For that matter, I believe that I have a certain kind of bias. Like when I say, "Could Warren Buffett buy Sears so Sears doesn't decline as much." Now Sears declined as a result of several factors, including the rise of Internet retail, the decline of the Midwest/Rust Belt and of the American Middle Class in general, and the rise of chains like Wal-Mart & Target that did what Sears did for cheaper. But one of those factors is that a guy named Edward Lampert has owned Sears since 2005. So I basically said that if you removed Edward Lampert from the equation and replaced him with Warren Buffett that Sears wouldn't have declined as much. This is basically what happened with Kodak, would anyone have known that digital cameras were more than a passing fad in 1987.