.

The question is whether they had deeper, less readily available information on Theodore's history. Did they know that he had been an undercover Jacobite spy in England? Did they know that he was involved with, and may have even been on Ormonde's fleet that was intended to help the 1719 Jacobite Rebellion? Did they know that he corresponded with the Earl Marischal James Keith? Had they heard the rumors that Theodore had received a knighthood from the Pretender? If so, they gave little indication of it. Mann liked Theodore least of all, and as Britain's man in Tuscany he was in a better position than most to know about what was going on at the Pretender's court in Rome, but Mann's dislike appears to have been strictly personal. None of his correspondence about Theodore, or at least none that I've come across, suggests that he suspected Theodore to be a Stuart agent or was in any way concerned about his Jacobite past. If he knew, he clearly did not think it to be important.

ITTL presumably the truth will come out eventually, but after the '45 Rebellion political Jacobitism was basically dead and it's hard to see anyone really throwing a fit about it. In the latter half of the 18th century, I imagine the British will have more important things to think about than whether the King of Corsica used to be a Jacobite agent decades ago.
 
Last edited:
savoy might do well to support Theodore covertly, not just in armaments and cash but if troop training as well, maybe even Britain will pitch in by giving Theodore some caputured ships and little training for Corsican crews. I can see the jews filling up the void left by Genoese and with the connections many of these immegrants will have to the financial organs of Europe, corseca may begin to economically develop.
 
Peace and Justice
Peace and Justice


WruKBZm.png

Artist's interpretation of women performing a voceru over the body of a murdered kinsman.

Despite Genoa’s disinterest in engaging with the Corsicans’ demands, the negotiations between the representatives of the consulta and Commissioner-General Pier Maria Giustiniani, Bishop of Ventimiglia, continued for months. It was a long exercise in futility. The rebel negotiators pressed Giustiniani for an ever lower tax burden, while the bishop pointed out that the Republic at the very least needed enough money to actually administer the island. Growing exasperated at one point, he declared that Genoa could indeed ask the Corsicans for no money at all, but the Corsicans would receive nothing in return, and even their own consulta had instituted a poll tax to try and enforce some form of justice. The Corsican representatives, however, remained frustratingly obdurate. The whole argument was of dubious worth, for neither Giustiniani nor the Corsican delegates were actually empowered by their respective governments to approve any concession or agreement. The commissioner-general eventually came to the conclusion that neither side was acting in good faith. The Genoese were interested only in using the negotiations to buy time, while Giustiniani believed the Corsicans were knowingly making impossible demands to try to bait the Genoese into refusing and thus placing the blame for their rebellion on the Republic.

As this pointless affair dragged on in Bastia, King Theodore was trying to run a government. By the end of the summer he had filled several key vacancies. The vacant post of Prime Minister was returned to its original holder Marquis Luigi Giafferi, the “grand old man of the Revolution,” who in August resigned his colonelcy in the army of Naples and returned to Corsica. Giafferi, now 75 years old, still had the mental clarity to be of some use as an advisor, but his greatest utility was as a propaganda asset. Upon his return and reinstatement to Theodore’s government, Giafferi launched a blistering attack on the Concessioni, dencouncing even Genoa’s generous terms as an insult to the nation and claiming (correctly) that the Genoese had no intention of accepting Corsican demands and were merely dragging their feet.

Royal Cabinet of 1743

Marchese Luigi Giafferi, Prime Minister and Secretary of State
Conte Gianpietro Gaffori, Secretary of State and President of the Currency
Padre Giulio Natali, Grand Chancellor and Keeper of the Seals
Padre Carlo Rostini, Secretary to the Chancellery
Conte Marcantonio Giappiconi, Secretary of War
Padre Erasmo Orticoni, Foreign Minister and Almoner of the Realm
Pietro Ginestra, Minister of Justice and Auditor-General


The post of chancellor, vacant since the death of Sebastiano Costa, was given to the former secretary to the chancellery Father Giulio Natali, one of the best-known authors in support of Corsican independence, while Natali’s previous position was filled by Carlo Rostini, a 33-year old Jesuit-educated priest with a doctorate in Theology who had previously served as one of the royalist government’s agents abroad.

To serve as his minister of justice, Theodore selected Pietro Simone Ginestra, a 73 year old lawyer from Oletta. Coincidentally, many years before Ginestra had been the diocesan chancellor of the Bishop of Sagone, the very same man who was presently Corsica’s commissioner-general. Nevertheless there was no doubt as to his loyalty. A skilled writer and poet, Ginestra was best for the pro-revolutionary history Ragguagli degli ultimi tumulti seguiti nell'Isola di Corsica sino al presente written under the pseudonym of “Orazio Buttafuoco.” He too had publicly denounced the Concessioni. Scarcely younger than Giafferi, Ginestra was perhaps not the most energetic choice for the position, but Theodore had a political motivation: the Ginestra family was among the most prominent clans in the Nebbio region. His eldest son, Simone Ginestra, had fought for Theodore during his campaign against the Genoese at San Fiorenzo, and his youngest son Giuseppe Ginestra was a former officer in the Neapolitan army.[1] Although the Ginestra clan was already “national” in its sympathies, Ginestra’s appointment bound them more tightly to the king and allowed the royal government to extend its influence into the Nebbio district.

From his capital at Corti - he had moved back into the Corti government house that had been in headquarters prior to the French conquest - Theodore sought to consolidate his control over the Diqua. His foremost preoccupation was judicial. The withdrawal of the Genoese from the interior had left most of Corsica as a vast, ungoverned space, and violence rose sharply. Some of this violence, of course, took the form of politically-motivated attacks against filogenovesi, but without any possibility of government reprisal it was an ideal time for men to act upon grievances of all kinds. Theodore renewed his criminalization of the vendetta as well as the acts of offense which often caused it, the rimbeccu [2] and the attacar.[3] To simply declare something illegal, however, was not enough, a fact which was amply demonstrated by the fact that the vendetta and its associated ills had been criminalized under Genoese law for decades. If justice was to be brought to Corsica, it would require more than just signed edicts.

The first step was to gain control over the “flying companies” established by the consulta of Bozio, which were sustained by a 1 lira hearth tax. Owing to poor enforcement and organization, the yield of this tax was not particularly great; the number of men that it could support was scarcely more than a hundred over the entire Diqua (save the Balagna, where Marquis Simone Fabiani had his own company and collected his own tax). The consulta had attempted to keep these forces out of Theodore’s hands by appointing local captains to lead them, but Theodore appointed the auditors who collected and disbursed the moneys, and in the end the first loyalty of the flying companies and their commanders turned out to be their paymaster. By October at the latest, this force was Theodore’s police in all but name.

