Earthquake Weather: Pop Culture & Tech Goes Weirder

Star Trek
"You treat her like a lady, and she'll always bring you home."

Space… the Final Frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise. Her continuing mission: to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no one has gone before.

(Opening narration for Star Trek: The New Frontier.)[1]




Gulf+Western had been considering a new Star Trek TV series ever since they had planned to launch a fourth television network headlined by Star Trek: Phase II a decade earlier. The original Star Trek had become the most valuable show in syndication over the years and by 1986 was the crown jewel of Paramount Pictures' programming. In addition the movies were becoming too expensive with an aging and high salary demanding cast that, despite the incredible success of Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, naturally compelled Paramount Pictures to think they would have only one or two more movies left. This meant that their thoughts and plans shifted to a potential new Star Trek TV series. The problems arose when they began to shop this new Star Trek show to the networks.

NBC & ABC both asked for pilot scripts, not willing to commit to anything more than that. CBS offered a miniseries deal, with a potential pick-up after that. Fox, the brand new network desperate to have a major program to start with, offered 13 episodes but wanted them in March of 1987. Paramount Pictures was offended by the NBC and ABC deals, and didn't feel much better about CBS or Fox.

Throughout the early half of 1986 Paramount Pictures looked for a way around this by potentially cobbling together a syndication based "network". However Fox sweetened the potential deal in the wake of the Japanese earthquake causing economic effects (and LeVar Burton's new high profile, after reports had leaked of The Living Daylights) which led Paramount to reconsider, and so they gradually warmed up to Fox. The 13 episode deal for March 1987 was unacceptable but Fox was open to possibilities and had heard rumours of the CBS offer which they mistakenly thought was bigger than it was. Therefore Fox agreed to picking up the whole first season of 24 episodes for September 1987, down slightly from the 26 Paramount was looking for, after some additional time in back and forth between them and Paramount. As Paramount wanted a wider audience they made an offer to Fox: any network affiliate could play Star Trek once one week of the first-run airing had passed, in return Fox would receive a percentage of those profits. Paramount managed to find a number of ABC/CBS/NBC affiliates that would commit to the deal, and based on the ratings would be theoretically willing to preempt their own network's prime time shows. Fox was willing to take the risk, especially on anything that would disrupt the Big Three competition as they well realized they were the underdog.[2]

Some observers in Hollywood noted that Paramount Pictures going to Fox was darkly funny as it had been at Paramount where Barry Diller had proposed a new fourth television network and when they passed on it he went to 20th Century Fox and… started a new fourth network. Gulf+Western executives were not nearly as amused by this undercurrent of Hollywood thought as the rest of the town was.

With the unique partial syndication deal in place Fox managed to get away with a low price for Star Trek, once they committed to a major advertising campaign, of just half the cost of an episode which meant Fox only had to cover $700,000 an episode, except for $3.5 million for the $7 million two hour pilot[3]. Fox demanded and received some creative control as well and this led to turmoil in the staff of the purposed new Star Trek. Gene Roddenberry had, in his older age, become increasingly fixated on particular elements of the Star Trek universe that Fox absolutely refused to go with. With the lucrative Fox/early-syndication deal on the table Roddenberry found himself increasingly sidelined, especially as his entire writing staff—led by veteran Star Trek writers David Gerrold & D. C. Fontana—were actually with Fox on that issue, especially since Fox had made it clear that Standards & Practices would be sidelined on most items.

For the moment, at least, Gene Roddenberry would remain show runner but many of his weirder ideas, such as no interpersonal conflict between the crew, were junked by a combination of both Fox and Paramount pressure. The entire writing room would work on the two-hour pilot, Where No One Has Gone Before, and it was both an expensive undertaking with a particularly unhappy set (although the actors got along well with each other).


Original plans to set the new Star Trek series in the 25th century with a registry number of NCC-1701-7 quickly changed when Star Trek IV: A Voyage Home was released with the Enterprise NCC-1701-A first to NCC-1701-G and than to a new time period roughly eighty years after the end of the original series, with the second-to-last registry number change of NCC-1701-D.


The design of the new Enterprise was contentious, both inside and out. The interiors had been designed by Andrew Probest based on Roddenberry's thoughts and were mostly ready to go, as was the first idea of the Enterprise's exterior. The ship design was based on a sketch Andrew Probest had done for his wall at the office but story editor David Gerrold had seen it and liked it, as had Roddenberry. However when Fox saw these sketches they once again refused, citing the "hotel lobby" nature of the bridge colours and carpeting and the weird wide saucer of the ship. Paramount was also starting to remember how difficult Roddenberry was to work with as (Star Trek: The Motion Picture flashbacks were filtering in, especially as they talked to former executives from Paramount) after he pitched a fit over Fox's notes.


Paramount asked Andrew Probest to take another crack at, stating they still liked his early sketches. They also brought up the fact that the fans had liked the Excelsior, perhaps he could work elements of her into the design? Andrew Probest went back to his original sketch and also went back to study all the previous concept art that been generated in the movies and for Phase II.


The final design of the Enterprise was a cross between Probest's sketch, the Excelsior, and switching from lower-than-saucer nacelles to flat out horizontal nacelles, inspired by one of the Phase II Enterprise's and taken to a logical extreme. This final design made everyone happy, even Gene Roddenberry, and it was sent off to the model-makers. The Enterprise NCC-1701-C was the new registry, as the time period had changed yet again so as to allow the use of the Reliant and Excelsior models as standard parts of the Star Trek fleet with everyone still undecided about the use of the Enterprise-A model.[4]


Next up was Fox's objection to the interior style of the ship. Probest once again went back to the drawing board designing a brand new bridge based on the spacious layout—at least from the only angle shown, since it was a partial set in the movie—of the Excelsior in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock and on a piece of concept art for that movie that envisioned the front half of the bridge as a massive wraparound screen. Paramount managed to get additional money from Fox to build the set as it was projected to be quite a bit more expensive than the first version they had presented would have been.




Minor changes in interior design were also made, moving closer to the whiter palate of Star Trek IV and eliminating all the carpets from the concepts (over Roddenberry's strong objections). Many of the sets needed quite a lot of work done to them but it was still cheaper to do that than build new ones and the movie quality of the older sets helped set the tone—to Paramount's late and unfortunate realization of how much money it would cost—for brand new sets like the Bridge. The accounting justification transferred much of the expense forward onto the as yet untitled Star Trek V.


Engineering was not in the pilot script so naturally Paramount refused to build the set. Reminiscent of the Original Series not getting a shuttle until specifically put in the script, Engineering was promptly written into the pilot… and Paramount responded in kind, by promptly handing over the Engineering set used in the movies, which required a fair bit of work to make it look different and to that end they added an upper level and redid the lower one (naturally much of this was also charged to Star Trek V).




To save some money somewhere and capitalize both on the popularity of Star Trek IV and the idea of this being a fairly close successor crew modified versions of the movie uniforms were used, the main difference being the reintroduction of blue and gold as main top colours with red being using for command (to avoid the red shirt syndrome). Early trials of spandex uniforms had been rather uncomfortable, a little too revealing, and Fox—continuing their streak of wanting to just put the movies on television—hated them as well. So, at least for the first season, it was the movie uniforms with two more colours.


Casting went on through the fall of 1986 and the spring of 1987:

Captain Jean-Luc Picard saw a number of actors considered, including: Patrick Stewart, Mitch Ryan, Roy Thinnes, Yaphet Kotto, and Patrick Bauchau. Stewart and Bauchau were the early frontrunners but concerns were raised about their "toughness" following Kirk in the role as Captain, despite the plan being not to have the Captain constantly going on away missions in the new show. In a surprise choice the producers went with Yaphet Kotto for the role, marking a major milestone in casting with a black man at the helm of a starship for the first time in Star Trek history. His casting did result in a name change for the character, however.



Executive Officer William Ryker needed a youthful Kirk-like persona, as head of the away teams and second-in-command of the Enterprise. Among those in the running for Ryker were Michael O’Gorman (an early stand-out), Gregg Marx, Jonathan Frakes, Ben Murphy, and Jeffrey Combs. Unknown Jonathan Frakes impressed everybody but in the end Jeffrey Combs was the final choice, demonstrating more of an edge that the producers felt would help balance out the otherwise potentially bland role. On an interesting note Jonathan Frakes found himself on the crew of the new Star Trek and he would go on to play a number of minor roles as well as working to help put the show on the screen: he directed his first episode in the second season and developed a career as a prolific and well regarded television director.



Counseller Deanna Troi saw Denise Crosby as the early choice but Gene Roddenberry took a shine to Marina Sirtis and in one of his increasingly rare victories against the network managed to get her cast in the role. A strange kerfuffle over eye colour promptly ensued with a number of producers claiming her green eyes were incongruous with her dark hair but in the end the exotic nature of it won out as she was technically playing an alien.



Chief Engineer Geordie La Forge[5] had perhaps the largest potential list of names but the heightened profile of one of the actors they had already talked to about it, LeVar Burton, virtually guaranteed him the part as he had also been an early favourite. Among the stranger names considered was Reggie Jackson, former Major League Baseball player, and it seems certain that if cast Wesley Snipes would have missed out on much of his movie career.



Chief of Security Tasha Yar was a difficult role to cast with Lianne Langland, Julia Nickson, Rosalind Chao, Leah Ayers, Marina Sirtis (also considered for Troi), and Bunty Bailey all considered for the role, as was Denise Crosby (also considered for Troi). The role was based on the character of Vasquez in Aliens but Dorothy Fontana brought up that Jenette Goldstein was in fact blue-eyed and blonde, so they moved away from their idea of picking a Latina. Rosalind Chao, an early favourite, was beat out by another Asian American actor: Julia Nickson.



Science Officer Data had a relative newcomer, Brent Spiner, become the late favourite beating out Mark Lindsay Chapman, Eric Menyuk, Kevin Peter Hall, and Kelvin Han Yee. Spiner had been guest starring on Night Court and that show soon created an episode centred around a fight between a fan of the original series and one of the new.



Finally the key role of Doctor Beverly Crusher was a tough choice to cast as she was originally planned as a love interest for the Captain. With Ryker and Troi filling that particular slot and with the favourite—Cheryl McFadden—preferring to continue her stage career the runner-up choice, Jenny Agutter was cast. Her youthfulness did, however, make the idea of her having a son rather unlikely. Therefore Wesley Crusher was cut from the already large cast, although the producer's liking of Will Wheaton would see him become a recurring character as as an agent working for Star Fleet headquarters who invariably managed to interfere in an annoying manner.



The last main character of the cast wouldn't join the show until after the tenth episode (over Paramount's handling of the sixth and seventh episodes). The Worf character had been considered from the beginning but vicious fights between Roddenberry (who wanted a never before seen alien) and Paramount (who wanted an alien from the original series) had sidelined him, despite the incredible audition Dorn had had. With Roddenberry on the way out as show runner Dorn was brought back—of course it had nothing to do with him being black—as the Klingon second in command of security.



The members of the cast that hadn't yet leaked to the media and the name for the new Star Trek television series were revealed in April of 1987 and soon fans and non-fans were talking about the series. The popularity of syndicated Star Trek episodes and the success of Star Trek IV that had gone beyond the traditional fanbase combined to form a major launching pad for Star Trek: The New Frontier. That, along with a joint Fox-Paramount marketing push throughout the summer, made it seem clear that at least the first episode would be seen by a wide audience.

