The hat seems goofy to me, but maybe that's a side effect of keeping a monarchy. Perhaps as dress uniform? I'd think the regular on-duty fatigues would be closer to practical frontier gear, so more of an Aussie look with a brimmed hat of some kind,for sun shade and shedding rain. But perhaps you understand pragmatics of battle gear I do not? Anyway a practical hat can be prettied up for dress purposes. It seems you don't recognize any purpose in making the hat an armored helmet, and by golly I believe few early-19th century uniforms included much in the way of armor of any kind. Headgear is, in addition to its symbolic functions, mainly serving to keep the head warm and dry and fend off rain and sun glare. Given how warm most of the KNA gets in summer, even in places like New England, and how rainy the land most people have settled is, as a practical matter perhaps there should be seasonal hats or even full uniforms--winter gear that might indeed look much like your offering, except they'd want some kind of scarf and ear coverings, and summer gear that is more lightweight, with say camouflaged pith helmets as a solution for keeping off heavy rain while leaving some breathing room to cool the head in a fairly humid hot setting. And of course some kind of jacket which ought to be feasible in all seasons, not just for weather protection but to hold ammo and weapons and so forth. The desirability of white versus green for camouflage is unfortunately the reverse of when you want them for weather protection! The latter suffers I guess--there might be white winter greatcoats over white gear and hats in winter the better to hide in snow, but the Army has few historic experiences of fighting in such climes, and so the darker green, perhaps even hitting on the notion of making it mottled somehow for campy in foliage, might persist as the standard since most historic fighting has happened in the semitropical zones that don't usually get snow cover. But can unfortunately get very hot and humid--too bad, soldiers often must suffer from such heat.How close would this be to American "greencoat" uniforms?
View attachment 562945
How close would this be to American "greencoat" uniforms?
View attachment 562945
Depending on how bad and costly a war with China would be to the Russian Empire, would there be a chance for the Tsar to consider selling Alyeska?
I know that America doesn't want to antagonize Spain and potentially start a war that the KoNA could win at an expense, but it seems like a wasted opportunity to leave the Texan revels high and dry. Either way, hope the best of luck to Texas.
Maybe California could become a sub-national monarchy within the Kingdom of North America, their King being reduced to Duke status or something like that. They are so desperate for money that they could well accept this offer a couple of years from now, if they are offered special status and autonomy(more than a normal dominion).
Aren't the Russian supply lines back in Russia even farther away? They have to cross Siberia and the Pacific to send any sizable force to North America. The Russians also have to keep an eye in a bunch of enemies in Eurasia, while America don't have any real continental threats.the moment, fighting a war across a thousand miles of Indian-strewn Great Plains and then 500 miles of Rocky Mountains is practical for America. Thus the Czar would not, at least for a generation, feel inclined to give up a land which was still providing gold and silver in abundance.
Couldn't the Americans offer better terms(autonomy, cash, etc) than the Spanish King?If a Catholic Spanish King could not keep California and/or Anahuac under his control, how could the Americans?
Couldn't the Americans offer better terms(autonomy, cash, etc) than the Spanish King?
Good point.Theoretically, they could promise more democracy but I don't know of any significant early 19th century Spanish Catholic nation would see kneeling to a protestant King as acceptable or preferable to anything.