A Red Dawn: American Revolution and Rebirth

What role will Hollywood play in this new socialist paradise? I'm particularly curious about Charles Chaplin, and Orson Welles.

On a side note, I wonder what form state architecture might take. Neo-Classicalism and Deco will almost certainly be rejected, the works of Wright will probably be deemed too bourgeois, but I'm not quite sure modernists such as Louis khan will fall into favor either.
 
I think here the British will invent the bomb first, seeing as all the Continental European scientists will probably migrate there. Even before WW2, the British had a skilled and prestigious physics research team that were looking into the atom. But, before the war, they were looking into a way to harness its energy to create fusion power and only begun to try and find out its potential with the start of the war. The Manhattan Project may have been led and held people like Einstein and Oppenheimer, but the British team members are not to be overlooked.
 
What role will Hollywood play in this new socialist paradise? I'm particularly curious about Charles Chaplin, and Orson Welles.

On a side note, I wonder what form state architecture might take. Neo-Classicalism and Deco will almost certainly be rejected, the works of Wright will probably be deemed too bourgeois, but I'm not quite sure modernists such as Louis khan will fall into favor either.
That will be coming up soon.
 
What role will Hollywood play in this new socialist paradise? I'm particularly curious about Charles Chaplin, and Orson Welles.

On a side note, I wonder what form state architecture might take. Neo-Classicalism and Deco will almost certainly be rejected, the works of Wright will probably be deemed too bourgeois, but I'm not quite sure modernists such as Louis khan will fall into favor either.

IOTL a lot of WPA architecture has a Stalinist, Socialist Realist feeling to it. The Bauhaus guys were in the US and in ITTL they may achieve official status.

In OTL Hollywood was controlled by commies anyway. ITTL there would be no Catholic Decency League:)

How about the Frankfurt School guys? Most of them were in the US IOTL by this time.
 
Dubya Dubya Too

ITTL Trotsky (and the UASR leadershiop) might see a war w/Germany as more of an anti-capitalist war than an anti-Nazi one.IOTL the price Britain had to pay for the US bailing them out was the liquidation of the Empire (or liquidation of the British sphere of influence, which amounted to the same thing). ITTL the demands from the UASR on the British would be much higher. Ruling circles in Britain might find an accomadation w/Hitler more acceptable-IOTL this prospect wasn't all that far fetched.

The situation for the US government in exile would be interesting. I could see it HQed in Alaska as sort of an unstable regime backed by the British, nervously watching the Japanese. Would this lead to a long term political division like West/East Germany, the PRC/Tawan? Or would the USA "white regime" end up an insignificant rump?

If Alaska/Hawaii are occupied by the British there would be no Pearl Harbor (Pearl Harbour in this world?)IOTL the US was involved in an unofficial naval war for 9 months before Pearl Harbor, so America might still enter the war.

Britain occupying terrotry claimed by the USAR would create a different configuration to WW II.Are the American people outraged about losing territory? On the other hand could the UASR somehow be regarded as a different country than the former United States? There might be propaganda to liberate Hawaiin and Filipino coolies "oppressed by the Dole family and their British/USA capitalist puppet lackeys" .

Japan continues expanding into the Pacific. The British Empire allied w/Japan against Germany? The UASR sitting it out as as a British-Soviet alliance fights Hitler?
 

Teleology

Banned
I think I like the idea of Trotsky as a celebrity and author better than the idea of him insinuating himself into USAR politics.
 
I think here the British will invent the bomb first, seeing as all the Continental European scientists will probably migrate there. Even before WW2, the British had a skilled and prestigious physics research team that were looking into the atom. But, before the war, they were looking into a way to harness its energy to create fusion power and only begun to try and find out its potential with the start of the war. The Manhattan Project may have been led and held people like Einstein and Oppenheimer, but the British team members are not to be overlooked.

I think it'll be a race between America and the British. Britain will probably win, but I'm not entirely sure considering the Americans will have Fuchs, Oppenheimer, Einstein, and less notable native-born Americans plus potential a slew of well trained Soviet and American spies.
 
alists, the Trotskyists advocated workers councils

It was the ultra left council Communists not the Troskyites who supported workers councils. Trotsky advocated the continuation of War Communism with the subordination of the trade unions to the party.
 
