America's Silver Era, The Story of William Jennings Bryan

I'm sure that Atwood's conspiracy theories go on to inspire lots of spy fiction in TTL, in place of where you'd see the Illuminati or the Masons or whatnot in OTL.

Interesting to see right-wing political terrorism to emerge at this point. Looking forward to seeing what comes of this.
 
I'm sure that Atwood's conspiracy theories go on to inspire lots of spy fiction in TTL, in place of where you'd see the Illuminati or the Masons or whatnot in OTL.

Interesting to see right-wing political terrorism to emerge at this point. Looking forward to seeing what comes of this.

I've got plenty of stuff planned for Atwood, I'll have a lot of fun with him.
 
1956
There were four main candidates for the 1956 Democratic nomination. One was Senator Robert Kerr of Oklahoma, 1944 Vice Presidential nominee, popular in the South and West. There was also the arch-segregationist Warren Kipling of Florida. Representative John Edmunds Jr. of Michigan ran as a progressive. He was attacked for his previous Republican affiliation, however. There was also New Hampshire governor Ryan Quirke, a moderate with plenty of establishment support. The defining issue of the convention was civil rights. Kerr had voted against the 1955 Civil Rights Act, while Edmunds had voted for it. Quirke supported the law while Kipling strongly opposed it. Kerr became the compromise candidate, as he promised to uphold the law even though he voted against it. When the convention in Baltimore began, Kerr had more than one third of the delegates. In second place Quirke had more than a quarter. No one else broke 20%. Eventually Kerr was nominated. His running mate would be Ryan Quirke. The Kerr/Quirke ticket was seen as too moderate and did little to excite progressives.

Robert_S._Kerr.jpg

(Robert Kerr)

1956 DNC.png


Orange: Kerr
Blue: Quirke
Red: Edmundson
Yellow: Kipling

1956 saw a large number of third-party candidates. Representative Andrew Russell of New York ran an anti-corruption campaign. Russell was one of two independent members of Congress, though he was a former Democrat and much closer to that party ideologically. The Socialist Labor Party nominated Norman Thomas one final time. Both Russell and Thomas would benefit from dissatisfaction with the Democratic ticket. Vincent Page, state senator from Mississippi, ran under the newly formed American Workers Party. Page ran on a segregationist platform but would get very little traction as he was considered boring. William Atwood ran a write-in campaign as well, though he lacked ballot access in most states and would receive less than 10,000 votes. The averages of the polls leading up to September showed Savage with 45%, Kerr with 41%, Thomas with 4%, and Russell with 3%. After the assassination attempt, Savage’s support grew. When he recovered from his wounds, he addressed the nation on television. His TV appearance was well-received and the American people saw in Savage as highly relatable.​

The assassination attempt wasn’t the only factor working in his favor. The economy was also doing well. Swing voters broke heavily to Savage and he won convincingly. He was able to keep the Hoover coalition together. Conservatives, Liberals, Westerners, Easterners, Whites, and Blacks, all helped him win the election. It was unclear just how much longer the Republicans’ diverse coalition could hold together, but as of 1956 it hadn’t disintegrated yet. Robert Kerr was not heard from much afterwards. He retired from the Senate not long after the election and died in 1963. Ryan Quirke, on the other hand, became DNC chair in 1959. Republicans experienced minor losses in the House and Senate, though they still retained strong majorities in both chambers. In the weeks leading up to the election, there were mass arrests of members of the Cascadian Knights. Law enforcement in Washington, as well as Oregon and Idaho, crippled the group’s ability to carry out acts of violence. The closest state in this election was Kentucky, which was won by slightly over 100 votes.

genusmap.php

Alexander Savage (R-CA)/Irving Ives (R-NY), 32,756,756 votes (51.54%)
Robert Kerr (D-OK)/Ryan Quirke (D-NH), 23,134,379 votes (36.40%)
Norman Thomas (S-NY)/William L. Daniel (S-IA), 3,298,556 (5.19%)

Andrew Russell (I-NY)/Victoria Greenwald (I-IL), 3,044,331 (4.79%)
Others, 1321965 votes (2.08%)
 
