Thank you.Really good account of Centurion in action, great update!
OTL, she gave good service during her long career ... and for several months after she was sunk.
Thank you.Really good account of Centurion in action, great update!
Thank you.You need to write a screenplay, bevause that was mesmerizing. Reminds me of the Lord of War scene with the bullet.
Thank you.
I'm playing with one, based on my book, but only playing at this stage...
Back in a naval genre, I'd recommend C.S. Forrester's 'The Ship', if you haven't read it already.
Can we get an updated OOB with SitReps on 1SG, 5BS, BCF and the lead elements of the HSF?
Second this. An OOB listing ship conditions would be extremely helpful
You know you should take some care when dealing with addicts... I have just bought it from Amazon.uk thanks a lot and I will enjoy it.Thank you.
I'm playing with one, based on my book, but only playing at this stage...
Back in a naval genre, I'd recommend C.S. Forrester's 'The Ship', if you haven't read it already.
For Panther and Repulse, is the flooding and boiler/engine room damage affecting their speed at all? I assume that for Princess Royal and Indefatigable the minor flooding is not really affecting their speed?Panther – B & Q-turrets out of action, Minor engine room damage. Flooding forward.
Princess Royal – Minor flooding abeam X-turret.
Repulse – Flooded abeam B-turret. Q-turret destroyed, heavy fire aft. Boiler Room 4 out of action.
Indefatigable – Aft 4” battery burned out. Minor flooding amidships.
Best line in the whole story.New Zealand – It’s alright, he’s wearing it.
How badly is the flooding affecting her in regards to station keeping and trim?Malaya – Significant flooding forward. 6” Port battery fire.
One word: ouch. That's gonna tie up significant repair resources for months.Lion – crippled, heading north. Adm Beatty transferring to destroyer HMS Defender.
Warspite – Significant flooding forward and aft. Fires forward and to starboard. A-turret jammed. Heading north
Royal Oak - Significant flooding forward and aft. B-turret destroyed. D-magazine flooded. On fire aft. Heading north
Inconstant – Forwards guns destroyed, flooding forward
Holy...! I knew Hipper took a beating, but not that bad! His Scouting Force is effectively destroyed as an operational unit.Lutzow – Port 5.9” battery burned out. Minor flooding aft.
Derfflinger – crippled, heading East at 12 knots. 3 turrets still operational.
Seydlitz – Only has two wing turrets operational. Flooding aft. Forward 5.9” battery wrecked.
Moltke – crippled, heading south at 10 knots, detached after ‘dash to the South’. Only 2 guns operational.
Goeben – C & E-turrets out of action. Bunkers flooded amidships. Bridge destroyed, conning from aft.
Von der Tann – Flooding forward and aft. Much of Foc’sle deck destroyed. 3 boilers damaged. D-turret out.
Again, ouch. Grosser Kurfurst and Konig are gonna be in the yards for weeks, if not months.Bayern – Flooding aft, one gun disabled in C-turret, 5.9” battery wrecked forward.
Grosser Kurfurst – A & C-turrets destroyed, D damaged. Fires amidships and in battery.
Markgraf (SUNK)
Kronprinz – Bridge wrecked.
Konig – A & D-turrets out. Major fire forward. Bridge destroyed. 5.9” battery abandoned. Flooding in port bunkers.
Haven't read it since I was young, but yes, I did think of the description of every step leading up to the decisive hit on the Italian battleship's turret when I read your update.
You know you should take some care when dealing with addicts... I have just bought it from Amazon.uk thanks a lot and I will enjoy it.
Panther is incapable of more than 24 knots, which is continuing to keep the BCF's speed low (although that's not all bad, as it allowed Sturdee's two ships to catch up)For Panther and Repulse, is the flooding and boiler/engine room damage affecting their speed at all? I assume that for Princess Royal and Indefatigable the minor flooding is not really affecting their speed?
Wish I could claim credit, but it was reported as said by one of her crew.Best line in the whole story.
