America's Silver Era, The Story of William Jennings Bryan

This is the list of British Prime Ministers. For most of Europe the leadership is pretty similar to OTL for the first 20 years (Prime Ministers in bold letters are the ones who were actually mentioned in this TL):

Robert Gascoyne-Cecil (1895-1902) Conservative
Arthur Balfour (1902-1905) Conservative

Henry Campbell Bannerman (1905-1908) Liberal
H. H. Asquith (1908-1919) Liberal

Coningsby Disraeli (1919-1928) Conservative
Ramsay McDonald (1928-1934) Labour

Edward Frederick[1] (1934-1946) Conservative
Clement Attlee (1946-1951) Labour
Harold MacMillan (1951-1960) Conservative
Oswald Dexter[2] (1960-) Labour

1: Lord Halifax
2: Born after the POD and did not exist OTL
 
France is a little more complicated

French Prime Ministers:

Jules Meline (1896-1898)
Henri Brisson (1898)
Charles Dupuy (1898-1899)
Pierre Waldeck-Rousseau (1899-1902)
Emile Combes (1902-1905)
Maurice Rouvier (1905-1906)
Ferdinand Sarrien (1906)
Georges Clemenceau (1906-1910)
Louis Barthou (1910-1914)
Alexandre Ribot (1914-1918)
Adolphe Cartier (1918-1922)
Hubert Lagardelle (1922-1940), Essentially a rubber stamp for Cartier, the sacrifice of German soldiers was a bridge too far and he finally spoke out. He was arrested on July 12, 1940 on Cartier's orders. This allowed him to escape execution during the Paris trials.
Renard Tailler (1940), Born in Nantes in 1905 and was a Cartier loyalist. He participated in human sacrifice. Officially, he was killed by a Russian soldier during the Battle of Paris (no body was found). Others claim that he escaped Paris and is still alive in 1960. American conspiracy theorist Bill Atwood claims that Tailler is collecting a pension in Moscow under a new identity.
Francois Darlan (1943-1948)
Rene Coty (1948-1954)
Joseph Laniel (1954-)

French Presidents:

Felix Faure (1895-1899)
Emile Loubet (1899-1910)
Raymond Poincare (1910-1918)
Paul Lafargue (1918-1922)
Adolphe Cartier (1922-1940)

Provisional Presidents:
Francois Darlan (1940-1943), Presidency abolished in 1943 when France became a Constitutional Monarchy
 
German Chancellors (bolded means they were mentioned. Lettow-Vorbeck was mentioned, though I apparently forget to write that he became chancellor).

Chlodwig zu Hohenlohe-Schillingsfürst (1894-1900)
Bernhard von Bülow (1900-1909)
Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg (1909-1920)
Elard von Oldenburg-Januschau (1920-1928)
Herman Müller (1928-1932)
Wilhelm Groener (1932-1940)
Franz von Papen (1940-1941)
Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck (1941-1947)
Erwin Rommel (1947-1957)
Gottlieb von Ingersleben (1957-1961)[1]
Konrad Ardenauer (1961-)


1: Born after the POD

Soon I should have my chapter on Japan written (this will be the first Japan-centric chapter of this TL). After that, we'll return to America where we'll see President Valenti govern, and his conflicts with the both GOP as well some Democrats, the Republicans argue among themselves as to the best strategy to get back into power, and the Porcherites do what Porcherites do.
 
Last edited:
Why no SPD Chancellor? OK, Germany may have a spikevin trust of conservative leadership after two Great Wars, but I would imagine that at some time Germamy would have had an SPD Prime-Minister, even if by a general strike if the Kaiser refused to confirm him.
If you can't add one in this list, can you please add one in future updates?
 
Why no SPD Chancellor? OK, Germany may have a spikevin trust of conservative leadership after two Great Wars, but I would imagine that at some time Germamy would have had an SPD Prime-Minister, even if by a general strike if the Kaiser refused to confirm him.
If you can't add one in this list, can you please add one in future updates?

Muller and von Ingersleben are both SPD.
 