China Revisited
After centuries of unity under the Qing emperor, China was once again divided. Mongolia and Xinjiang provinces had broken away, and Tibet had nearly done so as well. And now there were two rival claimants to the Qing throne, one in Beijing and one in Mukden. Peasant uprisings had left much of the countryside in ruins. It seemed as if all the progress made under the reign of the Guangxu Emperor was coming undone. In Beijing, the government was divided against itself, with the king and the Prime Minister not trusting one another. Sa Zhenbing sought to unite multiple parties in the Chinese Congress into one. He hoped to abolish the monarchy. In 1941 the 繁榮黨 (Prosperity Party) was formed, and the Gold, Reform, and People’s Parties (along with minor parties) members were encouraged to join. Some did, some didn’t. Song Jiaoren, leader of the People’s Party, opposed this move, but some members of his party joined. Some members of Sa’s own Gold Party refused to join. The Prosperity party just barely was able to control Congress. Some have suggested that bribes were used to convince some members of the People’s Party to join.

The party that was not asked to join was the ultra-conservative Qing Party. During the 1920s they held almost one third of the seats in Congress, but by 1941 they only had 8%. They had opposed women’s suffrage, and that hurt them with female voters. Their base of support was the Northeast, which was now under the control of the Mukden government. Their members were also accused of having secret pro-Mukden and pro-Japanese sympathies. They were largely seen as protectors of an old system that no one particularly liked. For instance, they were the only party to have the majority of its members vote against the foot-binding ban in 1937. Members of the Qing Party vowed to do whatever they could to keep the monarchy in place, but it looked as if they couldn’t do much. Meanwhile, the entire Prosperity Party, along with some members of other parties, voted to approve a referendum on whether or not to keep the monarchy. The referendum was scheduled for 1942. It would take place alongside the Congressional elections.

While the Qing Party was the most opposed to abolition of the monarchy, members of other parties also opposed it. They saw it as a power grab by the newly-formed Prosperity Party. This group included some who had previously supported the formation of a Chinese Republic, like Song Jiaoren and Wang Jingwei. A lot of people who were anti-monarchy planned on boycotting the referendum. The government’s popularity took a hit in 1942 when Chinese soldiers were sent to help the British fight rebels in India, a highly unpopular move. When voters went to the polls, they chose to keep the monarchy 59.1%-40.9%. The Qing Party made massive gains, more than tripling their number of seats. Emperor Mergen began to assert himself more, reminding China that he still had power. The Prosperity Party had to govern in a coalition for the next few years, which stayed until the Qing Party, rebranded as the Conservative Party, took power in 1956. Sa Zhenbing stayed as Prime Minister until his death in 1952 at the age of 93. He was effectively a figurehead of corporate interests by that point.

330px-%E6%B1%AA%E7%B2%BE%E8%A1%9B%E7%85%A7%E7%89%87.jpg

(Wang Jingwei)
 
Britain and India
Britain was on the winning side of the Second Great War and gained territory from its victory. But it was not a nation at peace. In the colonies, resistance to British rule continued. At home, much of the country was devastated. The French Air Force was the best in the world at the beginning of the war, and British cities and towns learned that the hard way. London, Birmingham, as well as several other places in Southern England were targeted. The conventional bombs were bad enough, but the biological weapons were more horrific. During the latter months of the war, people wouldn’t leave their homes without gas masks. For a long time afterwards, cancer rates in the region were significantly higher than in Northern England, Scotland, or Wales. Lord Halifax and the ruling Conservative Party, looking at Hoover’s landslide reelection in the United States, decided that it was time to call for an election. And thus, an election was to be held in 1941. This election, however, would prove to be very divisive and bitter.

A sizable minority of the British pubic opposed the war. This was especially the case in the Labour Party. Many British civilians were angry that their homes and crops were destroyed in a war that saved their old enemy, Germany. While there was enough food to prevent starvation, here was less food than there was before the war, and prices were high. The Conservative Party won more seats than any other party, but fell well short of a majority. They formed a coalition with the Liberals in order to govern. In order to make up for lost farmland in England, the British government turned to Africa, specifically South Africa and Rhodesia. Both dominions of the crown became richer due to increased British imports. The most pressing issue for the government, however, was India. While British Indian troops had been instrumental in putting down pro-French Communist revolts during the war, British rule was still unpopular. In 1942 protests against Britain turned violent, Delhi descending into chaos. Over 300 people died in the riots in March. Hindu nationalism was rising, and British colonial officials had been targeted since early 1941.