However a bitter dispute between the various sides broke out soon after filming the first few episodes over Yaphet Kotto and he parted ways with Star Trek: The New Frontier. The writing room and Roddenberry managed to convince the producers to at least keep Kotto on for two additional episodes than Paramount had planned, the sixth and seventh, as a two-part event to close out his character. That let him both introduce the new captain, Patrick Stewart using the previously settled upon name Jean-Luc Picard, and memorably sacrifice his life to save the Enterprise. Critics would view Kotto's performance highly favourably (unlike Paramount), and his departing pair of episodes was a major turning point in the series after the not so well received second through fifth episodes.

This was kept under wraps until Paramount kicked off a major promotional event for the sixth and seventh episodes… coincidentally the first two of November "sweeps", that key month where the ratings that help determine the advertising rate were studied. Indeed the two-part wrap-up of Kotto were the second and third highest rated episodes of the entire first season (as they aired on separate nights, unlike the pilot). As for Yaphet Kotto he had nothing but good things to say about the actors he worked with and he took both his payday and his newly raised profile and vaulted into the soon-to-be highly successful Midnight Run movie almost right away.




The two hour pilot, Where No One Has Gone Before, had a high bar to uphold. Some of Gene Roddenberry's ideas from the novelization of Star Trek: The Motion Picture provided the central frame of the episode: in what case is force justified? The pilot was a tense yet philosophical thriller as the Enterprise raced towards a potential conflict and confronted internal issues over the nature of Starfleet and the strong divide between humans and New Humans and their approach to the pending confrontation that left the crew torn apart. Coupled with conflicting orders from different factions in Starfleet this left the Captain isolated in his choices, as he attempted to reconcile the two sides and save the universe from plunging into war.[6]

The only thing left was to see the reception.

Star Trek: The New Frontier was a major media event, with some 28 million people tuned into the first episode airing on Sunday 27 September 1987 on Fox, and a further 12 million people watched it at some point the week of 4 October through syndication on both Fox and non-Fox affiliates[7]. Although those ratings would decrease it was easily Fox's most popular show for the 1987-1988 television season and much like the original series the demographics of the people watching were excellent. Fox, Paramount, and the affiliates were incredibly happy with the show. Indeed the Big Three networks saw a number of their shows pushed out of primetime in both major and minor markets to make room for Star Trek on Sundays.

Critically the pilot was highly praised as was the sixth and seventh episodes. The ones in-between were poorly reviewed, and reviews for the the latter seventeen episodes varied. Audience response, however, was excellent throughout as they latched on to the hopeful future themes that were inherent throughout the show.


Star Trek: The New Frontier was off to a solid start, the only question in Paramount's minds was whether or not the film franchise could hold up its end of the bargain.



|||||


[1] They adopt the "her" referring to the Enterprise from Star Trek II instead of the "its" used in the original series and OTL's TNG, but also use the "no one" instead of "no man" phrasing (ships are girls, damn it… except Russian ones). I don't know if they considered any name except Star Trek: The Next Generation and I couldn't find evidence but it seems possible, and the name was always a little silly.

[2] With the economic ripple effects Fox wants Star Trek even more than OTL, and Paramount is less sure about the first-run syndication plan as that had never been done before for a drama in the 1980s. The syndication deal is unique but it seems like an interesting idea to me. 1987 Fox didn't have nearly the coverage of the Big Three and Fox is traditionally the network willing to take the most risks. The affiliates are getting a slightly better deal than OTL: the show for free, six minutes of commercials to them, six minutes to Paramount (of which a third of that money heads back to Fox), and a massive amount of free-to-them advertising.

[3] At that time the networks usually paid about $800,000 for an hour long and Paramount probably could have squeezed for a million dollars. ITTL the syndication deal lets Fox get the show cheaper from Paramount. If my math is reasonably okay the syndication money heading to Fox drops the cost to them by a third, in the first season. OTL's budget for an episode was $1.3 million at the beginning and 1.5 million at the end of the first season, ITTL it's $1.4 million increasing to $1.6 million. The two hour Encounter at Farpoint IOTL cost $5 million.

[4] Think mostly the first sketch, with horizontal nacelles similar to how the one's on the Phase II Enterprise concept seem to heading at the beginning of the thread (but not the same refit-Enterprise style, of course), and detailing/lights more like the Excelsior. In other words it's the next flagship class after the Excelsior, a more direct continuity, on Fox's insistence and for budgetary reasons. Or something like a cross between the Renaissance class, and the Excelsior.

[5] Minor butterflies have resulted in Geordi being the Chief Engineer from the beginning, instead of the collection of people that played that role IOTL's first season. Incidentally all mentioned alternatives were considered IOTL and the fragile nature of casting is inherently subject to butterflies.

[6] Thanks to Jello_Biafra for reminding me of the New Humans. And don't worry, the level of militarization in Star Trek: The New Frontier is only a little higher, more reminiscent of TOS and certainly not DS9.

[7] IOTL around 20 million watched Encounter at Farpoint in the first week. The combination of a broadcast network and much greater promotion has increased this. The second week syndication number is pure speculation, but of course there is no TiVo or streaming internet video yet and Fox only airs two nights a week in the 1987-1988 television season so they don't do many reruns, therefore the only chance to see it again (or catch up, having missed it) is through syndication.

-----

And… Star Trek, easily the longest section so far of this timeline (in other words: don't expect this length going forward :)). I hope everything seems reasonable and that Brainbin feels a tiny bit better about this new series. A positive case of network interference! The Writers strike will be covered at some point in a little bit along with tech '87, but I haven't decided upon the next post yet.

I was a little hesitant about reversing the Picard casting, but I really loved Stewart in the role and with Kotto's example (and other factors) to play on his Picard is probably a little different in good ways—it was also a fun twist, and cast shake-ups are rare in Star Trek but reasonably common in other shows. Star Trek: The New Frontier gets a major two-part event early on in the shows run and Kotto gets a nice chunk of change, a great ending, and a little more publicity heading into Midnight Run.

As always, comments are very welcome :).
 
Last edited:
So here we are, boldly going where no man has gone before, once again...

Fox was willing to take the risk, especially on anything that would disrupt the Big Three competition as they well realized they were the underdog.
I like this arrangement, because it does reflect the realities on the ground; FOX wouldn't be a "major" network until the OTL realignment of 1994. Certainly, the "can you find your FOX station" campaigns of the late 1980s will have a bit more urgency and potency to them ITTL.

Electric Monk said:
Gulf+Western executives were not nearly as amused by this undercurrent of Hollywood thought as the rest of the town was.
They should just be relieved that old Charlie Bluhdorn is dead; he'd probably have a conniption.

Electric Monk said:
With the unique partial syndication deal in place Fox managed to get away with a low price for Star Trek, once they committed to a major advertising campaign, of just half the cost of an episode which in this case was $700,000, except for the $7 million two hour pilot.
I like this, too. A leaner, meaner Star Trek will force the writers to concentrate on good stories, as they did on the original series.

Electric Monk said:
With the lucrative Fox/early-syndication deal on the table Roddenberry found himself increasingly sidelined, especially as his entire writing staff—led by veteran Star Trek writers David Gerrold & D. C. Fontana—were actually with Fox on that issue, especially since Fox had made it clear that Standards & Practices would be sidelined on most items.
The continued involvement of Gerrold and particularly Fontana will be good news for the series. They understood Star Trek, and what it really meant to people. Also, they're both far more talented writers than Roddenberry, though that's not saying much.

Electric Monk said:
The Enterprise NCC-1701-C was the new registry, as the time period had changed yet again so as to allow the use of the Reliant and Excelsior models as standard parts of the Star Trek fleet with everyone still undecided about the use of the Enterprise-A model.
The new design sounds interesting, and of course I strongly approve of bringing the setting closer to "home", which will help to prevent certain characters from posturing about how much better they are than the great Starfleet officers of Kirk's time.

Electric Monk said:
Minor changes in interior design were also made, moving closer to the whiter palate of Star Trek IV and eliminating all the carpets from the concepts (over Roddenberry's strong objections).
I certainly appreciate this. Frankly, the OTL Enterprise-D bridge looks... well, "hotel lobby" about covers it, actually!

Electric Monk said:
The accounting justification transferred much of the expense forward onto the as yet untitled Star Trek V.

Engineering was promptly written into the pilot… and Paramount responded in kind, by promptly handing over the Engineering set used in the movies, which required a fair bit of work to make it look different and to that end they added an upper level and redid the lower one (naturally much of this was also charged to Star Trek V).
Isn't Hollywood Accounting frightening? This stuff is still going on, too... Now there's an industry that needs an Enron-style scandal.

Electric Monk said:
So, at least for the first season, it was the movie uniforms with two more colours.
That would be interesting to see, actually. I suspect it would be a navy and a mustard, to match the saturation of the burgundy... the problem with using movie-style uniforms is that they are already colour-coded (by undershirt), which would create a redundancy. Not that such a thing would be out of line, considering some of the truly hideous uniform choices in the franchise's long history.

Electric Monk said:
His casting did result in a name change for the character, however.
To what, exactly? :p

Electric Monk said:
Unknown Jonathan Frakes impressed everybody but in the end Jeffrey Combs was the final choice, demonstrating more of an edge that the producers felt would help balance out the otherwise potentially bland role.
Well done. I hate Frakes as Riker; the man delivers the most stilted dialogue on that show. I don't think I've ever heard one naturalistic-sounding line come out of his mouth. Even Shatner pulled that off sometimes! Frankly, I don't know what they saw in him. What I've seen of Combs tells me that he could pull off the Herculean task of making that character interesting.

And no, to anyone who asks, I have not seen Frakes on Gargoyles, despite being young enough to have been part of the target audience; I don't doubt that he was good in that, although Keith David probably blew him out of the water anyway.

Electric Monk said:
Among the stranger names considered was Reggie Jackson, former Major League Baseball player, and it seems certain that if cast Wesley Snipes would have missed out on much of his movie career.
I don't blame you for sticking with Burton, but it does seem that you have a ready-made substitute in Snipes, which would totally butterfly his career, although given his OTL personality, I suspect that he would meet much the same end.

Electric Monk said:
With Ryker and Troi filling that particular slot and with the favourite—Cheryl McFadden—preferring to continue her stage career the runner-up choice, Jenny Agutter was cast.
Jenny Agutter?! Wow, I bet she'll be happy that Roddenberry won't be involved as heavily with the show. It should be very interesting to see what kind of role her character plays in the further development of the show.

Electric Monk said:
With Roddenberry on the way out as show runner Dorn was brought back—of course it had nothing to do with him being black—as the Klingon second in command of security.
Good on Dorn. One of the few cast members of TNG I really like; though with the survival of Yar, he too will need to find his niche.

Electric Monk said:
That let him both introduce the new captain, Patrick Stewart using the previously settled upon name Jean-Luc Picard, and memorably sacrifice his life to save the Enterprise.
Really? Such a tease - promising a shake-up in the status quo, only to chicken out at the last minute ;) I'll be honest here; I don't like Picard. Never have. Even after the Roddenberry-era sanctimony wore off. He's one of those people whom everybody tells me I should love, but he just leaves me cold. Maybe this new situation will allow Stewart to approach the character differently (and from what I understand, he always wanted a more action-oriented, more Kirk-ish, if you will, character). But again, I know that I'm in the minority here. Many of you adore Picard, for all the same reasons that I don't care for him, and would balk if he were portrayed differently.

Electric Monk said:
The pilot was a tense yet philosophical thriller as the Enterprise raced towards a potential conflict and confronted internal issues over the nature of Starfleet and the strong divide between humans and New Humans and their approach to the pending confrontation that left the crew torn apart. Coupled with conflicting orders from different factions in Starfleet this left the Captain isolated in his choices, as he attempted to reconcile the two sides and save the universe from plunging into war.
Good synopsis - it feels like a genuine ethical dilemma, rather than the this is what's right and we're telling you how you should think morality of modern Star Trek. Of course, this makes "New Humans" - a typical Roddenberry idea if ever there was one - canon, which creates yet another interesting wrinkle in the show - the whole franchise, in fact - moving forward.