Lacking the money to establish any sort of complex judiciary, Theodore sought to economize by targeting the most serious of offenses with a single court. In September, the king signed an edict creating an extraordinary tribunal of three magistrates appointed by the Minister of Justice. The tribunal was to be sort of traveling courthouse, moving from place to place with its own law enforcement in tow (a detachment of the “flying companies”). The tribunal, however, was not an all-purpose court. It concerned itself only with a handful of capital crimes, most of them concerning the practice of the vendetta, which Theodore believed could be crushed only with extreme measures. Its jurisdiction was very narrowly defined to the following offenses:
  • Commiting murder or being an accessory to murder
  • Public incitement to murder
  • Laying a hand on a maiden so as to cause her dishonor
  • Sheltering or giving succor to a fugitive from the tribunal
Officially this body was variously called the tribunale ambulatoriale (“ambulatory tribunal”) or tribunale capitale (“capital tribunal”), but the Corsicans soon gave it their own nickname, A Marcia (“the march”), presumably alluding to the “marching” of the magistrates and their gendarmes from pieve to pieve. The magistrates would set up shop in a parish where a vendetta killing or other act within their jurisdiction had been committed, gather witnesses so as to identify a perpetrator, and dispatch its enforcers to hunt him down. If the wanted man was caught alive, he would be dragged back to the tribunal, and after a cursory hearing sentenced to death and executed by firing squad. There were no appeals.

The threat of execution was not as significant as it might seem. As a general rule, murderers already lived under the threat of violent retribution from the family of the victim under the reciprocal logic of the vendetta. To address this problem, the Marcia was also vested with extraordinary powers of punishment. If a wanted man became a fugitive, the tribunal could levy fines against a fugitive’s family and relatives or seize their property. In the case of a vendetta transversa killing, which was held to be especially heinous,[4] the tribunal’s men would burn down the murderer’s house, and if such a man was killed he was prohibited from being buried in consecrated ground or receiving funeral rites, an extreme sanction indeed in such a religious and superstitious society.

Although the Marcia only concerned itself with nominally capital crimes, its sentences were not always capital. Murder always merited a death sentence, but if man wanted for another crime surrendered himself to the tribunal voluntarily the magistrates were authorized to pursue other “remedies” in consultation with the leaders of the pieve. The attacar, for instance, could sometimes be remedied by marriage (either to the perpetrator himself or another, typically a relative, who agreed to “overlook” the loss of the maiden’s honor), although in such cases the perpetrator would still be fined. To provide an incentive for cooperation, those who were accessories to murder or gave succor to a fugitive were not punished if they assisted in the murderer’s capture. Female criminals were only executed in the case of murder, which was exceedingly rare; those who gave succor to a fugitive or committed incitement were usually fined. A difficult case was that of the provocative voceru, a funeral dirge traditionally composed and performed by women, which often called for bloody vengeance in explicit terms. The tribunal occasionally charged offenders under the charge of incitement, but the magistrates were clearly more comfortable with executing murderers than punishing bereaved women for their lamentations.

The Marcia certainly had its faults. As it did little “investigating” and relied almost entirely on the testimony of local witnesses, it was susceptible to being misled if a criminal had broad support in the community or if the community generally considered a killing to be justified. Its sentences were harsh and its procedures were, by modern standards, nowhere near a fair trial; the magistrates seem to have made up their minds largely from the initial witness testimony before the accused even made an appearance, no objection was made against hearsay, and once captured the actual “trial” was exceedingly brief. Nevertheless, in some concrete ways it was an improvement over Genoese justice. It was, in the first place, a Corsican-run court, and its magistrates understood custom very well even if it was to some degree their purpose to fight against it. Honest efforts were made to confer, where possible, with local leaders, and the tribunal seems to have had more success with enlisting local cooperation than the Genoese had ever gotten.

Theodore’s justice relied not only on courts, but on Corsica’s religious community. Although the Church hierarchy was against him, support for the revolt in general and the king in particular was widespread among the island’s native clergy and the mendicant orders (the Franciscans were particularly supportive of the Naziunali). Theodore urged the priests to preach against the vendetta and to withhold the sacraments from those involved. He further called for clergymen to volunteer as paceri (“men of peace”), or mediators, who were intended to arbitrate disputes in the hope of addressing grievances before they caused bloodshed.[A]

The effect of these reforms should not be overstated. Little reliable evidence exists to support any sudden drop in the murder rate. Theodore’s instructions to the clergy, while clearly followed by some, were not mandatory. While the Marcia acquired a formidable reputation, a single roving court could only handle so many cases at one time, and by no means did the thinly-spread “flying companies” always get their man. Ultimately the vendetta was a cultural phenomenon which could not be stamped out overnight with the small amount of force Theodore was capable of applying. Nevertheless, both the Marcia and Theodore’s gendarmes were surprisingly efficient, catching more murderers and bandits than Spinola’s “judicial expeditions” had been able to. It was helpful that the flying columns were composed of Corsicans, who knew the terrain and had a light logistical footprint compared to companies of Genoese regulars.

Not all the king’s attention was on justice. He commanded the minting of new coins to bolster the legitimacy of his rule, but profit was not out of the question; Theodore may well have been aware that his brief 1736-37 issuance of coins had become collector’s items, which were reported to sell for as much as two silver sequins, or approximately 80 times the face value of Theodore’s 5-soldi billon coins. A proposed mint at Corti evidently did not mint much, and may not have produced anything at all; more success was had at Isola Rossa, where there was more money changing hands. Although they remained crude in form, the 1743 issue did see some increase in fineness relative to the first issue, with the 5-soldi pieces hovering around 12-15% silver compared to the old pieces which were virtually all copper. As the old coins were in complete discredit among the Corsicans themselves (and in any case the old dies had apparently been lost), new dies were made which replaced the prosaic “Pro Bono Publico” with the more martial “Vincere Tyrannis” (“to conquer tyranny”) on the 2 and 5 soldi pieces. The 20-soldi (1 lira) silver pieces remained largely unaltered.

Theodore’s budget remained slim at first, but windfalls were soon to come his way. The king appears to have enjoyed virtually no profit from Ajaccio, which probably had less to do with corruption than with the fact that Count Antonio Colonna-Bozzi had to pay what remained of his battalion (whose salary was, by the time of Ajaccio’s fall, several months in arrears). With the consulta’s capitation going entirely to the gendarmes, this left only port fees at Isola Rossa (minus Fabiani’s “expenses”), some rather spotty collection of the tithe, and the occasional seizure or sale of filogenovese property. Much of this went to pay the salaries of officers, secretaries, and magistrates. In October, however, the king was informed that his Jewish backers had agreed to loan him an additional 3,000 sequins, somewhat lower than his initial loan but nevertheless welcome. Theodore dispatched his nephew Matthias von Drost to Livorno to buy goods on this credit (and withdraw some as cash). The supplies were almost invariably military - muskets, flints, lead, gunpowder, and sulfur to produce more gunpowder - as well as cloth, iron, and leather for clothing, tents, tools, and shoes. There were also the occasional remittances from Hamet, stationed in Tunis, usually in the form of arms but including small amounts of cash and specie.