By 1942, British strategy for holding on to India involved keeping using Muslims to fight Hindus. Muslims didn’t particularly like British Imperialism, but they weren’t about to hold hands with Hindu nationalists. Britain made similar appeals to Sikhs, Christians, and Buddhists. The more prescient members of the British military command saw rebellion as likely. The people were starving. Several countries in Africa and Asia had already overthrown their colonial overlords. In June 1942, the revolt began. Britain’s ally, China, sent soldiers to help fight the rebellion, but they were soon withdrawn after a public outcry. Britain had a hard time motivating their own men to fight in India as well. The rebellion, led by Subhas Chandra Bose, spread like wildfire. Orissa Province had fallen to the rebels, and nearby areas of the country were also being overrun. Inspired by Bose, Indians rose up in the South as well. Bose was a devout Hindu, but he assured Indian Muslims that he would protect their rights if his rebellion succeeded. People like Gandhi urged for peace, but they were sidelined by Bose and other independence fighters.

330px-Subhas_Chandra_Bose_NRB.jpg

(Subhas Chandra Bose)

By the beginning of 1943, nearly 20% of British India was controlled by rebels. But Britain was preparing for a counter-offensive. In early 1943, British, Indian, Canadian, South African, Australian, and New Zealand troops struck at the heart of the rebellion. In March, the rebels were defeated at Patna. Then in April, Britain and its allies began the assault on Cuttack, Bose’s hometown. Fierce fighting in the streets led to tens of thousands of casualties. It was a pyric victory for Britain. Back home, there was increasing pressure on the government to leave India. Australia’s Republican movement grew stronger. To make matters worse, Bose was not found in Cuttack, and his location was unknown. In July, a Kenyan regiment deployed in India joined the rebels. Britain began to hire mercenaries, many of whom were Uighurs. Britain asked for help from other countries. Portugal, still reeling from the affects of French occupation, gave limited support. Austria-Hungary declared that it was on Britain’s side in the war, but did nothing. Britain reached out to the United States as well, but was rejected by Hoover.

With the coming of a new administration in January 1945, Britain tried its chances again. The British underestimated America’s new President Alf Landon. They thought he would be a pushover compared to Hoover. The British ambassador to the US testified before Congress that the Indian rebels needed to be stopped. British civilians had been killed, as well as Indians viewed as collaborators. There was also a far-leftist faction among the rebels, making some worried that Communism might make its return in world politics. But Landon was not moved. Back in India, Canada and Australia began to withdraw their troops. Britain controlled most of the major cities, but the countryside was firmly in rebel hands. In January 1946, there was a ceasefire. Britain opened negotiations with the rebels. Britain agreed to withdraw its troops from most of India, though it would hold on to Burma and Sri Lanka. On July 1, 1946, the Republic of India was born, with Subhas Chandra Bose defeating Muhammad Ali Jinnah to become President of India.
 
The End is Nigh?
On Sunday, January 6, 1957, a Congregationalist Church in Brattleboro, Vermont, held its usual services. But there was nothing about the message that day that was usual. 65-year-old pastor Arnold Porcher got up and announced that Second Coming of Christ would occur soon. He did not give a specific date, but said that apocalyptic events would begin to occur frequently starting in 1960. Porcher claimed that after 1960, he would know the exact date of the Second Coming. His message was not received well, and the congregation demanded his resignation. The next Sunday he would preach his final sermon at that church. He left the church with his wife and two others who believed him. He traveled to Northampton, Massachusetts, where his son lived, and preached there. Porcher and his followers sold almost all of their possessions, being committed the full-time preaching. After months of travelling throughout Vermont, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire, his followers numbered 12. Then, Porcher determined that he needed to relocate. In 1958, they moved to Mayersville, Mississippi, located in the poverty-stricken Issaquena County.