Electric Monk said:
Indeed the Big Three networks saw a number of their shows pushed out of primetime in both major and minor markets to make room for Star Trek on Sundays.
On the whole, I like the public reaction, but one thing to note is that, in this era, Sundays were not the "dead zone" that they are today. Both CBS and NBC had a very solid night that season IOTL; only ABC affiliates would consider the kind of shifting you're talking about.

Electric Monk said:
Star Trek: The New Frontier was off to a solid start, the only question in Paramount's minds was whether or not the film franchise could hold up its end of the bargain.
They're not the only ones.

Electric Monk said:
I hope everything seems reasonable and that Brainbin feels a tiny bit better about this new series.
Well, it's a question of tone. It does seem like you're trying to give it a feel more akin to TOS, or at least the movies; IMO, this is definitely a good thing. By and large, I'm not really a fan of the cast of TNG IOTL; probably my least favourite from all the series (excluding Enterprise, of course - yes, I liked Voyager's cast better, though obviously they had less to work with). The changes you made look like a net positive for me in that respect; of course, like OTL TNG, I'm sure that New Frontier will have growing pains as it matures into its ultimate form; as long as it keeps moving in the right direction, I'm sure I would view it as a worthy successor to TOS :D

And thank you for taking my feelings into consideration! :eek:

I'm definitely looking forward to your take on the strike; it will have massive effects, as mentioned, on both New Frontier and Star Trek V. Both the series and the film franchise were narrowly rescued from oblivion IOTL; but will they be so lucky ITTL?
 
In case you missed it the Star Trek update is right up there and I'd love to hear your thoughts.

I'm glad I talked about Star Trek before I posted it, but I think I'll keep most future updates a surprise. As usual, however, there is a guessing contest: … hmmm, properly obscure, let's see: a show that will be at least part of the next update is referenced in Back to the Future Part II IOTL.

In a perfect world, more elaborate alien designs, instead of the vast majority looking like, well, bumpy-foreheaded aliens. Also, play off of the arc set up in "Conspiracy", and have the *Borg be insectoid [1]. Go along with OTL, though, and kill off Yar, because without her Worf got his chance to shine.

[1] course, this may depend on how the writers strike goes...

Star Trek: TNG actually had an excellent budget for an hour long of the time but sometimes I wonder what they were spending it on :). Money is the reason I've heard for why the Borg were cyborgs, rather than insects. Tracy Tormé is probably on the writing staff, although I don't know if he'll write Conspiracy.

As you've seen Yar is at least played by a different person and Star Trek: The New Frontier has already had a major cast shake-up. Presumably the producers will evaluate at the end of the season how everyone is doing.

Yeah that 1988 writer's strike is just a killer, in terms of impact. I assume it'll still happen ITTL so… ouch.

Whatever you do with TNG, don't turn it into grimdark military sci-fi, which seems to be the central tendency on this board when people get asked how they'd change Star Trek.

Heh. No worries, that's really not what Star Trek was about (well, except half of DS9). That said I could argue TNG & DS9 both went too far—in different directions—from the TOS example.

what I would have loved to see is for context in TNG. Roddenberry built quite a rich texture in his novelization of Star Trek: The Motion Picture, building the context of the background of the Federation, some of which was echoed in TNG, but a lot just never made it.

The problem, at least with Rodenberry around, is that however interesting the philosophical arguments might be between "New" Humans and "Old" Humans is that Rodenberry forbade interpersonal conflict. Which was a huge mistake of course. As you see I attempt to work around that, particularly for the pilot.

It might be hard to have that realistically play out, but I think Star Trek would be more interesting if there could be more emphasis on humanity "growing out of its infancy", and particularly more explanation of what that means.

I don't think a post-scarcity society has to go the way Star Trek: TNG did, but the question of societal evolution is an interesting one.

I suspect that I would be outnumbered, and possibly mobbed.

I'll make this suggestion anyway, even though I know you'll discard it: TNG is cancelled after season 2. It is remembered as a sub-par and unworthy successor to the original series, and it becomes clear that Kirk, Spock, Bones, Scotty, et al., are Star Trek, pure and simple. But that'll never happen in a timeline that I'm not writing, so...

So you're that one guy who hates TNG! Heh. Look in some sense I agree with you in that it wasn't Star Trek Star Trek. However I do think it was a good show. There really isn't much thoughtful science fiction on television, if Star Trek: TNG dies early on… well, that's it for television science fiction for a while. And I've tried to improve it in various ways.

Of course, the creators came to blame the serendipitous timing of finally ending the unresolved sexual tension between David and Maddie, resulting in many producers deciding to prolong or extend will-they-or-won't-they plots from then on (witness the decade-long dance between Ross and Rachel).

And that's just one entirely logical butterfly to result from changing the course of this strike. It's an embarrassment of riches!

I knew that terrible story. Forget Ross and Rachel, pick any romantic relationship on television… utter refusal to put them together on the assumption it'll sink their show but it's all based on a self-reinforcing false premise.

Even if the show did have huge ratings, I'm sure Bruce would have walked as soon as his contract allowed to carry on with his movie career.

Of all the networks, I would put the likeliness of pickup at FOX-CBS-ABC-NBC, in that order. It would be a huge coup for FOX, of course,

As you can see I agreed with that, although I based it on OTL discussions that were had as well. Fox offered the most episodes IOTL and could probably be talked into more and airing them later in a somewhat rougher economic climate to launch a new network into (the interesting syndication deal, a cheaper deal on episodes, and so forth all help).

I am looking forward to your take on TNG. Unlike with TOS, it's hard for me to imagine a better reception for the show, at least, taken as a whole, than the one it got IOTL. Sure, it had a slow start, but I think that's difficult to eliminate without getting rid of Roddenberry, and he very much took the reins of this show's development. Even if you somehow butterfly him away, that still leaves you with the WGA strike, and changing that will unleash the rabble of butterflies...

As a whole? I'd more or less agree with you. For the first season, well, I did what I could. Many of the episodes are similar to scripts that were written… before Gene went off and rewrote the first 15 to remove all traces of humanity like arguments and stuff from them. So they are better episodes (and certainly look nicer), but they are not necessarily good: just a step up from OTL. There are exceptions like the pilot, the sixth and seventh episodes, and a few here and there. The first season is viewed much more favourably than IOTL.

As you've seen I used that usually terrible thing—network notes—to weaken Roddenberry. Fox being Fox, of course they would try to copy the movies as much as possible. I think they were probably right to do so, and note that they didn't care about plots so much as style and attitude (i.e. no interpersonal conflicts). But since Roddenberry's idea for TNG was founded on attitude that strikes right at him and frees up the talented writers that were hamstrung OTL.

I like this, too. A leaner, meaner Star Trek will force the writers to concentrate on good stories, as they did on the original series.

Technically they have more money to play with than IOTL (I could have worded that better, see footnote [3] of that Star Trek post). Of course Hollywood accounting means they actually have less money than OTL, because they spread the already balking at super-expensive pilot onto the rest of the season.

The new Bridge set, for instance, is incredibly expensive. And basing the quality of the sets on Star Trek IV is also a heck of a lot more expensive than what they did for the scratch built sets (IOTL they repurposed plenty of movie sets, but not the Bridge for instance). In addition the pilot and two-part Kotto episodes have a lot more SFX, as does the show in general with the having a rather more elaborate bridge screen: going off the sketch it looks the centre is a traditional screen, with the left giving a 2D top-down look at the system (kinda like Andromeda did sometimes) and the right being used to examine items in more data? Something like that, which costs some extra money to run.

(The quality of the sets will pay off for *DVD release, and even moreso if the SFX gets redone for *Blu-ray release.)

So assuming a 1.3-1.5 million budget per episode IOTL and 1.4-1.6 million "budget" per episode ITTL… well a lot of it has been eaten away by upfront and extra SFX costs… their effective budget is lower, which means more reliance on the interpersonal drama and less on aliens of the week (a good thing, IMO) which they are allowed to do without Roddenberry.

The continued involvement of Gerrold and particularly Fontana will be good news for the series. They understood Star Trek, and what it really meant to people. Also, they're both far more talented writers than Roddenberry, though that's not saying much.

So very true. And I couldn't resist turning the network notes are bad trope upside down. Fox is an incredibly savvy and risky network compared to the Big Three in both timelines and they fully understand Star Trek movies = money, whatever the heck Roddenberry was thinking = ???.

The new design sounds interesting, and of course I strongly approve of bringing the setting closer to "home", which will help to prevent certain characters from posturing about how much better they are than the great Starfleet officers of Kirk's time.

Lol. That always bugged me to. This way the collection of Miranda and Excelsior classes in the setting make much more sense, and theoretically the original crew are around for guest spots at more reasonable ages.

It seems to take between 25 and 40 years for Starfleet to roll out a replacement lead class, and I'd argue that the Refit-Enterprise was actually a fifteen-year life extension plan because the Excelsior design wasn't ready. So Enterprise or Constitution rolls out in 2245, the surviving ships are upgraded fully in 2270 along with some new-build construction, the Excelsior rolls out in 2285 (has problems) but is operational out the door in a couple more years. Since the Excelsiors weren't refit, IOTL, that means 25 or so years before putting a brand new class out the door by 2310, somewhere around the setting of the show (IOTL they had at least the Ambassador class between the Excelsior and the Galaxy (~2360) class, putting it around 37 years an update) so perhaps that pushes it back as far as 2320. TOS was 2265, Star Trek VI was 2293… much closer to the Kirk era, basically.

That would be interesting to see, actually. I suspect it would be a navy and a mustard, to match the saturation of the burgundy... the problem with using movie-style uniforms is that they are already colour-coded (by undershirt), which would create a redundancy. Not that such a thing would be out of line, considering some of the truly hideous uniform choices in the franchise's long history.

My best guess is that they add a light colour for each of the three main colours: so Burgundy/light red for ensigns; Navy for science, Navy/sky blue for medical; Mustard for operations, Mustard/light yellow for security.

Well done. I hate Frakes as Riker; the man delivers the most stilted dialogue on that show. I don't think I've ever heard one naturalistic-sounding line come out of his mouth. Even Shatner pulled that off sometimes! Frankly, I don't know what they saw in him. What I've seen of Combs tells me that he could pull off the Herculean task of making that character interesting.

Combs played horror, he can totally pull it off. Frakes is a really excellent TV director and I figured sparing us from him to give in an early start in that field is just fine. In honour of his "performance" the name Riker goes down with him and they stick to the original "Ryker".

I don't know what they saw either, but apparently they loved him.

I don't blame you for sticking with Burton, but it does seem that you have a ready-made substitute in Snipes, which would totally butterfly his career, although given his OTL personality, I suspect that he would meet much the same end.

I did give it quite a bit of consideration, the same as with Denzel or Burton in The Living Daylights. The problem I had was that I literally couldn't imagine Snipes pulling off the role as his range is basically action "star" or crazy person (and he's much better at the latter). Burton, at least, is a fairly solid actor.

Jenny Agutter?! Wow, I bet she'll be happy that Roddenberry won't be involved as heavily with the show. It should be very interesting to see what kind of role her character plays in the further development of the show.

Oh god yes. Not least because it's space miniskirts all the way! Fox is rather insistent on the skirt option—first seen IOTL Star Trek V—being the standard on the new show, the same applies to Troi's… um, outfits? At least the poor lady will have better writing and be spared wearing contacts.

