Could it be possible that the 2½s coins refers to the average content value rather than the intended value of the coin? It seems unlikely to mint a coin with a higher content value, but it would make it a more desirable among merchants.

While I'm not familiar with the area, or your sources & will concede to your expertise, given what I know about French & French colonial coinage from this time period, a 2½ coin wouldn't be surprising.

You know what, I think I've been misreading that caption. "S[OL]DI DVEM" confused me because "duem" isn't a word in Italian; two is just "due." But if you actually look at the coin, rather than a transcript, it's on three lines:

SDI
DVE
M

I thought that was just bad layout or something, but now that I think of it that "M" could actually stand for mezzo ("half"). I could never find any 18th century Genoese coins worth 2½ soldi, but when I expanded my search I found that they did indeed mint such a coin back in 1671, which reads "SOLDI DVE E MEZZO." So I think I was probably wrong - the coin does say 2½ soldi, it's just very abbreviated (and shoddy-looking). A 2½ soldi coin (30 denari or ⅛ of a lira) seems to be fairly rare, but it makes sense if he's already minting 5 soldi coins, and clearly it did exist. I've gone ahead and updated the last chapter and the currency table to reflect that.

Changing the 2 soldi coin to a 2½ soldi coin makes the quattrino (4 denari ) a somewhat awkward denomination; it makes more sense to have a 6-denari coin (a half-soldo) which would be easily divisible into the 30 denari/2½ soldi coin. Historically a half-soldo was often called a soldino ("little soldo") so I've gone ahead and changed the quattrino of 4 denari to a soldino of 6 denari.
 
Last edited:
Actually, now I'm wondering whether the most sensible thing to do is have the currency reform under Minister Carli move to a 1/2/4 soldi standard. After all, this was historically the favored setup under Paoli, who is now in charge; it also makes sense if one of the purposes behind the rework is to fix the bad reputation of Corsican billon coinage, because what better way is there to "fix" the reputation of the 2½ and 5 soldi coins than to get rid of them entirely. It's also just a more common setup than 2½ and 5, which is sensible if you're trying to convince other people your currency is "normal."

In this system you'd still have the lira and half-lira (10 soldi), 4/2/1 soldi coins, and then maybe 6/4/2 denari coins (soldino, quattrino, sestino). Thoughts?
 
Actually, now I'm wondering whether the most sensible thing to do is have the currency reform under Minister Carli move to a 1/2/4 soldi standard. After all, this was historically the favored setup under Paoli, who is now in charge; it also makes sense if one of the purposes behind the rework is to fix the bad reputation of Corsican billon coinage, because what better way is there to "fix" the reputation of the 2½ and 5 soldi coins than to get rid of them entirely. It's also just a more common setup than 2½ and 5, which is sensible if you're trying to convince other people your currency is "normal."

In this system you'd still have the lira and half-lira (10 soldi), 4/2/1 soldi coins, and then maybe 6/4/2 denari coins (soldino, quattrino, sestino). Thoughts?
Two thoughts:
  • What is the currency intended for? If the government wants it for trade and merchants, then high value & "easy math" denomination coins are preferred. If it is everyday transactions from commoners, then small value & possibly fractional amounts as even 1 soldus may be too much of a jump without change.
  • Would the the sensible option be the most likely?
 
  • What is the currency intended for? If the government wants it for trade and merchants, then high value & "easy math" denomination coins are preferred. If it is everyday transactions from commoners, then small value & possibly fractional amounts as even 1 soldus may be too much of a jump without change.
By the 1770s/80s, the "small change" is intended to introduce the cash economy into the interior, where up to this point most Corsicans only use coins for the purpose of paying taxes. Paoli and his asphodelati friends are convinced that expanding access to markets is critical for the "regeneration" of the Corsican interior. Roads give farmers access to markets in a physical sense, which is why (as we will see) the new administration is very keen on transport, but to be able to buy and sell one's produce effectively one also needs a medium of exchange suitable for purchases at that scale.

