A Red Dawn: American Revolution and Rebirth

Awesome updates JB, seems like Premier Foster is wasting no time trying to consolidate the UASR's place in the world, eventhough the Red Terror does seem to be one of the horrible splotches of history that later generations will look at in shame. Can't wait to see what massive Economic programs Foster will push through to help lift the nation out of the depression...Keep it comming JB:D
 
So the Union of American Socialist Republics still retains some democratic elements, such as an elected legislature that can pass laws? Or is it mostly symbolic and possess no real power?

Very interesting timeline so far. :)
Yes, and one the provincial and local levels there has been a flowering of participatory democracy in communities and in the workplace. Nevertheless, the national government is highly authoritarian during this period, and a tension will develop between local participatory democracy and the dictates of the state.

I enjoy this a lot. I look forward to seeing what happens with China and Japan. The Second World War should be interesting. Decolonization might go differently. Revolution in India?


ITTL postwar France is allied with Britain. IOTL the French and Italian CPs were powerful, the biggest part of the anti-Nazi resistance. My understanding is that these CPs were basically defanged by Stalin and the US. (there's a scene in the Bertulluci film "1900" that has a CP leader telling the peasants to give recently seized land back to the landowners)Otherwise it would be likely that France and Italy would "go Communist" after the war.

This is great!

Someone else has been peeking at my notes again, or so it seems... :)

France is going to be a complicated place after the Second World War, the enduring Franco-British Union will largely be a product of actions during the war itself.

Something like a cross between "Working" by Studs Terkel and "A People's History of the United States" by the late Howard Zinn?

Pathfinder Press,

The SWP publishing house?
Indeed, though obviously this work is focused only on the period of the 1930s.

Same name, similar function, but ITTL it's not an adjunct to the SWP. It was simply founded by some of the same men who founded the SWP's publishing house IOTL.
 
Where would Teller go? As I recall, he came to the US because of an invite of a friend, a Russian defector and physicist. Before that he was in Brussels. Would he have just remained there? Or would he flee Europe once war broke out, fearing it would come to Belgium along with Nazi totalitarianism?

Given the historical developments, I think it's pretty clear that Fuchs would end up going straight to America instead of Britain.

As for Fermi, I can't see why he wouldn't come to America. There will be plenty of enticements for European refugees with any sort of skill to come to America.

It's pretty clear that if America is communist, Fermi, Teller, et alia are going to the next best thing: the United Kingdom.
 
Policy updates, continued

People's Secretariat for Labor

Emma Goldman, by any respect, had the most interesting position within the UASR's government. As a life-long self-professed anarcho-communist, the prospect of even agreeing with a state socialist program, let alone being a government minister, would have once given her chills. She fell in with their lot originally in hopes of using her popularity among American workers to drum up support for an independent syndicalist movement. Now she found herself the architect of policies that made a truly independent syndicalism impossible.

Perhaps more than any other person, Emma Goldman would be the architect of the American economic system, and the great political tension that would shape American history: the conflict between grassroots participatory democracy, and the program of the nationwide planned economy.

In October of 1934, the passage of the First Five Year Plan would begin a major reorganization of the American economic system. Under the terms of the Plan, the atomic unit of the economic system would be the Solidarity labor union's syndicate. Each syndicate would organize a single workplace, ranging anywhere from a dozen workers to several hundred, and would be managed by an elected worker council. Syndicates would be part of larger, economically rational units called combines, which would unite any number of syndicates in the same industry under the leadership of an elected committee. Each combine would be part of a manifold, which would organize the economic plans of an entire industry. In turn, each manifold would send to representatives to a National Congress of Workers, chaired by the People's Secretary for Labor.

The primary goal of this federal system was two-fold: to collect economic information to be used by the State Planning Commission to develop the economic plans, and then to carry out the updating plans set by StatePlan.

The Labor Secretariat would in turn set and enforce the rules of conduct within the industries. As part of Goldman's tenure, a comprehensive system of health and safety laws were passed. Child labor, previously prohibited by union rules, would now be comprehensively abolished. Strict workplace safety standards were enacted, along with the standardization of the five day, forty-hour work week. Women workers, a sizeable and growing part of the labor force, would be given state subsidized maternity leave, and a comprehensive system of government subsidized daycares were created by a joint trade union/government initiative.

People's Secretariat for Finance

Thomas G. Corcoran would have the unenviable duty of completely reorganizing the system of government finance from the ground up. He would have to do this while continuing to service American public debt owned by foreign nationals, lest a major international incident begin. America's previous systems of taxation at the federal level would no longer be viable in the post-revolutionary era. Similarly, provincial tax systems based upon the property tax were similarly obsolete.