Really? Such a tease - promising a shake-up in the status quo, only to chicken out at the last minute ;) I'll be honest here; I don't like Picard. Never have. Even after the Roddenberry-era sanctimony wore off. He's one of those people whom everybody tells me I should love, but he just leaves me cold. Maybe this new situation will allow Stewart to approach the character differently (and from what I understand, he always wanted a more action-oriented, more Kirk-ish, if you will, character). But again, I know that I'm in the minority here. Many of you adore Picard, for all the same reasons that I don't care for him, and would balk if he were portrayed differently.

On purpose, alas, despite how much I like Kotto. I needed a reason to establish earlier on that TNF is willing to do stuff that they wouldn't get to IOTL until the third season and the Borg. It's also a high profile event, and the publicity is worth a ton (Star Trek and Kotto get off scot free, Paramount gets egg on their face, and Fox sails through happily with extra ratings).

I'm more with you, but not entirely. I adore Stewart for the performance because he's such a great actor, but at the same time even as a kid I wanted more Kirk. When he steps it up (seen mostly in the movies) he truly does nail a Kirk-ish role: he's older, he knows he has limits, but he's willing to go all out. With Kotto's example for Stewart to argue with the producers about that's more or less how's he playing it from the beginning. (So if you found some inkling of appreciation for how Stewart played Picard in First Contact, you might like this ATL TV performance more… still intellectual, but rather tougher.)

Good synopsis - it feels like a genuine ethical dilemma, rather than the this is what's right and we're telling you how you should think morality of modern Star Trek. Of course, this makes "New Humans" - a typical Roddenberry idea if ever there was one - canon, which creates yet another interesting wrinkle in the show - the whole franchise, in fact - moving forward.

The New Humans, yes. The transitional bridge from how Star Trek moves from capitalism and war if needed and not putting children in harm's way on starships to being a bunch of pacifist child-endangering communists :). Although I loved the show, personally I always thought it was a little silly on TNG's part and much preferred TOS's more straightforward approach. If there's a theme of the series, the New Humans vs. Old is it.

As much as I hate the idea of sticking kids on terribly dangerous starships Gerrold was a big proponent of that, so they'll still be around ITTL. (I'm sure *Fox is already thinking of a Star Trek: The Academy Years spin-off :rolleyes:.) That said this is much more like hardship postings, not kindergarten. The kids are along because people have families and they are going to be in deep space for years… (it may be also be a clever Starfleet idea to indoctrinate kids into the service, neatly side-stepping some New Human problems).

On the whole, I like the public reaction, but one thing to note is that, in this era, Sundays were not the "dead zone" that they are today. Both CBS and NBC had a very solid night that season IOTL; only ABC affiliates would consider the kind of shifting you're talking about.

Syndication airs throughout the week following the next Saturday and Star Trek is pretty popular. Example: new episode is on at Day 1 8pm, syndication is allowed on Day 7 from 7pm onwards, there's no requirement for it to air on Sunday.

The smarter affiliates look at the weak spots in the line-up of the shows they're getting and plug Star Trek in there and sometime that's primetime (as happened IOTL, to a moderately lesser extent ITTL).

Preempting Sunday itself was mostly a pilot matter based on tracking data Fox handed out although as you mentioned ABC affiliates make it a fairly common matter to do it the "one week later, Sunday Star Trek returns" kinda thing. Fox affiliates have a tendency to do back-to-back Star Trek playing last week's and then switching over to the Fox network feed for the new one (hence the one hour before the new one airs clause, clever Fox).

[Paramount] They're not the only ones. [worried about the films]

Something to consider, though, which dovetails nicely into our previous discussion, is the 1988 WGA Strike, which will almost certainly happen ITTL.

I'm definitely looking forward to your take on the strike; it will have massive effects, as mentioned, on both New Frontier and Star Trek V. Both the series and the film franchise were narrowly rescued from oblivion IOTL; but will they be so lucky ITTL?

Yeah. Shatner. Director and strike problems. Yikes. The massive barrel of a gun WGA Strike is indeed huge, and not something that can be avoided, only altered. And it's right on the heels of Season 2. Yikes.
 
Last edited:
Love the update as a whole, and I'm definitely glad I subscribed to this TL :)
Heh. No worries, that's really not what Star Trek was about (well, except half of DS9). That said I could argue TNG & DS9 both went too far—in different directions—from the TOS example.
I would certainly agree. Though, I do think that even with the context of a pseudo-utopia (politics was implied to still exist in OTL TNG, and you've made it clear it certainly does exist ITTL, so I wouldn't consider even the rosiest of days on TNG a true utopia, since utopia is by definition post-political), one can have both internal and external conflict.

By any chance, have you read The Dispossessed by Ursula K. Le Guin? I think a lot of what was wrong with TNG era Roddenberry's views could have been corrected had he read it. And I definitely see some parallels with that novel in your description of TTL's TNG.

Frankly, Paramount should make you producer on a new Star Trek show :p
The problem, at least with Rodenberry around, is that however interesting the philosophical arguments might be between "New" Humans and "Old" Humans is that Rodenberry forbade interpersonal conflict. Which was a huge mistake of course. As you see I attempt to work around that, particularly for the pilot.
I rather enjoy your effort. Are there perhaps any New Humans on the crew of the Enterprise now?
I don't think a post-scarcity society has to go the way Star Trek: TNG did, but the question of societal evolution is an interesting one.
To be quite honest, though, I think that when people think of a post-scarcity society obviating conflict, they've adopted an old Marxist conceit that they really shouldn't have. Of course, that does depend on your definition of post-scarcity.

The replicators on TNG were a mistake, I think, because they were overly handwaving and tore huge plot holes into the series. Post-scarcity isn't a land of infinity, it's a land of abundance, which means there's enough to meet people's material wants. Quite obviously, this doesn't prevent someone from taking this away from you, or feeling that they are justified in having more because of a sense of entitlement.
 
Thanks so much for responding to my thoughts in such detail, and for addressing my concerns in a very thoughtful and reasonable way, especially since, as you note, some of my opinions on the matter aren't exactly popular...

So you're that one guy who hates TNG! Heh. Look in some sense I agree with you in that it wasn't Star Trek Star Trek. However I do think it was a good show.
As I said before, the cast really turns me off. Roddenberry's directive that these were "evolved" humans really hurt their characterizations, and most of them weren't quite able to shake that off after he left (to the point that Data, a deliberately stilted and awkward character, didn't really carry himself all that differently from the rest of the allegedly "human" cast). I'm not crazy about some of the directions that DS9 went off in, but those characters were real people, in a way that the TNG characters weren't. Similarly, you could see the Voyager actors chafing under their show's terrible plotting and thriving whenever they were handed even halfway decent material, whereas the TNG cast just seemed to pull their punches, and were never better than the material they were given. At least, IMNSHO ;)

Electric Monk said:
There really isn't much thoughtful science fiction on television, if Star Trek: TNG dies early on… well, that's it for television science fiction for a while. And I've tried to improve it in various ways.
I understand this, and I do see that you have some of the same underlying qualms about how TNG turned out, despite your overall fondness for the show. And I definitely think you're making changes that would help to mitigate those qualms.

Electric Monk said:
I knew that terrible story. Forget Ross and Rachel, pick any romantic relationship on television… utter refusal to put them together on the assumption it'll sink their show but it's all based on a self-reinforcing false premise.
That philosophy is finally weakening in our modern era of more continuity-minded shows - certainly, "The Office" would never have resolved the Jim/Pam scenario had it come out just a few years earlier - but there are still some problems. "How I Met Your Mother", for example, might as well be "Friends, Part Deux" in that respect. (Then again, as much as I harp on "Friends", their successful handling of the Chandler/Monica relationship is probably a big reason why creators have been more willing to bring couples together in recent years.)

Electric Monk said:
Even if the show did have huge ratings, I'm sure Bruce would have walked as soon as his contract allowed to carry on with his movie career.
Agreed - assuming that he has his mainstream breakthrough with Die Hard, of course ;)

Electric Monk said:
The first season is viewed much more favourably than IOTL.
I can definitely see that - though I'm sure it would later be described as "uneven" or maybe even "schizophrenic".

Electric Monk said:
As you've seen I used that usually terrible thing—network notes—to weaken Roddenberry. Fox being Fox, of course they would try to copy the movies as much as possible. I think they were probably right to do so, and note that they didn't care about plots so much as style and attitude (i.e. no interpersonal conflicts).
They were absolutely right to do so - the Bennett/Meyer movies were good. Even The Final Frontier, though bad, was simply dull, disappointing, and nonsensical, no worse - at least in my opinion. And it had a great cast - Nimoy wasn't trying (he never does, when he doesn't like the script), but Kelley, to his eternal credit, certainly was. And the rest of them were game, at least. (Yes, I tend to be an apologist for bad TOS episodes, too. But only the so-bad-it's-good ones. "Spock's Brain" is absolutely hilarious, by the way.)

"Style" and "attitude" are definitely two problems I had with TNG, so changing those are just fine :cool:

Electric Monk said:
So assuming a 1.3-1.5 million budget per episode IOTL and 1.4-1.6 million "budget" per episode ITTL… well a lot of it has been eaten away by upfront and extra SFX costs… their effective budget is lower, which means more reliance on the interpersonal drama and less on aliens of the week (a good thing, IMO) which they are allowed to do without Roddenberry.
Agreed. Bottle shows really allow the magic of Star Trek to shine through - all the best episodes of early TOS ("The Corbomite Maneuver", "The Naked Time", "The Enemy Within", "Balance of Terror") were essentially bottle shows, and they made that show. I see absolutely no reason why that same basic formula wouldn't work here, especially with the experienced Fontana and/or Gerrold writing.

Electric Monk said:
Star Trek movies = money, whatever the heck Roddenberry was thinking = ???.
Somebody at FOX probably has that scrawled on a whiteboard somewhere :p

Electric Monk said:
Lol. That always bugged me to. This way the collection of Miranda and Excelsior classes in the setting make much more sense, and theoretically the original crew are around for guest spots at more reasonable ages.
You better believe it! For example, assuming that our Bones cameo still happens, he'll be playing someone in his 90s (more than feasible even in this day and age - look at Bob Hope and Betty White) rather than a 137-year-old :rolleyes:

Electric Monk said:
I don't know what they saw either, but apparently they loved him.
I'm just glad I'm not the only one! I'm honestly baffled as to why he was hired, of all people - and I assume your list was taken from OTL. Any one of them probably would have done a better job. At least ITTL he sticks to directing and spares everyone from his "acting".

Electric Monk said:
I'm more with you, but not entirely. I adore Stewart for the performance because he's such a great actor, but at the same time even as a kid I wanted more Kirk. When he steps it up (seen mostly in the movies) he truly does nail a Kirk-ish role: he's older, he knows he has limits, but he's willing to go all out. With Kotto's example for Stewart to argue with the producers about that's more or less how's he playing it from the beginning.
All right, I like the sound of that. I know that Stewart has the chops, but the great thing about Kirk is that he had a verve, a zest for his position. He had enough perspective to recognize the inherent challenges of being the Captain, and he did suffer for it, but that was what he wanted to do, more than anything else in the universe. Picard really seemed to me like he'd much rather be sitting at a desk somewhere, drinking his tea, and reading his books. Captaining a starship always seemed to be such a chore to him. If you have Stewart project that same enthusiasm, that same passion, into his performance, it'll make all the difference.

Electric Monk said:
(So if you found some inkling of appreciation for how Stewart played Picard in First Contact, you might like this ATL TV performance more… still intellectual, but rather tougher.)
I've actually never seen the TNG movies. Being a devoted fan of TOS, I refuse to watch Generations on general principle, and I never did watch any of the rest. From what I've heard, Picard's arc in First Contact does sound more compelling and appealing to me, though.