IOTL a lot of WPA architecture has a Stalinist, Socialist Realist feeling to it. The Bauhaus guys were in the US and in ITTL they may achieve official status.

In OTL Hollywood was controlled by commies anyway. ITTL there would be no Catholic Decency League:)

Hollywood was controlled by often conservative movie moguls such as Louis Mayers who was a Republican.
 
I would like what happens to Paul Robeson and Helen Keller is still alive in this period and she was a major Socialist and Labor activist. She could work in the Labor Department eliminating child labor and unsafe working conditions. Have you read the political text book Democracy for the Few by Michael Parenti?
 
Foster-Reed doctrine and effects in Latinamerica

Well the American Revolution has won. Seeing this more questions come.

People's Secretariat for Labor
...
Foreign trade and investment with Mexico was another key plank of the Foster-Reed doctrine. Mexico, as an allied developing nation under a left-wing social democratic government, would be a natural ally, and a perfect propaganda tool in the inevitable world revolution. Trade and aid to Mexico would be the tool used to transform Mexico into a first-world socialist state. The government of Mexico would enthusiastically comply. In Mexico from the 1930s to the 1950s, socialism would be synonymous with modernization.

...

Will the revolution be exported to the rest of Latin America? Having in mind that the old USA since the Monroe Doctrine and the Manifest Destiny considered the Western Hemisphere has a natural extension of its foreign (and sometimes domestic) policy, or it there will a a more radical Good Neighbor Policy like FDR's? or the ''promotion'' of socialist republics in the Americas? At least in OTL it existed briefly a Socialist Republic of Chile and there was the tenente revolts in Brazil and fairly numerous and important socialist party in Argentina.

Also, how will the development of events in Central America and the Caribbean be?, considering that the exiled counterrevolutionary government of the old USA is in Cuba

Anyway, good work Jelly Biafra.
 
It was the ultra left council Communists not the Troskyites who supported workers councils. Trotsky advocated the continuation of War Communism with the subordination of the trade unions to the party.

In 1920-21 Trotsky advocated subordinating labor unions to the state apparat, in effect militarizing labor.This was an attempt to deal with the horrible situation Russia faced after the Revolution and the almost complete destruction of industrial capacity after the Russian Civil War.Lenin thought this was unworkable and essentially talked Trotsky out of this idea.

US Trotskyist movements of the 1930s (IOTL)-James Cannon's CL, SWP, the Worker's Party and others advocated worker's councils. This is a demand of the Transistional Program and is part of the program of Trotskyist groups today.
 
I wonder what will happen to Franco and Spain, will he still attempt to seize power?

Will Japan stay neutral in WW2? Allie with the Anglo-French after WW2?


By 36-37 Stalin himself was acting more than a little loopy and there's evidence he was clinically paranoid.

Which might well be why he lived so long... ;)

Early rearmament could also be a bad thing, if it means that the *US Army gets stuck with large quantities of obsolete equipment in the way that the Italians did IOTL.

No, it would mean they can begin to give a good fight early. With more active military oriented industry, mobilisation will be faster.
Italian fight was bad because the majority of the Italians themself really didn´t have the atitude for it, not just because of light weaponery.
 
Last edited:
Policy updates, continued

The People's Secretariat for Agriculture

American agriculture, particularly in the Great Plains, was in a serious state of crisis when the Revolution began in early 1933. Low crop prices, massive land repossession, and drought conditions had already plagued Midwestern and Western communities. As these drought conditions continued to worsen, the agricultural crisis reached it's terrible apogee. The Dust Bowl, in which millions of tons of topsoil were blown away, ruined millions of hectares of farmland. The drought would continue to worsen leading into 1934, prompting one of the most drastic government industrial reorganizations in history.

It would be up to Henry Wallace and his advisers to plot the country's course through these treacherous waters. There were political concerns that had to be navigated as well as practical ones: in spite of the Party's pre-revolution propaganda romanticizing the American yeoman farmer, the Party favored farm collectivization to individual land ownership. Farmers were a core of the Party's constituency, and alienating them would be an inadvisable move.