To say that the peace endured through the remainder of 1743 does not mean that there was no fighting. Throughout the autumn there were frequent clashes in the Nebbio, where naziunali and filogenovesi clan leaders skirmished with one another while the Genoese garrison remained shut up within San Fiorenzo. The most serious fighting was in the east between naziunali militias and the followers of Giacomo Filippo Martinetti of Fiumorbo, one of the few filogenovesi captains who had resisted expulsion owing to the general pro-Genoese sentiment of his pieve and the considerable size of his following (claimed by the Genoese in 1742 to be as many as 300 men). Martinetti held out and his men even raided neighboring pieves; in contrast, the loyalist movement in the Nebbio crumbled, and following the major withdrawal of Genoese troops in October the naziunali gained nearly complete control of the pieve outside San Fiorenzo itself. In the northwest, Fabiani and his comrades seized control of Calenzana against the wishes of most of its population, who at times resisted with force. The garrison of Calvi, however, was too timid to sally forth and oppose them, and lost the ability entirely following the withdrawal.

The peace was not without occasional disruptions. Theodore could easily keep his promise to forgo violence against the Genoese as he had few forces to command, but he could not stop occasional attacks by Corsican militia and “bandits” against Genoese patrols south of Bastia, where the Genoese sought to retain control of Mariana and Casinca (and thus the approach to Bastia and its suburbs). A more direct violation of the truce occured in October, when a Genoese galliot caught sight of a smuggler’s ship off the coast of Tavagna and gave chase. A coastal tower nearby, manned by naziunali, saw the smuggler being pursued into the shallows and fired upon the Genoese ship. The galliot was unharmed but broke off its pursuit, and it was considered a serious enough incident to be reported to the Senate by Giustiniani.

Such breaches of the peace were not altogether one-sided. Giustiniani’s forces did not dare patrol far outside their citadels, but the would-be reconciler was not averse to employing the dirty tactics which the Genoese had often used against the rebels. While traveling near Bozio, an attempt was made to assassinate Theodore by luring him into an ambush, as the Genoese had paid off some of the local militia. The king, however, left the village of Mazzola at nearly the crack of dawn before his would-be murderers were in place. Such tales only fuelled what the Corsicans had long been whispering, that the king was shielded from harm by divine providence. The king himself encouraged these rumors, claiming that his latest escape from death was due to a warning given him in a dream by Saint Devota herself. That was both powerful and credible in the land of the mazzeri, sometimes (albeit somewhat inaccurately) called the shamans of Corsica, who hunted beasts in their dreams and were said to be able to predict impending deaths.[B]

Not all the nationals enjoyed divine protection. Giovanni Tomaso Franzini, an ambitious “bandit” leader who had fought alongside Johann Freidrich von Neuhoff zu Rauschenburg in 1741, was ambushed and murdered in November, and the Balagnese national leader Gio Ambrogio Quilici was wounded by a would-be assassin’s bullet near his home in Speloncato. But the king’s providence did appear to extend to Marquis Fabiani, who was the target of at least two failed plots in these months, one to murder him and the other to abduct his wife and son. For the latter plot there is direct evidence that Giustiniani himself had given the order. Yet the naziunali were not averse to stooping to the same tactics. The filogenovese captain Domenico Paganelli of Moriani narrowly escaped assassination in August. When Marco Pasqualini, a captain of the Rostino militia who had been named in the Good Friday Plot (and had vanished before he could be questioned) returned from exile, he did not even make it to his home pieve before he was gunned down in Ampugnani by unnamed assailants. His treason to the national cause had never been proved, but it may be notable that the Marcia made no inquest into his murder.

Footnotes
[1] His middle son, Salvadore, was a naturalist and a professor of botany at the University of Pisa.
[2] The rimbeccu (from Italian rimbeccare, to retort or reply) was an allegation of unfulfilled revenge. In Corsica the vendetta was not merely an option, but a social obligation; a family which suffered a murder was expected to reply with murder. To give the rimbeccu was to publicly taunt a person by claiming that they had not fulfilled their duty of vengeance. The rimbeccu was considered deeply humiliating, tantamount to an accusation of cowardice and dishonoring one’s family, and the insult was itself a frequent cause of violence and an invitation to vendetta. The Genoese had already criminalized the giving of the rimbeccu before the Revolution, but to little effect.
[3] The attacar (literally “strike,” probably from Italian attaccare, to attack) was a physical act in which a man asserted possession of an unmarried woman by pulling off her headscarf or touching her hands or face. In Corsican society, a woman was expected to not only be a virgin but literally untouched by men if she wished to maintain her honor and be considered eligible for marriage. Despite being a “mere” touch or removal of the headscarf, the attacar was a symbolic rape which rendered the woman impure and thus unmarriageable. Unless the man who had performed the attacar subsequently married his victim, it was a grave affront which provoked a vendetta. While there were occasions when the attacar was done to force a marriage against the will of the woman’s family (either to a willing or unwilling bride), the attacar was primarily inflicted by men with no intention of marriage as a means to deliberately and publicly dishonor a rival family. Some considered it to be the primary cause of murder on Corsica in the early 18th century. Like the rimbeccu, the attacar had been made a criminal act by the Genoese, but they had failed to eliminate it.
[4] A “transverse vendetta” killing occurred when the relation of a murder victim, unable to revenge himself upon the murderer, instead targeted a relation of the murderer (usually a brother or cousin) for a reprisal killing.

Timeline Notes
[A] The term paceri has a number of different connotations in Corsican history. It did indeed mean a traditional mediator, a role which was often filled by priests, but it was also used as an alternate title in 1745 for the “protectors” Venturini, Matra, and Gaffori, who together led the national movement. In more modern times it has apparently been used to indicate a high-ranking member of the Corsican mafia.
[B] For more on the mazzeri, who are quite frankly weird as hell, I recommend Dorothy Carrington’s classic book The Dream-Hunters of Corsica. My local public library had a copy.
 
Last edited:
I like the Marcia. It is probably the best that can be done at the moment in terms of a criminal justice system, somewhat reminiscing of wild west judges. State building doesn't happen overnight, as you mentioned, but this is already a step in the right direction.
 

Isaac Beach

Banned
RIP Franzini, he seemed like quite the character if I recall the updates in which he appeared correctly, albeit a little unhinged. While it was obviously a different time this update really reminds us that Corsica was very backwards and violent, because while you’re very measured in your assessment of the various actors of this TL I think by nature of its protagonist and subject matter the Corsicans usually come across as quite valiant, whereas this demonstrates just how brutal they really were as a society.
 
RIP Franzini, he seemed like quite the character if I recall the updates in which he appeared correctly, albeit a little unhinged. While it was obviously a different time this update really reminds us that Corsica was very backwards and violent, because while you’re very measured in your assessment of the various actors of this TL I think by nature of its protagonist and subject matter the Corsicans usually come across as quite valiant, whereas this demonstrates just how brutal they really were as a society.
Well, "valiant" and "brutal" have some tendency to be a frequent pair in history.
 
With increased central authority, access to some external sources of income and the loyalist arsenal still in play, I am thinking that Theodore will be able to start the siege of at least one of the Genoese strongholds the very day the ceasefire ends.
 
With increased central authority, access to some external sources of income and the loyalist arsenal still in play, I am thinking that Theodore will be able to start the siege of at least one of the Genoese strongholds the very day the ceasefire ends.
He almost has to. San Fiorenzo and then Bastia are the most obvious focus, though considering how undermanned Bonifacio is, maybe sparing some artillery for there might be worthwhile. Logistics are far worse here however. Calvi can wait. Actually the Genoese position looks untenable in the medium term.
 
