Map Thread XVII

Status
Not open for further replies.
View attachment 350231
Map Legend #27-
Note: No colors are repeated
Union of North American States
Quebec
Union of Britain
Scandinavian Union
La France Nationaliste
Socialist Republic of Germany
Polish Union
Finnish Empire
Kingdom of Italy
Austria-Hungary
Lithuania
Russian Empire
Kingdom of Spain
Romania
Greece
Brazil Commune
Gran Colombia
Portagul
Bulgaria
Illyria
Arabia
Yemen(Arab Vassal)
Mali
Sultanate of Egypt
India
Ethopia
Greater Liberia
Chinese Republic
Korea(Chinese Puppet)
Japan
Thailand
Australasian Federation
La Plata
Peru

Please Ask Questions!

Ideology of Chinese Republic?
 
View attachment 350231
Map Legend #27-
Note: No colors are repeated
Union of North American States
Quebec
Union of Britain
Scandinavian Union
La France Nationaliste
Socialist Republic of Germany
Polish Union
Finnish Empire
Kingdom of Italy
Austria-Hungary
Lithuania
Russian Empire
Kingdom of Spain
Romania
Greece
Brazil Commune
Gran Colombia
Portagul
Bulgaria
Illyria
Arabia
Yemen(Arab Vassal)
Mali
Sultanate of Egypt
India
Ethopia
Greater Liberia
Chinese Republic
Korea(Chinese Puppet)
Japan
Thailand
Australasian Federation
La Plata
Peru

Please Ask Questions!
Arabia that's just about half Arabian?
 
Arabia that's just about half Arabian?
During a quest to regain ottoman land, turkey and Arabia allied and crushed Iraq, them the Arabians and Turkey merged due to political instability in turkey. They then took out Persia and conquered the levant, the Afghan and Pakistani lands were gained in a deal to rid Muslims from india
 
My buddy @Hood1944 certainly has the right pic for this. But anyway.
I disagree.
1457122645268.png
 
oops I dropped a WIPView attachment 350021

Canada isn't done yet BTW
Step away from the mouse. I think you have done more than enough already.
What a successful Armada of 1779 might look like.

mkOHu68.png


-Although both sides see heavy losses, the Franco-Spanish alliance is able to annihilate most of the Royal Navy and launch tens of thousands of troops onto British soil, with a spectacular invasion of London seeing King George III slain and the remainder of the British government forced north. However, France and Spain don't have the muscle to impose their will on the British people, and a period of anarchy begins. With British loyalists drawn to the rapidly unfolding meat grinder in the UK, the colonists gain the upper hand in the American War of Independence and a sudden putsch overthrows British rule in Ireland as the isle is left undefended aside from Protestant militias in the north.

As it is not shown, I shall assume that Gibraltar is still firmly British. Also, dumb move on the part of the Dutch. The first Glorious Revolutoin was a guy leaving you because you were broke and wouldn't act like he was King. Then again, better the Dutch there than the French reaching even further. I expect they, the British, and Americans will get along just fine against the Buorbin barbarians.
Here's the western half of the world of my scenario. Still working on the eastern half. Detalis as soon as I get everything else done.
View attachment 350162
Hmmm. Seems like Bolivia, Argentina, and Patagonia will be difficult to manage, given the mountains, deserts, and prairies splitting them in half.
Italy found itself in a civil war, that grounded down to a halt, and a Russian backed Five Star Movement controlled South Italy.
The Sicilians and Sardinians are autonomous regions. And I think it is the groups in the north of the country who want independence, so it probably wasn't too hard for them to leave here. I imagine that even if you had Naples leave, the area of Latium and Rome would stay with the north. southern Iraq and North Yemen also seem more likely to go into Iran's sphere than Russia's, perhaps with Lebanon going as well. May also want to make changes around Armenia. No reason for them to give up the nearly fully Nargano area in exchange for the totally Azeri Nachiven. And kind of odd that Germany has no sphere of influence. I imagine that they, the Low Countries, Poles, and Baltics would all hand together, or at least in a set of three or four groups.
This evening improvisation was designed to be the most ridiculous scenario possible, judge for yourself:
territorial_history_of_connecticut_by_strathconabooster-dbr7zzf.png
i think the area aruodn Sault St Marie was separate form the area Michigan in the original Toledo exchange. They also seem like they would want to keep that peninsula tip if only because of the strategic position in the Great Lakes.