220px-Blacksmith_in_Mayersville%2C_Mississippi.jpg

(House in Mayersville)

In Mississippi, Porcher gained more followers. A church was built and the congregation that worshipped there was multiracial. By 1959, the church had 91 members. Later that year, the first “Sign of the Times” took place. There was a recession, which devastated many Americans fell into poverty. Mississippi, along with the rest of the South, was hit especially hard. The 40s and 50s are idolized by many today, and for good reason. Many people were lifted out of poverty in the years following the Second Great War. Appalachians and African-Americans were two groups who saw their condition improve greatly after 1940. Much of these economic gains made by both groups were reversed in 1959. Porcher made a tour of the former Confederate states, along with Kentucky and West Virginia. He established dozens of churches throughout the region. All throughout the country, it looked like America was falling apart. Race riots broke out in nearly every major city. Crime rates skyrocketed. Outside of America, things were just as bad if not worse. Germany was particularly effected.

While Alexander Savage generally took a hands-off approach to government, especially when it came to the economy, he was deeply saddened by the situation. He knew what it was like to be poor, living through the Great Depression himself. At the same time, Democrats stepped up their attacks on the administration as the election got closer. He had also been heavily criticized by his lack of response to a deadly hurricane in the Carolinas (another “Sign of the Times” event according to Porcher). Several moderate and liberal Republican politicians formed the secretive Committee to Save the Republican Party, which would pressure the administration to make a more active response to the recession. Senator Nathan Baker (R-RI) came up with a plan for some temporary government employment programs, which would be funded by tax increases. Savage was not eager to raise taxes, but he could agree to a tax increase as long as only the top earners were the ones paying more. Former Senator Rupert Kneller (R-KY) had a different plan. He suggested that money should be given to the states, which he claimed would know better how to use those funds than the federal government.

Savage was naturally inclined to agree with Kneller. While Kneller had lost reelection in 1956, several sitting Senators and Representatives liked his plan. Nathan Baker eventually supported the idea and cosponsored a bill with Christian Peterson (D-ND), which passed the Senate. After it passed the House it was signed into law by President Savage. The economy was obviously going to be the biggest issue in 1960, and Kneller, Baker, and Peterson were all running for president. Baker travelled to Iowa to give speeches with Republican politicians there, telling Iowans that the bill would help their state. So far, only two other Republicans had announced their intentions to run; Rupert Kneller and Secretary of General Welfare Nahum Johnson (R-SC). There were some rumors of an Eisenhower or Macarthur candidacy, but neither was very likely. On the Democratic side, there was Senators Brendan O’Reilly of Massachusetts, Joel Abelson of New Jersey, and Christian Peterson of North Dakota, along with former Senator Lenny McCracken of North Carolina and former Governor Warren Kipling of Florida. Norman Thomas also planned to run as a Socialist.
 
1960: Who Will Win?
November 15, 1959

Welcome to the Calvin and Kevin show, Santa Fe's favorite show on the radio!

Kevin: today we're talking politics, specifically, the upcoming 1960 Presidential election. I honestly don't know who will win the election, but it's going to be a Democrat. My bets would be on Brendan O'Reilly or Christian Peterson.

Calvin: I think Republicans can win this one, though it will probably be close. Nathan Baker is the current favorite, but if former Nebraska Governor Carl Herman gets in the race, I think he can win. While Rupert Kneller will attack Baker for supporting too much government spending, Herman can do that better. Kneller has a drinking problem anyway, though I've heard he's gotten that somewhat under control recently. Representative Arthur Glenn of Illinois might try to do the same, but his opposition to the 1955 Civil Rights Act will damage his electability. Herman is popular with the Republican base and Nebraska did well under his leadership.

Kevin: The economy will sink any Republican candidate. The GOP nomination is a poisoned chalice. Serious candidates like Baker would do best to sit this election out, just as high profile Democrats sat out the last election. I know you're a Republican, so let's agree to disagree on this one.

Calvin: Okay, let's discuss electability. Brendan O'Reilly is Catholic, Joe Abelson is Jewish, Nahum Johnson is Black. If we're including potential candidates, Mikayla Makinen is a woman, and Richard Ou is Asian. We've already had a Catholic President, but that's because he was William Jennings Bryan's VP. He lost the nomination in 1924, but his Catholicism wasn't the only factor working against him. I think that a Catholic can win.