Electric Monk said:
If there's a theme of the series, the New Humans vs. Old is it.
That makes sense; a nice callback to other science-fiction concepts (like Eloi and Morlocks, for example) and bound to create just the right kind of dissonance with the audience. For we (and Kirk, and his entire generation) are Old Humans, after all!

Electric Monk said:
Syndication airs throughout the week following the next Saturday and Star Trek is pretty popular. Example: new episode is on at Day 1 8pm, syndication is allowed on Day 7 from 7pm onwards, there's no requirement for it to air on Sunday.
Aha, now I see. Thank you for clearing that up. Quite the interesting arrangement - though it does sound very plausible. The nice thing about TV scheduling is that it's surprisingly fluid, and has been throughout its entire history.

Electric Monk said:
Yeah. Shatner. Director and strike problems. Yikes. The massive barrel of a gun WGA Strike is indeed huge, and not something that can be avoided, only altered. And it's right on the heels of Season 2. Yikes.
It's a critical turning point, which is exactly the right kind of thing to get the alternate historian's juices flowing :D
 
I just had a thought about the comic book portion of popular culture ITTL. Since the POD in 1986, I assume DC still went through with its line-wide shakeup with Crisis on Infinite Earths and the subsequent reboots. Though maybe, just maybe, the editorial staff decides to do it more uniformly. The Wonder Woman reboot by George Perez is similar to John Byrne's Man of Steel in that it takes place in the past rather than the contemporary DCU. Thus we avoid the confusion of Donna Troy in New Teen Titans, and Wonder Woman's status in Justice League of America.

As for Man of Steel, maybe Superman could have been "Superboy" (never referred to as such in the comic) and joined the Legion of Super-Heroes and avoid the mother of all continuity snarls. I don't know if Tim Truman's Hawkworld will be butterflied away but if not, then maybe DC will avoid trying to shoehorn it into modern continuity and make it a "Year One" story as it was supposed to be. As for Power Girl... I don't know. I think her Atlantean "origin" was pain silly; maybe she can be an amnesiac survivor of Crisis. Hell, I think it would make more sense if the heroes remembered the Crisis but simply don't remember how it happened due to how it messed with time and leave it at that.

And wouldn't it be interesting if Ron Perelman never buys Marvel Comics and Jim Shooter (and his financial backers) managed to buy it. Think of the potential butterflies, Valiant will probably never exist after Shooter's return to Marvel and Image might never come to be (at least in its original form.) Marvel could possibly avoid bankruptcy, and I wonder how that will the industry in the long term.
 
A grab-bag from talk about post-scarcity societies and New Humans to comics to casting details of Star Trek to why Patrick Stewart just needs a push to nail the role. Everyone is free to chime in, of course, as well as make comments about technology, James Bond, Star Trek, and things not yet covered :).

However here's a shiny sketch I forgot to put it in the Star Trek update (although it's there now, for new readers):


A hotel lobby, right from the start. The *Bridge is at least this big, but as I said looks more like the Star Trek III Excelsior bridge as built with a (somewhat smaller) viewscreen from the concept sketch.

Really? Such a tease - promising a shake-up in the status quo, only to chicken out at the last minute ;) I'll be honest here; I don't like Picard.

Additional answer to this one.

The other reason I flipped on it in addition to the ones I mentioned earlier/above (because my original plan was indeed for him to be the Captain for the show's run) was that reading about Star Trek it seemed pretty clear that Patrick Stewart was a huge reason the show worked on the set. Could Kotto adopt that role? Possibly, I could just handwave it. But Kotto despite two major stints on television was never the lead, nor was he the lead in movies very often. So I decided to take the opportunity of, yes, in one sense chickening out and use it to boost everybody involved (except Paramount). Maybe Kotto gets his own TV show in a bit, or is the star of a major movie, and certainly (and unlike the rest of the cast) he isn't typecast. Meanwhile his departure radically shakes up the ideas of what TNF can do, which isn't apparent in most of the first season but later on…. (Edit: Okay, well I touch a little on it below.)

The ATL "Best Captain" debates tend to go with Kotto, incidentally, based on the great four hours of television he has and the very good performance in the other four hours of weaker episodes he has.

Equally so the great "What If" of TTL Star Trek is, of course, "What if Kotto stayed Captain of the Enterprise?". (If I ever feel like going baroque, maybe I'll do that post as I know both the speculation ATL AH fans would do and the reality… :).)

Love the update as a whole, and I'm definitely glad I subscribed to this TL :)

Frankly, Paramount should make you producer on a new Star Trek show :p

Yay! Hopefully I'm also living up to the collection of (cough silent readers cough) other people as well.

At this point I think it would have to be a full reboot on the order of the new movie, in a different direction (Enterprise should have been a full reboot, but it wouldn't have mattered with the first batch of writers). Given a choice I'd start up in the 2270s or 2280s with the older and wiser Kirk (casual reference to exploits in the past) and focus on the changing nature of Federation society confronted with the existential threats that are lurking in the darkness that the earlier 5-year missions had revealed, and the more prosaic but no less meaningful problems of peer competitors that didn't like the regular old humans and Federation, let alone what the New Humans want. It's be a hard needle to thread because you're picking perhaps the most fertile ground, but also in many ways the least optimistic part. The light would have to be at the end of a very long tunnel. TOS/movies didn't have to do as those were adventures, TNG shied away from, and DS9 only touched upon. Not militaristic, particularly, but there would probably be a lot more darkness. The trick of course would be to maintain the optimistic nature: yes we're trudging through darkness, but we are winning something.

That's just me though, TNF isn't nearly as dark as that. Equally well I'd be happy to do something that is set in the same kinda universe as above, but it's basically the luckiest/happiest crew in existence and everybody hates them because of it. So the lighthearted/comedic elements of TOS, except here everyone in the galaxy hates you because you are getting off scot free. Almost a very carefully played farce, that still delves into the issues of Star Trek. So they solve racism, by getting both races to set aside their differences to attack the crew. They stop a god creature from taking out the universe, by getting another god creature on his ass, etc…. Everything works out perfectly, just for them.

I would certainly agree. Though, I do think that even with the context of a pseudo-utopia (politics was implied to still exist in OTL TNG, and you've made it clear it certainly does exist ITTL, so I wouldn't consider even the rosiest of days on TNG a true utopia, since utopia is by definition post-political), one can have both internal and external conflict.

Not utopia, of course, even on TNG let alone DS9 but I think that's what Roddenberry was working towards in his (admittedly terrible) way. There's something to admire there.

By any chance, have you read The Dispossessed by Ursula K. Le Guin? I think a lot of what was wrong with TNG era Roddenberry's views could have been corrected had he read it. And I definitely see some parallels with that novel in your description of TTL's TNG.

Just a few short stories IIRC and of course The Left Hand of Darkness. She's was one of a handful of authors who I admire what they're doing and enjoy the plot and characters… I simply can't stand how she writes. It's weird, I know.

I rather enjoy your effort. Are there perhaps any New Humans on the crew of the Enterprise now?

The way I look it, to try and make sense of how Star Trek changed IOTL (which carefully didn't mention it except as a "we're so much better now" fashion) and how it more explicitly is the process of changing ITTL—and note that where TNG settled is not where TNF is going to settle, for better or for worse—there are New Humans more or less spreading out from the core colonies (settled, safe) and those who sympathize with their ideals but aren't them. In Starfleet? I'd imagine the percentage of actual New Humans would be fairly low (Troi would probably be the highest ranking one of those, despite only being half-human), but as I failed to describe the ideals they're espousing are desperately hopeful in a particular way so their "faction" is well beyond the actual number of New Humans.

If one wants to pretend that TNG/DS9 is the post-New Human shake-out than you see it pretty well: most of Starfleet basically sympathizes with the New Humans, including our main characters, and the leftover humans that don't have been driven from Kirk's position to darker and darker places (Section 31, the coup) as they watch their hapless New Human companions fail to get just what a dangerous place the universe is. Or heck just sidelined in frustation like Captain Jellicoe who avoided that fate, but simply doesn't comprehend New Humans and they don't get him.

To be quite honest, though, I think that when people think of a post-scarcity society obviating conflict, they've adopted an old Marxist conceit that they really shouldn't have. Of course, that does depend on your definition of post-scarcity.

Oh I've never thought that. Post-scarcity is one thing, conflict doesn't particularly need anything to do with resources. Post-scarcity societies could clash (internally or externally) on any number of issues.

The replicators on TNG were a mistake, I think, because they were overly handwaving and tore huge plot holes into the series. Post-scarcity isn't a land of infinity, it's a land of abundance, which means there's enough to meet people's material wants. Quite obviously, this doesn't prevent someone from taking this away from you, or feeling that they are justified in having more because of a sense of entitlement.

This, if one wants to throw ideology into the mix as well (whatever that term means in the future, and Star Trek has attempted to talk about it). Needless to say I'm killing the replicator. Alas for all kinds of reasons I'm pretty sure the holodeck is entrenched.

That philosophy is finally weakening in our modern era of more continuity-minded shows - certainly, "The Office" would never have resolved the Jim/Pam scenario had it come out just a few years earlier - but there are still some problems. "How I Met Your Mother", for example, might as well be "Friends, Part Deux" in that respect. (Then again, as much as I harp on "Friends", their successful handling of the Chandler/Monica relationship is probably a big reason why creators have been more willing to bring couples together in recent years.)

I don't watch all of these, but: Castle, Bones (I hate the show, but apparently they win the no prize in the modern era), they're setting up for the long haul on New Girl, House did it for a few years, arguably the Mentalist, I Just Want My Pants Back is certainly going to go there, 2 Broke Girls is going there in subtext because it's obvious the in-character leads are attracted to each other and at least bi (they've already joked about it on the show), if Happy Endings wasn't so joke heavy and self-consciously modelled on Friends they'd probably go there, Suits is setting up the obvious, Fringe only sped it up in danger of cancellation, Psych did it for five years, Spaced teased you but never came back for a third season… I'm sure there's more. Hopefully it's changing but I don't think it is very much at all (The Office hopefully helps).

How I Met Your Mother is of course the worst, because they refuse to introduce the mother. It's like Ross and Rachel if RACHEL DIDN'T EXIST! Idiots. It was such a great show in the beginning, but given the current ratings it seems pretty clear that as shows prove time and again the smarter more interesting stuff does okay, the broader stuff does much better.

In fact thinking of shows that put the leads together after some time and are still working… hmm. Psych sort of, Fringe but they jumped to a new universe and the leads aren't together in that one, Party Down did a good job overall even with a break-up

I can definitely see that - though I'm sure it would later be described as "uneven" or maybe even "schizophrenic".

Oh yeah. Just like OTL a lot of the writer's are finding their feet. Just because Roddenberry can't screw with as much ITTL doesn't meant the scripts magically become great. As I said there's four great hours, a number of good hours, and some pretty bad (but shiny looking) hours.

As I said before, the cast really turns me off. […] the TNG cast just seemed to pull their punches, and were never better than the material they were given. At least, IMNSHO

Which is why I tossed overboard the weakest link, and forced Stewart to be the actor he can be. I'd suggest First Contact as the best TNG movie to watch (I'd suggest it as the only one to watch, really).

They were absolutely right to do so - the Bennett/Meyer movies were good. Even The Final Frontier, though bad, was simply dull, disappointing, and nonsensical, no worse - at least in my opinion.