Corcoran's creative solution to the dilemma was to pass the burden of taxation primarily from individuals to economic units. Based on the principal of public ownership of land and natural resources, a system of economic "rents" paid from a firm's surplus value would be the primary means of finance for both the Union and provincial governments.

The Comprehensive Finance Act would establish a dual federal and provincial tax system. Each economic firm, from the large industrial manifolds to local cooperatives, would pay a portion of its surplus value to the Finance Secretariat's provincial tax bureaus. The portion owed to the provincial government would then be paid to the province's Finance Secretariat. The portion owed to the Union government would collected, used to fund the operations of the government.

The Act would set variable rent rates based upon the health of an industry, and the gross amount of value-added. The tax system would also be used to subsidize critical industries and promote economic development in under developed areas, such as the American South, or Haiti.

People's Secretariat for Foreign Trade

Foreign trade in the UASR existed under the Union's state monopoly, and the critical job of managing trade with foreign nations, capitalist and socialist, would fall on academic Walter Lippmann. With a team of some of America's best economists, Lippmann set out to create a trade policy that would assist with development in America's allies, but not sell out the country to foreign capitalists.

The most critical trade policy in this era was the emerging trade relations with the Soviet Union. The USSR was rapidly industrializing, but faced critical shortages of basic industrial inputs, skilled labor, and consumer goods. Under the terms of the 1934 Moscow trade accords, America would provide free university education for the Soviet Union's best and brightest, who would return with the skills and expertise that would be of service to their mother country. America would provide a market for the USSR's Class A industrial goods in exchange for finished consumer goods. The American Union Bank would also arrange investment in the Soviet Union through the purchase of bonds.

Foreign trade and investment with Mexico was another key plank of the Foster-Reed doctrine. Mexico, as an allied developing nation under a left-wing social democratic government, would be a natural ally, and a perfect propaganda tool in the inevitable world revolution. Trade and aid to Mexico would be the tool used to transform Mexico into a first-world socialist state. The government of Mexico would enthusiastically comply. In Mexico from the 1930s to the 1950s, socialism would be synonymous with modernization.

Next installment: Agriculture, Education, and Public Safety
 
Interesting update. I get the feeling that the tension between the syndicalists and the communists is going to become much more explicit overtime, possibly leading to the split in the Worker's Party that's been hinted at thus far (Trotsky and Goldman leading a syndicalist-Trotskyist party to the left of the Communists?).

I'm also very interested in your next update. Having John Dewey at the head of Education is going to lead to some interesting developments in American education, as well as exacerbate the growing Trotskyist-Stalinist divide between the UASR and USSR, will it not? (IOTL, Dewey was a defender of Trotsky against Stalin's trumped up charges against him, IIRC). As for the Public Safety update, I'll be very interested in seeing how J. Edgar Hoover adapts to his new role as communist peacekeeper. :p

While we're on that subject, what has happened to the great bank robbers of OTL? Will Hoover be taking them out to pasture, or has this already happened ITTL?

My apologies for all the questions. ;)
 
Interesting update. I get the feeling that the tension between the syndicalists and the communists is going to become much more explicit overtime, possibly leading to the split in the Worker's Party that's been hinted at thus far (Trotsky and Goldman leading a syndicalist-Trotskyist party to the left of the Communists?).

I'm also very interested in your next update. Having John Dewey at the head of Education is going to lead to some interesting developments in American education, as well as exacerbate the growing Trotskyist-Stalinist divide between the UASR and USSR, will it not? (IOTL, Dewey was a defender of Trotsky against Stalin's trumped up charges against him, IIRC). As for the Public Safety update, I'll be very interested in seeing how J. Edgar Hoover adapts to his new role as communist peacekeeper. :p

Hoover would be looking for a way to A: secure his own position and B: undermine all of his enemies/rivals.

I'm also pretty sure that both of the two commie factions might try to have the other one "purged" sooner or later. Whether or not it ends up being a bloodbath worthy of Stalin is an open question.

While we're on that subject, what has happened to the great bank robbers of OTL? Will Hoover be taking them out to pasture, or has this already happened ITTL?

For all we know, people like Dillinger, Nelson, and Capone are working for Hoover as agents of the American version of the NKVD...
 
There was also mention of a president Dewey. Which one will it be? Thomas Dewey (He worked on the constitution) or John Dewey? I doubt, that so shortly after the revolution, a former Republican becomes president of a communist state.
 
There was also mention of a president Dewey. Which one will it be? Thomas Dewey (He worked on the constitution) or John Dewey? I doubt, that so shortly after the revolution, a former Republican becomes president of a communist state.
What makes you think he was ever a Republican ITTL?
 
