What writing style do you prefer?


  • Total voters
    78
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Chess Board is Set Up. White move first.


“God has numbered the days of your reign and brought it to an end; You had been weighed and found wanting; Your kingdom will be divided and given away”. Book of Daniel, 5:25​


The year of the Lord 1211

When the year start, both Philip Augustus and John Lackland prepare to fight against each other once again, as the truce will end in September. Both count theirs friends and enemies.

Philips know that aside of the direct territories controlled by him, he can also count on Brittany and Artois, Burgundy, Champagne (well, most of it), Blois, Dreux, Montfort, Auxerre and Tonnerre (controlled by his relative Pierre of Courtenay), Sancerre and Bourbon. The most delicate issue remains the Flemish one. The young Joan, countess of Flanders and Hainault, was in his control and betrothed to his cousin Pierre of Dreux, but she do not have any real control on the counties as everybody, from nobles to town’s bourgeoisie, reject her rule on the grounds of being French puppet. He knows that the Aquitanian nobles were not very trusty and they submitted only formal to him. Concerning the external allies, Philip could count only the claimant of the Imperial throne, the 17 year old Frederick Hohenstaufen king of Sicily and, ally of convenience, the Sanctity Pope Innocent III, now in struggle with John.

On the other hand, John can trust his money. Money that could rise a mighty army, pay a strong fleet and fuel his external alliances. While he had strong external allies, he do not have many internal ones. The barons despise him especially for his cowardice in battle but John was decided to change his nicknames from Softsword to Strongsword. He start the year with a series of lighting campaigns against Scots, Welsh and Irish.

Sadly, the historians tends to not give the right importance to his victories, as well as to John management qualities. Those are perhaps the greatest injustices made to this king.

In one single year (well, he start on previous one), John crushed the Scots in a succession of battles and took many of their castles on the southern border, captured their king William and force him to pay homage for the entire kingdom of Scotland and pay 10.000 marks. He repaired the damage made by the mighty praised Richard Lionhart who had sell his feudal right on Scotland established by his father for 10.000 marks, sum that he obtained it back.

With the Treaty of Falaise resurrected. John marched against the rebellious Llywelyn the Great, Prince of Gwynedd and de facto ruler over most of Wales. This was both a military victory and a political one. The prince was forced to accept the royal authority over most of his lands and pay homage to John, who used the marcher lords to kip the Welsh contained.

After this victory, John crossed the Irish Sea with more than 1000 knight and many foot soldiers and crush the rebellion, establishing once again his control over all of Ireland. He named Hugue of Lacy, freshly returned from crusade, as his Justiciar and enforce upon the Irish and Anglo-Norman barons a charter to order compliance with English laws and customs.

Troubles in Flanders - A false Baldwin?

In the beginning of the summer of 1211, Philip Augustus make the move that was cataloged by the historians as the start of the troubles. On the Sunday of 5 June, in Lille, the wedding between 24 years old Pierre of Dreux and 17 years old Joan was lavishly celebrated, but the ambiance was tense as most of the Flemish barons refuse to participate.

Soon after, in Gand, a popular revolt besiege the count loyal garrison inside the castle. When a relief force, make mostly from French troops arrived to the city and put it to the siege, a general revolt followed. Nobles and citizens rally to the banners of a strange man. A man who just arrived and declared the he was Baldwin, the true count and former Emperor of Constantinople, who had survived from the Battle of Adrianople and returned to retake his lands. He was meet with such popular enthusiasm that nobody bother to ask him about delicate and private details like from where he had so much money...

The French army in Flanders was slaughter and very quick the entire region was completely out of French control. The single loyal remaining city was Lille, who was quickly fortified and the garrison strengthen. Soon, the Emperor Otto IV sent envoy to recognise Baldwin as rightful count of Hainaut (fief of the Empire) and Flanders, as well as did John. Baldwin pay homage to John for Flanders and to Otto for Hainaut and expected help, help materialized by a force of English mercenaries arrived at Dames and lead by nobody than William Longsword, half-brother of the King of England.