"Style" and "attitude" are definitely two problems I had with TNG, so changing those are just fine :cool:

Somebody at FOX probably has that scrawled on a whiteboard somewhere :p

Fox is invariably the network most attuned to what their audience wants. It didn't always get them the ratings, especially in the earlier years, but they are the kind of network that would say "I want the movie, just give me that with a cheap cast".

You better believe it! For example, assuming that our Bones cameo still happens, he'll be playing someone in his 90s (more than feasible even in this day and age - look at Bob Hope and Betty White) rather than a 137-year-old :rolleyes:

Yeah that was silly. ITTL reasonable ages at the least, without having to stick Scotty in a time loop or whatever they did to him.

I'm just glad I'm not the only one! I'm honestly baffled as to why he was hired, of all people - and I assume your list was taken from OTL. Any one of them probably would have done a better job. At least ITTL he sticks to directing and spares everyone from his "acting".

As I mentioned in the footnotes every actor listed was considered IOTL and the favourites were as mentioned. I don't know what TV you watch, but take a look at his credits. From everything I've heard he's a great person and director (except for Thunderbirds, of course :)).

If you have Stewart project that same enthusiasm, that same passion, into his performance, it'll make all the difference. From what I've heard, Picard's arc in First Contact does sound more compelling and appealing to me, though.

Here's a taste, see if you like it.

comic snip

Looks down at the floor. Alas I've never read comic books (Calvin & Hobbes books is almost the closest). Got into regular books and whenever I'd open a comic book the low information density turned me off: I read fast, a thousand words a minute fast, and so I read the comic page fast and then I want to turn the page to get to the plot but I have to force myself to look at the artwork… just doesn't work out well for me.

I've read a couple nowadays, the classics, but I have basically no knowledge of the industry (like, say, I have no idea what goes in the world of cereal: I'm that removed).

In other words, PM me interesting ideas about comic books because you have been involuntarily drafted as the comic supervisor for this timeline :).
 
Last edited:
Electric Monk said:
If I ever feel like going baroque, maybe I'll do that post as I know both the speculation ATL AH fans would do and the reality… :)
I say go for it! I've been sorely tempted to do such a thing myself. So long as you have "Heart Container" talk about how they're both equally inferior to the great Captain Kirk :p

Electric Monk said:
Hopefully I'm also living up to the collection of (cough silent readers cough) other people as well.
I know, right? You can feel them watching, but they never say anything...

Electric Monk said:
I don't watch all of these, but:
Okay, okay, point taken. Obviously, it's a very long road ahead. And the aftershocks of the strike continue to be felt to this day!

Electric Monk said:
How I Met Your Mother is of course the worst, because they refuse to introduce the mother. It's like Ross and Rachel if RACHEL DIDN'T EXIST! Idiots.
Very well said. That show is beyond a joke.

Electric Monk said:
Fox is invariably the network most attuned to what their audience wants. It didn't always get them the ratings, especially in the earlier years, but they are the kind of network that would say "I want the movie, just give me that with a cheap cast".
I appreciate that bluntness. Television executives can be so duplicitous; it makes that contrast all the more refreshing. It's no surprise that FOX caught on so quickly IOTL. Though the earlier success of the network ITTL will have interesting effects on the rest of its programming. The two shows to keep an eye on are "Married... with Children" (the OTL breakout hit, which has obviously been replaced as the network's flagship show and, indeed, may see its rise to fame completely butterflied away), and, of course, "The Tracey Ullman Show" (yeah, it's okay, but I keep hearing about those cartoon bumpers with the weird yellow people... or do I?).

Electric Monk said:
As I mentioned in the footnotes every actor listed was considered IOTL and the favourites were as mentioned. I don't know what TV you watch, but take a look at his credits. From everything I've heard he's a great person and director (except for Thunderbirds, of course :)).
I have nothing against Frakes as a person (or as a director). Everything I've heard tells me that the cast of TNG is without exception comprised of warm, friendly, and charming people, and just might be the nicest of all the Star Trek casts (though I've not heard anything bad about anyone from DS9, either). He's done very well for himself as a director IOTL, and I don't begrudge him any of his success.

Electric Monk said:
I do, actually. Maybe I should give that movie a chance someday :)
 
Max Headroom
Broadcast Signal Intrusion Incident

"Have you any idea how successful censorship is on TV? Don't know the answer? Hmm… successful, isn't it?"



Max Headroom: 20 Minutes into the Future was a popular British cyberpunk movie based on the The Max Headroom Show which was a music video show where the digitally generated Max Headroom played clips from music videos, talked to guests where the topic always turned to golf, and in the second season included a studio audience and a quiz… with rarely awarded prizes, often due to an overlong explanation of the rules (which changed every week) ending up with either no quiz or a cut-off quiz.

For the time it was revolutionary. A sharp satire of the networks of the future in the still small cyberpunk world, helping to define what it means on screen. It was also one of those British shows that were about to make the leap across the pond….


"He's the toast of the town (lightly buttered). He's the non-fattening sugar substitute in your tea. He's a bon vivant, a gaucho amigo, a goomba, a mensch, and the fifth musketeer. He's the apple of your eye and aren't you glad he's here. Direct from a wax and shine at the carwash around the corner, it's the man of the hour, or at least for a good thirty minutes, Max Headroom."


The Max Headroom Show spawned a movie, Max Headroom: 20 Minutes into the Future, where Network 23 reporter Edison Carter discovers that the Network has designed new blipverts to impart advertising in just a couple seconds… except that they sometimes kill. However before he can reveal this Edison suffers a head wound, has a poor copy of his brain digitally uploaded (Max Headroom), and his body sold for organ parts. Luckily he escapes being chopped up for spare parts and moves on to defeat Network 23.



20 Minutes into the Future, a popular cyberpunk television series, an ABC/Channel 4 joint venture, British produced, Chrysalis Visual Programming Ltd. & Lakeside Productions, predominantly American cast: it's based on Max Headroom: 20 Minutes into the Future which is based on The Max Headroom Show which led to 20 Minutes into the Future which led in turn to The Original Max Talking Headroom Show on Cinemax, that same Cinemax who had broadcast The Max Headroom Show and Max Headroom: 20 Minutes into the Future thus creating enough interest for ABC to ask for its own Max Headroom which wound up as 20 Minutes into the Future. Mad Headroom was also a big fan of New Coke just "Don't say the 'P' word", several times over throughout 1986 and even took the Coke-Pepsi Taste Test.



20 Minutes into the Future was the chosen title as it was considered to have broader appeal than Max Headroom alone, although of course Max was heavily involved in the commercials. From a two-part appearance on NBC's Late Night with David Letterman to the cover of Newsweek where Max Headroom proclaimed, "I'm an image whose time has come," and indeed he was everywhere.



It was a complicated project to get going but once it did, ABC found themselves with a contender on their hands. Primed to believe the worst of the news media by the media themselves ("Boy finds pet dog in tree, news at 11") the revelations over in Japan simply put another round of ammunition in the gun. Of course most Americans didn't know or care about the details and it was already becoming the recent past, but they grasped the fact that the news had been… not news, a compliant organ of the government, and it had sunk in deep. It was into this environment that the first twelve episodes of season 1 (so that Channel 4 could split it into two six episode series) premiered in the spring of 1987 on Tuesdays.[1]



20 Minutes into the Future was, if not a hit or instant success, certainly a solid performer. It had good demographics, an above average audience for ABC, and received mountains of free publicity. Plus the multiple parties involved had put together a new deal with Coca-Cola for the Classic Coca-Cola, as Max Headroom had previously been promoting New Coke, which helped defray a surprising amount of the cost of the show. Max Headroom's apologies for New Coke became some of the stand-out advertising for Coca-Cola in that time period.



The second season of 12 episodes premiered in the spring of 1988 as ABC had decided to keep it a fairly short run of shows and with its decent ratings couldn't find a good spot for it on the fall 1987 schedule. Instead Coca-Cola and the premiere of the The Original Max Talking Headroom Show on Cinemax served as essentially free advertising, helping keep ABC's own advertising costs down and ensuring that Max Headroom would remain in the public consciousness. Just as with the first season the overall ratings were good, not great, but the demographics in the Adult 18-49 bracket remained better than the average ABC show. However the long-standing Hollywood gossip about the show centred on the fact that ABC was airing a show dedicated to attacking, essentially, future ABC and so as 20 Minutes into the Future closed out the second season widespread speculation considered it cancelled, leaving it only a brief pop culture icon.[2]


The Writer's Guild of America's 1988 strike proved to be a godsend for 20 Minutes into the Future. Produced over in the United Kingdom it was immune from the strike and indeed that's widely considered the reason it received a third season. It was the third season that became not just a critique of the news media but a blistering satirical take on government and corporations as well, described in storyline how each side is using the other for exactly what they want. It's also notable for finally understanding a little bit of computer networks (the competing rumours are a British writer on vacation in France saw their Minitel network & someone on staff finally read William Gibson's Neuromancer) and so the show managed to get a jump on the future internet.

The third season of 18 episodes airing in September 1988 saw itself face little competition to start and indeed the first several episodes saw themselves in the Top 10 of the week providing a major lift to ABC's overall brand as a series of new Max Headroom shorts began promoting other ABC shows (in Max Headroom's own particular way). Although competition picked up soon 20 Minutes into the Future had established itself as a major fixture in the television landscape. Nevertheless ABC remained unhappy with what the show was doing and soon the creators and Channel 4 found themselves locked in struggle over the future events of the show.


Max Headroom and his 20 Minutes into the Future TV show were, quite simply, being the future. Yet as it came off a successful third season how long could such a show last? At the very least it had kicked off a minor cyberpunk boom and had brought certain ideas about science fiction into the public. Indeed Star Trek: The New Frontier and 20 Minutes into the Future presented the most compelling and most mainstream potential visions of the future, and everybody else in Hollywood was taking notice.



|||||


[1] IOTL of course Max Headroom got only decent ratings in its first season of just six episodes. ITTL they've greenlighted more to start, and they've done somewhat better.

[2] For the second season of Max Headroom it moved to the Friday Night Death Slot for September 1987 and of course tanked. With better ratings it keeps the Tuesday slot, but has to wait until Spring 1988. Indeed OTL speculation considered one of the reasons for Friday and cancellation was ABC executives were uneasy with the show.

-----

Just a short update, covering what could have been a major show be somewhat bigger ITTL. The influence of it, of course, will start to effect things.

Around a week ago a friend and I were out drinking and although I don't remember the exact question the conversation wound up about technology and he goes (to paraphrase) "what was that digital guy in the '80s with coke and TV" and naturally I go straight to "Max Headroom". Hence, this.
 
Last edited:
I like it - Max Headroom going from a flash-in-the-pan fad to a genuine pop culture phenomenon. And although I'm sure it'll become dated in other ways, the most obviously dated thing about it IOTL - the ever-looming threat of Japanese economic hegemony - will never come to pass ITTL (and it was very sly of you not to mention that change at all in your update, or even allude to it). I also love how delightfully convoluted the production history of Max Headroom is - you're really good at capturing the flying-by-the-seat-of-your-pants feeling of trying to capitalize on success in the mass media. Obviously, the mainstream success of cyberpunk is also going to have a huge impact on popular culture. And, of course, Star Trek vs. Max Headroom is certainly not a battle royale I ever expected!
 
Last edited:
I know, right? You can feel them watching, but they never say anything...

Watching me in their silence, judging me, laughing at me… okay, I might be going crazy… I will get you silent readers! One day! :D

"Married... with Children" (the OTL breakout hit, which has obviously been replaced as the network's flagship show and, indeed, may see its rise to fame completely butterflied away), and, of course, "The Tracey Ullman Show" (yeah, it's okay, but I keep hearing about those cartoon bumpers with the weird yellow people... or do I?).