The 1934 Basic Law contained a provision that declared all natural resources to be public property. But the provision was far from specific: was land a natural resource, to be owned publicly? Furthermore, though "prairie socialism" was a strong phenomenon, would the millions of American farmers who had lost their land accept moving onto a collective farm.

Regardless, there was real pressure to move forward with agriculture collectivization, and Wallace's eventual solutions were an innovative mixture of carrot and stick approaches. The Natural Resources Act of 1934 would declare all land, forests, mineral, animal and plant resources within the Union to be public property. A dual union-provincial agency, the Land and Natural Resource Trust (more commonly known as the Land Trust), was chartered to manage the allocation of common property. At its founding, all extant legitimate ownership titles (i.e., those not seized from those who supported the junta or nationalized by government) would be converted into stewardship titles.

Those holding stewardship titles were required to farm or otherwise work the land provided in their title to maintain rights to it. The amount of land stewarded was limited the amount that a single family, with no hired help, could reasonably be expected to cultivate (this limit based on household size of the title holder). Besides these restrictions, a stewardship title could not be revoked for any reason, and they could be inherited.

Land that had been most severely affected by the Dust Bowl would be nationalized: the Land Trust would pay farmers to give up their stewardship. Land purchased this way would be used to form agricultural cooperatives. These government supported collectives, patterned off Palestinian kibbutzim, would use techniques of soil conservation and industrialization to re-cultivate the land.

Farmers less severely affected were encouraged to charter farm collectives with their own stewardships. In exchange for collectivizing and forming new kibbutzim, they would receive technical assistance, price supports, and access to mechanization.

The kibbutz project, as it was later called, would be a considerable success and a model for future programs of voluntary collectivization. By 1940, 56% of American agricultural land throughout the Great Plains and Midwest had been collectivized. In the South, collectivization reached a plateau of nearly 80% by 1940.

Wallace used the project as a means of improving the health and efficiency of American agriculture. Hardier, higher yield hybrid strains of corn and wheat were promoted to increase productivity. A National Agricultural Research Center was established to continue developing and promoting new methods of increasing productivity.

The kibbutz project also contained subsidies to build small-scale light industries in the agricultural collectives to encourage a more even distribution between town and country, as Marx had argued for in The Communist Manifesto. One notable consequence was a revival of American breweries and distilleries, long in decline under the weight of state temperance laws. Before long, each kibbutz would have its own brewery and distillery.(1)

The People's Secretariat for Education

As part of Foster's Cultural Revolution, the entire American educational system, from top to bottom, would be totally restructured. As part of this ideological program, the old norms of hierarchical instruction were to be questioned and discarded wherever possible. The purpose of education would not be to make competent factory workers, or obedient soldiers, but thinking, reasoning and politically participating "socialist citizens".

John Dewey's school reforms would affect all levels of education, from the first grade to the university. As part of the program, traditional models of education emphasizing the regimented classroom with the dictatorial teacher would be discarded. The Deweyite school would place far more emphasis on active critical thinking and democratic discourse than it would on concerns such as attendance or punctuality. Problem solving and critical thinking would be promoted hand-in-hand with cooperative projects and civic service. Individual homework would be discarded in favor of collaborative projects; each individual would succeed or fail not only on their own brilliance, but on cultivating the talents and cooperation of their peers as well.

The new educational models heavily reflected Marxist-Leninist ideology, at least in its American expression. While the full effect of the new educational models, rapidly implemented in the mid 30s, would take decades to observe, there was little doubt among proponents and detractors that it would achieve much of what it aimed. What differed was only whether those effects would be reflected positively or negatively. Would the thinking, engaged democratic citizen be in practice little more than a herd animal, or would he become the citizen of the future the world over?

The other major educational reforms of the period were more structural than methodological. The 1934 Basic Law abolished private educational institutions, including parochial schools, and the mid 30s saw the continued battle to integrate former parochial school students into public school systems. Many feathers were ruffled, particularly among American Catholics, and the end of the Catholic educational system in America added further complexities to the growing theological disputes in Catholicism.(2)

Significant reforms were made to higher education as well. Federal and provincial support for higher education was substantially increased. Access to higher education would be made entirely free to individuals, opening up positions in all colleges and universities to be based solely on merit. Programs were established to increase the number of available slots for students at universities, and dozens of new universities were planned and chartered, some of which would eventually become among America's leaders in education.