Japan
Japan had chosen the winning side in the Second Great War. However, by the time Japanese troops arrived in Germany, the outcome of the war had already been determined. It was seen by Japanese militarists as a good way for the army to get some more practice. Japanese troops would be involved in heavy fighting towards the war’s end, and over 10,000 Japanese soldiers died, with many more wounded. After the war, Japan’s attention was focused on combating Russian influence in Asia. Germany was naturally their ally. Western intellectuals at the time often underestimated Japan (as they did with China and India). College students studying international relations in American or European universities learned about the big four Great Powers: The Unites States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Russia (Before 1940, France would also be included). Some textbooks would even list Austria-Hungary as a Great Power. Japan was usually not listed, instead it was categorized most often as a minor power alongside Italy or Portugal. In reality, Japan was certainly more powerful (and much more stable) than Austria-Hungary and deserved a place among the big four.

Japanese_Special_Naval_Landing_Forces_Paratroopers.jpg

(Japanese soldiers during the Second Great War)

After the war, the great powers all tried to spread a positive image of their nation abroad. America did this through trade and occasionally the use of foreign aid. Britain strengthened economic ties with its colonies. Germany and Russia funded groups that promoted a pro-German or pro-Russian agenda abroad. Japan went the latter route. People of Japanese descent could be found throughout the world, but especially in the United States, Brazil, and the Philippines. And the Japanese government saw them as potential assets. Pro-Japanese political groups were formed in diaspora communities. Of course, these political groups represented a small percentage of the diaspora population. However, just like the German-Americans, many Japanese-Americans were sympathetic to the land of their ancestors. In places where those of Japanese descent were most heavily concentrated, pro-Japanese politicians were elected. This was especially the case in the US State of Hawaii. Richard Ou, the first Asian-American US Senator, was born to Japanese parents. He was a patriotic American, putting his country first. Nevertheless, he still advocated for closer relations with Japan throughout his career.

The Hawaii GOP, which dominated state politics, churned out many pro-Japanese politicians, a lot of whom weren’t even of Japanese descent. Japanese-Americans overwhelmingly supported the Republican Party, going over 80% for Hoover in 1940, and over 70% for Landon, Taft, and Savage. When Nathan Baker only won 55% of the Japanese-American vote he was highly disappointed. Republican administrations were also more likely to be friendly towards Japan than Democratic administrations. Hoover and Landon saw Japan in a positive light, while Patton saw Japan as a major threat. In Brazil, the Japanese government funneled money into the campaigns of pro-Japanese politicians. Afonso Coelho was elected President of Brazil in 1955, and it was later discovered that he indirectly accepted campaign contributions from the Japanese government. Elsewhere in Latin America, Japan was occupied with growing anti-Japanese sentiment. Nicaragua had been ruled by a pro-Japanese government since the 1910s. Japan and the US signed a treaty that allowed Japan to station one thousand troops in Nicaragua, the only nation in the Western Hemisphere where they would be allowed to do so.

For 40 years, both Japanese and American businesses operated in Nicaragua, peacefully competing with each other. In the 1950s, a popular movement arose to challenge both nations. A Catholic priest named Pelayo Villalobos began to speak out against the Nicaraguan government. He primarily spoke out against the rampant poverty in the country. He also spoke out against secularism, advocating that Catholicism should be the state religion. Villalobos was a peaceful man, but some of his sympathizers were not. In 1954 a small group of US business owners met with President Savage. They suggested that the US arm some of the more radical Nicaraguans, giving them weapons on the condition that they only target Japanese businesses. Savage replied that the idea was “both despicable and foolish.” Despite Villalobos’ calls for non-violence, blood would be spilled in 1960 as two Japanese businessmen were murdered. Shortly before, the United States Congress passed a bill to cut all aid to Nicaragua, citing widespread misuse of foreign aid by the government. From then on, anti-foreign sentiment was increasingly directed towards Japan.

Back in the home islands, things were going well for a while. The economy was growing. No fighting had occurred in Japan itself, so there was no need to rebuild. Japan sought to have a place among the great powers of the world, and the government greatly increased funding for scientific research. More and more Japanese were receiving a college education, and the educated workforce greatly expanded. Nuclear power expanded dramatically during the 1950s. There was increased attention from Japanese scientists to alternatives to oil. This was due to a practical concern, namely that Japan was overly dependent on foreign oil. And oil consumption was skyrocketing as more and more Japanese owned cars and had money to go on vacation. The standard of living in Japan was the best in Asia by the 1950s. The Japanese movie industry benefitted greatly from the increase in expendable income. Many of the foreigners who lived in Japan at the time were impressed by the Samurai-themed movies that were released.

Shimura-Takashi-Seven-Samurai-Mifune-Toshiro-Kurosawa.jpg

(Scene from a samurai movie)

The good times were not to last. The Depression of 1959 hit Japan just as in the rest of the world. Just like in other countries, the government was blamed for the economic situation. In 1960, a center-left government came to power, led by Prime Minister Otomo Akio. Otomo was a man of the people, enacting popular social programs designed to help those less advantaged. But that part of his legacy has been largely forgotten. He is mostly remembered for his anti-nationalist views. Depending on who you ask, he was either a visionary man of peace or a naïve fool. Otomo had a great fondness for foreign cultures. His government reversed some of the anti-Korean policies of previous administrations. He promoted greater cultural understand with regards to China and Russia, traditional rivals of Japan. Militarists soon grew to despise him. In 1962, leaders of the Army and Navy, who had traditionally competed for influence, met in secret to discuss the possibility of a coup against Prime Minister Otomo. Ultimately, cooler heads prevailed, and it was determined that efforts should instead be made at defeating him in the next election.

In 1963, Russia invaded Mongolia. The Mongolian government reached out to Japan for help. Many in Japan sympathized, but Otomo Akio steadfastly refused. Otomo himself opposed the Russian invasion, but was not keen on supporting the Mongolian government. There was also a concern about going to war with Russia without a guarantee of German help. Nevertheless, deposed President Batmönkhiin found refuge in Tokyo, supported by many of those who hated Otomo. Later that year there was a vote of no confidence in the Otomo government. Otomo was removed from his post as prime minister in December. Japan’s next prime minister would be Fujimoto Yuuto. Fujimoto had the militarists on his side, though he did not always see eye-to-eye with them. Otomo was saddened by his ousting as prime minister, but he took solace in the fact that his replacement was Fujimoto and not one of the more extreme members of the Japanese parliament. Fujimoto’s government announced that it would not repeal any of the social programs enacted during the previous government. The main change in policy would be a massive increase in the size of the Japanese army and navy.
 
Partisan registration advantage by state, 1960, with darker shades indicating a larger advantage:

genusmap.php


In Hawaii, less than 20% of voters are registered Democrats, in Nevada, about 25% of registered voters are Republicans.

Socialist Labor Party registration is strongest in California, Washington, Alaska, Idaho, Nevada, and Oklahoma.
 
President Valenti, Part 1
Al Valenti was inaugurated as president in 1961. He was the son of Italian immigrants and as such his election showed America’s changing attitudes towards Italian-Americans. He was born in 1899, and thus was the last President born before 1900. His Vice President, Christian Peterson, had a Norwegian immigrant father, though his mother was born in America. He was also nearly as old as Valenti. Despite these commonalities, the two would have a strained relationship throughout the Valenti administration. The new Secretary of State would be a little-known figure named Ryan Norwood from Alabama. Norwood was the American ambassador to Chile under President Patton who had very hawkish views. Norwood shared Valenti’s view that Japan was the greatest threat to the United States and that Japanese influence needed to be combatted. Japanese-American Senator Richard Ou led the attempt to stop his confirmation, but less than ten Senators joined him. Valenti’s pick for Secretary of the Treasury, Douglas McWilliam of New York, was confirmed without controversy.

Ted Spiros, a decorated war hero from Washington DC, became Secretary of War. Arthur van Buren of New York, a very distant relative of the eighth president, became Attorney General. Nick Milburn, representative from Massachusetts, became Postmaster General. The new Secretary of the Navy would be Representative Francis Walter of Pennsylvania. Christine Weigand of Kansas became Secretary of the Interior. Former Governor Dane Westcott of North Carolina was chosen as Secretary of Agriculture. Elderly Representative Michael J. Kirwan of Ohio became the new Secretary of Public Welfare. Valenti would appoint many Northeastern Democrats as judges and to other government positions. His vision for the Democratic Party was for the party to be moderate and urban-based. Though he said that the first vote he ever cast was for William Jennings Bryan in 1920 (Valenti lived in one of the four states that Bryan lost that year), he was not highly enamored with the western populists. He saw them as a relic of the past that were holding the party back.