Kevin: I agree. I think Abelson could win as well, though I'm not as confident about that. Mikayla Makinen couldn't win in 1960, but a female Democrat probably could. However, Richard Ou and Nahum Johnson couldn't win, even if this was a good year for Republicans. I think we're decades away from America really being ready for a president who is not white.

Calvin: I think you're right. It's unfortunate in my opinion, because I've met both of them and they'd make great presidents. Let's get back to the Democratic nomination, I was wondering why you think Peterson might win the nomination. He's tried and failed twice, and he's from one of the least populated states in the country. I feel like he could win if he got to the general, but I don't see him winning the nomination.

Kevin: He's like a modern day William Jennings Bryan, and the situation is perfect for a populist campaign. Plus, many of the early states like Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, are good fits for him.

Calvin: I'll believe it when I see it.
 
Last edited:
Here is how an ITTL generic Republican would do against an ITTL generic Democrat in modern day congressional districts. Illinois and Ohio were painful, I hope someone fixes their congressional districts. Those two states took a while so I'm just doing the midwest for now.

https://www.yapms.com/app/?m=koq
 

manav95

Banned
Here is how an ITTL generic Republican would do against an ITTL generic Democrat in modern day congressional districts. Illinois and Ohio were painful, I hope someone fixes their congressional districts. Those two states took a while so I'm just doing the midwest for now.

https://www.yapms.com/app/?m=koq[/QUOT
Here is how an ITTL generic Republican would do against an ITTL generic Democrat in modern day congressional districts. Illinois and Ohio were painful, I hope someone fixes their congressional districts. Those two states took a while so I'm just doing the midwest for now.

https://www.yapms.com/app/?m=koq

How did the 1958 midterms go ITTL?
 
Presidential Announcements
November 16, 1959:

"Those who say that more government is the answer to the current economic crisis are wrong, and that's why I'm running for President."

-Former Nebraska Governor Carl Herman, speaking to supporters in Iowa

November 17, 1959:

"Unemployment rate rises to 15%. Former Wyoming Secretary of State and famous conspiracy theorist Bill Atwood has announced his intentions to run for the Republican nomination. He has been particularly critical of front-runner Nathan Baker. He claims that there will be a third Great War in the near future and that Nathan Baker will drag America into it. He's also criticized the free trade policies supported by Baker, Kneller, Herman, and Johnson. In professional basketball, the Oklahoma City Warriors defeated the San Diego Scorpions 39-37..."

November 20, 1959:

"Two candidates announced their intentions to run for president today, one Republican and one Democrat. On the Republican side is Richard Ou, Senator from Hawaii, considered a moderate by most. He was influential in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1955, which he cosponsored. On the Democrat side, Reverend Edmund Sparks of Iowa is running. He is widely respected for his charity work. Sparks claims that he will 'bring back compassion.' He has called attention to state eugenics laws, which he seeks to end."

November 24, 1959:

"There's enough wealth in this nation to go around. Congress can end this depression, it just chooses not to. I'm running for president to fight for those who can't pay someone to fight for them."

-US Representative Sebastian Andrews (D-CA), speaking to supporters in San Francisco

November 29, 1959:

"US Representative Mikayla Makinen of Minnesota has finally confirmed that she is running for the Republican nomination. She became famous as a singer in the 30s and used that fame to launch her political career."

December 2, 1959:

"Retired General Leopold 'Leo' Mulder of Maryland announced his bid for the Democratic nomination in Annapolis today. He blasted the 'isolationist' policies of President Savage. He said that Taft and Savage were fools to give up US power and influence in the Pacific in the Treaty of Honolulu. Mulder served under Eisenhower and helped the Alliance win at the battle of Seville in 1939. Later he commanded American troops in Peru and served as an adviser to President Patton."

December 5, 1959:

"Al Valenti, CEO of Liberty Motors, announced he was running for president outside his home in Hartford, Connecticut today. Valenti is the American dream personified. He was born to poor Italian immigrants and worked his way up the corporate ladder to become CEO. His workers are paid well and his cars are affordable. He claims that his business expertise gives him insight into how to fix the economy."
 
Top