On a more serious note: what is this, a Zelda Item Quest? I do look forward to the next map in the series, when Wisconsin and Old Connecticut trade the rest of their land.
 

ST15RM

Banned
Step away from the mouse.
Hmmm. Seems like Bolivia, Argentina, and Patagonia will be difficult to manage, given the mountains, deserts, and prairies splitting them in half.
1.) Bolivia was around the size of what I have, besides, the U.S is divided by the rockies and it's a superpower.
2.) This is not Argentina, even though it uses the same X2 color.
3.) Patagonia pretty much formed out of a power vaccum, and the western side is pretty much ignored.
 
1.) Bolivia was around the size of what I have, besides, the U.S is divided by the rockies and it's a superpower.
2.) This is not Argentina, even though it uses the same X2 color.
3.) Patagonia pretty much formed out of a power vaccum, and the western side is pretty much ignored.
Bolivia here mostly expanded into areas that were unclaimed and uncharted during colonial times. Mountains, deserts, basically it is surrounded on all sides. It would be difficult to tie together into a nation. The US had an ever growing population that moved steadilly along the many rivers in the US. Getting to the West Coast could take a year early on. I suppose for this you could have Guarni as a unifying factor among the natives of Paraguay and Bolivia, while also having some Creoles and some socialist Bolivarism (versus the chauvinisit {not the gender type} actions of Simon Bolivar). One of the other issues I'd say has to be the claims Bolivia has everywhere else.no historica precedence really, though I suppose it probably explains a bit on the earlier map you mentioned for the series. And perhaps consider an independence movement or autonomy for the neglected parts of not-Argentine Chile? It was a land formerly belonging to Spanish Peru, and before that held areas that had been fighting Incan invaders. It is decent land, and now that I look over it, if this state (guessing it was a Confederation to start with?) is probably going be about as White as the US, if the Spanish, Italy, and German populatoins I moved to all those lands IOTL go here as well.
 
Not often that the Germans annex Finland. Partially because Hitler said he didn't want the land and talked about the Finns being so religious because they swere snowed in for months at a time. With Himmler talking about the need to threaten the Finns in the future to take the frozen lands of northern Sweden and Norway in the future, which the Finns had declined the offer of. It does help make the map stand out, but I can't see any motive or ability for the Germans to get over their for a quick war, and the talk in another post of most Finns being Germanized seems odd as it suggests the Finns didn't fight back enough for the Germans to get bitter. That, and it still leave over a fifth of the population vanishing off the face of the Earth. In future maps with similar scenario, perhaps the European Union should be refered to as Europa, the Bund (perhaps derogatorily, to suggest German dominance), or simply the European Union? Simply reading the Union when talking about bringing guns to the Chinese had confused me a bit, and I imagine both the Americans and Soviets are against using the term. Though perhaps the Europeans are doing partially to rub it in their faces, while really playing up the Fasces imagery.

Who is in charge of Argentina and Brazil? Considering how Italians and Germans made up a large portion of the population of the Southern, and the British had loads of economic interests down there, I don't see Americans as being seen as the main enemy right away. If we have Integralists in Brazil, then the Nazis would have no part with a party dedicated partially to race mixing. For Argentina... You can have the semi-populist Peronists who weren't really Nazi caliber by any measure, you have a possible military junta wanting order (and perhaps the Falkands, southern Chile, and dominance over Uruguay, all putting them at odds with the European Union bloc), or you can have some group dedicated to European identity, which would not go over well with Argentine nationalists who don't exactly see new immigrants from Spain, Italy, And Germany replacing them as being the most wonderful of ideas for the future off their country. Doesn't help that Spain was annexed by France. Gonna be a bit hard for Latin Americans to take any more kindly to it than when Bonaparte deposed the puppet Bourbon in charge of Spain. Also kinda surprised that there is no Reichskommiserate for Switzerland. I guess they either didn't fight hard enough or they all got sent to the East as colonists.