He almost has to. San Fiorenzo and then Bastia are the most obvious focus, though considering how undermanned Bonifacio is, maybe sparing some artillery for there might be worthwhile. Logistics are far worse here however. Calvi can wait. Actually the Genoese position looks untenable in the medium term.
let us not forget the chekhov's gun of the apprehended arsenal in bonifacio.
 
So Theodore's using the truce period to consolidate his rule; I do wonder if, pretty much as soon as fighting resumes on Corsica (early 1744), the other shoe in Sardinia drops (maybe the Bourbons decide they can't be flipped, or the Finale issue gets pressed somehow, or something different from OTL), getting Corsica the makings of a proper alliance that much sooner.
 
Surprising as it may seem, getting Genoa in the war earlier hadn't really occurred to me. Unfortunately, I don't really have any sources that spend much time on Genoese decision-making during this crucial period. I do know that de la Mina (the Spanish commander of the army in Provence in 1744), who wanted to invade Italy through Liguria, argued that the assault should be postponed until the Genoese could be cajoled into joining. The French, however, apparently grew tired of the constant vacillation of the Genoese, and Conti (the French commander) forced Mina to agree to an attack over the Alps instead.

Vacillation was indeed something the Genoese were good at, so that's in character. I suspect the real reason they didn't join the war at that time is that they were waiting for a clear sign that the Bourbons were winning. That wasn't really evident in 1744, as France had been taking it on the chin pretty much continuously for the last two years. By 1745, however, with the Prussians beating up Austria in Germany and Spanish armies converging on Lombardy from two sides, it must have seemed like the winning bet was Bourbon. Their ultimate decision was further delayed in 1745 by France vainly holding out for some sort of deal with Sardinia, but that may have been less of an issue in 1744, when Louis XV was still furious at Sardinia for betraying him at Worms and looking to humble Charles Emmanuel rather than conciliate him.

That suggests that the most plausible way for Genoa to get into the war earlier would be for the Pragmatic Allies to underperform relative to history. That's quite possible, but not necessarily compatible with an outcome of the war that includes Corsican independence.

Regardless, 1744 will be a busy year in Italy, and we'll see our first major departures from OTL in the broader war. I haven't quite settled on a plan yet, but soon...
 
Last edited:
The Gauntlet Thrown
The Gauntlet Thrown

The war in all probability will now be carried on with great vigour in Italy.

- The Duke of Newcastle to Admiral Thomas Mathews, December 1743


On Christmas Day of 1743, a conference was held in Turin to discuss the strategy of the Pragmatic Allies in Italy for the coming year. The Sardinians were represented by King Carlo Emanuele III and his chief minister Marquis Carlo Vincenzo Ferrero d’Ormea, the Austrians by their plenipotentiary ambassador Count Wenzel Anton von Kaunitz-Rietberg and General Baron Ladislaus Kökényesdi von Vetés, and the British by Rear Admiral Thomas Mathews and ambassador Arthur Villettes. Although the Treaty of Worms had made them allies, it had not resolved their fundamental differences as to how they believed the war ought to be prosecuted.

The Sardinians had every reason to expect a major Gallispan offensive into their territory once the snows melted sufficiently to permit passage through the Alps, as the Bourbon allies had already amassed more than 50,000 men on the west side of the Var under Marshal Lautrec and General de la Mina.[A] Admiral Mathews was equally apprehensive about this advance, particularly if it were to come along the coastal route towards Nice and Villefranche. Villefranche was the primary victualling base of his squadron. His closest alternatives were Port Mahon and Livorno, both of which were much further from the fleet’s base of operations at Hyères Roadstead. Continuing the blockade would still be possible even without Villefranche, but it would become more difficult, and as a result more porous. Mathews had helped the Sardinians harden this position by disembarking a substantial quantity of cannon and swivel guns from his ships to add to the fortifications, but the British could only offer weapons, not men.

Matters were further complicated by the ambiguous position of France. France had by now declared war on Sardinia, but they were not as yet formally at war with Britain despite the two countries already coming to blows on the continent. This gave France a substantial advantage, as if the French fleet were to emerge from Toulon on its own (that is, without the Spanish fleet which was also at Toulon) Mathews would have no cause to attack them. What Mathews feared was that the French admiral might effect a junction with the French Atlantic squadron based out of Brest, and this combined fleet could then descend upon his detachment off the Italian coast without warning and cause great havoc. War or not, if the French left Toulon he was obligated to pursue them, but if he gave chase he would be drawn away from the Italian coast, giving the Spanish free reign to escape with their fleet and move supplies and troops into Italy.

The Austrians were entirely insensitive to these concerns. Queen Maria Theresa had stomached the loss of Silesia only because she had been assured of compensation, and she was determined to swiftly take it with an invasion of Naples led by Feldmarschall Georg Christian, Fürst von Lobkowitz. Ambassador Kaunitz wanted at least a dozen British ships of the line dispatched to assist in this venture, which Mathews found quite mad given that the Toulon fleet was busily preparing for action and might break out any week now. D’Ormea argued that the primary aim of the allies in Italy was not to conquer Naples but to prevent a junction between the Gallispan army in Provence and the Spanish army in central Italy. If the Austrians marched against Naples and the Bourbons managed to penetrate the Riviera into Genoa and march on Parma and Piacenza, Lobkowitz’s army would be caught between the Spanish forces. But such arguments made no impression upon the Queen of Hungary, who suspected that the canny Carlo Emanuele was once more trying to cheat her and use Austrian soldiers for his own purposes. When the conference ended a week later there was still no compromise in sight. The Queen of Hungary was determined to have Naples no matter what, even though Lobkowitz himself opined that action against Naples without naval support was impractical.

Mathews’ fears seemed to be realized on the 1st of February, when he received word that the French Atlantic squadron had sailed from Brest. He could not be certain where they were headed; perhaps, as he had feared, they intended to join the Toulon squadron. It was also possible that they intended to cruise in the Atlantic so as to interfere with British trade and supply convoys, or to make some attack against Ireland or England itself. But Mathews had even more pressing things to worry about, for on February 4th the combined Gallispan fleet, including 28 ships of the line, sailed from Toulon.

Mathews’ assumption about the Gallispan fleet, that it intended to escape to sea and rendezvous with the Brest squadron, proved incorrect. Paris and Madrid had other plans: They wished to bypass Sardinia entirely by landing the Gallispan army directly in Italy, probably at Spezia. That would require gaining naval superiority in the Mediterranean, which meant defeating Mathews and his squadron. Thus the intent of the Gallispan admirals Claude-Élisée de Court and Juan José de Navarro was not to escape Mathews, but to attack him, and the departure of the squadron from Brest was entirely irrelevant. But the Bourbons, too, had misjudged the enemy, for they had underestimated the strength of the British fleet. By the numbers, the fleets were comparable; the British had only one ship of the line more than their opponents. But the British edge in firepower was more considerable. Although the Spanish boasted the most powerful ship on the water, the 110-gun Real Felipe, the Gallispan fleet possessed only one other ship with more than 74 guns. The British, in contrast, boasted four 90-gun ships and seven 80-gun ships in their fleet.

