How many months would really be needed to make a better ET game?
I agree on 6-8 Months. Though in my opinion what Howard managed in over 5 Weeks wasn't too terrible (assuming you read the manual) it just had a few problems like holes being too large and too many on screen and players struggling to leave the holes if they got caught in it.I do think just over 5 Months for example (Instead of just over 5 weeks that was actually allowed to develop the game IOTL) would allow a better E.T. Video Game to materialize.
The actual amount of time that it would be needed depends on the amount of programmers that are actually chosen for the project since more the programmers that are utilized for the development would allow a proper game to be developed in a faster length of time.
Personally I think at least 6 to 8 Months would be needed for a proper E.T. Video Game to be developed although others might have a different opinion on that.
Is there a chance of an earlier DreamWorks forming?
I agree on 6-8 Months. Though in my opinion what Howard managed in over 5 Weeks wasn't too terrible (assuming you read the manual) it just had a few problems like holes being too large and too many on screen and players struggling to leave the holes if they got caught in it.
In the Atari 2600 days most games were usually just one person with maybe another person doing graphics. (Super Mario Bros was one of the first examples of a game with a development team. With Miyamoto leading a team of seven.)
I think @OldNavy1988 has something planned for dreamworksI had a thought. If we can't have an earlier DreamWorks is it possible for Grand Diamond to take DreamWorks' place.
It is possible. Miramax could be another good candidate later in the decade or early in the 90's.Is it possible for Richard Branson (Virgin) to buy Cannon, Vestron, Hemdale, or another smaller studio.
How about have KHan die in his placeSo for Wrath of Khan, if Spock lives, how does the conflict of the story get resolved?
American Forces Network - Wikipedia
How has this been affected by the TL.