On that note, how are the Bosporans in Crimea faring ITTL? Any chance they could break free in such a scenario?they have just been subjugated, so for the moment no. However if things go south for rome they might
On that note, how are the Bosporans in Crimea faring ITTL? Any chance they could break free in such a scenario?they have just been subjugated, so for the moment no. However if things go south for rome they might
the bosporans will be featuring in the timeline, in a major role too.On that note, how are the Bosporans in Crimea faring ITTL? Any chance they could break free in such a scenario?
Considering how they were the last Hellenistic state, surviving as a Roman client state until the mid-4th century, the Bosporans becoming a major power here would be a fun concept to look at. Also, "fun" fact about them: their rulers could claim a line of descent from Mithridates of Pontus (yes, THE Mithridates).the bosporans will be featuring in the timeline, in a major role too.
the only real problem is that Rhescuporis I, the current king is kinda very pro-Rome to have a breakup happenConsidering how they were the last Hellenistic state, surviving as a Roman client state until the mid-4th century, the Bosporans becoming a major power here would be a fun concept to look at. Also, "fun" fact about them: their rulers could claim a line of descent from Mithridates of Pontus (yes, THE Mithridates).
You could have him be overthrown by his sibling or cousin in a palace coup or die from a random illness.the only real problem is that Rhescuporis I, the current king is kinda very pro-Rome to have a breakup happen
that is certainly possible, especially if the Roman position continues to deteriorate.You could have him be overthrown by his sibling or cousin in a palace coup or die from a random illness.
on some thoughts, you are pretty correct. Will have to edit that partThe location of Fulka shown in the picture looks more like Porta Westfalica than Bielefeld (there's no river anywhere close to Bielefeld). This location would also make more sense for the Teutoburgian capital, for not only is it located on the navigable Weser river, granting it access to the North Sea, it also controls the Westphalian gap and thus access to/from the North German Plain to Eastern Westphalia.
On some levels it would be good too. The European part of the Med was so dependent on Egyptian grain that the otl Muslim conquest totally destroyed their economies on some levels. Though yes you are correct in the short term if egypt falls then there will be pandemonium in Rome.So Rome is about to have a civil war, as is Egypt. If the latter proves sufficiently messy, the Persians need to do little but walk in. Which in turn set the city of Rome aflame -they´re completely dependent on Egyptian grain to feed their population.
Memphis is more than enough for the role of a protected inland central capital city instead of building a new one from the groundConsidering the anti-Greek attitude of the Egyptians, any chance they could build Cairo (obviously with a different name) a few centuries early if they win to serve as their new capital and in a sense, leave Alexandria to rot? Even ignoring the ideology of the rebellion, moving their capital to the rough location of OTL Cairo would make it easier to defend against foreign invasions with an inland capital.
I mean, Memphis is roughly in the location as the Greater Cairo Area IOTL, so there's that.Memphis is more than enough for the role of a protected inland central capital city instead of building a new one from the ground
marital?Chapter 1: Early Life
During his stay in Britannia, Thumelicus continued to impress many with his military and marital prowess. Many a times, the Germanic auxiliary of the Roman forces mutinied and rebelled against Roman command, and during those times, it was Thumelicus who restrained his fellow Germanics, and he quickly became a good advisor to Vespasian regarding Germanic affairs in the Roman Army in Britannia.
This figure is way too high, from what I know of iron age Roman genetics I don't think we should expect anything beyond 1-2% , this figures make it seem as if Rome flooded its conquered territories with settlers.as the Roman occupation had left behind a sizeable Latin minority, which is estimated to have been around 5% to 8% of the total population of the Kingdom back then.
Damn autocorrect it's martial.marital?
I was looking at Belgica and Germania superior as a model which were flooded by Romans, but considering the Rhine frontier is way out of place, o believe youre correct. Thanks. I will correct.This figure is way too high, from what I know of iron age Roman genetics I don't think we should expect anything beyond 1-2% , this figures make it seem as if Rome flooded its conquered territories with settlers.