Court’s attempt to catch the British by surprise in Hyères Roadstead was a failure, and probably impossible, as Mathews’s frigates were watching Toulon closely and kept the admiral abreast of the Gallispan fleet’s movements. Nevertheless, foul wind hampered the development of the British fleet, and they emerged from the Roadstead in poor order. Rather than waiting to form a proper line of battle, Mathews moved quickly to engage despite the confusion of his line. He knew that his ships, being heavily fouled from many months at sea, would be slower than the clean-hulled Gallispan fleet. He still labored under the misconception that the ultimate goal of his enemy was to escape him and find the Brest squadron, and as the French turned away towards the south he feared that failure to begin action immediately would result in the enemy escaping. What ensued was a confused running battle in which the British ships generally got the better of their opponents, but through poor order, bad communications, and incoherent tactics were unable to use their superior firepower to its full advantage. By the end of the day on the 6th, much of the British fleet had been heavily battered and pulled away to the east. The British had only lost one ship - HMS Rupert had surrendered after being disabled and drifting into the Spanish line - but many of Mathews’ ships were so badly damaged as to no longer be combat-effective, including his own flagship.


S0RqNv4.png

HMS Namur, Mathews' flagship, depicted after the battle

Court had looked forward pursuing the enemy with the coming of sunlight, but the situation on the morning of the 7th caused him to reconsider. Firstly, the British fleet had gained in strength. Mathews had now been joined by two undamaged British warships (the 70-gun Nassau and the 80-gun Torbay) which had been cruising when the Gallispan fleet had emerged from Toulon, and his combat-effective ships had finally established an ordered line which shielded the more damaged ships of the fleet. Secondly, the Spanish fleet was in just as much a shambles as the British. Navarro’s flagship, the Real Felipe, was a splintered hulk which was so damaged aloft as to be incapable of keeping up with the fleet, and Navarro himself had been taken out of action by wounds. The Constante had been crippled when a British fireship exploded off her bow. The fleets matched course for a time, but ultimately Court chose to cover the withdrawal of the Spanish. [B]

The Bourbons, and the Spanish in particular, were exultant. All agreed that the Spanish, despite their relative lack of training, had fought with exceptional bravery. Madrid had thus far found little success in the war, and the heroism of Navarro finally furnished them with a triumph. A grateful royal couple bestowed the honorary title of “Marquis of Victory” upon the admiral, who eventually recovered from his wounds; all that tainted the victory was the suspicion that the French had not pulled their full weight and had allowed the Spanish to take the brunt of British fire. The reaction in France was positive but not quite as exuberant, as Court’s decision not to pursue the enemy and potentially turn a marginal victory into a crushing one was heavily criticized. Although some in Britain initially claimed that the battle was a British victory because of Court's withdrawal, most were of the opinion that it was a stinging defeat; the British had lost a ship and taken a severe beating at the hands of inferior forces.

Yet amid the celebration in France and Britain, it was almost forgotten that the combined fleet had not actually achieved its objective. The Bourbons had seriously shaken British supremacy in the Mediterranean, but they had not quite gained it for themselves. The Spanish fleet which limped into Cartagena would be out of action for some time, not only because of physical damage but because of heavy casualties among the crews which would be difficult to replace. The Spanish navy was already short on experienced sailors, and in fact several Spanish ships had remained at Toulon during the battle for want of crewmen. The French fleet was in better condition and for a time enjoyed limited freedom, which as we shall see was used productively. Yet their commanders were not bold enough to take full advantage of the opportunity they had gained, and in any case France was soon dealt a setback that robbed it of all eagerness for naval adventure.

The French had never planned for the Atlantic squadron at Brest to sail southwards, for they had a far grander design: to knock Britain out of the war in one fell swoop. Britain had spread itself thinly trying to contest the war in both the West Indies and the Mediterranean, and the French hoped to use the Brest squadron to secure the English Channel long enough for Maurice de Saxe to land in England with 10,000 men, march on London, and restore the Stuart monarchy. With King George III and his “Pragmatic Army” still in Germany, not many men had been left to guard the homeland itself, and under Saxe’s brilliant command the French gambit might well have succeeded. The French fleet, however, proved unequal to the task. Admiral Jacques Aymar de Roquefeuil had been instructed to “crush” the British Channel squadron which was reported to be only “nine or ten” strong, but in fact the British had amassed a squadron of nineteen sail under Sir John Norris. In what came to be called the “Battle of Dungeness,” Norris’ superior squadron captured three French warships and forced another aground where it was taken apart by the rocks and the tide with the loss of nearly all hands. Some British ships took significant damage, but none were lost or disabled, and all were able to return to port as the winds began to pick up. With their covering fleet utterly defeated, the French were forced to call off the invasion.[C]

Coming shortly after the Battle of Toulon - Norris’ victory had happened just a few days after news of Mathews’ defeat reached London - the Battle of Dungeness was a much-needed shot in the arm for the British and a political debacle in France. Incredibly, all of this had happened while France and Britain remained technically at peace, but after Toulon and Dungeness there was no longer much point in pretending. What the French had started as an opportunistic attempt to interfere in the imperial succession and gain influence in the Empire had now become a continental war for supremacy. In March, recognizing the new reality and the true scale of the conflict, France declared war on Britain and Austria.

The most salient outcome of these clashes on the high sea, as far as the war in Italy was concerned, was that they forced a confrontation over the Alps. Without naval supremacy in the Mediterranean, the Gallispan army had no choice but to enter Italy by land, which required an attack against Sardinia. Nice and Villefranche were the obvious first targets, and their conquest was made considerably easier by the absence of Mathews’ fleet at Port Mahon, where it had been forced by strong winds and his fleet’s desperate need for repairs. Although the Bourbon plan to move the entire army to Italy could not be completed, the Gallispan forces was able to use the temporary absence of Mathews and the weakness of his blockade to move a substantial amount of supplies and materiel to Genoa and Naples, as well as landing some four thousand men at Monaco where they joined with an existing French garrison and hoped to catch the Sardinians in a vise when the main Gallispan army launched its assault over the Var.


Yn8c6cm.jpg

The Sardinian port of Villefranche


The strategic plan after that was less clear. The Spanish, who desired to effect a junction with their Italian army and seize their war objective of Parma as soon as possible, favored a march eastwards through Liguria into central Italy. The French commander Marshal Lautrec thought this risky. A littoral advance would permit the British, who still controlled the seas, to interrupt supplies and communications along the coastal route, and the Gallispan army might find itself cut off from France entirely by means of a Sardinian counterattack. In late February this question remained theoretical, as the Gallispan army had only just begun its land operations against Nice. Nevertheless, it was clear to the Spanish that their plan would benefit substantially from Genoese cooperation, and thus Madrid pressed Genoa to abandon its already compromised neutrality and join the alliance.