I don't have a good sense of the actual purchasing power of Genoese/Corsican currency at this time, but the Genoese paid a 15 lira per month salary to their local militiamen, or 300 soldi. Assuming a 30-day month, that's 10 soldi (one half-lira) per day. A 2½ soldi coin is thus worth a quarter of a day's wages to that militiaman; the equivalent would be a $30 bill for someone working a 8-hour job at $15 per hour. That's a unit of currency that might indeed conceivably be useful to a normal person, and might certainly be used by a small farmer selling bulk produce, but there are a lot of things that are going to be hard to purchase if that's the smallest denomination there is. To extend that same analogy, a sestino worth 2 denari would be the equivalent of a $2 bill (as there are 30 denari in a 2½ soldi coin), a much more commonly useful denomination for everyday purchases.

  • Would the the sensible option be the most likely?

I will readily admit that 18th century currency systems often did not make sense, but I think it's worth remembering that Corsica is a new state. A lot of the "irrational" artifacts of administration and bureaucracy that Enlightenment thinkers railed against weren't always irrational; they had been created for a reason at some point, but were then carried forward over the centuries by a post-feudal culture whose customs and elites were simply too deeply entrenched to allow sweeping "rationalization." One of Corsica's (few) advantages as a state is that they have a lot less administrative baggage. Federico's campaign to sideline the luogotenenti and introduce the provincial chambers was only conceivable because the "old system" had only been around for 20 years. Performing that same sort of wholesale administrative shakeup in France would be much harder. Paoli's ministry isn't dealing with some hallowed, ancient coin that people have been using for centuries, but a degraded coin that few people ever accepted which has been "circulating" for less than 50 years. They're not going to be pioneering decimalization or anything, but I think it makes a certain amount of sense to just toss it out and say "this is a brand new coin which has nothing to do with that old, crappy coin."
 
Last edited:
How widespread was currency usage amongst peasantry and smallfarmers on Corsica at this time? Would they even be paying taxes in coin, or would in-kind payments still be common?

Was tax collected directly from the peasantry or via notable/landowner intermediaries?
 
The Corsicans may have been directly contributing to this instability through counterfeiting in the late 1740s, as there are an unusually large number of specimens of debased and low-quality "pre-1746" lire; one must remember that Theodore's first head minter was himself an infamous counterfeiter.

Theodore’s innovative new take on the old poacher turned gamekeeper trope?
 
How widespread was currency usage amongst peasantry and smallfarmers on Corsica at this time? Would they even be paying taxes in coin, or would in-kind payments still be common?

Historically, taxes on Corsica were indeed paid in coins. We know this because this is literally how the Corsican Revolution started - as the story goes, an old man tried to pay his tax, but the luogotenente refused to accept his coin on the basis that is was under-weight, and threatened to confiscate all the man's property if he did not make full payment in one day. The old man spread the word of his unfair treatment, and the rest is history. (There are other stories surrounding the exact circumstances of the original rebellion, but that is the most common one.)

At this moment ITTL, some taxes must be paid in coin and others can be paid in kind. A farmer really only has to worry about three taxes: The taglia (capitation), the sovvenzione (agricultural product duty), and the tithe. The latter two can be paid in kind, which only leaves the taglia. The contract gabelle is also cash-only, but that only kicks in when you buy or sell real property, so it's not something a farmer deals with regularly. Lease arrangements between families for land use, livestock, water rights, and so on were very common, but these were usually paid in kind as well. So in theory, the only coin a farmer ever needs to get his hands on (in a normal year, at least) is a 1-lira coin (or some combination of coins equaling 20 soldi) to pay the annual capitation. This is not an inordinately large sum for a farmer - just two days wages for the aforementioned Genoese militiaman - but actually getting the coin can be a bit of a challenge, particularly if they live in a remote location.

The government has occasionally made a push towards collecting more taxes in coin, as that's obviously easier and more efficient for the state, but there just isn't enough of a cash economy in the interior to make this possible.

Was tax collected directly from the peasantry or via notable/landowner intermediaries?

I could go into some detail on this, but it will probably be addressed in a future update. Local elected officials, specifically the podesta, are responsible for collecting most taxes at the village level, and these local officials are the ones who meet with the assessors sent by the camera (provincial chamber).

Theodore’s innovative new take on the old poacher turned gamekeeper trope?

In case you missed it back in an early update: "Corsica, of course, had no mint and no minters, but eventually a rather unlikely engraver was found to craft the dies—a priest from Rostino known as "Settecervella" ("Seven-brains") who was locally renowned as a counterfeiter of Genoese currency [...]" This is completely OTL.
 
