Your idea for a TL reminds me of a short story where Hitler joins the navy in WWI and an officer takes him under his wing and instills in Hitler a sense of discipline and camaraderie with all German naval personal regardless of race or religion.I'm sorry, I don't understand how this remotely answers my criticism. It again continues to not logically follow; why would the Nazis joke about themselves in the third person? Why would they joke about something they would either be bragging about or desperate to hide at all costs? How is this even a joke?
I've been on the form for a while, and it seems like most if not all of your TLs follow the similar idea: something happens to Hitler, the German armed forces, or Germany; the German army effortlessly crushes all before them; the world stands there, grinning, saying "I like cheese!"
I don't have a problem with a TL about the Nazis winning, or Hitler being a different person. I don't necessarily have a problem with Notzis or Notler if written well or with a sufficient POD (see Dorogan's TL "Pax Germanica" where Hitler getting a huge blow to the end makes him sane and rational in 1934). Hell, I don't even have a problem with TLs that show the German armed forces as the protagonist; a lot of the OTL battles make for great drama, and the Bismarck chase is one of my favorite sagas of the war. But you are neglecting a very, very, VERY key issue in this and other TLs: just how much the politics and personal beliefs of Hitler informed Nazi policy and the behavior of the armed forces. They are inseparable. Refusing to acknowledge that racial policy goes hand in hand with military action for the Wehrmacht is not an accurate accounting of history.
If I were you, I'd scrub this TL and do one focused on what seems to interest you: the kit, weapons, and vehicles of the Wehrmacht in a world where they did better or won. That way, the disinterest in the genocidal aspects of the world being created would be more explainable.
Or, I would start with a much earlier POD. Here's one I considered on my walk today: suppose Hitler had a mentor in his youth. Someone that instilled in him a level of intellectual curiosity and a strong work ethic. So, instead of the Hitler of OTL, a lazy disinterested dreamer who blames everything on others, you have a driven, intelligent man who's able to work a crowd, probably because he empathizes with his fellow man having worked hard to get where he is. His WWI experience, as with the world, is the same, so he would be still upset and angry - but probably at the "right" people and things. A Hitler who's rational, clever and charismatic might still get to power and still reshape the world - and the German army. And, I'd argue, be a very dangerous man.
There. You can now build a world where the German army can be supreme, and not have to deal with the genocidal aspects.
Its a good story called "The Little Admiral" by Wade G. Dudly from the book "Third Reich Victorious"