School curricula reflected the new political climate in America. Though largely voluntary, the changes in educational curricula would be at the forefront of the Cultural Revolution, and would serve to create a "new mythology", with its own folk heroes and villains, as a new national historical and cultural narrative.(3)

The People's Secretariat for Public Safety

Originally formed out of the old National Bureau of Investigation and the United States Marshals Service, the People's Secretariat for Public Safety (informally SecPubSafe) would quickly become the UASR's dual public and secret national police force. Though largely manned by loyal party members during the 30s, it was quickly clear that it's executive officer, J. Edgar Hoover, was the one in complete control of the organization.

The public face of the SecPubSafe was its national police forces: train and shipping police, investigation units, border guards, archive guards, security for national public buildings and public officials, and the counterespionage service. It would also coordinate cooperation between provincial police forces, and take over in cases of major disasters. However, SecPubSafe contained its own secret, paramilitary police forces and espionage services. Many of the public organizations within the Secretariat also had classified divisions and secret functions. The secret police functions were under the direct control of the internal Commissariat for State Security (CSS).

Though J. Edgar Hoover had been welcomed onto the Central Committee for his role in the end of the Civil War, he was far from trusted by the rest of the political establishment. His outing as a homosexual by the Justice Secretariat's tolerance campaigns was a proverbial shot across the bow: so far he had been depicted as a wholesome patriot, ordinary and normal in every other way. His sexual proclivities, so far, had remained unmentioned.

His own organization was quickly staffed with persons whose loyalties to Hoover were dubious, but were unquestionable with regards to the Revolution. At any rate, Hoover got the message: play by the rules and do your duty, and we can have an understanding. Hoover set out to secure his position by proving where his loyalties lay.

SecPubSafe would play an integral role in the Red Terror. CSS special agents, armed with modern forensics techniques, wiretapping, Thompson submachine guns and Model 1911 autopistols, would scour the nation for paramilitaries and enemies of the state hiding out from the end of the Civil War.

The CSS would wage a two front campaign throughout the country: counterrevolutionaries would be isolated from potential sympathizers through propaganda and careful politics. Then they would be sniffed out and eliminated. The archetype of this campaign was the CSS's purge of the remnants of the KKK and other paramilitaries in the South. Isolated from sympathizers such as backwoods moonshiners by repeals of temperance laws and alcohol excises, and development programs, KKK cells were forced to undertake much more visible means of support. Following the chains of robberies, CSS units tracked down these cells. More often than not, they did not bother to take prisoners.

While many higher ranking officials in the KKK were given the People's Tribunal treatment, most rank and file militants from all groups were given far less luxurious treatment. On many occasions, captured counterrevolutionaries would be summarily executed. Hundreds, perhaps thousands more were killed trying to evade capture.

The purges and arrests were not contained to backwoods guerillas either. Southern officials in the Right Democrats or of dubious loyalty were often framed, disgraced or arrested by CSS agents. Several were outright assassinated by Public Safety. CSS largely obeyed the restrictions of its mandate: union members and members of the Worker's Party or the Left Democrats were immune from the secret police treatment. Dealing with corrupt or disloyal officials in the aforementioned organizations were dealt with by the regular forces of SecPubSafe.

1. This subject will be covered in more depth in later cultural updates. Rest assured, changes in eating and drinking habits will not be missed in cultural updates. I just do not want to clutter policy updates too much.

2. This will also be the subject of its own update(s). Religion during the Cultural Revolution will get its own full update, and the policies of major organizations, such as the Catholic Church will also be examined.

3. This will probably be the first update after I'm finished with policy updates.

Next Update: Railways, Communication, Maritime Transport
 
You know the acronym for the National Agricultural Research Center is NARC. :D

Just letting you know.

Also, with this huge increase in the power of the USAR central government, there could be a reaction against this in the future, maybe with the Democrats becoming more of a state's rights party in the future, maybe even becoming the ruling party for a while, until they privatize too much and cut back on too many government programs.
 
Last edited:
I can imagine a SNL analogue making fun of the acronym.

"I want to become a NARC!"

"A what!?"

"A member of the National Agricultural Research Center silly!"

"Okay dear, we thought you wanted to become something worse."
 
Top