As the Bourbons attempted to pull Genoa into their orbit, so the Savoyard monarchy began to engage more seriously with the Corsicans. As has been mentioned, by the end of 1743 Theodore had been in communication with Carlo Emanuele for months. This conversation was mostly one-way, but it had seemed promising enough for Theodore to arrange a more official line of communication. Initially his introduction to d’Ormea, and thus to the king, had been made through Villettes, but by December Theodore had his own man in Turin, Domenico Carlo Rivarola.

Given his background, Rivarola’s participation in the revolution went somewhat against the grain. The extended Rivarola family was one of the notable patrician houses of Genoa. Paolo Battista Rivarola, the commissioner-general of Corsica at the time of Theodore’s landing (who had surrendered Bastia to the king) was Domenico’s distant relative. Domenico belonged to a less prestigious branch of the family from the Ligurian town of Chiavari, and his father had moved from there to Bastia and married a Corsican woman from Omessa. Domenico was born in 1687 and became a career civil servant, eventually serving as the podesta of Bastia in 1724 and the vice-consul of Spain a few years later. When the revolution exploded in 1729, Domenico at first fancied himself a peacemaker and attempted to negotiate between the rebels of the interior and his Genoese employers. He traveled to Genoa to warn the Senate about the seriousness of the rebellion and the need for concessions, but the Genoese government paid him no heed, and thereafter Rivarola’s allegiance turned to the rebels. He was a personal friend of Sebastiano Costa, who had urged him to use his position and resources to win support for the Corsican cause abroad. How successful he was is unclear, but we eventually find him at Livorno arranging shipments of weapons and supplies to the rebels. Rivarola returned to Corsica at some point prior to Theodore’s landing, and when the baron arrived he rushed to give his allegiance.

Although he had gone to considerable trouble to support the rebels, Rivarola’s loyalty was not entirely unwavering, particularly where money was involved. As vice-consul he had been accused of embezzling a considerable sum, though given his later estrangement from the Genoese the truth of this is hard to determine. Theodore made him a governor in the vicinity of Serra, where as an in-law of the Matra clan he had powerful friends, but the king kept him at arms’ length after a letter which intercepted suggested his participation in a conspiracy against several members of the king’s cabinet (this happened shortly after the execution of the traitor Luccioni). When Saviero Matra capitulated to the French and turned collaborator, Rivarola followed, but the Genoese were still after him on embezzlement charges and Marshal Lautrec later expelled him from the island. Rivarola traveled from Livorno to Naples and eventually went north to Turin.

Theodore did not entirely trust Rivarola, but he was the obvious choice to serve as an ambassador in Turin. Rivarola was well-educated, cultured, and of noble blood, which were important assets when dealing with a proper European royal court. He spoke a number of languages fluently (at the very least Italian, French, and Spanish) and he had dabbled in foreign affairs as a vice-consul for Spain. Most importantly of all, he was actually in Turin, where Theodore had few (if any) other Corsican agents. He would certainly not be a plenipotentiary - even if he had been completely trustworthy, Theodore was too possessive of foreign policy to give any man such power - but as a glorified courier between Theodore and the Court of Turin he appeared suitable, and hopefully could not get up to too much mischief.[D]

Theodore was aware that he needed to appear useful to the allies and not a mere beggar, and so for the past few months he had stressed to the Sardinians two key services he could provide. The first concerned the island’s ports. Theodore was well aware of the precarity of the British squadron gathered at the Hyeres Roadstead and the limited number of Mediterranean ports which were available for their shelter and resupply. Calvi and San Fiorenzo (which were the ports most likely to be of interest in the present war) were not well-developed ports and lacked the dockyards and arsenals that would be needed for major repairs or overhauls, but they could certainly be used to supply the British fleet with food and water as well as to careen Mathews’ badly fouled ships. Insofar as this made the British blockade tighter, this was of interest to Carlo Emanuele, but Theodore’s “offer” had serious issues. In the first place, neither Calvi nor San Fiorenzo were actually in Corsican hands, and while San Fiorenzo might be quickly taken by a concerted assault - by October its total garrison was a mere 80 men - Calvi was unlikely to fall to the Corsicans alone. There was also the slight matter that if the British fleet were to use these “liberated” harbors it would be a flagrant breach of both Genoese sovereignty and British law. Despite the favors for Theodore rendered by the British Navy, any commerce with the Corsican “malcontents” was still banned and Theodore’s government was still entirely unrecognized.[1]

Theodore’s second offer concerned soldiers. The king grandly claimed that, with the proper subsidies, he could raise 8,000 Corsicans for service on the continent with the Austro-Sardinian army, all of whom would be eager to avenge themselves against the Frenchmen who had occupied their country. Even by Theodore’s standards, this was breathtaking in its mendacity. The idea that Theodore could find 8,000 Corsicans (more than 6% of the island’s entire population) ready and willing to cross the sea and shed their blood for the rights of the Queen of Hungary was madness, and few people in Corsica wanted to “avenge” themselves against the French, whose occupation in the north had been generally mild and even-handed (to say nothing of the fact that the Austrians had also occupied their country, and done so twice). But nobody at Turin was in a position to dispute Theodore’s numbers, a state of ignorance which ironically enough was perpetuated by Genoese censorship, and it seemed plausible that they might indeed flock to the anti-Bourbon cause with enthusiasm, either to satiate their well-known love of vengeance or simply out of a desire to win their country’s freedom. Certainly few doubted that the Corsicans were a “martial race” of some renown after their astonishing victories over the French Army at San Pellegrino and Ponte Novu.

A new source of soldiers was particularly appealing to Carlo Emanuele, who ruled a relatively small state (about 2.3 million people) which was relatively wealthy but had limited manpower. To expand his army without taking vital laborers away from fields and industries, the king had relied heavily on recruiting Swiss mercenaries into his army over the past few years of war. While these units were to prove their value in combat, they knew that their services were in high demand and commanded lavish salaries compared to the “native” Piedmontese provincial infantry. Carlo Emanuele was willing to take any warm bodies to expand his ranks, but given the poverty and reputed martial vigor of the Corsicans there was some hope that they would turn out to be a sort of “discount Swiss,” capable troops at an affordable price.

Although not a matter of the highest priority, Corsica was a subject of discussion during the Turin Conference in December, and Theodore’s proposals were at least informally provided to Turin’s allies. It is perhaps notable that, of the six figures at the conference, General Vetés was the only one of the participants who had no connection to the Baron von Neuhoff: Carlo Emanuele and d’Ormea had received his letters, while Mathews, Villettes, and Kaunitz had actually met him.[2] Nevertheless, Theodore’s plans were met with a lukewarm reception at best. The British pointed out the difficulty of actually using Corsican ports given Genoa’s neutrality, while Vetés (and probably others) questioned whether Theodore could actually raise that many men and in sufficient time as to be of use. The general consensus was that the matter had not sufficiently ripened; Theodore would, perhaps, best be used as a cudgel to keep Genoa in line, and active support for the rebels was not conceivable at the moment. Yet that did not mean that more measured steps might be taken. After the dissolution of the conference, the king instructed Giuseppe Antonio Osorio Alarçon, his ambassador to Britain, to secure the consent of the British government for Sardinia to raise troops from the insular and expatriate Corsicans. That permission was readily given by Southern Secretary Thomas Pelham-Holles, Duke of Newcastle, but the result of his lengthy diplomatic exchange between Turin and London Osorio’s report did not reach Turin until the 3rd of February 1744.