Malaya's struggling to keep up, so the line of the three remaining ships of 5BS is pretty ragged. However, for now she can still fight, so she won't be going away.How badly is the flooding affecting her in regards to station keeping and trim?
(Malaya)
They'll either need plenty of dockyard time ... or none at all.sts-200 said: ↑
Lion – crippled, heading north. Adm Beatty transferring to destroyer HMS Defender.
Warspite – Significant flooding forward and aft. Fires forward and to starboard. A-turret jammed. Heading north
Royal Oak - Significant flooding forward and aft. B-turret destroyed. D-magazine flooded. On fire aft. Heading north
Inconstant – Forwards guns destroyed, flooding forward
One word: ouch. That's gonna tie up significant repair resources for months.
He's a worried man ... he's cut off from the HSF and effectively fighting 4 and two-half British battlecruisers with only the Lutzow and a limping Von der Tann.Holy...! I knew Hipper took a beating, but not that bad! His Scouting Force is effectively destroyed as an operational unit.
...
Well that's not ominous at all...They'll either need plenty of dockyard time ... or none at all.
New Zealand – It’s alright, he’s wearing it.
RN post-battle damage assessment has shown that superfiring turrets are more vulnerable. Compare B&X turret damage with A&Y turret. Any follow on design should have triple gun turrets with twin superfiring or a single triple superfiring. This will minimise the loss of fire through damage to the more vulnerable turrets. Reduce the height of the superfiring turrets, even at the cost of some fire power at low elevations on the centre line. This will make them smaller targets and offer more cover from the turret adjacent. Reduction in top weight is a bonus best spent on more turret casement armour.
I get the feeling that the USN will be feeling very validated about their decision to go to All or Nothing armor starting with the Nevada class. The decision to provide the heaviest possible armor over the most vital areas will be seen as exceptionally fortuitous. I can also see everyone else rushing to go to AoN ASAP. Probably with existing order being cancelled in favor of new designs (an exception for ships beyond a certain point in their construction).The subject of armour will certainly be a hot one after the battle, and for some years to come - what is effective protection, what is worth protecting and how?
Conversely, the USN will probably be concerned about the fact that most of their ships have Triple or Three Gun turrets. This battle has seen turret after turret burned out or disabled. For all navies, I think 4 turrets going forward will be considered an absolute minimum. A 5x2 arrangement could continue to be very popular. Otherwise, I think you'll see a move to a 4x3 arrangement. I doubt we ever see a 3 turret/9 gun ship built ITTL.Should turrets be better armoured (as is currently planned for TTL's Hoods), or should there be more turrets, accepting that some of them may be damaged?
New Zealand – It’s alright, he’s wearing it.
And since New Zealand was at Scapa Flow and thus doing gunnery practice regularly she should actually hit something unlike otl which means she's one scary ship. As for turret numbers if a naval treaty similar to otl's still occurs having an extra gun on less displacement is still a very valid argument for having 3 triple turrets instead of 4 twins and having 5 turrets leaves magazines too close to the boiler rooms and steam lines for comfort and takes up a massive amount of displacement to bootLove this
New Zealand – It’s alright, he’s wearing it.
I get the feeling that the USN will be feeling very validated about their decision to go to All or Nothing armor starting with the Nevada class. The decision to provide the heaviest possible armor over the most vital areas will be seen as exceptionally fortuitous. I can also see everyone else rushing to go to AoN ASAP. Probably with existing order being cancelled in favor of new designs (an exception for ships beyond a certain point in their construction).
Conversely, the USN will probably be concerned about the fact that most of their ships have Triple or Three Gun turrets. This battle has seen turret after turret burned out or disabled. For all navies, I think 4 turrets going forward will be considered an absolute minimum. A 5x2 arrangement could continue to be very popular. Otherwise, I think you'll see a move to a 4x3 arrangement. I doubt we ever see a 3 turret/9 gun ship built ITTL.
Magnificent. Long may she sail.And at the launch of the same name matured - HMNZS Aotearoa.
https://medium.com/@nzdefenceforce/...vy-ship-christened-in-south-korea-46243318eb3