-Excerpt from The Guide to the Executive Mansion, an in Depth Look at America's Presidents by Benjamin Buckley, Harvard Press, 1999.


Unfortunately for Valenti, nostalgia for the Bryan era was making a resurgence. In 1960, the movie Age of Silver was released. It was a four-hour long movie with an intermission chronicling the life of William Jennings Bryan. The film begins with his 1896 campaign for the presidency, and his rousing speeches. It shows his first two terms, the assassination attempt, and his failed campaign in 1904. Right before the intermission, Bryan is shown reading a newspaper telling of the outbreak of the first Great War. After the intermission, Bryan campaigns for the presidency once again and wins. The rest of the movie shows his final two terms. Bryan fails to secure peace in Europe. But at the end, Bryan shows his courage by attacking a powerful force within his party. Bryan stands before congress and gives a speech condemning the violent racists that were at their height of power during that time. The movie suggests that the race riots stopped and that violent white supremacist groups were somehow defeated by his speech, which was an overexaggeration to say the least. Bryan’s personal racist views were also never discussed in the film.

Many populists and progressives attacked Valenti for being too moderate. In 1961 a stimulus was passed, but critics claimed that it mostly benefitted corporations rather than working Americans. And there was some truth to that accusation. Valenti was a CEO and was very favorable to corporate interests. He was not, however, a conservative. His administration created new social programs, and spending on anti-poverty programs increased massively. Valenti was a strong supporter of nuclear power, and new power plants were opened during his presidency. Science funding was also increased. Valenti was very interested in making sure America stayed ahead in science. This was in contrast to Taft and Savage, who saw science as something best left to the private sector. In particular, he was concerned about Germany. Germany was home to many great scientists such as Albert Einstein, and the German government kept much of his work a secret. Speculation as to what Germany was hiding ran rampant across the world.

nuclear-power-station-Calder-Hall-Cumbria-England-1956.jpg

(Al Valenti was a big supporter of nuclear power)

Some less-than-reputable publications ran stories featuring fake photos of the moon. In some of the photos, the “Germans” weren’t even wearing spacesuits. In one photo, the temperature on the moon was at least taken into consideration and the “scientists” were pictured wearing heavy coats. In another, people dressed as German soldiers were pictured with people dressed as aliens. In 1962, a South African tabloid published photos from the Namibian desert, which it claimed were from Mars. In addition, it was claimed that the German military possessed weapons capable of destroying cities. Scientists in the US, Britain, and Russia all tried to reassure the public that these were baseless rumor and that if Germany wouldn’t be able to launch spaceships without them knowing it. Regardless, many people believed that Germany had made it to the moon. In reality, Germany had sent objects into space, but not into orbit. The US, UK, Russia, and Japan had done so as well. Needless to say, science fiction would be an extremely popular genre of books and film during the 1960s.

In the United States, conspiracy theorist Bill Atwood dismissed the reports of a German moon landing on his radio show. He did, however, take the reports of German superweapons seriously. He claimed that Germany was gearing up for war with Russia. He also claimed that there was going to be a third Great War. This one would pit the United States and Russia against Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Japan. Britain was a wildcard. Germany was its rival but so was Russia. There was also the possibility of France declaring war on Germany and taking back Alsace-Lorraine. According to Atwood, two ancient shadowy organizations fought for control of the world. Since the late 19th century, their seats of power have been in London and Berlin. London was the seat of the Sabazian Society. Berlin was the seat of the Eleusinian Society. The First Great War saw the Eleusinians defeat the Sabazians. In the Second Great War the Sabazians supported Adolphe Cartier until he was no longer useful. The Sabazians, Atwood said, control the US government, though not nearly to the extent that they control Britain.