Despite some administrative successes in the months of peace, as 1743 drew to a close and the Ortiporio deadline loomed Theodore and his government seemed ill-prepared for war. The royal government had managed to modestly improve its tax revenue so as to increase the number of regulated troops of the “flying companies” to some 200 men, but the state coffers remained scanty and the government had no other standing forces aside from the king’s personal guard. The king and his Secretary of War, Count Marcantonio Giappiconi, had made some efforts at organizing the Castagniccian militias and appointing new officers, but the government had difficulty giving these officers the arms and salaries they demanded owing to both a shortage of money and logistical hurdles. The Genoese clearly had no intention of meeting the consulta’s ultimatum in time, but it remained unclear if the nation would actually rally to the king and march to war when that time came. The consulta had delayed the uprising before and they could very easily do it again if enthusiasm for war was lacking.

If the fiscal situation was rather poor, that of supplies and other war materiel was somewhat better. Shipments from Tunis, Livorno, and even Genoa itself, bought with Jewish and syndicate credit, had been flowing into Ajaccio, Isola Rossa, and the estuaries of the eastern shore. Although a few ships were intercepted, the Genoese navy was clearly too feeble to rigorously enforce a blockade. There were, in the first place, too few of them, but they were now also forced to face rebel coastal defenses. The towers that the Genoese had built centuries ago to allow the Corsicans to protect themselves from Barbary corsairs were now being used by the Corsicans to protect themselves from the Genoese, and despite their obsolete construction and armament these towers could still pose a danger to the small galliots, feluccas, and gondolas which were the workhorses of the Republic’s blockade. The Republic’s complement of “full-sized” galleys was only half a dozen. Moreover, galley-type ships were principally fair weather craft whose use in Corsican waters was perilous in the winter months.

Artillery was also relatively plentiful. Count Giuseppe Costa reported that over the course of the summer and autumn the Corsicans had managed to salvage more than 30 guns from the wreck of the San Isidro, around half of the ship’s overall complement. Some of these pieces remained at “Fort Costa” opposite the harbor in case the Genoese returned, but Theodore ordered that as many of the 12 and 18-pounder guns as could be spared were to be brought inland. Most of them lacked carriages, as they had not survived the warship’s explosion and sinking as well as the guns themselves, but given time the Corsicans could manufacture gun carriages themselves. The greater problem was moving heavy guns over the length of the rugged island. By the time winter set in and the Vizzavona Pass over the island’s mountainous spine was rendered impassable by snow, the Corsicans had only managed to move a total of eleven guns from Ajaccio to Corti, and Corti was still a long way from the fortresses of the north which would be the main objectives of a new uprising. The rebels had been building a reasonable stock of gunpowder, but if heavy artillery could not be brought to bear on the citadels there was little the rebels could hope to accomplish.

Theodore’s situation may not have been ideal, but Commissioner-General Pier Maria Giustiniani was even worse off. The Genoese Senate had not only taken nearly half his soldiers but was plundering Corsica for anything of military value that might be of service in protecting the homeland. The Ordnance Office ordered the citadel armories to be stripped of all their surplus weapons for the armament of Ligurian militias and requisitioned dozens of artillery pieces for transfer to the mainland fortresses. The government also ordered the formation of new companies of Corsican regular infantry, who by necessity were drawn mainly from the filogenovesi living in and around the Genoese-controlled zones. That offer was particularly tempting to existing micheletti and irregular loyalist militia bands who knew that they would enjoy a higher and more reliably paid wage as regular troops. Even financial resources were redirected, and like Spinola before him Giustiniani found it increasingly difficult to pay the regular forces still under his command. The results were dispiriting: Giustiniani could do nothing but watch as his best militia forces evaporated, his armories were emptied of all but a smattering of obsolete and non-functioning muskets insufficient to arm those loyalists who remained, his citadels were stripped of their best bronze guns leaving mostly 17th and 16th century iron antiques, and more of his regulars deserted every day as their wages fell progressively further into arrears. He sent urgent warnings that the Corsicans were arming themselves for a new uprising, but to no avail. It was not that the Genoese government did not care; they simply had higher priorities. Giustiniani was instructed to hold on with what he had.

So it was that the six month deadline came and went with little comment from either side. With no artillery in position and money still tight, the situation by January seemed so unfavorable to a new uprising that Theodore was probably grateful for the poor weather. January snows not only closed Vizzavona but made a convocation of a new national consulta impractical, which was a convenient excuse to delay a rebellion. Giustiniani certainly wasn’t going to object to a delay, as his own situation was abominably poor and he knew very well that he had nothing to offer which would satisfy the naziunali. Not wanting to play into Theodore’s hands by being the one to cut off the obviously fruitless negotiations, there seemed no other option but to wait and hope that the present quiet was indicative of a deeper paralysis in the ranks of the nationals and not merely the calm before the storm.


Footnotes
[1] By European countries at least, but it is generally agreed that the Kingdom of Corsica was already recognized by the Beylik of Tunis. The exact year is disputed; a treaty between Theodore and the Bey of Tunis was first signed in 1735, but at that time Theodore was not yet king and the bey was overthrown before Theodore even arrived on Corsica. Even if this first treaty is discounted, however, the validity of the subsequent treaty of alliance between Theodore and Ali Pasha in 1743 is unshakable.
[2] Kaunitz’s first mission as a diplomat was to Turin, Rome, and Florence in 1741. There is documentary evidence that Kaunitz paid Theodore a visit at dell’Agata’s house in Florence and had an interview with him. Unfortunately the substance of this interview is entirely unknown.