The King Trial

In reaction, the King Philip Augustus call the Baron Assembly. He invite the self-declared Baldwin to come to the assembly in order to be questioned about the identity and to be recognized as he was really was. He publicly accused John for truce braking. Also, John received a summon to be judged for his crimes.

The Barons of France gather at Amiens on the 29 August, the feast of martyrdom of Saint John the Baptist. Recently Amiens acquired a tremendous important relic, brought by Wallon de Sarton from Constantinople after the sack of the city – the head of the Saint John. The chosen date and place were highly symbolic. Of course, neither Jon nor Baldwin were presents. After the mass, the barons gather for the John trial. John was formally accused for murdering Arthur of Brittany and disobeying the King call as his vassal. In the witness stand was William de Braose, a man who once was John the most trusting man.

De Braose related to everybody what happened to Arthur and swear that John had killed his nephew with his own hands, being drank on the Thursday before Ester in 1204. The details stunned the nobility of France who, in unanimity, declared John forfeit of his all properties and titles, including the throne of England. As an excommunicated felon and murderer, he will be disposed and the throne of England will be awarded to Prince Louis, Duke of Brittany, by right of his wife, the true heiress of the Kingdom.

The second item on the list was Baldwin case. As he was not present, refusing to summon at the king call and paying homage to an accursed king, enemy of the Church and of the Kingdom, he is not the true Baldwin and so the rightful count is Joan.

The barons swear to help these two injustices to be punish and to defend their King against his enemies. A papal legate confirm the disposition against John and right of Prince Louis to the throne. Even more, he promised a crusade against the excommunicated king, a "tyrant who committed disgraceful crimes", mandating Philip and Louis to organizing and leading it.

With the same occasion, the King and the recently elected Bishop of Amiens, Évrard de Fouilloy, give a charter to rebuild the Cathedral in the same fashion as the one built in Paris, dedicated to Saint John the Baptist[1]. From now the Amiens become an important place of pilgrimage for the entire Christendom.

The King of England receive a formal letter announcing his trial and condemnation. The letter start with the scripture passage: “Mene, Mene, Tekel, uPharsin”.

A Royal army was sent to Gascony to put in place the decision of confiscation. The Gascons lords were in doubt. What they prefer the most? An absent and far away king-duke, even if incompetent and malicious, or a strong and more closely king with great prestige, acting rightfully, but maybe not so willing to let them to do whatever they pleased? For the moment they prefers to stay apart and watch.

Rumors start to spread that John had sent a diplomatic mission formed by the King’s men Thomas of Erdington and Ralph fiz Nicolas and the royal clerk Robert of London[2] to Mohammed al-Nasir, the emir of Morocco with the instruction of paying homage to him and offer John conversion to Islam in exchange of protection, but the emir was so disgusted about the proposal than he rejected it with anger. As the historians later clarified, the mission was real but the purpose was to sign some commercial treaties, nothing more. It was another example of Capetian propaganda, helped by the “battalions of hostile monks”][3].

----------------
Main Sources:
Wikipedia
“The Household Knights of King John” by S. D. Church
“Blood Cries Afar: The Forgotten Invasion of England 1216” by Sean McGlynn
"La condamnation de Jean Sans-Terre par les pairs de France" by Paul Guilhiermoz and Charles Bémont
---
[1] The Cathedral of Amiens start to be built in Gothic stile in 1220 by the same Évrard de Fouilloy
[2] From “The Household Knights of King John” by S. D. Church
][3] From “Blood Cries Afar: The Forgotten Invasion of England 1216” by Sean McGlynn
 
Last edited:
Does the French nobles have the right to legally declare John forfeit to the throne of England?I think not.Otherwise,everything's fine.
 
Does the French nobles have the right to legally declare John forfeit to the throne of England?I think not.Otherwise,everything's fine.

Ok, it's not quite legal, but the Pope done it both OTL and ITTL, so they could claim that it's just an enforcing of the Papal decision. A trial of his pears (John is considered also Duke of Aquitaine).