Historically, taxes on Corsica were indeed paid in coins. We know this because this is literally how the Corsican Revolution started - as the story goes, an old man tried to pay his tax, but the luogotenente refused to accept his coin on the basis that is was under-weight, and threatened to confiscate all the man's property if he did not make full payment in one day. The old man spread the word of his unfair treatment, and the rest is history. (There are other stories surrounding the exact circumstances of the original rebellion, but that is the most common one.)

At this moment ITTL, some taxes must be paid in coin and others can be paid in kind. A farmer really only has to worry about three taxes: The taglia (capitation), the sovvenzione (agricultural product duty), and the tithe. The latter two can be paid in kind, which only leaves the taglia. The contract gabelle is also cash-only, but that only kicks in when you buy or sell real property, so it's not something a farmer deals with regularly. Lease arrangements between families for land use, livestock, water rights, and so on were very common, but these were usually paid in kind as well. So in theory, the only coin a farmer ever needs to get his hands on (in a normal year, at least) is a 1-lira coin (or some combination of coins equaling 20 soldi) to pay the annual capitation. This is not an inordinately large sum for a farmer - just two days wages for the aforementioned Genoese militiaman - but actually getting the coin can be a bit of a challenge, particularly if they live in a remote location.

The government has occasionally made a push towards collecting more taxes in coin, as that's obviously easier and more efficient for the state, but there just isn't enough of a cash economy in the interior to make this possible.
Now I have the desire for Corsica to pioneer modern banknotes through the very common use of card money. ATL bills would resemble playing cards as a result 🤣 (Not even French-suited cards either!)
 
Last edited:
Just spent the last few days reading this most excellent timeline. Truly the research is top notch, the writing exceedingly engaging, and the story riveting. Well done!
 
Default
Default


zZgNxQZ.jpg

Isaac de Pinto, Dutch Sephardic banker and financial theorist


Chancellor Pasquale Paoli’s ambitious plans for enlightened reform and national development immediately ran aground upon a crisis which had been building for decades - the insolvency of the Corsican state. By the time of his death King Federico had succeeded in bringing government revenue up to nearly 140,000 scudi per annum, but expenses had also risen.[1] The army alone consumed at least half of this sum, while the navy’s costs appear to have fluctuated between 30 and 60 thousand scudi depending on the activity of the navy’s ships and the maintenance which was undertaken. Even on a “good” year, then, military expenses may have consumed around three quarters of the country’s revenue, leaving little to spare for government salaries, infrastructure, courts, and so on.

That calculation also excludes interest. Even under Federico’s regime the government ran a deficit almost every year, and under Theodore I the state’s income had been considerably lower. In 1778 the new Minister of Finance Don Marco Maria Carli estimated that the kingdom’s debt amounted to nearly 1.2 million scudi. The interest rates on this debt were reasonably favorable, probably no more than five percent overall, thanks in part to Theodore’s own connections and Corsica’s unique relationship with (principally Jewish) international lenders. Even so, at 5% this debt would have required around 60,000 scudi per year in debt service, more than 40% of the government’s overall revenue. That was not an unreasonable figure by the standards of the time; Britain and France routinely spent between a third and half of their revenue on debt service in the 18th century. Minister Carli had reason to be worried, but despite the poverty of the Corsican government in absolute terms, one could argue that Corsica in 1778 was not facing an immediate crisis. If the government could continue to gradually raise revenue and keep a lid on military spending, there would be no reason to fear default.

Then came the war. Rosy predictions that war with Genoa would “pay for itself” with lucrative seizures of Genoese shipping were not borne out by reality. Over a year of war, the Corsican government racked up around a quarter million scudi in “extraordinary” expenses. Government revenues also fell as trade and fishing were both curtailed during wartime. By the Treaty of Poggio Imperiale, Corsica further agreed to pay another 30,000 scudi to Tuscany for the purchase of Gorgona. In October of 1782, as the Corsican consulta generale was exuberantly ratifying the treaty, Carli bemoaned that the state debt now stood at 1.6 million scudi. This amounted to about 8.2 million French livres, more than half of the seemingly insurmountable 15 million livre “Monaco Debt” which Corsica had struggled under in the 1750s.