Timeline Notes
[A] This is a key difference from OTL, and the first major departure from history as far as the general conduct of the war goes. IOTL the French army which first began combat operations against the Sardinians in 1744 was led by the Prince of Conti, but Conti’s road to command was quite unique. Louis XV evidently did not trust his ambitious young cousin, and Conti was initially denied a command early in the war. He defied this command and joined the army of Maillebois without permission, but was caught, arrested, and stripped of his rank. Yet Louis was evidently convinced to take some pity on him, for Conti was released and given a relatively minor command. He led a 6,000-strong French division at Deckendorf, but was forced to retreat by the inexorable advance of the Austrians through Bavaria. Brave even to the point of recklessness, Conti had a horse shot out from under him and also managed to lose all his baggage in this battle. Allegedly impressed by his cousin’s courage, the king gave him command of the army preparing to invade Italy in February of 1744 at the tender age of 26. Yet although Conti’s campaign got off to an excellent start, the wily Charles Emmanuel eventually got the better of him and the Gallispan army was compelled to withdraw back over the Alps despite winning every battle in the campaign. Such a series of events that led to Conti’s command in 1744 could easily not have happened, particularly given that ITTL Lautrec led the army in Bohemia to which Conti was initially attached rather than Maillebois, and thus Conti was probably in different places at different times even if you don’t account for random butterflies. Perhaps ITTL his bravery was not as conspicuous; perhaps Conti caught the bullet that IOTL merely struck his poor horse. Either way, ITTL the command in Italy goes to a Marshal of France instead of one of the king’s brash young cousins, and Lautrec seems as good a choice as any given that Maillebois, the man who was in Lautrec’s shoes IOTL, was indeed given command of the Italian army in 1745 (as Conti’s replacement).
[B] So goes the ATL version of the Battle of Toulon. ITTL, the engagement is similar but goes marginally worse for the British because of the weather. IOTL the battle was delayed for a week or so on account of wind, during which time the British were joined by an additional five ships of the line; moreover, foul wind kept the Gallispan fleet from reaching the Roadstead in a timely manner and allowed Mathews some time to escape, although because of conflicting signals and the treachery and/or ineptitude of Vice-Admiral Lestock the British made rather a hash of it and engaged only partially along the line. TTL's Toulon is bloodier, although it's still something of a draw - Court is too timid (and old, perhaps) to chase a superior foe, even a battered one, and Mathews fears being drawn away from the Italian coast. Accordingly, the Gallispans get a somewhat better opportunity to move ships to Italy; IOTL, they did indeed get to move a lot of supplies eastwards in Mathews' absence, but the attempt to land soldiers east of Villefranche was thwarted.
[C] This is a battle that, IOTL, never happened. The French indeed tried to invade Britain, but their covering fleet ran straight into Norris' squadron and almost certainly would have been smashed if not for a sudden gale that allowed the French to escape (albeit at the cost of many of the supply ships at Dunkirk, which were destroyed by the weather). ITTL, no gale saves the French, and they get their clocks cleaned as they undoubtedly would have IOTL. A poorer outcome for the British in the Mediterranean is thus balanced by a significantly better outcome in the Channel.
[D] Those of you paying close attention to this thread will have heard this name before, although not in any updates. Rivarola is the gentlemen who - chiefly on the advice of Horace Mann - the British and Sardinians decided to give command of the expatriate conquest of Corsica instead of Theodore in 1745. This was a profoundly stupid idea which backfired predictably. Rivarola was an arrogant, corrupt career bureaucrat with no military experience whatsoever. He "conquered" Bastia (actually the city surrendered to the British bombardment and Rivarola arrived a day later), but made himself so obnoxious to the people of his own home city that they drove him out, and his disagreements with the National leaders (Gaffori, Matra, Venturini) actually started a civil war between his "Sardinian" faction and that of the triumvirate. Disgusted by the incompetence and fractiousness of the Corsicans, the British gave up and decided to turn their ships to more useful purposes, and so ended the best chance the Corsicans ever got to win independence from Genoa. Rivarola is still a rather dubious figure ITTL (and still just as arrogant), but at least he's not in a position of military command. Whether he ends up being merely an annoyance or an actual traitor (as he may well have been IOTL) remains to be seen.
 
Last edited:
So Lautrec is commanding an army which is looking to threaten Sardinian forces which looks like it's in a position to do better than its OTL counterpart commanded by the Prince of Conti. If Genoa is looking for a sign that the Bourbons are winning, then this, combined with other changes (like the Brits faring not so well in the Mediterranean) could be the sign they're looking for.
 
Theodore should look into acquiring some galleys to serve as a Corsican Navy/Coast Guard when his situation finally settles. It would allow him to project authority over the Corsican coastline and make him seem legit. Also, this could make him be seen fulfilling his promise to end slave raids on Corsica.
 
8,000 Corsican soldiers is a little ambitious even for Theodore, but now I can't get the image out of my head of having the Corsica occupy Genoa during the war in an especially cruel twist of fate.
 
Last edited:
Still sounds like theodores government is still a loose bag of beans that gonna fly apart when the bag holding them together (the independence war) is finally concluded unless Theodore can get a cash cow to just buy the loyalty of the clans.
 
Corsican soldiers attacking Genoa will certainly be fun to read about.

If they do get to the mainland, it's possible (although not likely) that they could end up fighting other Corsicans. At the moment, Genoa has a thousand Corsican infantry in Liguria in two regular battalions, plus however many filogenovesi they end up recruiting in 1743-44; IOTL the number of Corsican troops fighting for Genoa in the WotAS reached a nominal 2,000 but the actual number was probably considerably lower.

The Genoese were careful never to station their regular Corsican troops in Corsica during the Revolution, and there seems to have been little "revolutionary activity" among the regular battalions IOTL. That said, one wonders if loyalties might be tested if Corsica becomes mostly or totally liberated during the war and royalist Corsican soldiers are active on the mainland or in Liguria itself.

Theodore should look into acquiring some galleys to serve as a Corsican Navy/Coast Guard when his situation finally settles. It would allow him to project authority over the Corsican coastline and make him seem legit. Also, this could make him be seen fulfilling his promise to end slave raids on Corsica.

Theodore did make plans for a navy IOTL, but he never had an opportunity to implement them. Paoli’s government was more successful and had a “navy” of several state-owned and privateering vessels, although they were really commerce-raiders rather than true warships, and since the state was unrecognized they ran the risk of being labelled as pirates. The most successful venture of Paoli’s navy was perhaps the amphibious assault on Capraia, in which the Corsicans succeeded in taking the island from its Genoese garrison.

The main difficulty is that Corsica, despite being an island, is not a very seafaring nation. The coast was largely abandoned in the Early Medieval era to avoid the depredations of Saracen “pirates,” and it remained abandoned (with the exception of the citadels) into the 19th century because of lowland malaria and Barbary corsairs. As a result, very few (non-urban) Corsicans live near the water or make a living from it. Aside from the coral fishermen of Ajaccio, who make up a relatively small community, native fishermen and sailors can really only be found in significant numbers in Capo Corso (Cap Corse). As the part of Corsica nearest to Genoa, however, the cape and its people tended to be under Genoese control through most of the revolutionary period.

An aptly named ship.

Do tell. I picked it from the order of battle more or less at random...

Might there be some sufficiently large and enterprising loyalist group to force the issue and attack San Fiorenzo by themselves?

Possibly, but the question is why. San Fiorenzo is little more than a village, and one with a malaria problem at that. It may have diplomatic/economic value to Theodore, but probably not to the local clans in the Nebbio. If they control the whole Nebbio outside of San Fiorenzo they don't have much motivation to kick a single company of Genoese out of their last little foothold.

8,000 Corsican soldiers is a little ambitious even for Theodore, but now I can't get the image out of my head of having the Corsica occupy Genoa during the war in an especially cruel twist of fate.

IOTL, Theodore promised Charles Emmanuel 6 or 7 thousand when he wasn't even on Corsica, so I figured he'd aim at least a bit higher if he actually controlled (well, nominally) most of the island. The number is demographically plausible, but it would require a logistical and organizational effort that is well beyond Theodore's power, and it's questionable whether so many Corsicans would actually be willing to do it even when offered pay.

As for occupation, presumably the Corsicans couldn't be much worse than the Austrians, who managed to provoke an uprising and lose control of the city altogether!
 
Last edited:
Top