It has some parallels to Francoist Spain in some ways, but it’s also different. In Eastern Europe monarchism and Russian Orthodoxy have experienced a massive revival in reaction to the collapse of the Soviet system. It’s definitely a Constitutional Monarchy, but more akin to the 1905 Empire under Stolypin. The Vozhd here essentially established a more authoritarian regime with the monarchy more a figurehead for legitimacy. Though the Parliament functions as a powerless institutions so that there’s a means of controlled opposition. It also provides the illusion of popular support behind the government.What is Putinist-Tsarist Russia like? Any major differences, aside from being an authoritarian monarchy born from a civil war instead of an authoritarian republic born from a largely bloodless collapse, between it and the Russian Federation IOTL?
Russia here has a more tense relations with its neighbors like Poland and Ukraine. Though here Russia is a bit bigger as it includes Kazakhstan and Belarus.
So while it wouldn’t be a Cold War 2.0, the world would instead be more of a multipolar world after the fall of the USSR.
Not so sure. The Romanovs would not really want to become figurehead monarchs to what’s essentially a Crowned Republic like in the UK or Spain. Though I could see the next generation of royals getting sick of Putin and engineering a popular “self-coup” against him. I could see them look to Greece as an example of a successful moderate monarchist nation.I wonder if the restored Tsar could play a role similar to the king in Spain, backing a transition to democracy post-Putin? (Of course, we are talking Romanovs here... )
Last edited: