Since people liked my previous version of "the US with a Canada-style party system", I decided to try some more.
Unlike the 2012 one, there was no three-way poll with a someone I could use NDP/Progressive challenger in there, so I had to actually do a bit more work. The Progressives' vote total is that challenger's percentage that they got in the Democratic primaries, with adjustment for each state by the factor of what Ralph Nader got in each election compared to his national average. Their result is subtracted from the Democrats' OTL total and added to Nader's OTL total to get their TTL result.
For the State's Rights totals, I got an approximate average of what the best southern-born candidate got in the 2000 race (I used 2000's percentage for 2004) since Bush is a transplant and McCain isn't a southerner got in the southern primaries then did the same thing with the SR votes with the GOP vote that I used for the Progressives & Dems'. In 2008, I gave McCain roughly whatever percent he got in each southern primary before Super Tuesday for his share of the OTL GOP vote & for the ones held afterwards (KY, LA, MS, TN, TX, VA, WV) I gave him his average (32%) (I gave Huckabee an additional 5% boost in Arkansas since it's his home state).
Whew...enough methodology, here's the first out of three:
The State's Rights must have planned to let Bush pick up the south, because their best candidate (Gary Bauer) got 5% of the OTL southern...GOP vote...yeah. So he finished
way below the threshold for inclusion on the infobox and Dubya didn't come close to losing a southern state.
It looks weird that Nader won Massachusetts & Rhode Island while Vermont and Hawaii go Republican. This occurs because MA & RI were so Democratic that more than half of their votes could split to Bradley & he'd still win, while HI & VT weren't quite lopsided enough where such a split could be pulled off.