The real problem, however, was that all this “extraordinary” debt had been contracted at much higher interest rates than the Corsican government had been accustomed to. The American War had been an excellent time to wage a war against Genoa diplomatically speaking, as the great powers were all occupied elsewhere, but it was the absolute worst time financially. Britain and France were both running massive wartime deficits and borrowing enormous amounts of money to cover them, soaking up all the credit floating around the London and Amsterdam markets. Particularly in wartime, creditors were looking for safety, and Corsica did not seem like a particularly safe bet - certainly not compared to Britain or France. Carli and his associates were only able to finance the war by taking usurious loans, and thus the state’s new debt was far more expensive than its old debt. Corsica was now on the hook for around 100,000 scudi a year in debt service. The state’s long-term debt problem was now a short-term debt problem - given the country’s current financial difficulties and the ongoing dearth of cheap credit, it was a challenge even to find lenders willing to cover the state’s immediate deficits.

Negotiations with Turin offered a temporary reprieve. Foreign Minister Giovan Francesco Cuneo d’Ornano had secured Sardinia’s under-the-table support during the Coral War for, in part, an understanding that Turin would take possession of the southern “isole intermedie” off the Sardinian coast. The Sardinians had not even waited for the war to end to land a token force on Maddalena. The French, however, had disregarded this seizure and had assigned all the isles to Corsica in the Treaty of Poggio Imperiale. Corsica did not intend to keep them; Cuneo d’Ornano considered these barren rocks to be a liability, as they had little economic value and would always be an obstacle to good relations with Turin. His informal “understanding” with the Sardinians, however, was not public knowledge, and if Corsica were to just hand them over it might seem as though Corsica had been intimidated into handing over hard-won territory for nothing.

In December, Corsican and Sardinian diplomats met at the Palace of Racconigi in Piedmont to formalize their arrangement. The diplomats drew a line down the center of the Strait of Bonifacio and agreed that this would be the permanent boundary between their countries. Most of the intermediate isles, the Isole della Maddalena, lay south of that line and would be ceded to Sardinia, but Corsica would retain the Isole di Lavezzi, a cluster of rocky islets best known for being the gravesite of the Minerva. Sardinia paid 40,000 scudi for this acquisition, which did not put a significant dent in Corsica’s overall debt but did keep the government solvent for a while longer. Apart from territorial matters, the Convention also made allowance for Corsican coral fishermen to continue working in the Maddalenas, established favorable trade terms between the two countries, and included a mutual pledge to work together against the Barbary menace. Most importantly, the agreement established a Corsican infantry regiment in Sardinian service.

Sardinia-Piedmont was a heavily militarized state whose modest population was insufficient for its geopolitical ambitions. Unlike the Genoese, the Sardinians did not consider their native population to be unsoldierly or unreliable; Piedmont’s “national regiments” were arguably the best in the army. Nevertheless, the state maintained several regiments of Swiss, Germans, French, and other foreign soldiers because there simply were not enough Piedmontese to do the job. Every foreigner in arms meant that there was another native citizen who was free to pursue taxable economic activity that benefitted the state. Corsicans had a good reputation as fighters and had fought creditably under the Sardinian flag during the War of the Austrian Succession. All the Corsicans would have to do was furnish the recruits, and Turin would pay the Corsican government one scudi per month for each man. For one full battalion of 600 men, this meant 7,200 scudi per year, and twice that for a full regiment - not enough to solve the debt crisis on its own, but certainly helpful.

Vittorio Amadeo’s interest in this arrangement was not merely military. While he was not privy to Carli’s account books, he knew that Corsica was a poor state with considerable debt. A subsidy from Turin would be very useful - so useful, in fact, that the Corsican government would be reluctant to part with it. The Corsican regiment would thus be an instrument of influence, a means of ensuring that Corsican policy and Sardinian interests remained aligned. The Corsican government was not ignorant of the link between subsidies and political dependence, and Minister Paoli had initially opposed the proposal; he had argued that Corsica’s young men ought to be helping to build Corsica rather than serving as mercenaries to a foreign government. Yet the financial situation was now so desperate that it was difficult to argue against a new source of revenue, and in truth Corsican soldiers were already serving in foreign armies. At least this way the Corsican government would get something out of it.