Fortunately for Valenti, the economy was starting to show signs of improvement. The unemployment rate had dropped significantly and overall quality of life had improved. The market crash was turning out to be less damaging than the one in 1927. The president was somewhat nervous about the 1962 midterms. The economy still wasn’t in a great situation and there was a great amount of infighting in the Democratic Party. In addition, the Socialist Labor Party was mostly taking away votes from Democrats. Some segregationist candidates were running third party as well. But Republicans were in an even worse situation. They were still being blamed for the state of the economy. There were bitter primary struggles across the country that pitted moderates against conservatives. Southern Republicans were in a particularly unenviable situation. Black turnout was down, and the Socialists ate into GOP margins. White southern support for Republicans also fell. Many Southern incumbents were abandoned by the RNC. In the end, Democrats expanded their majorities in both houses.

In 1963, white supremacists marched in several cities across the country, especially in the South. Some of these marches escalated into violence. White supremacists often clashed with black nationalists, with dozens being killed. The mayor of Jackson, Mississippi, upon hearing of a planned Klan demonstration in his city, decided to pursue an unorthodox method of keeping the peace. He reached out to the Porcherites. Since the death of Arnold Porcher in 1962, the majority of his followers supported Rowland Dale as his successor. Dale discontinued Porcher’s pacifist ways, and formed paramilitary groups. These groups attacked drug dealers, gangsters, and other criminals. In addition, they shut down brothels and harassed moonshiners. Due to the Porcherites’ anti-racist views, the mayor believed that they would be perfect for keeping the Klansmen in check. Unfortunately, they only made matters worse. The Porcherite paramilitary forces attacked and killed several Klansmen, and pursued them as they ran away. The incident actually caused many to sympathize with the Klansmen.

The paramilitaries patrolled the streets of Jackson, seeking to root out vice and corruption. The police did nothing as the paramilitaries were better armed than they were. Mississippi Governor Toby Stern called upon the state guard to bring back order. Dale was not eager to start a confrontation and ordered the paramilitaries to leave the city. Though the Porcherites were unpopular, many were attracted to their message. The towns where they were a majority had some of the lowest crime rates in the country. In Philadelphia, they could always be seen helping the city’s homeless population. Retreating from normal society had increasing appeal. Anarchist communes popped up in some areas of the country as well. Over 10,000 people, mostly from San Francisco, moved to rural areas in Northern California. They were not very popular with the local residents, who tended to be conservative. They were mostly peaceful, though when some Porcherites came to Evangelize the communes, they were violently driven out.

Though the economy was improving, all was not well in America. Crime was still high, much higher than it was during the 1950s. This had multiple political ramifications. There were calls for gun control legislation. In New York, the Democrat-controlled legislature passed a gun control bill that was signed by Brandon Bird, the state’s Republican governor. This would become a major point of contention when Bird would later run for President. President Valenti came out in support of some gun regulations, and called upon his home state of Connecticut to pass a gun control bill. This was unsuccessful due to the influence of gun manufacturers within the state. Valenti’s support for greater regulations would put him in conflict with his vice president as well as many other Democrats in rural areas. The Governors of Kansas and Texas, both Democrats, rebuked Valenti for his stance on guns. Valenti understood that this was a losing issue politically and decided not to pursue it any further.

Another response to the increase in crime was to vote for politicians who were seen as “tough on crime.” This was not mutually exclusive with gun control, as many politicians were pro-gun control and pro- “tough on crime” policies. Despite Republicans having a bad year in 1962, Republican sheriff Kirk Wagner was elected governor in New Mexico, a traditionally Democrat state. He campaigned on harsher sentences for violent crime. As governor, he cracked down hard on drug crime and illegal immigration. Wagner had his sights on higher office, and began to criticize 1964 Republican hopefuls like Carl Herman (R-NE), Camilla Grey (R-NH), Walter Jackson (R-TN), and Brandon Bird (R-NY). He didn’t consider Bill Atwood to be worth attacking. Wagner thought very poorly of the Porcherites, who had a decent presence in New Mexico. He referred to them as a dangerous cult, and claimed that they were trying to infiltrate the government. He warned that the group would cause an insurrection if left unchecked.
 