Also the same justification it seems to be used OTL by Philip and his son, even if it was a shaking one...
 
Even more, he promised a crusade against the excommunicated king, a "tyrant who committed disgraceful crimes", mandating Philip and Louis to organizing and leading it.
Rumors start to spread that John had sent a diplomatic mission formed by the King’s men Thomas of Erdington and Ralph fiz Nicolas and the royal clerk Robert of London[FONT=&quot][2][/FONT] to Mohammed al-Nasir, the emir of Morocco with the instruction of paying homage to him and offer to John conversion to Islam in exchange of protection, but the emir was so disgusted about the proposal than he rejected it with anger.
Eh bé! You could say half the Christendom isn"t Christian looking at this...
->John Excommunicated/Rumored muslim
->Otto IV : going against the pope, probably excommunicated too...
and poof! In the West, only Scandinavia, Poland and France/Iberia are still in the Pope's favor.
 
Ok, it's not quite legal, but the Pope done it both OTL and ITTL, so they could claim that it's just an enforcing of the Papal decision. A trial of his pears (John is considered also Duke of Aquitaine).

Also the same justification it seems to be used OTL by Philip and his son, even if it was a shaking one...

For the French readers there is a source available on net:
"La condamnation de Jean Sans-Terre par les pairs de France" by Paul Guilhiermoz , Charles Bémont where it's specified that Louis VIII use that argument to the papal legate Wendover in 1216:
« Jean, soi-disant roi d’Angleterre, avait été condamné à mort dans sa courte pour le meurtre d’Arthur »

Persee, Review Historique- Bibliothèque de l'école des chartes lien Année 1899 lien Volume 60 lien Numéro 60 lien pp. 363-372
 
Last edited:
Eh bé! You could say half the Christendom isn"t Christian looking at this...
->John Excommunicated/Rumored muslim
->Otto IV : going against the pope, probably excommunicated too...
and poof! In the West, only Scandinavia, Poland and France/Iberia are still in the Pope's favor.

Iberia? uh, the Pope favorite sport is to excommunicate the Iberian kings because of freaking intermarrying..... The Tasmaras and Hapsburg do not invented the wheel...
And France was not quite buddy-buddy with the Pope either... remember the Ingeborg situation...
 
Iberia? uh, the Pope favorite sport is to excommunicate the Iberian kings because of freaking intermarrying..... The Tasmaras and Hapsburg do not invented the wheel...
And France was not quite buddy-buddy with the Pope either... remember the Ingeborg situation...
Then was only Poland of true Catholic? :p
France was still the "Fille ainée de l'Eglise". Must count for something?
 
Then was only Poland of true Catholic? :p
France was still the "Fille ainée de l'Eglise". Must count for something?
France yes, but his king is not quite a true Catholic in the eyes of the Pope... Now, yes, they are allies, but just formal ones...

I'm wondering if the Pope Innocent III also is a true Catholic... uh... was just a thought...
 
France yes, but his king is not quite a true Catholic in the eyes of the Pope... Now, yes, they are allies, but just formal ones...

I'm wondering if the Pope Innocent III also is a true Catholic... uh... was just a thought...
Religion actually WAS Politics through another medium.
Napoleon was right to say "treat the pope as if he had a 10000 man army". Here it's even more, like 50k men...
So, when do we get Avignon? I don't record when exactly it started IOTL, but it was in that century.
 
Religion actually WAS Politics through another medium.
Napoleon was right to say "treat the pope as if he had a 10000 man army". Here it's even more, like 50k men...
So, when do we get Avignon? I don't record when exactly it started IOTL, but it was in that century.

I'm sadly to disappoint you but I do not think that we'll have Avignon TTL...
As for Innocent III - he had a real army of many k men :D
 

The Albigensian Crusade

The year of the Lord 1212

When Herve of Donzy found that his only son and heir, Guillaume, was slain was a ravaged men. When he had evidences that the Count of Toulouse was behind it, he become crazy for revenge. The war between the two start a year before, but it was 1212 were the most events happened.