Taps nose.

the most obviously dated thing about it IOTL - the ever-looming threat of Japanese economic hegemony - will never come to pass ITTL (and it was very sly of you not to mention that change at all in your update, or even allude to it).

And now you've gone and ruined my not-joke. Although that's a good thing because I imagine plenty of people reading the timeline didn't know about the almost racist "Japanese Yellow Peril" stuff Max Headroom did IOTL. Obviously that's gone ITTL's TV show.

I also love how delightfully convoluted the production history of Max Headroom is - you're really good at capturing the flying-by-the-seat-of-your-pants feeling of trying to capitalize on success in the mass media.

Which is more or less OTL, but great fun. Don't worry, we'll be seeing more of that kind of stuff in the future.

Obviously, the mainstream success of cyberpunk is also going to have a huge impact on popular culture. And, of course, Star Trek vs. Max Headroom is certainly not a battle royale I ever expected!

It seemed to me to an obvious battleground of much of 1980s/1990s science fiction IOTL (more so ITTL) and I couldn't resist expanding it into the television sphere.

Yep, cyberpunk has gone somewhat mainstream.
 
New Year's Eve 1987 Technology Bash Video Game Cotillion (It's a Joint Party)
The New Year's Eve 1987 Technology Bash Video Game Cotillion (It's a Joint Party)

Hot hits today! More hits on the way!

(Sega Master System slogan upon launch in North America in 1987.)



Sun Commodore (Is A Busy Bee)

Coming off a successful 1986 Christmas season for the Atari 7800 essentially validated some of the time and expense involved in putting three major technology companies—Sun Microsystems, Commodore International, and Atari Corporation—into one new one, Sun Commodore, as well as acquiring Atari Games. However the main problems lay ahead. Sun Commodore was running some five (or seven, depending on how you look at it) different operating systems across its various brands and needed to begin consolidation as well as keep momentum on the Atari 7800 going.

The Commodore 64 game ports had helped the 7800 strongly and so they doubled down on that, working hard to bring on board more developers and providing development tools to more easily create new C64/7800 games. In addition they began wooing the major American publishers, such as Electronic Arts, to bring their purely computer game based libraries to the 7800. For technical reasons much of that catalogue couldn't be brought over, but at the least they made inroads in mindshare.

Throughout 1987 the Atari 7800 saw a reasonably steady stream of games head onto the console validating their developer centric approach (they charged less royalties than Nintendo, for instance) and their internal Atari Games studio released several titles as well. Although they never hit the peak 35% fourth quarter '86 market share in 1987 they were able to retain a roughly 20% standing against Nintendo.

With that ship steady Sun Commodore began planning for the future. The Atari 7800 was from 1984, at least originally, and even against the marginally newer NES it was out-of-date in the fast-paced world of CPUs. So the Atari Panther project began. With the Amiga being quite popular for games it was obvious that the Atari Panther would have to capitalize on the previous computer-console success, this time by it being easy to make Amiga/Panther games at the same time. For that they'd need a new CPU for both platforms, but luckily Sun Microsystems had been working on one.

The only other major factor was Japan. The best-selling games of all time were from Japanese developers and Sun Commodore had no foothold in that market nor could they break Nintendo's grip on third-party Japanese developers by themselves. Something would have to be done. The search for partners began in earnest by mid-1987 and by the end of 1987 they had found what could be an ideal partner.


Sun Commodore also needed to get out of the Atari ST & XE business as fast as possible to cut costs and simplify their line-up, but the ST in particular was doing quite well. The Amiga 1000 ST was their first step as it possessed all the hardware features that made the Atari ST so compelling, particularly in the niche music field, as well as improving the specifications from the Amiga 1000. It also contained the beta version of the application compatibility layer for the Atari ST and the beta version of the emulation layer for the Atari XE, Commodore 64, and 74. Now of course it was in beta and performance for Atari ST programs wasn't great (the other machines were slow enough to emulate fine, just as the Atari 7800 could run ported C64 games) but it was a major first step to getting their ducks in a row. This would allow them to begin the wind down of the Atari XE & ST lines.


1987 saw the start of development on the SunAmiga operating system as well. Based on the existing SunOS (itself based on BSD Unix) it was the Grand Unifying Operating System which would bring in support (via emulation or a compatibility layer) for nearly everything Sun Commodore was selling and add user interface design improvements. This would, at least in theory and three to four years down the road, provide an upgrade path for everyone buying the current computers and save a great deal of resources as the many product lines could finally be trimmed down.


The other major item was the CPU. The revolutionary chipset that powered the Amiga and enabled it to do video and audio processing well in advance of any consumer computer was also complicated and expensive and the next generation of it it certainly wasn't going to fit in the Atari Panther for a reasonable cost. With advancing CPU technology it was obvious that much of the work could be put on a single chip and it just so happened that before all the mergers & acquisitions Sun Microsystems had been working on their own Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC) workstation class CPU but they lacked internal foundries. Perhaps if a partner could be found to help fund and maybe design it, a cut-down version could be used in a home console.

Indeed, a partner could be found.


Fujitsu in Japan was a major manufacture of semiconductors but had seen virtually no non-Japanese success with the licensed designs they had tried (such as TRON) and had been thinking about either making their own probably-RISC design or finding another licensed design. With Sun Commodore making overtures to various companies Fujitsu was by far the most interested. So in early 1987 the two companies joined forces on the SPARC design and (at the behest of the personal computer and console side of the business) began working on SparcLite, a lighter weight version suitable for use in those consumer electronic items.

As part of the deal Fujitsu obtained both a SunOS and AmigaOS license and began work on their AmigaOS personal computer for the Japanese market, the FM Towns aimed squarely at the multimedia and gaming markets there. They had previously been considering a modified version of DOS as the operating system but the AmigaOS was much better. NEC's PC-9801 wouldn't know what had hit it. They also asked for another compatibility layer, this time for their FMR50 computers, to be added to the AmigaOS which wouldn't be a (huge) problem. Of course the FM Towns wouldn't be out for another couple years but it didn't seem like NEC was planning a new computer.


RISC CPUs Will Take Over The World (Maybe)

In fact 1987 was a major year on the CPU front as a variety of companies were working on RISC design CPUs. In particular three of them, at a fourth company's instigation, would join forces. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) was designing a RISC CPU, the AMD 29000 (29k), for a 1987 launch; Motorola was working on the 88000 (m88k) for a 1988 launch; and IBM was in the preliminary stages of their own POWER design based on their earlier pioneering work on RISC itself (the 801 project).

The fourth company, naturally, was Apple. At the time reliant on Motorola's 68k chips they were well aware of Motorola's work. In addition they had been contemplating their own future chip plans as they were unsure if the 68k could compete with Intel's x86 or new i960 RISC chip. Obviously the day in which they'd move to a new CPU architecture was some ways off (in fact software at the time couldn't even begin to emulate all the existing 68k programs on a new architecture) but it was coming. It would be in Apple's best interests to have the strongest possible alternative, if Intel wasn't chosen.

Thus in early 1987 Apple began discussions with Motorola over the m88k and also brought Motorola around to Apple's way of thinking (once the promise of a Mac OS license was put on the table)[1]. Motorola began talks with a variety of companies and soon interested people at both AMD and IBM about the possibilities. Particularly if they could sell a lot of CPUs they could put together enough resources to compete with the Intel bemoth in the long run.

Once talks began it became clear that although all sides had conflicting goals it would be possible to eventually put them together. The AMD 29k was almost out the door, but it wasn't the workstation class chip that the other partners needed, so that was out. However AMD was interested in the workstation market and once the 29k was out would have a team free. The m88k was a little further off from release and it seemed clear that SPARC, AMD 29k, Intel i960, and MIPS would have the early-mover advantage enough that the m88k's improvements wouldn't be enough so that was folded into the new project. Finally IBM was some time away from a launch, which would allow them to incorporate the other two CPU design teams into a larger effort. Once everything was signed… Power was a go with a 1989 planned launch for workstations and servers, intended to be followed by PowerClear in 1991 for personal computers.[6]

Apple in turn signed the documents for the Mac OS licenses and Motorola promptly got to work on clones. AMD and Apple also started consulting on who AMD would sell their license to (as AMD had no intentions of making Macs) and IBM began planning for their own clone. This was an easy way to partially satisfy the two main factions at Apple as regarded cloning by limiting it to strategic partners as, of course, any clone sold will still make money for Apple but there will only be a few other companies making them.




Sony Collects Ducks To Put In Order & NeXT Is Thinking About The Next Thing


Sony had been planning to move into the content business. Music, movies, television, the entire collection of entertainment & Hollywood baubles that seem so very tempting when you can't look at the books. Now, well, now those plans were off the table. It's a little hard to secure financial banking when the banks themselves are under (if not exactly investigation, that doesn't fly in Japan's cosy world) a much closer eye.

However Sony is a major company making lots of things across the consumer electronics space… but not videogame consoles or computers. Yet they do have interesting technologies in the planning stages. The earthquake has essentially resulted in the cancellation of not only the content move but also various other items such as Digital Audio Tape (DAT) which was suffering major technical issues and it has also caused problems with debates about the standards for CD-WO technology[2] and in the competition's world the Digital Compact Cassette (DCC).

In fact this has left Sony in a disturbingly good position for a small team's side project… the MiniDisc[3]. Importantly and (mostly) unlike either the DAT or DCC it can easily be used to store data as the MiniDisc can be rewritten like a floppy disk entirely unlike a CD. It can also hold around 160 MB of data (or 74 minutes of compressed audio) with projections that the second generation would match CDs at 650 MB and with formatting & software improvements take older MiniDiscs up to 320 MB. The only real problem is that it can't be out the door until 1989… except maybe that isn't a problem.


Steve Jobs left (was forced out) of Apple in 1986 and promptly founded a brand new computer company, NeXT. However as part of his agreement with Apple he couldn't directly compete in Apple's markets. That made Jobs', as a particular subset of teenagers would say, kirk out[4]. Of course that contract didn't say anything about getting some other company to do that work for him if the workstation market was looking a little crowded with Sun Commodore around.

Sony had long thought about getting involved in the computing world but there weren't any (good) homegrown Japanese operating systems, Windows handled the characters used in Japanese incredibly poorly, and neither AmigaOS nor the Mac OS were up for licensing. However Steve Jobs and his new NeXT needed money, lots of it. Well. Lots for them but not exactly lots for Sony.

By the time Sony and NeXT started talking the original NeXT plan of an Apple-like hardware/software combination was in full play but of course it could only be in limited markets by contract. Sony didn't have that problem. Steve Jobs didn't like divorcing hardware from software but if he could at least control it it wasn't so bad. In return for a great deal of cash giving them a major stake in the company Sony gained a optional exclusive licence, in that if Sony and NeXT both agreed on adding an additional party it could happen, on NeXT software. Of course NeXT had a fair amount on input on the internals of future Sony computers.

NeXTStep, the object-oriented, multitasking operating system under development, was vastly more powerful than consumer OSs of the time such as AmigaOS or Mac OS as it (like Sun Commodore's SunOS) was based on BSD Unix. Furthermore Jobs had poached much of the best Apple staff in an effort to build it, so it would be at least as up-to-date on modern interface design as Mac OS. Sony understands that opportunity, at least if they're going into computers, and so they throw their muscle (and MiniDiscs) behind it.

This allowed NeXT to focus more on the software side of things, although they were also designing NeXT workstations, and progress moved ahead fairly rapidly on NeXTStep to the extent that Sony began designing their own computers for a 1989 release, matching up nicely with their planned release of the MiniDisc.