1963 Radio Stories
January 12:

New mining operations in Nevada have increased dramatically since the discovery of large deposits of Tungsten. This has led to an influx of people moving to the state. Nevada is smallest state in terms of population [1] and its economy has suffered from the decline of silver mining.

February 4:

Serial killer Liam Essert has been executed by hanging in Iowa today. Essert had been convicted of 8 murders from 1953 to 1957. Police caught him in an attempt to kill a 9th victim, raided his house and found bones in his basement. Reverend Edmund Sparks led a protest against the death penalty, and called upon Iowa governor Herbert Brooks to halt the execution.

March 13:

The state of Arizona legalizes most forms of contraception.

March 19:

Ukraine deports Porcherite preacher, claiming that Porcherites are causing social unrest.

June 4:

"So Valenti has this new infrastructure project. That's fine, I like roads. But I'm hearing that there's a plan to build a superhighway to integrate the US and Canada, and that Mexico and the rest of Central America is coming next. This is part of a plan to create one North American nation under Sabazian control. And I think that Canadian Prime Minister Benjamin Delaney is even higher up in the ranks than our president is. I'll keep you updated as events unfold."

-Bill Atwood

July 1:

The Supreme Court has handed down its decision in Clark vs. Florida. In a 7-2 decision, the court found that laws against interracial marriage violate the Fourteenth Amendment.

July 24:

In the Kingdom of Hejaz, charismatic and controversial Shi'ite cleric Ali Hussein and his followers have risen up in revolt against the Sunni-dominated government. The major reasons for the rebellion are increasing persecution of and discrimination against Shi'ites. Hussein has called upon Persia for help.

August 10:

New York Governor Brandon Bird has announced his intention to run for the Republican nomination. The moderate Republican emphasized his record in reducing crime in his state. He is under intense criticism from others in his party due to his support for gun control.

August 22:

Former Nebraska Governor Carl Herman has announced his intention to run for President. The conservative Republican came in second place in the 1960 primaries.

August 29:

New Mexico Governor Kirk Wagner will seek the GOP's nomination on a law and order platform. He is widely criticized for his lack of experience, as he has been governor for less than a year.

September 15:

Texas Governor Erick Harrison seeks to challenge President Al Valenti for the Democratic nomination from the right. Meanwhile, Representative Sebastian Andrews of California is running to Valenti's left.

October 11:

The College of Cardinals has selected a replacement for Pope Pius XII [2]. Spanish Cardinal Sergio Franco was elected Pope Damasus III. Franco was born in Oviedo in 1894, served as a chaplain for the Spanish Navy in the First Great War and for the Monarchist forces in the Spanish Civil War. He was appointed as a cardinal in 1936 in Puerto Rico while he was in exile and was a personal friend of Alfonso XIII.

1: ITTL Las Vegas is just a small town and Nevada doesn't have any big cities.
2: Not OTL Pope Pius XII, just someone who took the same name upon becoming Pope.
 

Ficboy

Banned
Another important thing about this timeline is that the Republicans are liberals with a large voting bloc of African-Americans and the Democrats are conservatives with most of their voting base being White Americans. It's nice to see the GOP fully embrace its role as the Party of Lincoln and they even wear blue to honor the Union in contrast to the Democrats who use red as their main color. It's an interesting reversal of OTL's parties.
 
Another important thing about this timeline is that the Republicans are liberals with a large voting bloc of African-Americans and the Democrats are conservatives with most of their voting base being White Americans. It's nice to see the GOP fully embrace its role as the Party of Lincoln and they even wear blue to honor the Union in contrast to the Democrats who use red as their main color. It's an interesting reversal of OTL's parties.
Well to be fair, it's probably more different on the economic front, where Dems are more open to welfare and unions, while Republicans are still generally pro-buisness. What's more interesting is that African American voters, who became New Deal supporters OTL, will have a much more lassiez faire view of economics and civil rights this TL.
 
Another important thing about this timeline is that the Republicans are liberals with a large voting bloc of African-Americans and the Democrats are conservatives with most of their voting base being White Americans. It's nice to see the GOP fully embrace its role as the Party of Lincoln and they even wear blue to honor the Union in contrast to the Democrats who use red as their main color. It's an interesting reversal of OTL's parties.