First, he obtained from Pope re-excommunication of Raymond of Toulouse for attacking the crusaders and the seizure of his all properties who were awarded to Donzy: the county of Toulouse, Saint-Gilles, Rouergue, Narbonne, the marches of Gothie and Provence. Then he move to conquer those lands.

Deprived theoretically of his titles, Raymond had the loyalty of the entire south. His banner became the rally point of the resistance against the crusaders and the northerners. He asked the help of his brother-in-law, the King of Aragon who was concerned as well about the crusade. At the end of the previous year he pay homage to him for all his lands.

In March, King Peter crossed once again the Pyrenees with a strong force. Many other southern nobles come to his help. In one skirmish, Peter and Raymond captured, Baldwin of Toulouse, the own brother of the count who fight for the crusaders. After a summary trial, Baldwin was hang on the walls of Toulouse for treason. With many towns rejecting the rule of Herve of Donzy, it seems that the crusade will felt away...

Still, in the beginning of May, the crusaders won an important victory on the plain outside Castelnaudary[1] where they crushed a vastly superior number of enemies, poorly lead and placed. In the battle, the King of Aragon was nearly slayed, escaping with life only grace of his thought armour and the devotement of some of his bodyguards who carry him from the battlefield unconscious and badly wounded. That wound will prevent him to ever mount a horse all the rest of his life.

The count Raymond was not so lucky… he was captured and put in prison, forced to sign a renunciation of all his lands and titles to Herve of Donzy. Still, it seems that the signature was falsified or obtained under torture, as he soon deny that he had done such thing. Nobody ever see the count again. The flag of resistance was taken by his son, who become of Raymond VII of Toulouse. At least in the eyes of some.

Returned to Barcelona, the King Peter was recovering when a message from the Pope come to inform him that, under the threat of excommunication[2], he should participating with all his forces to the new crusade launched against the Moors and not do any harm against Donzy. This was a wound even worse than the one he received at Castelnaudary for the “Catholic King”, crowned by the Pope itself.


--------------
Main Source: Wikipedia

[1] It’s similar with the OTL Battle of Muret.

[2] After the OTL battle of Muret, were Peter was slain, his body was excommunicated.
 
Last edited:
Well, Donzy seems to win his much wanted trophy... but can he establish a durable control of the region? or he will be kick out like Montfort OTL? :confused:

Next update: the Iberian Crusade :eek::eek::eek:
 
Oh well, he's a Northerner. Only the King of all northerners can durably own the South.
Iberian crusade... it sounds like a meat-mincer, don't you think?
 

The Iberian Crusade


"Blessed be the Lord, my rock,
who trains my hands for war,
and my fingers for battle;
my rock and my fortress,
my stronghold and my deliverer,
my shield and he in whom I take refuge,
who subdues the peoples under him!”.
Psalm 144[1]


Monday 2 July 1212, Las Navas de Tolossa [2]

The Almohad Caliph/Sultan/Emir Muhammad Al-Nasir, continuing his father legacy who crushed the Christians in 1185 at Alcatros and retook several cities and towns, was decided to reconquer the lost lands and his principal target was Toledo and Kingdom of Castile.

Seeing the thread approaching and the lack of allies, the King Alphonso VIII of Castile, called the Noble, knew that only a common effort of all Christian kingdoms could stop the Moors. But only one man in the world could achieve that. He worked together with the archbishop of Toledo Rodrigo, Jiménez of Rada, convinced the Pope to lunch a new Crusade, this time against the infidels who were just next door to the main kingdoms of Christianity. It was the third Crusade preached by the mighty Pope Innocent, after the one who failed to reach Cairo and consider that Constantinople is also good enough and the other that is still burning down the heresy in the Languedoc.

The greatest achievement was not the arriving of many crusaders from the entire Christendom (who soon become very deceived and they mostly left), but the alliance between the five Christian kingdoms of the peninsula. The three "Alfonso", the VIII of Castile, the IX of Leon and the II of Portugal, joined with Sancho VII of Navarra and Peter II of Aragon, setting apart their rivalry and hate. Still, the king of Portugal do not come, preferring to continue his own attacks against the Almohads, while the king of Aragon was carried to the battlefield to inspire the men but it will not take any active role, being wounded.

After The Muslim text al-Marrakushi, al-Mu’jib, relate the events:The Commander of the Faithful left Jaen and encountered Alfonso – may God curse him – at a place called al-‘Iqab, near the castle called Hisn Salim [...] at the end of Safar, 609[3]

The true numbers are disputed, ranging from 40.000 Cristian and 180.000 Muslims to 10.000 versus 20.000. Concerning the big number of volunteers that left the crusade after the Jews massacre in Toledo, we tend to accept that the Christians were at least 10.000 but not more than 12.000 combatants, of which approx. 3.000 cavalry and the rest infantry, while the Muslims were between 32 and 36.000 men, of which 8-12.000 cavalry. The bulk of Crusaders forces were made by Castilians, reinforced with the holy orders, especially the Orders of Santiago and Calatrava, but also Templars, Hospitals and even Teutons. The contingents brought by the three other kings were smaller than expected. The papal legate, Arnaud Amaury, commanded a small force made up by french volunteers.

Alphonso of Castile complains in a letter to the Pope of the lack of help form his allies: “The King of Aragon joined us, he having brought only a small number of noble knights in his army[4]; and the King of Navarre, who similarly was accompanied by a force of scarcely 200 knights, while the King of Leon and Galicia had even less”[5].

The Cristian army dress in three battles and three lines: the wing left, commanded by Alphonso of Leon, seconded by Peter of Aragon, the right wing, commanded by Sancho of Navarre and the center commanded by Alphonso of Castile, seconded by the Archbishop of Toledo and Gonzalo Nunez de Lara. The vanguard, composed by light troops and volunteers, was under the command of Diego Lopez de Haro, lord of Biscay and one of the biggest Castilians magnates that had received from the King the governments of Old Castile in 1210, Asturias de Santillana in 1211 and Álava in 1213. The priests pass between ranks giving the Holy Communion and remember the soldiers that the Pope had absolved them for their sins.

The Muslim army, was also deployed in several groups: the Berber and Arab light cavalry was split on each wings and the center was made by several lines of entrenched infantry, supported by the heavy Almohad and Andalusian cavalry while the Caliph stay behind with his fortified slave-guards and loyal troops on each wing. The command of the center was trusted to the cadi of Marrakesh, Abu Abd-Allah al Husayni. Despised the numerical advantage, the Almohad army adopted a more defensive position, occupying the hill at the edge of the plain and fortifying it. This army was also plagued by lack of trust and coherence. The Moors did not trust the Arabs, Arabs do not trust nobody and nobody the Arabs, the Andalusians the Berbers and the Berbers each others, consisting of mostly hostile tribes and black slaves were more afraid of their masters' whips than of Christians’ spears. Still, despite their heterogeneous composition and the hate between them, they all cries “Allahu Akbar” and "God alone is true, and Satan is a betrayer" at unison. The Caliph, with his scimitar in right hand and the Koran in the left one, encourage his men with words as "Our horses will soon drink water from Tiber" but also with words form the Muslim Holiest book: "He read those passages of inspiration to the Muslims which promised the delights of Paradise to those who should fall in a holy war and the torments of hell to the coward who desert his ranks".

navas11.jpg

The disposition of both armies at Las Navas de Tolosa. The king of Leon was on the left flank with the king of Aragon


The Battle start with the Muslim cavalry attacks on the wings, followed by massive arrow storm from all the line, trying to soften the enemy and, if possible to go around. The light cavalry, armed with javelins and avoiding the contact, cause much disarray in the enemy lines but no encircling achieved as the Christians guarded well their flanks. With Battle cries of “Santiago!” and “Deus vult”, the crusaders smashed the center of Almohad army, cutting the infantry like a hot knife do with the butter. They arrived to the back trenches and were extremely difficult repulsed by Arab infantry and Grenadine allied cavalry. Overwhelmed by the arrows and spears thrown at them and stopped by trenches the crusaders withdraws in disarray.

