Hello everybody,
I have seen a number of posts talking about a KMT civil war victory scenario. I'm going to offer my input based on information I have found online. In my scenario, I'm assuming a KMT total victory over the Communists, establishing a Republic of China with Nanking as the Capital.
1) I have found a link on the Office of the Historian (US department of state) website with a record of the KMT statement, identifying their intentions for post war China's economy and reconstruction. Here is the link as follows:
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945v07/d997
Based on this link, the KMT intended to have State Owned Enterprises and free enterprise. They wanted to attract foreign capital so a License Raj type import substitution economy may be out of the question. The KMT mention tariffs so protection of local industries will be there. Furthermore, state monopolies will be kept for things like Telecom, Defense Industry, and post Office. Any industry where private capital is insufficient will have State owned enterprises or even joint ventures. If the KMT follow this plan, there will be state owned enterprises in China's auto sector, machinery, mining, oil, gas, etc. There would also likely be joint ventures in these areas esp with US companies. The key here is that the KMT wanted State owned enterprises to be run like Private companies and be treated as such. They may be LESS statist than OTL PRC as I've found that despite the similarities between the KMT and CCP, the KMT always represented a less extreme version of China. There will of course be private companies as well.
One thing the KMT economic plan fails to mention are land reform and exports. In OTL, Chiang Kai Shek wanted to do land reform because he viewed it as secondary compared with his conflict against the Communists. If Chiang retains control of China, he will do things gradually and it will take time. Landlords will be given shares to hold in Companies (maybe mixed ownership SOEs) and others will open factories and become small-medium business owners. Chen Cheng did land reform in Hubei, which served as a model for what the KMT in our timeline did in Taiwan. KMT may also adopt export oriented growth and if the US is willing to open their markets, it could create a trade war scenario the US had with Japan in the 1980s. Maybe KMT China will have to sign a plaza accord or something along those lines.
2) KMT foreign relations, esp with the US will be interesting. I have found another link on the Office of the Historian Website, outlining the American intention of negotiating a treaty of friendship, navigation, and commerce with the KMT: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945v07/d967
I believe such a document will set the tone for a ROC-US post war relationship. Things like the South China Sea, tech transfers, IP, and such can be laid out and the contents could be adjusted from time to time via negotiation. One potential issue could involve IP as the US might let ROC citizens work in various American industries.
3) In terms of Chinese society, KMT may switch to simplified characters. In OTL, they used traditional on Taiwan to make a statement and differentiate themselves from the PRC. If the Republic goes well post war in China, than Chinese literature and cinema could thrive. Lao She and Lin Yutang, among others could lead a renaissance of Chinese literature. Chinese cinema, like the shaw brothers and TVB will stay in Shanghai and Canton. Let us not forget all the talented human resources that would have otherwise stayed in China had the CCP not won in 1949. Chinese traditional culture and values will serve as a check against too much emphasis on money.
4) Chinese politics is interesting. KMT was corrupt at all levels before the war but it was gradually, slowly getting under control. The war with Japan increased corruption within the KMT and Chiang knew he had to do something. He did not feel safe tackling corruption while fighting the Japanese and Communists because any action could have destroyed the KMT warlord faction foundation, making them even more vulnerable. Post war KMT China will trend towards unification so nobody will accept any warlord BS. Chiang can consolidate power and force the warlords to play ball. Many lost their power base due to the war. The only ones who had enough power were the Ma Clique and those dudes were loyal to Chiang. Post war KMT China will see Chiang consolidate power and target corruption with his son, Chen Cheng, etc. It won't be easy but Chiang will not be idle.
I also do not believe that Chiang will be a dictator in a KMT China like he was in Taiwan. In Taiwan, he had a siege mentality, with a behemoth Communist China threatening nearby. If KMT controls China post war, he will not have that feeling...unless he sees the Soviets as a problem. The KMT-Soviet relationship will be hot-cold with a cooling feeling and Chiang, being realistic, will know that China cannot afford to poke the Bear due to a lack of strength. Chiang also ran elections in 1947-48 on China and accepted some kind of democratization to appease his critics. KMT China won't be a full on one man dictatorship because they will accept SOME degree of dissent. They will be kinda democratic and further pressure to liberalize in the 60s and 70s may create a full democracy.
In regards to Taiwan, it won't be all perfect. While a KMT victory would ensure that the Republic of China control Taiwan as a province, lets not forget that Chen Yi instigated the 228 incident. Furthermore, the Taiwanese locals were suspicious of the KMT. Taiwanese identity and unique history may create independence parties in Taiwan under Republic of China Rule....DPP anybody haha
I have seen a number of posts talking about a KMT civil war victory scenario. I'm going to offer my input based on information I have found online. In my scenario, I'm assuming a KMT total victory over the Communists, establishing a Republic of China with Nanking as the Capital.