Well to be fair, it's probably more different on the economic front, where Dems are more open to welfare and unions, while Republicans are still generally pro-buisness. What's more interesting is that African American voters, who became New Deal supporters OTL, will have a much more lassiez faire view of economics and civil rights this TL.

The use of blue for Republicans is actually due to the website that I use to make electoral maps.

On economics, the Republicans have usually been the more conservative party in this TL, though there have been exceptions (1904 and 1908). Both parties are big tent parties, though the Democrat tent is bigger than the Republican one. Here's an overview on the development of the parties since the POD:

William Jennings Bryan moved the Democrats well to the left of where they had been before, but the conservative wing of the party remained powerful. Bryan was to the left of McKinley. When Bryan tried to run for a third term in 1904, the conservative wing took back control of the party, though the populist wing of the Democratic Party remained influential. At that point the Republicans were to the left of Democrats. When Republicans under Roosevelt tried to bring America into war against Germany, Bryan made his comeback. So in 1916 Democrats were running to the left of the GOP but the contrast was a lot less pronounced than it was during Bryan's first two terms. Throughout the '10s and '20s, the progressive wings of both parties were highly influential, and the nominees of both parties usually had at least some progressive views. As the '20s progressed, conservatism made a comeback, though the Republican party was more affected. Both parties talked out of both sides of their mouths during the '20s and '30s. Republicans became more fiscally conservative, but at the same time Republican President Hanly was open to national healthcare and was criticized by Democrats for excessive government spending. In 1932 Charles W. Bryan won and governed much closer to the center on economics than his brother. Herbert Hoover ran to Bryan's right and won in 1936. He generally governed as a moderate conservative. During the '30s, both Republicans and Democrats decided to pass some civil rights reforms to counter increasing black support for the Socialist Labor Party and there was a great concern that Adolphe Cartier would exploit racial divisions in American society. After the war, African-Americans protested for more rights. Hoover was on the fence until he decided to support civil rights. Some Republicans supported civil rights out of sincerity, while others supported civil rights as a means to increase the number of Republican voters. Landon took support of civil rights further than Hoover, and that caused some voters to abandon him for Patton in 1948. By this point, fiscal conservatism was ascendant in both parties, with progressives and populists losing influence. In 1952 the conservative wing of the GOP scored a major victory with the nomination of Taft. Alexander Savage continued Taft's hands-off approach to government. Originally, he didn't want to do anything about civil rights despite opposing segregation. However, he was persuaded to support the Civil Rights Act of 1955. Senators Christian Peterson of North Dakota and Rupert Kneller of Kentucky convinced enough Western Democrats and Southern Republicans respectively to pass the bill. The GOP went back to nominating moderates in 1960. Democrats also nominated a moderate.

African-American voters are more fiscally conservative than in OTL, but they are less likely to be part of the conservative wing of the GOP. Democrats are making inroads with black voters in Northern cities.
 
@CELTICEMPIRE , one of the things I love most about your timeline is that I can' tell if this timeline is better or worse than OTL. I like it when a timeline has aspects that are both better and worse than our timeline and I think you hit that medium right on the head with this timeline.
 
@CELTICEMPIRE , one of the things I love most about your timeline is that I can' tell if this timeline is better or worse than OTL. I like it when a timeline has aspects that are both better and worse than our timeline and I think you hit that medium right on the head with this timeline.
Thanks! I think it really depends on where you live or your political views. Western Europe is worse off than OTL, while Asia is much better since this TL's version of WWII saw very little fighting in Asia. The best change IMO is that Cartier never managed to kill as many people as Hitler. ITTL people will debate whether Cartier or King Leopold was the bigger mass-murderer.
 
The Primaries Begin
President Al Valenti faced significant criticism from within his own party. 1960 candidate Sebastian Andrews, Representative from California, argued that Valenti was too conservative. Andrews had refused to support Valenti in the general election, instead lending his support to Socialist Labor nominee Norman Thomas. Since Andrews had been a constant critic, Valenti was not surprised when he announced he would run for the Democratic nomination. The President’s daughter would later recall that Valenti often expressed his wish that a Republican would win Andrews’ district. He was not particularly worried about this challenge, he was more concerned about a possible challenge from his Vice President, Christian Peterson, which never came. He was challenged from the right by Erick Harrison, the governor of Texas who had strongly supported him in 1960, and had worked hard to keep Texas from voting for either Nathanson or Kipling. Harrison’s main gripe with Valenti was the latter’s support of gun control, though he also attacked him for his support of national healthcare and other expansions of government power as well.

