Salazar and Franco were clearly more moderate than "fascists" also they lacked desire to completely reshape society around their views, which is the core tenet of fascism.
To say that Franco did not create a totalitarian regime is strange. It may not have been hysterically demonic like the Nazi regime or Mussolini's colorful populism, but all the elements of totalitarianism - secret police, one party, repression, the title of Caudillo, imitation of the Reich and Italy (Roman salute, one nation-party-leader).
When the Axis lost, of course Franco "liberalized" so as not to follow them and enlist the support of the United States. With an Axis victory, will Franco "liberalized"?
Bunya irl is not a well known figure as far as political views are included, so I'd argue devs could write him as any flavor of right wing they want him to be.
About Bunyachenko. He does everything that the fascist leaders in Europe did. Perhaps he does it without "gamer moments". Carefully, systematically, without hysteria, but he is building a state where all power belongs only to him, the economy is subordinate to the state and is aimed at creating a powerful military machine, and the population follows only one goal - "national revival."
Did you play him?
Bunyachenko has absolute power in Russia. In fact, there is not even a strong ruling party.
In the entire game, he does not have any power struggle after he destroys Octane's supporters. Further, he weakens the military elites of the ROA, creating civilian authorities that are completely subordinate to him.
LMAO, Yazov has less power than Bunya. You can compare Bunya with Rodz or Velimir in terms of absolute power.
I think it is his non-demonstrativeness (Bunyachenko does not yell sig heil with foam on his lips) that misleads people. I would say that Bunyachenko is a "
smart fascist".