The counter-attack do not waited very much.The Knights of Calatrava were nearly wiped out and the Castilan center start to wavering. The Muslim attack was done with so strength and vigor than the King Alphonso of Castile had serious reason to think that he will meet his Creator that day. It was recording that he had turned to the Archbishop of Toledo who stayed right next to him and says: “Archbishop, both me and you will die here today”. But the King was stupefied seeing the Archbishop having an arrow stuck between the limbs of his armor[6]. He was bleeding and soon fell from his horse. Angry and full of desperation, Alphonso commanded a full charge of the rear-troops, holding itself the banner with Virgin image and so he repulse the enemies.

Another great deed that will remains in legend, will be the cavalry attack lead by Sancho of Navarre who brooked the defensive perimeter formed around al-Nasir by the chained black slaves. The crusaders were nearly won in that moment, as the slaves panicked and tried to escapes the chains[7] if his men do not stopped to pillage the sultan tent. They captured his flag and several personal objects but this brought time to al-Nasir who refolded to a safer place and send the reserves troops to repulse the Christians.

NAVAS%207.jpg

Depiction of King Sancho of Navarre, breaking the defensive ring of the Caliph camp

King Sancho of Navarre returned to the Christian camp covered with glory, but with the regret that he do not given the fatal blow to the Sultan and his army. The battle continued till down, being one of the longest battles of the middle age.

During the night, the Christian camp was continuously under the attack of Berber light cavalry who harassed without rest the tiered army. Nobody could sleep, everybody prepared to the worst. The Christians had low morale as they lost so many men and, despite inflicting heavy loses as well, the enemy still strong and more numerous. When the sun rise again, the crusaders were astonished to see that the Moors had left the battlefield during the night. The harassment of the irregular Berber cavalry was just a trick designed to cover the retreat.

The leaders of the Crusade gathered to a war council to decide the next move. Alphonso of Castile, still mourning his friend and ally, the Archbishop Rodrigo Jiménez de Rada, wanted to follow the Muslim army and to strike deeper in the enemy lands. But he do not received any support from the others leaders. Alphonso of Leon wanted to return as quickly as possible to his kingdom, same as Peter of Aragon and Sancho of Navarra. The military orders were not very keen to continue the fight against the moors as they suffered greatly and lost many hard replaceable knights and foots. The other volunteers considered that they had fulfil the crusade vow and can go back. Overall, the entire army was tiered and everybody was relieved that the escaped with life from the battle and do not want to risk another one. Seeing that even his own men refuse to go further, Alphonso back down. For him was still the crowning achievement of his life. Returned together to Toledo, the victorious kings were enthusiastically received by the people with the scripture words "Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord!" and "Peace in heaven and glory in the highest!" (Luke 19:38) [8]

The year 1212 become “the year in which I, the aforementioned King Alfonso overcame Miramomelin, King of Morocco, on the field of battle”, sometime completed with “not by my own merit but by the mercy of God and the help of my vassals”.

So, the crusaders call victory and retreat to their home. They gives thanks to God for the victory that saved the Christianity from the Muslim Invasion. This victory was the pinnacle of the Pope Innocent fight to stop the Islam. This fact is also resulted from the letter of Arnaud Amaury to the Cistercian General Chapter and in the Chronicle of Bishop Sicard of Cremona:

Blessed in all things is our Lord Jesus Christ, who through his mercy in our times, under the blessed apostolate of the Lord Pope Innocent, has granted victories to the Catholic Christians over the three pestilential peoples and enemies of His Holy Church, namely the eastern schismatics, the western heretics and the southern Saracens.” Letter of Arnaud Amaury to the Cistercian General Chapter. Recueil des Historiens des Gaules et de la France, xix.250-4.
What Arnaud had forget in that letter, was the forth people that was also the enemy of the Pope and Church and were fought with the same vigor as the others namely the pagan Baltics and Lithuanian tribes.