Well...he was one IOTL :eek: Thomas Dewey at least ;)

IIRC, Tom Dewey was also the American Labor Party's choice for Attorney General of New York back in the day. Despite later becoming one of the GOP's red-baiters, Dewey himself was actually quite the progressive on the issues, so I can see him with the Worker's Party ITTL.
 
Last edited:
Was syndicalism popular with the radical left in the 30s in OTL? The IWW were syndicalists, the Trotskyists advocated workers councils and CPs traditionally viewed labor unions as "conveyor belts" between the decisions of the part/state and the working class. ITTL the union movement is more radicalized, Gomperism collapses and the IWW absorbs the union movement. My guess is that during the Revolution Solidarity seizes factories and industrial plant, so its a fait accompli anyway.

How democratic is Solidarity? How much authority to the locals have and how much does Stateplan have?

A state labor union with a revolutionary heritage run by an anarchist as a major means of government control! The ironies and cognitive dissonance become enormous. There's bound to be a collision.

The anarchist Paul Averrich wrote a popular high school textbook so there's an indication how it turns out.
 
Uncle Joe

How does a successful revolution in America effect the Soviet Union? Stalin had consolidated control by 1927. The bulk of the brutal land collectivization had been completed by the mid-30s. The personality cult was at its height but things were tense. By 36-37 Stalin himself was acting more than a little loopy and there's evidence he was clinically paranoid.

Stalin's climb to power was based on the necessity of building "socialism in one country". There's recent evidence from the Soviet archives that Trotsky (in absentia) was the central figure thoughout the purge trials, far more than was previously believed.

So a succesful socialist revolution in America-w/Trotsky playing a role is bound to have some effects. I don't see Stalin overthown right away but maybe a larger internal opposition. Especially true if there's massive UASR aid and large educational and cultural exchanges.

BTW, what does Trotsky do ITTL? Does he stay in Mexico City? Does he move back to NY and play a role in the UASR?
 
Was syndicalism popular with the radical left in the 30s in OTL? The IWW were syndicalists, the Trotskyists advocated workers councils and CPs traditionally viewed labor unions as "conveyor belts" between the decisions of the part/state and the working class. ITTL the union movement is more radicalized, Gomperism collapses and the IWW absorbs the union movement. My guess is that during the Revolution Solidarity seizes factories and industrial plant, so its a fait accompli anyway.
That was essentially the case. The factory occupations of the Revolution occurred under the direct management of Solidarity locals. And the new policies organizing industry based on trade union federations essentially formalizes what was already the case ITTL.

How democratic is Solidarity? How much authority to the locals have and how much does Stateplan have?

A state labor union with a revolutionary heritage run by an anarchist as a major means of government control! The ironies and cognitive dissonance become enormous. There's bound to be a collision.

The anarchist Paul Averrich wrote a popular high school textbook so there's an indication how it turns out.
During this period, most of the authority in Solidarity is in the locals, which roughly correspond to the combines in the new industrial organization model. As the 30s march on, that authority will shift towards the national executive of the unions, and to StatePlan. It will largely be accepted as a necessary measure to rebuild and modernize the economy, and prepare the country for war against the fascists. The tension will start immediately after the end of the Second World War, and the balance of power will bob back and forth over history.

One thing to keep mind is that ideologies ITTL may or may not be identical to IOTL. The way I see it, the distinctions between anarchism and Marxism will end up blurring considerably.
How does a successful revolution in America effect the Soviet Union? Stalin had consolidated control by 1927. The bulk of the brutal land collectivization had been completed by the mid-30s. The personality cult was at its height but things were tense. By 36-37 Stalin himself was acting more than a little loopy and there's evidence he was clinically paranoid.

Stalin's climb to power was based on the necessity of building "socialism in one country". There's recent evidence from the Soviet archives that Trotsky (in absentia) was the central figure thoughout the purge trials, far more than was previously believed.

So a succesful socialist revolution in America-w/Trotsky playing a role is bound to have some effects. I don't see Stalin overthown right away but maybe a larger internal opposition. Especially true if there's massive UASR aid and large educational and cultural exchanges.

BTW, what does Trotsky do ITTL? Does he stay in Mexico City? Does he move back to NY and play a role in the UASR?
Stalin and his close allies have majorly lost face over the American Revolution. To the extent American revolutionaries were successful, it was proportional to how much they ignored Moscow's dictates. The party cult is starting to collapse around him, and Stalin's inevitable reaction will be swifter and more brutal than IOTL, and will ultimately seal his fate.

Trotsky is currently residing in NY, and is applying for American citizenship. He occupies himself writing accounts of local politics in the wards of New York City. He has quickly become a bit of a national hero in America.
 
Top