The main reason the Reich annexed Finland is because, unlike OTL, the reds won the Finnish Civil War. Finland was a soviet republic within the USSR, and they were more loyal to the Soviet Union compared to the Russian Empire, as the Soviets let the Finnish run themselves under local communists without too much intervention by the CPSU. This, of course, led to the Reich to seeing the Finns as just more communists, roughly equivalent to the Estonians on their racial hierarchy. They did fight harder than most other Soviet Republics, but the Wehrmacht ITTL was stronger than the OTL 1939 Red Army.

As for South America, the Nazis aren't huge fans of Brazil's Integralism, but it's close enough to fascism that they'll tolerate it. Plus, Brazil serves as a good counterweight against American influence in South America, alongside Argentina.

The Peronists aren't running the show in Argentina, actually, but rather more traditional fascists run by a junta. They desire dominance over the Southern cone, which puts them at odds with Chile, which favors the British over Germany. Overall, the nations of the European Union do work together against the Americans/Soviets/Japanese, but they aren't friends. France, for example, feels hemmed in and marginalized by the Union, and South America isn't liking France for annexing Spain. If it weren't for the Monroe Pact, the Union probably would've dissolved almost immediately after the Soviets were thrown out of Europe.

Hitler decided that the Swiss were just as German as say, the Austrians and the Luxembourgish, and so German-speaking Switzerland was annexed into Germany Proper. They're starting to regret it though, and there are still some resistance cells holed up in the Alps.
 
This is our last map from a map game that really needs some support. And no, Map Games is no longer a cesspool of conflicts - at least not to an extent as it could seem a few years ago.

The game is called Dawn of a Century: A 1900 Mapgame. And the map is of the year 1979, in a sort of three-way Cold War where two sides are more friendly with each other than with their arch-enemy. The latter has its capital in St. Petersburg...

Anyone here who could give some support?
Lindnersche FDP.png
 

ST15RM

Banned
Bolivia here mostly expanded into areas that were unclaimed and uncharted during colonial times. Mountains, deserts, basically it is surrounded on all sides. It would be difficult to tie together into a nation. The US had an ever growing population that moved steadilly along the many rivers in the US. Getting to the West Coast could take a year early on. I suppose for this you could have Guarni as a unifying factor among the natives of Paraguay and Bolivia, while also having some Creoles and some socialist Bolivarism (versus the chauvinisit {not the gender type} actions of Simon Bolivar). One of the other issues I'd say has to be the claims Bolivia has everywhere else.no historica precedence really, though I suppose it probably explains a bit on the earlier map you mentioned for the series. And perhaps consider an independence movement or autonomy for the neglected parts of not-Argentine Chile? It was a land formerly belonging to Spanish Peru, and before that held areas that had been fighting Incan invaders. It is decent land, and now that I look over it, if this state (guessing it was a Confederation to start with?) is probably going be about as White as the US, if the Spanish, Italy, and German populatoins I moved to all those lands IOTL go here as well.
This isn't WW2, Argentina is the the Federation of the Rio de la Plata. Bolivia is an expantionist Bolivarian dictatorship hell-bent on conquering Latin America and fufilling Bolivar's promise, with a vast army. They are the main power of South America.
 
This isn't WW2, Argentina is the the Federation of the Rio de la Plata. Bolivia is an expantionist Bolivarian dictatorship hell-bent on conquering Latin America and fufilling Bolivar's promise, with a vast army. They are the main power of South America.
WWII? I was taking about the Germans, Italians, and Spaniards that settled in Chile, Uruguay, Argentina, and they areas Rio de la Plata got from Brazil. Pretty sure they had been settling the area at least a century before that war started. And I do have to question how strong the Bolivians would be, but I don't know much of the area. lot of the stuff they want vacant lands, anyways.
 

ninel

Banned
prussian_dominions_by_wewlad11-dbqoyn3.png

Congress of Vienna goes all wrong for the Prussians...
Why border of South Prussia follows border of the OTL Congress Poland then? Even thought it’s partly natural border it doesn’t make much sense in this scenario.

And Neudorf is supposed to be Modlin, right? Weird name then.

Other than that I kinda like this scenario. Maybe because my region is given back to Prussia here, and doesn’t get to be part of Russia with the whole civilisational backwardness that comes with it…
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top