1) I have found a link on the Office of the Historian (US department of state) website with a record of the KMT statement, identifying their intentions for post war China's economy and reconstruction. Here is the link as follows:
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945v07/d997
Based on this link, the KMT intended to have State Owned Enterprises and free enterprise. They wanted to attract foreign capital so a License Raj type import substitution economy may be out of the question. The KMT mention tariffs so protection of local industries will be there. Furthermore, state monopolies will be kept for things like Telecom, Defense Industry, and post Office. Any industry where private capital is insufficient will have State owned enterprises or even joint ventures. If the KMT follow this plan, there will be state owned enterprises in China's auto sector, machinery, mining, oil, gas, etc. There would also likely be joint ventures in these areas esp with US companies. The key here is that the KMT wanted State owned enterprises to be run like Private companies and be treated as such. They may be LESS statist than OTL PRC as I've found that despite the similarities between the KMT and CCP, the KMT always represented a less extreme version of China. There will of course be private companies as well.
One thing the KMT economic plan fails to mention are land reform and exports. In OTL, Chiang Kai Shek wanted to do land reform because he viewed it as secondary compared with his conflict against the Communists. If Chiang retains control of China, he will do things gradually and it will take time. Landlords will be given shares to hold in Companies (maybe mixed ownership SOEs) and others will open factories and become small-medium business owners. Chen Cheng did land reform in Hubei, which served as a model for what the KMT in our timeline did in Taiwan. KMT may also adopt export oriented growth and if the US is willing to open their markets, it could create a trade war scenario the US had with Japan in the 1980s. Maybe KMT China will have to sign a plaza accord or something along those lines.
2) KMT foreign relations, esp with the US will be interesting. I have found another link on the Office of the Historian Website, outlining the American intention of negotiating a treaty of friendship, navigation, and commerce with the KMT: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945v07/d967
I believe such a document will set the tone for a ROC-US post war relationship. Things like the South China Sea, tech transfers, IP, and such can be laid out and the contents could be adjusted from time to time via negotiation. One potential issue could involve IP as the US might let ROC citizens work in various American industries.
3) In terms of Chinese society, KMT may switch to simplified characters. In OTL, they used traditional on Taiwan to make a statement and differentiate themselves from the PRC. If the Republic goes well post war in China, than Chinese literature and cinema could thrive. Lao She and Lin Yutang, among others could lead a renaissance of Chinese literature. Chinese cinema, like the shaw brothers and TVB will stay in Shanghai and Canton. Let us not forget all the talented human resources that would have otherwise stayed in China had the CCP not won in 1949. Chinese traditional culture and values will serve as a check against too much emphasis on money.
4) Chinese politics is interesting. KMT was corrupt at all levels before the war but it was gradually, slowly getting under control. The war with Japan increased corruption within the KMT and Chiang knew he had to do something. He did not feel safe tackling corruption while fighting the Japanese and Communists because any action could have destroyed the KMT warlord faction foundation, making them even more vulnerable. Post war KMT China will trend towards unification so nobody will accept any warlord BS. Chiang can consolidate power and force the warlords to play ball. Many lost their power base due to the war. The only ones who had enough power were the Ma Clique and those dudes were loyal to Chiang. Post war KMT China will see Chiang consolidate power and target corruption with his son, Chen Cheng, etc. It won't be easy but Chiang will not be idle.
I also do not believe that Chiang will be a dictator in a KMT China like he was in Taiwan. In Taiwan, he had a siege mentality, with a behemoth Communist China threatening nearby. If KMT controls China post war, he will not have that feeling...unless he sees the Soviets as a problem. The KMT-Soviet relationship will be hot-cold with a cooling feeling and Chiang, being realistic, will know that China cannot afford to poke the Bear due to a lack of strength. Chiang also ran elections in 1947-48 on China and accepted some kind of democratization to appease his critics. KMT China won't be a full on one man dictatorship because they will accept SOME degree of dissent. They will be kinda democratic and further pressure to liberalize in the 60s and 70s may create a full democracy.
In regards to Taiwan, it won't be all perfect. While a KMT victory would ensure that the Republic of China control Taiwan as a province, lets not forget that Chen Yi instigated the 228 incident. Furthermore, the Taiwanese locals were suspicious of the KMT. Taiwanese identity and unique history may create independence parties in Taiwan under Republic of China Rule....DPP anybody haha
Last edited: