Also, not to get into chat, but Bangladesh more or less has a female autocrat in charge right now, Sheikh Hasina (the daughter of Bangladesh's first president). It doesn't get a lot of media attention because I assume the powers that be would hate to jeopardize their source of cheap textiles, but a quick google search hasn't revealed anyone arguing the opposite (which is usually true about almost every imaginable situation).

https://thediplomat.com/2019/01/the-bell-tolls-on-bangladeshs-democracy/

I hate it when people throw around the term dictator, but when you disappear political opponents and more or less prevent opposition parties from running, you've probably earned the title.

Also, a lot of female dictator scenarios have either a daughter or wife take over the country as a dictator succeeding their husband or father and although Hasina's father was a dictator as hell, he was murdered in a 1975 coup - and she was fairly elected in 1996, so she wasn't exactly handed power in any sense. She won it fair and square...the first time...and actually the second time (though obviously not the third or fourth time).
 
Leila Ben Ali, widow of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, former President of Tunisia. Should the Tunisian revolts not have happened, and should Zine El Abidine die earlier, she would have been in a good spot to take over the country as his successor. Tunisia would have been somewhat more tolerant of having a female leader than other Arab states, though the rising discontent and anger at the government's corruption would have meant that sooner or later, her rule would have exploded into riots and revolts.
 
Okay, so your challenge here is incredibly simple yet pretty difficult: give a woman dictatorial power over a country. Absolute monarchs don't count. Bonus points if they have the necessary disposition and retain power for long enough to do some incredibly fucked up shit.
surely Indira Gandhi during the emergency should qualify....
 
elena-ceausescu3_49120500.jpg

ba341.jpg
 
People here are making a lot of mention of women whose power was derived exclusively or mostly from their being wives or daughters of dictators and was unlikely to survive the dictator's death.
 
Would that have been legally possible in the UK? Even in 1945, when the UK was still fighting World War II, Churchill was either unable or unwilling to cancel an election.

And why would Thatcher go berzerk against ATL socialists, when she wasn't having republican apologists arrested en masse in OTL?

Agreed, Thatcher was no proto-dictator and showed no signs of becoming one.
 
Also, not to get into chat, but Bangladesh more or less has a female autocrat in charge right now, Sheikh Hasina (the daughter of Bangladesh's first president). It doesn't get a lot of media attention because I assume the powers that be would hate to jeopardize their source of cheap textiles, but a quick google search hasn't revealed anyone arguing the opposite (which is usually true about almost every imaginable situation).

https://thediplomat.com/2019/01/the-bell-tolls-on-bangladeshs-democracy/

I hate it when people throw around the term dictator, but when you disappear political opponents and more or less prevent opposition parties from running, you've probably earned the title.

It doesn't get attention because Bangladesh is a backward 3rd world country that is easily overlooked. None of the great powers are going to make the slightest change to their policies over what Bangladesh thinks.
 
Liebknecht is installed as head of a Communist post-Weimar Germany after the Spartacus Revolutions. He dies and Rosa Luxemburg is his heir.
 
As others have said, Indira Gandhi was a dictator in India from 1975-1977. Of course, her extraordinary powers in that period were never intended to be anything except for temporary - to establish order and prevent (in her eyes) a possible military coup, then restore liberties and hold an election which she (wrongly) believed would be a victory assuring her continued rule. Then again, a temporary dictatorship is still a dictatorship.

Also, not to get into chat, but Bangladesh more or less has a female autocrat in charge right now, Sheikh Hasina (the daughter of Bangladesh's first president). It doesn't get a lot of media attention because I assume the powers that be would hate to jeopardize their source of cheap textiles, but a quick google search hasn't revealed anyone arguing the opposite (which is usually true about almost every imaginable situation).

https://thediplomat.com/2019/01/the-bell-tolls-on-bangladeshs-democracy/

I hate it when people throw around the term dictator, but when you disappear political opponents and more or less prevent opposition parties from running, you've probably earned the title.

Not to mention her main opponent, Khaleda Zia, is wannabe dictator in her own right.
 
Top