Although imminent disaster was averted by this injection of cash, Minister Carli knew that the crisis had only been briefly postponed. He warned that only radical fiscal solutions would prevent catastrophe, and even then a default of some kind might be inevitable. Ideas included demanding forced loans from the nation’s wealthier citizens, as well as disbanding the entire army save for the Guard Grenadiers and a few squadrons of Royal Dragoons. Yet Corsica simply did not have many wealthy citizens, and the king resisted inflicting such radical cuts on his recently-victorious forces. The regular companies were cut to a peacetime strength of 70 men (from 105) and the navy sold off the captured Rubea, but Carli knew this sort of trimming around the edges was not going to be enough.

One of the government’s few creditors who was actually privy to these internal discussions was the newly-ennobled Don Isacco Levi Sonsino, who had access to the ministers of state thanks to the crucial role he had played in facilitating arms purchases for the government during the Coral War. He was not merely a facilitator, however; Sonsino had lent the government a substantial amount of his own money, and thus stood to lose personally if the government defaulted on its debts. Sonsino held a unique position of influence, but he was not the only domestic creditor - merchants, maritime insurers, shipowners, and even middling proprietari had lent money to the government as both an investment and an act of patriotism.

Sonsino thus approached Carli with a proposal. He suggested that he and other local creditors could incorporate themselves as a joint-stock company and consolidate their outstanding government loans into one loan with a reasonably attractive rate of interest - say, four percent. In exchange, the government would give the company special exemption from any planned default. Creditors might not ordinarily consider unilaterally lowering the interest on their own loans, but if the choice was between a guaranteed 4% rate and a potential zero percent rate if the government suspended loan payments, some might choose the former. Sonsino further proposed that this company could operate as a bank, attracting investors and depositors whose money could be used to support the government with further loans.[2]

This was somewhat beyond Minister Carli’s competence. A 63 old lawyer-turned-bureaucrat, Carli was a hard worker and had proven himself to be a skilled accountant. He owed his present position to his impressive record as director of the royal saltworks, which he reorganized and restored to profitability. But Carli had no experience with banking and little familiarity with cutting-edge theories on public debt. He was suspicious of this foreign-born Jewish financier and his ulterior motives, and he resented Sonsino’s attempt to insinuate himself into government affairs. Don Isacco may have unofficially been “the most important man in the war ministry” in the words of Count Innocenzo di Mari, but this was not the war ministry, and Sonsino held no formal government position.

Chancellor Paoli, however, was more favorable. Paoli had spent several years in London as Corsica’s envoy and was a professed admirer of its political and financial system. He had his own qualms about the political power which might be exerted by a private bank holding a substantial share of the government’s debt, but he also desperately wanted a way out of the crisis and a means to raise funds for the capital improvement projects he believed were so vital to the national good. Paoli decided to convene an “emergency” committee to offer recommendations on a state bank and appointed Sonsino to chair it, which gave Don Isacco an actual government position (albeit not a salaried one). This committee went so far as to solicit an opinion from Isaac de Pinto, a Dutch banker and Sephardic Jew who was an influential theorist and writer on banking and finance. Pinto, who was well-regarded in London and served as an informal advisor to the government there, was happy to offer his musings on the proper role of a bank in Corsica and endorsed Paoli's plan, although his confidence was not so great as to prompt him to personally invest in it.

Although a charter was drawn up in April of 1783, the bank’s launch was stymied because of a lack of capital. Its largest “asset” would be the money owed to it by the government, but while this capital did generate income (in the form of interest) further capitalization was necessary for it to perform its basic functions and to issue new loans to the government. The idea of issuing bonds or consols was discussed, but it was unclear who would buy them; there was not much un-invested capital circulating around in Corsica and foreign investors would be difficult to find. It was King Theodore II himself who came to the bank’s rescue, offering to invest £5,000 of his own money (nearly 23,000 scudi) - a relatively safe investment for the king, as he did not have to worry about the government defaulting on its obligations to him because he himself controlled the government. This not only provided the bank with some startup capital (albeit quite meager by the standards of national banks) but some sense of legitimacy and safety, and on June 20th the Banco Reale d’Ajaccio was formally incorporated and held its inaugural shareholders’ meeting at the Lumbroso coffeehouse.[3]

The charter of the Royal Bank of Ajaccio allowed it to act like an ordinary bank in most respects - it could receive deposits, offer loans, and hold funds in escrow (indeed, it was granted a monopoly on escrow deposits in the kingdom). Yet it also had aspects of a “national bank” - it was intended to furnish the government with further loans (at a rate not exceeding 4%) and the government was obligated to hold its own deposits with the bank. The bank would publicly sell shares which anyone could buy, even foreigners, but only shares owned by Corsican subjects would be considered voting shares. The king himself owned around a quarter of these voting shares. Shareholders would elect a board of directors, and the bank would be managed by a “governor” who would be nominated by the Council of Finance but would have to be approved by these directors.