The Republican Party was in a very different place than it was four years ago. Back in 1960, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, many Republicans thought that America still favored the Party of Hoover. Such delusional ideas were virtually nonexistent in 1964. Most Republicans with presidential aspirations were convinced that it was probably best to wait until 1968. The quality of Republican candidates in 1964 was lower than in previous years. The Republican establishment favored Brandon Bird, governor of New York. Bird had previously served as mayor of New York City during the 1950s. His ability to win elections in a city that favored Democrats and winning reelection as governor at a time when Republicans were being routed across the country caused many to see him as the most electable Republican candidate. More conservative Republicans favored the 1960 runner-up Carl Herman, former governor of Nebraska. Former Senator Rupert Kneller of Kentucky declined to run, instead offering his support to Herman. These were considered the two serious candidates with a shot at winning, though Bird was heavily favored over Herman.

Nelson-Rockefeller.jpg
Senator_Goldwater_1960.jpg

(Left: Brandon Bird, right: Carl Herman)

In addition, Senator Camilla Grey of New Hampshire would run as a moderate. Her strategy revolved around winning the early New Hampshire primary and gaining momentum from that. Representative Walter Jackson of Tennessee was running as a conservative, as well as a war-hawk. He argued that America should flex its military muscles more in the Pacific, particularly against Japan. Kyle Jameson of California was another candidate. The famous actor would run a populist campaign. He previously had little involvement in Republican or Democratic politics. Conspiracy theorist Bill Atwood of Wyoming ran as well. Finally, there was Kirk Wagner, the controversial governor of New Mexico. Wagner called for harsher sentences for crimes, more restrictions on immigration, military rearmament, and government monitoring of anarchists and the more radical Porcherite groups. Wagner was known for his abrasive attitude. He would often engage in personal attacks on other candidates. He called Nathan Baker, the 1960 GOP nominee and a well-respected senator, “a useless man” when Baker spoke in favor of Brandon Bird. He also spoke negatively of previous Republican presidents such as Alf Landon and Alexander Savage (he didn’t dare insult Hoover, however).

John_G._Schmitz.jpg

(Kirk Wagner)

In January, the Republicans held a debate. Much to the GOP establishment’s consternation, Bill Atwood had qualified to participate. A few days earlier, there had been a coup in Ukraine. King Otto II had been stripped of all political power by the military, supported by some members of the Ukrainian parliament. Most Americans weren’t paying much attention to the events. Atwood used his time in the debate to speak about the coup, and how it was really one secret society taking power of a country and seeking to drive away another secret society. He claimed that President Valenti was going to use the events in Ukraine to justify involving the US in a war. He claimed that there was a plan to unite the US and Canada. He said that Russia was hiding high-ranking officials from the Cartier regime. And finally, he claimed that President Robert Taft was assassinated. It was the best publicity he ever got. His support grew, partially among people who believed what he said, and partially among those who saw the whole political system as corrupt.

The first state to hold a primary was North Dakota. Herman won the state by a larger percentage than in 1960. Valenti received 59% of the primary vote in the state, not good numbers for an incumbent. Valenti did much better in New Hampshire, where he received over 80% of the vote. Camilla Grey won her home state of New Hampshire with 35% to Brandon Bird’s 28%. Losing this important Northeastern state was a major setback to the Bird campaign. At the same time, congress approved a referendum to determine if the US government would mandate health insurance. It would be the first national referendum held since the 1930s. Valenti announced that his administration would enact the healthcare mandate if reelected and the if the referendum passed with a simple majority (60% was required to make a referendum binding). In addition, the United States, along with the United Kingdom, began to sell weapons to the Kingdom of Hejaz. Hejaz was a major supplier of oil for both the US and the UK, and was currently facing a rebellion.
 
Top