Nin-ten-do Is A Catchy Marketing Jingle (And Much More)

By 1987 Nintendo had fully recovered from 1986 and although their entry into Europe had been tough—against entrenched opposition from the Sega Master System, the Atari 7800, the C64/74, and the Amiga—they were making headway slowly but surely, helped out by their unbeatable collection of exclusive games. They had also found their footing after the potentially disastrous Christmas 1986 and new marketing centred on showing the gameplay differences between the NES and Atari 7800 had done wonders.

Yet like just about everybody else thinking about videogame consoles it was also time for them to begin planning a new one. The key question was whether or not they would go for a CD add-on, as that would enable vastly better graphics and sound and was becoming popular on the computer side. There were problems with the CD though including loading times and the expense of the CD player (although not the CDs themselves) and how many people would buy the add-on. On that front they had encouraging news: the Famicom Disk System had sold reasonably well in Japan and Europe, although they hadn't offered it in North America, and despite developer grumblings the delay of larger cartridges had meant that the Disk System had been required for a number of games which had in turn helped its market penetration. Perhaps that strategy could be duplicated again.



Sega (Doesn't) Like A Wide Release

1987 also saw Sega's fortunes improve. With increased supply and a launch throughout all of Western Europe before Nintendo got there (and already deeply established in smaller countries from there 1986 soft launch) their strategy had been vindicated, especially if one looked as well to Brazil, Australia, and New Zealand where the Sega Master System was also the market leader. It was time for North America.

…It wasn't time for North America. Maybe it had never been time for North America. The launch of the Sega Master System in the United States and Canada was an exercise in futility with Nintendo and Atari having more or less locked up the market. Most Japanese third-party developers and publishers were barred by Nintendo from the Sega Master System in America and most Western developers and publishers were going with computers or the Atari 7800. Sega, with only a handful of exclusive internally developed games, was simply a non-factor. At least the Japanese launch of the Sega Master System had been smooth as Sega finally replaced the Sega Mark III.

That, naturally, would have to change for their new console and so planning began right away. The hardware side was the easier one and they made the same choice Nintendo were planning to make: 16-bit cartridge system with a CD add-on, as Sega had noticed how well the Disk System had done for Nintendo. The software was tougher, but Sega strengthened their internal studios and started (multiple years in advance) the wooing process for both Japanese and Western developers and publishers.



That Other Console Company (That Didn't Make A Console)


NEC & Hudson Soft had seen their plans interrupted for a console and then had seen that they would be too late to launch against Nintendo and Sega. Furthermore they had no real presence outside Japan and Sega was proving handily in North America that that was a major problem if you weren't first to market.

The solution was obvious in retrospect, of course. In the fall of 1987 NEC, Hudson Soft, and Sun Commodore entered into talks. In return for NEC & Hudson Soft providing games from both Hudson Soft and deals with Japanese third-parties they could simply rebrand the Atari Panther (and Atari 7800, if they wanted) and make it themselves in Japan. NEC/Hudson Soft would collect the videogame royalties in Japan and remit a portion back to Sun Commodore.

NEC & Hudson Soft had saved a ton of money on redoing all their development work for a console and gained exclusive translation/publishing rights to all Atari Games games (but not vice versa); Sun Commodore gained access to the Japanese publishing and development community and a little extra money from Japan that they wouldn't have received otherwise. It was more or less a win-win for both companies.



In Other News…

Microsoft Windows 2.0 makes it out the door just before the new year ticks over and in an amazing piece of technology (that the Mac OS has had since its launch) windows can overlap each other. Apple sues them.


The state of the computing market remained in flux as Commodore 64/74, Apple II, and IBM clones running MS-DOS duked it on the lower end of the market while Amiga, Mac OS, and Windows fought it out at the upper hand. With no clear victor yet established in either market it seems clear that the war will continue and widen.

Go Corporation is the most well-funded start-up in Silicon Valley history.

And in games a collection of amazing titles are released, including: Nintendo's Zelda II: The Adventure of Link (and The Legend of Zelda in North America/Europe); Konami's Castlevania, Metal Gear, and Contra games; Capcom's Street Fighter[5], Square's Final Fantasy, Sega's Phantasy Star and LucasFilm Games' Maniac Mansion.



|||||


[1] Jean-Louis Gassée was perhaps the strongest force preventing Apple from licensing Mac OS. With him gone that faction is weakened although not to the point where just anyone can get a license.

[2] CD-R in other words. The original name was CD-WO for Compact Disc—Write Once. As it was a multi-company standard pre-release (unlike MiniDisc, which Sony widely licensed post-release) it is an easy thing to distrupt.

[3] The MiniDisc was created in reaction to the failure of DAT. However it seems reasonable that it was a pre-existing project pushed onto the back burner by DAT, there simply isn't a lot of data about the internal workings of Japanese companies.

[4] To really freak out or go crazy about something especially to talk in short clipped sentences. I'm sure one can guess the origin.

[5] Yes, Mega Man fans, it has been delayed (but not cancelled). Sonic the Hedgehog fans, if Thande happens to read this and I feel like Yorkshire Rage, are out of luck.

[6] Let's call this footnote the catch-all CPU section. IOTL Sun relied on Texas Instruments to fab the SPARC and eventually opened it up as a standard that all kinds of companies used, the most successful being Fujitsu, but because Sun didn't have their own fab they never quite got the top tier of chip designers going forward: ITTL Fujitsu functions as an in-house fab so Sun will have better people. In addition the pressure of needing a CPU for their PCs and consoles means they make a cut-down version (see PowerPC, OTL) for them which I've named the SparcLite for obvious reasons. That and the fabs is why they partner with Fujitsu.

The AMD 29k was a fairly big success but AMD was mostly focused on making x86 CPUs and let it fall by the wayside to get run over by the Intel i960 which also fell by the wayside for different reasons. That more or less happens ITTL, but AMD invests a lot more effort in RISC design since they have partners. The Motorola m88k was a very nice CPU that came out too late. IBM's POWER, of course, led to PowerPC and ITTL it's a similar thing with PowerClear. AMD and Motorola are pretty much at the height of their RISC expertise and so work with IBM on much better terms than the OTL Motorola-IBM PowerPC partnership because by then Motorola was fading as a powerhouse with the m88k failure.

ITTL Apple has a carrot (Mac OS license) and a stick (Intel x86) and the existence of Sun Commodore and the potential of the SPARC with Fujitsu on board early acts as a turning point in getting the various companies above together but even more importantly, volume = money = only way to compete with Intel in the long run. They all more or less knew this IOTL, but persisted in thinking that one more great RISC CPU would give them victory. ITTL the good-enough RISC (SPARC) has potential volume sales in Sun Commodore's line-up… so, they hustle.

And if you love this CPU stuff (who are you? :)), there's a few more major players that hasn't been introduced yet, but they're all orbiting one particular thing…. (Neither ARM nor MIPS is the only clue.)

-----

Would you believe I've never owned a MiniDisc player or even touched a MiniDisc? Just stared longingly at them on screen, where they are the de facto standard (or were) for cool future technology. More on them later.

Technically it's wrong of me to refer to System x as Mac OS, but I didn't figure anyone would mind. The same goes for Workbench (the AmigaOS).

A little dry I admit, but I needed to do some groundwork, and I'm sure I screwed something up in that morasses of CPUs. Also the Sega Master System slogan followed by Zelda II: The Adventure of Link amused me.
 
Last edited:
Nice pair of updates, the Warholian boom is incredible(I'm giving credit to Andy because him was who make the people in the 60s being interested more in the so called 'pop art' or day to day art as i called it) and your timeline simple was nice

Max Headroom, after now he was the first Virtual Celebrity was nice and how hilarous was him.

The Videogames landscape is Incredible, even if want to kill your for axing Megaman(he with Mario & Sonic were my Childhood heroes), and was good than nintendo release a Famicom instead a NES in Europe(against Piracy..Europe doens't have so bad history) and the Disk System(Nintendo relaxed a little his demand like they will promote the game globaly to use the disk??) was more good(Nintendo disapoiment withh Disk-kun was the main reason they have cold feet with CD)

And with Now NEC-Atari Partnership... we have the trinity in the console wars.... and Sony post is interesting... is me or i'm thinking in Nintendo-Sony-Apple/next powered CD BASED SNES(that would be.... wow....)

The Godzilla shake will be amazing, as colombian i'm partly safe for butteflies.. but as the NES in the reason of my birth(long history).

Nice update.
 
Ooooh. Nintendo and Sega both have had a bumpier ride so far, but both could do far better than OTL still...
 
I'm not surprised about Sonic being butterflied out of existence. I think that was a given with the PoD though it would be interesting if we got Mighty the Armadillo (of Segasonic and Chaotix fame) whose design was a finalist when Sega was trying to come up with its own mascot.

*Scratches chin* Hm, Mighty and Ray (the Flying Squirrel) instead of Sonic and Tails... that would be an interesting idea. :D

As for Mega Man, I wonder if the aforementioned Bond Man will make it in as boss. This might also have some interesting butterflies when Mega Man 2, 3, ad infinitum come out because of how Capcom solicited fan ideas. :cool:
 
And if you love this CPU stuff (who are you? :)), there's a few more major players that hasn't been introduced yet, but they're all orbiting one particular thing…. (Neither ARM nor MIPS is the only clue.)
Is it the tragically ahead-of-its-time CPU ubermensch that is the DEC Alpha 21x64?
 
Oh goodness me, I missed the Max Headroom update!

Well, it seems in a timeline that could possibly be the timeline for all the cyberpunk worlds, it's certainly fitting that Max would get a boost.:D
 
And so, the battle lines are drawn. I like that all three major markets are dominated by three different duopolies: Nintendo/Sega in Japan, Nintendo/Atari in North America, and Sega/Atari in Europe. Nintendo looks like it's having a harder time in Europe than IOTL (which was certainly no picnic in any event), but for Sega to have effectively ceded North America?! It seems downright outlandish from an OTL perspective, but that's what AH is for, right? (Confession time: my cousin and I were on opposite sides of that greatest of Console Wars: he had a Genesis, I had an SNES. We visited each other's houses often. TTL just won't be the same...) I'm also suitably tantalized by the promise of Atari attempting to move into Japan by proxy - and that proxy is NEC!

As for that looming evil, which ITTL has been hobbled but may yet rise again at any moment... getting them into the PC business as opposed to the console business (especially through Steve Jobs!) is a clever but very plausible way to keep them involved in the industry without treading down the same old OTL path. Indeed, I'm a little too young to appreciate first-hand how much variety and opportunity there was for so many companies to stake out a claim on the hardware/software/OS front! It really does beat the homogeneity of "Mac vs. PC". I certainly hope that for all your hyping of these many alternatives, that at least a few of them will get through. I imagine there will be some consolidation and conglomeration, as there always is, but it would be nice to see more than just Microsoft and Apple left standing at the end of it. I'm especially rooting for venerable old Sun Commodore, for the obvious sentimental reasons... so long as they do not become the instrument of Nintendo's destruction, that is. (I'm watching you.)

I really like the comprehensiveness of your timeline, in that it's covering so many aspects of popular culture, one after another. I'm genuinely curious as to where you'll be going next - and definitely looking forward to it, of course.
 
And if you love this CPU stuff (who are you? :)), there's a few more major players that hasn't been introduced yet, but they're all orbiting one particular thing…. (Neither ARM nor MIPS is the only clue.)

The two possibilities I have are either ASCII succeeds in bringing out an MSX3 standard based on the Zilog Z380 and compatibilities that blindsides American cloners, or else Hyperstone is able to compete with the big boys.
 
Top