Your challenge is to have at least one Muslim country establish at least one colony in the New World. It doesn't have to be very successful or last very long, it just has to exist for a time.
It happened OTL. The Dutch imported Indonesian Muslims to Suriname in the 19th century. Technically it is a Muslim colonization.Your challenge is to have at least one Muslim country establish at least one colony in the New World. It doesn't have to be very successful or last very long, it just has to exist for a time.
I think they mean colonisation by a Muslim country, but that kind of counts I guess.It happened OTL. The Dutch imported Indonesian Muslims to Suriname in the 19th century. Technically it is a Muslim colonization.
It depend on what exactly is your PoD but a surviving United Al Andalus could do it . Morocco too to some extent with the good PoD , Barbary pirate having some kind of base in the caraïbe too. All is possible especially if the colony only need to be temporary . I have recently done a discussion thread about the possibility of Moroccan colonization they’re some good idea for Moroccan colonization.Your challenge is to have at least one Muslim country establish at least one colony in the New World. It doesn't have to be very successful or last very long, it just has to exist for a time.
Your challenge is to have at least one Muslim country establish at least one colony in the New World. It doesn't have to be very successful or last very long, it just has to exist for a time.
That is one way... But the Ottoman conquest of North Africa wasn't like the conquest of Hungary or the Caucasus. Algeria was taken by Muslim Pirates from local rulers and Spanish occupants and the conquerors declared to be a part of the Ottoman Empire. Tunis might be the farthest the Ottoman Armies moved in North Africa. A lot of wars there were done by local forces. Still Ottoman but unlike Hungary, no direct participation from Constantinople. Which brings me to the point... Unless the Wattasids join the Ottoman Empire, or the same analogue for Algiers is applied for Northern Morocco, the Ottomans won't conquer Morocco to have an Atlantic Port. Not past the 1540s at least...Would be for the Ottomans to somehow get a port in the Atlantic and colonise the new world. I remember there was a timeline called something like “The Sea Of The Sultab”, where the Ottomans conquer Italy and managed to use Granada to colonise the New World.
Yes that why if one want Muslim presence in the new world the easiest way would be a long living and solidified Caliphate of Cordoba .Any Muslim country would be fighting the Iberian countries to maintain any a colony in the new world.
as much as I like the idea of a emirate of Grenada in America it seem extremely unlikely to happen with OTL situation we might need some Castille screw in the 14 /15 century they won’t be establishing colony in the new world with the Castilian pressuring them in the North . But if the emirate manage to adapt their military and fortifications to the gunpowder era and have the support of a dominant Muslim power they might last long but I still think they’re very doomed in the long term .Al Andalus: If you want a New World dominated by Muslims. Could even work with Granada, though the colonists must be as much as possible from North Africa rather than Al Andalus. Though Granada may need long term protection from a dominant Muslim Power (Moroccan or Hafsid led North Africa/Ottoman Empire). If Granada were to fall, the colony will likely join the new Muslim Power, assuming the Christians haven't burned it to the ground yet.
The problem is that a surviving Caliphate of Cordoba would do away with the reasons that the Age of Exploration started which was Christian countries (namely Portugal( trying to go around West Africa. This led to development of new ocean going ships and exploration of West Africa Coast and eventual Portuguese national project to sail around African to India and Orient. Columbus lived in Portugal for several years and there came up with his flawed theory he could reach the Orient sailing west.Yes that why if one want Muslim presence in the new world the easiest way would be a long living and solidified Caliphate of Cordoba .
The problem is that a surviving Caliphate of Cordoba would do away with the reasons that the Age of Exploration started which was Christian countries (namely Portugal( trying to go around West Africa. This led to development of new ocean going ships and exploration of West Africa Coast and eventual Portuguese national project to sail around African to India and Orient. Columbus lived in Portugal for several years and there came up with his flawed theory he could reach the Orient sailing west.
With a Muslim Iberian Peninsula none of that would of happened and any exploration would be accidental and occur much later.
Their location is just too far from the Bering Strait I think.What about the Khanate of Sibir? Can they jump the Bering Strait and have territory in modern day Alaska?
Mali: If it remains united and voyages to Brazil leave with success and return to form existing colonies there while also keeping communication with Africa
I often see posts about Mali settling Brazil or establishing colonies in new world. But Mail sailing vessels while capable of sailing to new world be hard pressed to return. The winds and currents are from Africa to Americas. The return is way to the north or south. So very likely got Mail ships to end up along the Amazon I not see them as colonizing it.Their location is just too far from the Bering Strait I think.
I can see Mali doing voyages tho, like what this post said.
I tend to think that if Christian states make it harder for Al-Andalus to trade with the Eastern Muslim states then it's possible for them to be incentivized towards finding a way to circumvent the Mediterranean through Africa. The New World would simply be a bonus in their eyes. A united Umayyad Al-Andalus obviously makes it easier for this to happen while a politically fragmented Iberia would be a harder sell since they're distracted by internecine conflicts between Muslims and/or Christians.Not necessarily. The primary reason of course was to make that sweet cash from monopolizing easier trade routes to the Asian markets. An endeavor an Al-Andalus would be interested in.
Though we can throw in political ones like say the Caliphate split continues or the Cordobans adopt a more diverging view of Sunni Islam or their eastern neighbors controlling the East Med just raise taxes like crazy for imports
Religion isn't really a factor though. Portuguese interest in going around Africa has nothing to do with who is dominating the Mediterranean spice trade (which was invariably dominated by Catholic Italians), but because they were peripheral to the Mediterranean trade network. Portugal rightly saw the profit to be made by cutting out the Mediterranean middlemen and sought a way to do just that. It doesn't matter if the middlemen are Venetian, Genoan, Ottoman, or Egyptian, what matters is that there's any middlemen.The problem is that a surviving Caliphate of Cordoba would do away with the reasons that the Age of Exploration started which was Christian countries (namely Portugal( trying to go around West Africa. This led to development of new ocean going ships and exploration of West Africa Coast and eventual Portuguese national project to sail around African to India and Orient. Columbus lived in Portugal for several years and there came up with his flawed theory he could reach the Orient sailing west.
With a Muslim Iberian Peninsula none of that would of happened and any exploration would be accidental and occur much later.