Despite Paoli’s hopes for this new approach to finance, the formation of the bank did not allow the government to avoid default. The kind of cuts that were necessary, including a wholesale gutting of the military, simply were not compatible with the “dignity of the state” and the king would not accept them. In June, Carli declared the government to be insolvent and announced a suspension of all interest payments on most of its debt for a period of two years (the Bank of Ajaccio excepted). Officially Carli blamed the American War, which had damaged Corsican trade because of the enforced exclusion of British ships (and the increased activity of Barbary corsairs) and had decreased the availability of credit. This was true, but these factors were rather minor in the overall scheme of things. Whatever Carli’s rationalizations, the suspension was a serious blow to the country’s financial reputation.[A]

Carli tried to encourage creditors to incorporate with the Royal Bank of Ajaccio, essentially transferring the government’s debt to them to the bank in exchange for an equivalent amount of bank shares - an action which would lower their expected interest but meant they would get at least some interest in the next two years. Most foreign lenders, however, saw this for what it was - an attempt to intimidate them into renegotiating their loans at lower rates by cutting off interest payments. There was little confidence in the bank despite its royal imprimatur. Sonsino, now seated on the board of directors, worked his connections to Jewish lenders in Livorno and Amsterdam as best he could, but Corsica’s goodwill with the Jewish community did not mean that lenders were willing to take a leap of faith on such an uncertain investment. By the end of 1783 the bank’s assets were estimated at around a relatively meagre 150,000 scudi, nearly three quarters of which were loans to the government, comprising less than 7% of the national debt. Paoli's hope that the bank could be used as an instrument to settle the state's high-interest loans and consolidate its debt in a domestically-controlled institution had foundered on the basic problem that there was simply not very much capital in Corsica - all the kingdom's wealthiest citizens combined could not provide the bank with the capital it needed to step into this role.


Footnotes
[1] All mentions of scudi in this chapter refer to the Corsican scudo d’argento, which was officially adopted as the government’s unit of account in 1774.
[2] This sort of structure was not unprecedented in Corsica. There were some businesses who operated on a joint-stock model - particularly maritime lenders, as they needed to front a lot of money to fishermen and merchants assembling an expedition (and might charge as much as 18% interest for the service). Maritime lenders and insurers were prominent among the original bank shareholders, so much so that they ensured that the bank’s charter explicitly banned it from making maritime loans so the bank would not become their competitor. Unlike the bank, shares in these interests were not publicly traded - they were, in modern parlance, “closely held” corporations.
[3] The Lumbroso family was a wealthy and prominent clan of Italo-Tunisian Jews (grana) whose members in the 18th century included a chief rabbi of Tunis and the bey’s personal doctor. The mid-century unrest in Tunis pushed many of its members to flee abroad, and one scion of the family, Samuel Lumbroso, established himself in Ajaccio and opened Corsica’s first coffeehouse. The Casa Lumbroso became an important center of news and business and was a favored gathering spot for the Constitutional Society in Ajaccio, and thus became a key center of the Enlightenment in Corsica - especially appropriate given that Lumbroso means “bright” or “luminous” in Spanish.

Timeline Notes
[A] Suspension was the most mild form of default and was the first choice of most countries when they found themselves unable to meet their obligations. France suspended payment on certain debt payments several times during the 18th century, and the new American republic defaulted on interest payments to France in 1785 and 1787. This isn’t a great sign for Corsica, but they’re in good company.
 
Last edited:
Would any Corsicans feasibly be serving in America?

ITTL the Régiment Royal-Corse was abolished after the Prussian War, but its remaining soldiers were merged into the Régiment Royal-Italien. Historically, detachments of the Royal-Italien served as naval infantry in de Grasse's squadron and participated in the capture of Tobago in 1781, so it's not impossible that ITTL some Corsicans might be in the American theater under the French flag.
 