The same impact of the victory resulted from the chronicles of the Bishop Sicard of Cremona: "With the help of the grace and mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the resourcefulness of the Lord Pope Innocent, the Kings of Aragon and Navarra and Castile and Leon met the pagans and put them to flight"

About Mohammed al-Nasir we know from the same source of Muslim text al-Marrakushi, al-Mu’jib that “He then returned to Seville and remained there till Ramadan, when he crossed over to Marrakesh. The Muslim army was retreated from the battle not because it was defeated but because of divisions in the hearts of the Almohads.”[9]

The battle start the decline of the power of the Almohad dynasty and Muslim power in Iberia. Unfortunately, the Christian kingdoms had also hard times to recover for the battle and they reverted to their favorite activity: fighting among each others. Only Portugal made some gains, expanding their territory to south in the years that followed.

"Las Navas de Tolosa apears to have decide nothing. In reality, it decide practically everything." will write Fletcher Pratt and Edward Gorey in their book "The Battles That Changed History". Still, in 1212 nobody knew that.


---------------------------


Sources:
Wikipedia

"The Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa: The Culture and Practice of Crusading in Medieval Iberia" by Miguel Dolan Gomez, 2011
"The Battles That Changed History", by Fletcher Pratt and Edward Gorey
http://deremilitari.org/2014/11/three-sources-on-the-battle-of-las-novas-de-tolosa-in-1212/
http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28317
First image: http://m.forocoches.com/foro/showthread.php?t=2727514
Second image: http://www.grandesbatallas.es/batalla de las navas de tolosa.html


---------

[1] This psalm was used OTL by Pope Innocent to answer to the letter of King Alphonso of Castile, announcing the battle of Las Navas de Tolosa
[2] Slightly later than OTL but roughly on the same spot.
[3] Year 609 = 1212. The End of Safar correspond roughly with the beginning of July.
[4] Well, IOTL it seems that Aragon brought 1000 cavalry (knights and mounted sergeant and militias) but ITTL there are much less as the King had just lost an army in South of France
[5] From http://deremilitari.org/2014/11/three-sources-on-the-battle-of-las-novas-de-tolosa-in-1212/
[6] OTL words: “Arzobispo, muramos aquí yo y vos”In OTL, The Archbishop had not die, but instead he inspire the troops and he was later the main architect of following Reconquista.
[7] That’s happened OTL
[8] He was similar received in OTL, with the same words
[9] Adapting after the original text
 
Last edited:
Actually, it's a little more complex.

The Christian army was smaller than otl and do not crushed the Muslim one as OTL. ITTL it made a organized retreat. The power of Almohads is not braked but just severely damage, also the lost of legitimacy is less important, so it will be a slower decline.
On the other hand, the Christians also suffered big casualties and will not exploit the situation. This means a different Reconquista. The Archbishop of Toledo is dead... this will have some consequences...

All over, the Spanish kingdoms will have a slightly different fate ITTL. :D
 
Actually, it's a little more complex.

The Christian army was smaller than otl and do not crushed the Muslim one as OTL. ITTL it made a organized retreat. The power of Almohads is not braked but just severely damage, also the lost of legitimacy is less important, so it will be a slower decline.
On the other hand, the Christians also suffered big casualties and will not exploit the situation. This means a different Reconquista. The Archbishop of Toledo is dead... this will have some consequences...

All over, the Spanish kingdoms will have a slightly different fate ITTL. :D
hmmm. No Spain to troll France in the future, I would expect. France might gobble Navarre and/or Aragon (Catalonia seems evident anyway, they have a good old 987 claim).:D
If Al-Andalus is only weakened, it seems Grenada might survive until 2015:eek:
Archbishop of Toledo... What did he do IOTL? outside of these anti-muslim crusades?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top