Excellent work! I know I haven't always been able to comment due to work and other obligations, but I do enjoy reading all the updates!

I only have one quibble with the latest update: the lack of a larger reaction from the broader Jewish community. IMHO, Jews across Europe would have a keen interest in ensuring the stability and success of the Corsican Kingdom due to their desires to be fully incorporated into their own countries of residence/origin. In all likelihood they've probably already begun holding up Corsica as a model for Jewish emancipation and would see it as a major setback if the Kingdom struggled or failed (not without reason...). Though this wouldn't completely solve Corsica's problems, I'd wager it'd go a bit further than what you've outlined above... then again, perhaps it's coming in future updates since the problem isn't severe enough to attract that kind of attention.

Though I know it isn't a focus of this TL, the intellectual influence of Corsica on Jewish Emancipation and Jewish Enlightenment that's going on at this time would certainly be massive. Corsica would be constantly brought up and would have become a subject of considerable interest by this point, with many thinkers likely visiting the island (perhaps even Mendelssohn!) to see for themselves. Any Jew interested in Emancipation would certainly be well acquainted with the island and it's recent history.

All in all, excellent update!
 
I only have one quibble with the latest update: the lack of a larger reaction from the broader Jewish community. IMHO, Jews across Europe would have a keen interest in ensuring the stability and success of the Corsican Kingdom due to their desires to be fully incorporated into their own countries of residence/origin. In all likelihood they've probably already begun holding up Corsica as a model for Jewish emancipation and would see it as a major setback if the Kingdom struggled or failed (not without reason...). Though this wouldn't completely solve Corsica's problems, I'd wager it'd go a bit further than what you've outlined above... then again, perhaps it's coming in future updates since the problem isn't severe enough to attract that kind of attention.

Though I know it isn't a focus of this TL, the intellectual influence of Corsica on Jewish Emancipation and Jewish Enlightenment that's going on at this time would certainly be massive. Corsica would be constantly brought up and would have become a subject of considerable interest by this point, with many thinkers likely visiting the island (perhaps even Mendelssohn!) to see for themselves. Any Jew interested in Emancipation would certainly be well acquainted with the island and it's recent history.

I have been trying to walk a line between idealism and realism when it comes to Jewish interests in Corsica. On the one hand, I agree that "Theodoran liberty" would have staunch defenders and admirers among the broader European Jewish community, and its collapse would be very unwelcome. On the other hand, financiers - regardless of their religion - are first and foremost in the business of profit and, as a rule, will value their bottom line over sentimental causes of questionable financial sense. It is entirely possible that I've gone too far to one side of that line in my attempt to remain grounded. That said, however, I think it's worth remembering the broader situation in 1783 - there is a major ongoing war between the western European powers which has had severe impacts on trade and caused government debt in England and France to balloon dramatically. In retrospect, we know that Britain was never on the verge of default, but this was not apparent to everyone at the time. Theo is also an unknown element - he is a young man in his late 20s who has only been on the throne for a few years, and during that time has presided over a war of choice that has nearly bankrupted the state and a default on Corsica's credit obligations. Unlike Britain, Corsica has no parliament to control or restrain government finances; the Dieta gets a veto over new taxes, but not new spending. This means that, ultimately, your trust in Corsica is only as good as your trust in Theo, because the ministers of state serve at his pleasure and there is no institutional check on his ability to spend money or renounce his debts entirely. How much of your fortune would you entrust to this man?

The bank is arguably a step in the right direction, as it demonstrates that Theo himself has skin in the game. Because of his investment in the bank, defaulting on the government's debt to the bank would mean defaulting on himself, so he is presumably unlikely to do it. But this bank is only a few months old, Carli is probably not the best salesman for it, and the bank's directors are trying to raise capital at a particularly uncertain and dangerous time for international finance. It may take time for Sonsino's strategy to bear fruit - and, as you say, the depth of the crisis is not yet obvious to most. As I mentioned in the update, France and the United States both suspended interest payments on loans around this time, as did Genoa in the 1740s; it's not a good thing and will spook potential lenders, but it's also not necessarily an indication of the state's imminent financial collapse.
 
Last edited:
Top